Kayant3802d ago

MT in £40/$60 needs to just die. A helping hand should not be needed what is the point of playing the game if you can buy your way past challenges?

"The issue is, will Gran Turismo's progression system be adversely affected by microtransactions? Eurogamer's Martin Robinson has been playing the game and tells me GT6's economy works exactly the same as GT5's, with progression, payouts and car prices very similar"

If the above is indeed true than at least this doesn't effect the way it's played traditionally. But the present of MT shouldn't exist in these games IMHO.

come_bom3802d ago

Microtransactions... No thank you. They can keep it.

bobsmith3802d ago (Edited 3802d ago )

The good thing is all dlc is going to be free because they want to sell credits.

Also someone on GTplanet who has the game already posted a money glitch LOL ultimate karma just delete the updates if they patch it every time you want to make money.

abzdine3802d ago

i prefer to play the game and unlock them for myself.
microtransaction? no way!! but it's same as DLC and people still say yes to them.

indysurfn3802d ago

Okay the last time I got Gran Turismo I did not get into it because I'm getting tired of having to race crappy cars to get a license to get to the real game. They should drop that.

Micoros transactions all have one thing in common. From facebook to consoles. They have spots that are hard to get past without spending! Well if they make the yugo racing harder than it is so I can make a micro transaction then I think they have ruined the game. Blank Microsoft for bringing in the micro-transactions. And now Sony is competing by doing the same.

I think the gamer needs to make a stand and not buy the game. This is the last line drawn in the sand, don't buy it. Wait until the next racer from Sony which will be free or cheaper. Now if Gran Turismo comes out half price and have micro-transactions then that could offset it and make the game sell more. But full price plus Micro transaction games are avoided by me.

HammadTheBeast3802d ago

"The video, below, showcases GT6's cars and reveals one of the top priced, the Jaguar XJ13, which costs 20 million credits. You can grind for it in traditional Gran Turismo fashion or you can buy it straight away if you drop £119.95 - that's the total you pay for two packs of 7m credits, two packs of 2.5m credits and one pack of 1m credits."

What the actual ****?

Pay twice the amount of the original game for a single car.

Seems legit. Even the Forza guys didn't drop this low, it's bullshit.

SolidStoner3802d ago (Edited 3802d ago )

@ bobsmith

cheats with money... its even worse than Microtransactions!!!!

but the irony!! :D same like GTA5...

FamilyGuy3802d ago

The forza guys are intentionally driving you to buy their DLC, unlike GT6. The prices aren't meant to be extravagantly high for profits alone. Why would they want to let any yahoo with an extra $10 to be able to ignore the whole game and have one of the hardest to attain cars so easily?

I'm glad it's so highly priced, just means it's more worth it, like all the top cars have been in GT history.

Side note, the higher up you get, the more money you make per race. Once you get so high up making millions becomes easier so why would anyone ever spend $120 when the natural way is more... natural, it makes sense.

badz1493802d ago

sigh...MT ha? why do we have to come to this? I hate MT in all retail games and I was vocal about it in Forza 5. but at least, in GT6 you will have 1000 car more than Forza 5 and 33 tracks as oppose to 14 in Forza 5.

and GT6 is a fully featured racer with night day cycle, dynamic weather and many more features not available in Forza 5. at least, those many extra features are not DLC eh?

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 3802d ago
Why o why3802d ago

Sorry sony/pd..... not feeling it. Lets vote with our wallets people. Even if this isnt as bad as x or y I believe its a a slippery slope if we dont shut it down.

curtis923802d ago

I see what you're saying and I don't fully disagree but at the same time, a slippery slope is also wishing low sales on a franchise. Vote with your wallets by simply not buying MT. But not supporting the franchise will do more harm than good.

That's assuming you mean not to buy the game when you say to 'vote with our wallets.'

boeso3802d ago

Word. Shut. It. Down.

LiQuiZoN3802d ago

This isn't an MMO. You can't buy an advantage to win races. Races are performed in classes usually restricted by Power Points.

The only thing this gets you is "TIME" which to many adults is more valuable.

PoSTedUP3802d ago (Edited 3802d ago )

well said LiQ

i will still grind but i cant like i use to. GT is the hardest of the hardcore games and take serious time. if its not gamers getting softer and softer each generation bc of all these ridiculously easy games, its people not having enough time. these MTs are for both of them while the hardcore have the option to stay HARDCORE >:D!

Mr_Writer853802d ago

What's the difference between MT and cheats?

They both unlock things when you don't have the skills to do so without.

Expect now you are paying for those cheats.

Cheaters never prosper.

AaronMK3802d ago

"The only thing this gets you is 'TIME' which to many adults is more valuable."

I'll spend my valuable time playing games that don't want to nickle and dime me.

AaronMK3802d ago

@curtis92

If a franchise is going to move in the direction of micro-transactions, than yes I do wish low sales (actually, zero sales) on that franchise.

Having a gaming eco-system with a few less franchises is better than having one dominated by micro-transactions, and that is a vote I will make with my wallet.

insomnium23801d ago (Edited 3801d ago )

@why

True. The entire free to play (with mt)is so cell phonish I just hate it. I don't want for everything to have a catch. I don't enjoy being on my heels like that all the time like I am being suckered into stuff unless I'm carefull. One game, one payment, 100% access. DLC is cool if it's done right though.

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 3801d ago
Xsilver3802d ago

DriveClub better not follow this Trend or I'mma be Royally Pissed.

MestreRothN4G3802d ago

Are you nuts?

Even retail titles are destroyed by MT now. Why do you think a F2P game won't be ruined by it?

Every major game design from now on will focus on it: progression walls and extortion.

Xsilver3802d ago

@Mestre DriveClub isn't Free to Play :/

Prime1573802d ago

I think your disagrees (in your reply to mest) are confused about what the PlayStation plus version is, lol

Fluke_Skywalker3801d ago

@mestre
Just to clarify, Driveclub is not f2p, but the PS+ version which is free is not the whole game and thus by paying you can unlock the rest if the game. So in essence yes the PS+ version is kinda f2p.
The full version of the game is a full prices retail game which is not f2p. Although judging by the current state of affairs is likely to be littered with microtransactions anyway! I do sincerely hope not though.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3801d ago
TheTwelve3802d ago (Edited 3802d ago )

I can't support this mess.

P.S. I'm listening to people who are saying that the game will play the same as past GTs, and just allow for those who want to get ahead faster to pay if they wish.

We'll see.

Narutone663802d ago

As long as the cars are all available in-game and I could earn it by winning credits while driving and remove the earning cap for the game, I'm ok with that. The problem I had with GT5 is that for my region, I'm stuck with only up to 20 Million credits, anything I earned beyond that won't be credited, which is a bummer. I've been winning left and right in seasonal games but I'm stuck with only 20 million credits. But anyway, I got all the cars in GT5 and if all of it will carry over to GT6, I'll be very delighted.

Prime1573802d ago

@naruto

You are fine with someone hopping in day one and getting a better car than you because they paid double?

Narutone663802d ago (Edited 3802d ago )

Doesn't concern me as having a better car does not guarantee that you will win all the races. If your skills suck, the fastest cars won't help you. As for the races, if you are a long time GT5 gamer, you will know that each races have a corresponding PP where in you could not drive a car with more PP than what is required in the race. So a faster car with higher PP than what is allowed in the race is disqualified. I've driven cars with lower PP than most in the game and won the race. So, yes it doesn't bother me if they got it with MC, because I believe it's skills that's the deciding factor in a race and not the fastest car.

Fluke_Skywalker3801d ago

@Naruto
I agree with all of your above comment except the last sentence. Current F1 proves that wrong :P
Not that Vettel isn't a great driver, but he isn't nearly as good as Alonso or Hamilton.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3801d ago
LiQuiZoN3802d ago (Edited 3802d ago )

Microtransactions to buy credits...Who really cares? It won't impact my enjoyment of the game at all. I can see the benefit of someone like me who is a grown professional, whose time is very limited and yet still wants to play the game.

I'd rather just slowly work my way through, but I don't see any impact regarding the end product. GT6 will be fantastic with a tremendous amount of content.

I think some of you people needs to "Check your Context". Instead of just "Wanting to be heard" on the internet. Make valid points. In the context of GT6 these micro-transactions are quite literally meaningless.

Example:
Buying extra Costumes for street fighter when the costumes are locked on the disk is a valid context for complaining.

Another example...
Buying special weapons in an MMO which you can use to enter PVP matches, which OVERPOWER the other players would also be an issue.

MestreRothN4G3802d ago

When you hit the progression walls put there to force players into MT, remember this post of yours and how 'it doesn't affect you'.

It is a major design and business choice. It affects the whole game.

Volkama3802d ago

Racing is the core of the game. That's the fun bit. Credits and progression are the metagame that 'drives' you to keep racing (pun).

The presence of MTs places a time/value proposition on those races and alters perception, the races become a chore.

They have no place, they are not acceptable. Not in this form anyway.

LiQuiZoN3802d ago (Edited 3802d ago )

I think that either both of you aren't as big gt fans as I am or don't see the context for what it is. It will have zero influence online. Also, most people who jump in a 700hp car without adept skills and track knowledge will end up mowing the tracks grass instead.

This is not a bad form of micro transactions. If you disagree I would like to see valid points presented which would affect my view on the subject matter.

@mestherroth I totally agree with you IF Polyphony has purposely put in progression walls (like mobile games) to force your hand in micro trans , but what your saying is pure speculation. There is nothing factual about it. The progression will be the same as past GTs from my understanding.

Debaitable3802d ago

If the MTs present still allow people to enjoy the game traditionally with no pay wall then it shouldn't be a problem. Not of all us have the time to clock in 120hrs in a game. I'm all for it as long it doesn't bring any advantage to other players like all those F2P games.

Guwapo773802d ago

As much as I love GT series and played it since GT1, I will not purchase this game or any full priced game that has MT. NBA2K14 shocked the hell out of me with it...I'd return it if I could.

Debaitable3802d ago

But you can still enjoy the game by yourself and it doesn't give anyone online an advantage? It just helps people who do t have the time to clock in 100+ hours.

shutUpAndTakeMyMoney3802d ago

Thank the pc gamers for getting the ball rolling lol

MT & sometimes f2p is wack..

showtimefolks3802d ago

i will play this the old school way and earn my credits and my cars, but if there is one i can't get to in few month than i don't mind paying a little to get there

its about having options, not everyone wants to grind.

theshonen88993802d ago

This isn't a popular opinion but if the core game has been unaffected by microtransactions, what exactly is the problem? Valve introduced MTs into TF2 and it's been working great. I think people need to understand that not all MTs are exploitative.

In my opinion, if MTs don't affect GT6's core game, then I'm glad they included it. It means the developers get more money from people who have money to spend and I get better quality games. On the other hand, if they cripple the core gameplay (Battlefield Play4Free/Blacklight Retrobution's "temporary" weapon B$) then yeah, it's horrible.

novcze3801d ago

I don't have time to grind (had enough of it in GT5), pricing of in game credits is ridiculous so I will just not buy GT6, first GT ever I will not buy ...

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 3801d ago
Godmars2903802d ago

Oh joy: more pay-to-play BS...

At the very least, hope Sony at least has the decency not to offer a car that costs more than the whole freakin game. Allow cars to earned with a reasonable amount of effort.

Bet the gaming bean-counters will conform such shortly now that there's something to work with.

Xsilver3802d ago

"At the very least, hope Sony at least has the decency not to offer a car that costs more than the whole freakin game"

Ikr when i saw that i was like WTF.

HammadTheBeast3802d ago

No.... it has the audacity to off a car that costs almost twice as much as the game.

Xsilver3802d ago

@Hammad
but the grinding level is the same in GT6 as it was in Gt5 so you can just play to get that car if you really want it without hard work then by all means buy it.

PoSTedUP3802d ago (Edited 3802d ago )

its not pay2play at all. its the same GT game with the option to buy your in-game credits. still more #of available cars, similar prices and same ammount of credits you would get winning a race. the prices are also so ridiculous i doubt many people would buy them. im sure a lot of people would buy the 500,000Cr tho for a few bucks, that many credits can go a long way when buying and tuning the least expensive cars. i dont care for MT but im glad to see its not going to affect my game. i like gringing a 24 hour endurance race to earn my merits. you can only max tune a car so much when racing online; whether you earn your $1m car or buy it, a race is a race, and it all comes down to your skill of driving and knowledge of tuning and optimizing your car for that race.

Death3802d ago

Yeah, I don't see what the fuss is all about. Just like in Forza, you can buy credits with real money or you can earn in game currency to buy the cars. The game is not impacted by microtransactions since they are optional and the same cars can be earned.

curtis923802d ago

Like with most things this issue isn't black & white. In this case (and maybe forza's case too, I'm not totally sure) the game is how it's always been. They're just giving lazy gamers a way to get through stuff faster by using real money. In THAT instance, I don't have an issue. But if it's pay to win or if they severely punish you for not paying more, then there's a big issue.

guitarded773802d ago

So far, it's just pay to unlock faster. That doesn't bother me... I'm a grinder.

weekev153802d ago

At least your proud of it...grindr.com

thisismyaccount3802d ago (Edited 3802d ago )

Well.. to be honest there is no difference between getting a car for $50 or getting ingame currency and use virtual money to get said car for $50 or more like the Jaguar X13!

Anyone knows, if one can re-sell virtual goods gained from GT6 to other people around the world?

Grind the same event over and over again and sell those 200x Nissan GTR for $1 per car, is this the future? :(

torchic3802d ago (Edited 3802d ago )

it's not pay-to-play, it's more play-to-win.

people who buy credit will be able to access better cars easier and that's the real issue here.

I've been reading the comments in this tread and people have been misdirecting their anger. you get 100% of the content, all the tracks, all the cars from day one with your disc but if you want to access all of it faster then you can buy your way to it.

I wonder how PD will sort this out for multiplayer.

Majin-vegeta3802d ago

Maybe add some sort of level system.

E.G. LVL1-5 you can only use certain cars.The higher you're level the more cars you can use but have to play on tracks according to your level?Seems like a good idea to me.What's your take

Morpheuzpr3802d ago

Every car has a PP (performance points) score or index. In career mode every race or event has a PP restriction and a tire restriction. In online mode you can put a PP restriction on the races as well as a multitude of other options as well.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3802d ago
blib3802d ago

Check. Never buy Gran Turismo 6. Next.

MestreRothN4G3802d ago

I wasn't going to buy it anyway. Now I'm not buying it even more!

mt3801d ago

well as much as I hate MT but this type of transaction is not forcing you to buy it, only lazy people who have extra $ will buy this BS. you can buy the game and play it just like any other previous GT games. but it looks like you are not planning to get the game from the get go.

Volkama3801d ago (Edited 3801d ago )

There seem to be 2* big opinion camps on MTs

1- Absolutely hate them, ruins games and it's a slippery slope that threatens the hobby
2- Happy to ignore them and play as though they are not there

If you buy the game and ignore the transactions then your voting group 2, and not protesting at all.

If you actually want them to stop putting in MTs buying the game doesn't really get that point across. But it's a difficult situation, as you miss games you want to play. I haven't bought Forza.

*In theory there is a 3rd camp that like to use micro-transactions, but nobody has met one of them and lived to talk about it.

ElementX3802d ago (Edited 3802d ago )

LOL and everyone talked about MS doing microtranactions...

PoSTedUP3802d ago

because thoes games came with a lack of content and harder to earn stuff to sell MTs. this isnt the same at all. it comes with even more content that is available to all, same pricing economy, but with the option to buy credits. i dont like MT so i dont have to use them and its no going to affect my game.

Nujabes_3802d ago

People like you have gotten gaming into this mess.

Not so long ago, if you didn't have time, couldn't be arsed or whatever, you'd stick in a cheat code. Instant invincibility, everything unlocked, etc.
These days they charge you 120 quid for a digital bloody car and people try to justify it.

---stone---3802d ago

Forza 5 isnt as robust as Forza 4. Eventually the content cut from F4 will be able to buy to add to F5 in addition to M$/Turn10's microtransaction model for the game.

GT6 on the other hand is as robust and full featured as GT5. Now Polyphony/Sony are going down this route. It was/is inevitable for them, much like just about all game companies going to do this.

Its almost like the lesser of two evils.

Forza 5, gimped, compared to Forza 4 for $60 bucks + microtransactions.

GT6, just as equal, if not more robust as GT5 for $60 bucks + microtransations.

Microtransactions are bullshit. Now its just a matter of how deep you want to be in if you want to drive through the pasture... or if at all.

Really thinking about now not even picking up GT6 until there is like an ultimate/goty/xl edition.

LOGICWINS3802d ago

"GT6 on the other hand is as robust and full featured as GT5."

You got an early copy of the game?! Post your impressions man.

YodaCracker3802d ago (Edited 3802d ago )

Forza 5 is not gimped for the sake of microtransactions. It's gimped because it's a launch game! It's being built for a brand new console. It's rushed! If it were releasing on the 360, it would be just as full a game as you could want it to be. And there would still be optional microtransactions.

Show all comments (153)
240°

Comparing the New Grand Valley in Gran Turismo 7 to the Original

A detailed look at Gran Turismo 7's new track Grand Valley, judging its evolution from its former design and layout in Gran Turismo 6, side by side.

SullysCigar436d ago (Edited 436d ago )

Wow, crazy isn't it? The draw distance is vastly improved, the background textures too and there's ZERO shimmer now. And the replays are night and day!

EIDT: @below, Haha I didn't notice that!

IRetrouk436d ago

Yeah, theres a massive improvment all round, Looks amazing with the time of day transitions too, me and a couple online buddies jumped on earlier to try it out lol, did you notice the beach full of seals?

closed_account436d ago

That coastline looks amazing and I can only imagine it in VR! Looks like an entirely new course as far as scenery goes.

IRetrouk436d ago

Yeah, those views are going to be crazy when we are "there" can't wait!

PureBlood436d ago

Just got confirmation my PSVR2 is shipping by 24 hour courier, so I should have it tomorrow! I know nobody else cares, but I had to tell someone lol

GT7 will be my first game, as I want to test out my wheel - so excited - it's going to be awesome!

Deathdeliverer436d ago

I got my confirmation and date (22nd) showing for the charging station. The headset itself has been in “shipped-processing” status since last Friday. I’m like dang can I see the date? I was in the first round of preorders. Whenever it does get here, I’m ready. Going to go update everything and try to get over this cold.

PureBlood436d ago

Wish you better, bud, fingers crossed for your order too.

@S2Killinit - Thank you!

IRetrouk436d ago

I care👊🏻, mine is still saying prep for shipping😔

PureBlood436d ago

Thanks man 👊

Word of advice: be ready for the impromptu jig that happens when that email drops, it can be embarrassing..

DaReapa436d ago

Just got my second shipping confirmation email as well.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 436d ago
S2Killinit436d ago

Man i caant wait. One day left!

Flawlessmic435d ago

I know you and a lot of people are excited for VR but dont sleep on sophy, sophy is the real game changer here!

After giving sophy a run last night, i can safely say the actual racing in future GT's is going to be Fu***** amazing!!!

even on intermediate on some tracks the AI was coming back at me on my waiting for me to slip, attacking the space if i left the door open for them, honestly felt like i was racing against people and not some very limited AI that once i passed them they may as well have been eliminated from the race like GT ai normally is.

pump it up to expert and its a real challenge to stay ahead, the next level up from expert man the AI kicked my ass, like badly.

i remember when sophy was first annouced all the nay sayers said its a pipe dream and we will never see it implemented and here we are a yr later and sophy is being tested in game for us to try out and is every good as whats been promised.

VR plus racing against sophy and wowww your not gonna feal like your actually racing for real anywhere else outside of gt.

sophy will change the game in gt8

S2Killinit435d ago

Hm I didnt realize it was like that. I didnt even know why there was so much hype about it. But thanknyou for explaining that. I mean I get it now.

But I’ll be seeing it in action tomorrow! Woot woot.

Flawlessmic435d ago

It's only for a limited time and only has 4 races but I encourage you and everyone else try it and see the difference compared to the normal Ai.

Sophy has slipped completely under the radar in this latest uodate

436d ago Replies(2)
Father__Merrin436d ago

Wow gt6 was awesome under appreciated because of time it came out

Show all comments (24)
280°

What Happened To Gran Turismo?

When thinking about simulation racing games in this console generation, it’s not unreasonable for your first thought to be “Forza”. Microsoft’s first-party sim-racer series has been wildly successful, and for many of us, it’s been the go-to franchise for quite some time. But simulation racing games weren’t always synonymous with Forza; there was a time when Polyphony Digital’s hardcore series, Gran Turismo, reigned supreme. While the long-time franchise continues to sell exceptionally well, there’s no doubt that it isn’t the young, spry series it used to be.

Read Full Story >>
gamingbolt.com
darthv721714d ago

It doesnt suck but I would love to see a return to form with GT7. Sport is such a departure that it can turn some people off. It has gotten better over time but it's still no match for a proper GT7.

Rude-ro1714d ago

Sport is awesome for what it is...
However, polygon built a whole new engine and the tech is still being worked on...
I understand it is easy to praise a cookie cutter because it release the same game over and over with rotations of maps and cars...
But this engine polygon has designed does more for things other than gaming.

Repetitive old engines with new makeup does not make anyone king.

Gt7 will be most likely in two years with 120fps and ray tracing because their new engines are ready now.

LordStig1714d ago

It decided to focus on racing rather than cars and in the gaming world, racing = gameplay.

Imalwaysright1714d ago

What complete and utter BS. GT has always focused on racing and gameplay.

1714d ago
neutralgamer19921714d ago

Good I guess selling millions of copies and have OFFICIAL FIA license races and Esports means it sucks

We just don't get it every year which is why ms also delayed next forza. You can't keep making yearly sequels. Quality and innovation takes time

GT sports at launch to now it's a different game and support has been free

Imalwaysright1714d ago

GT games have always sold millions of copies and what's so innovative about GT sport? It's a racing game FFS.

IRetrouk1713d ago

The online championships and tournaments alone offer more innovation than any racer this gen🤷‍♂️ then you also get the live ones in New York etc with proper race like commentary, something else no other sim has done before. It sells millions because it's the best, simple really.

Imalwaysright1713d ago (Edited 1713d ago )

IRetrouk

I'm not even sure why think that having proper like race commentary or championships and tournements is innovative but I'll play along... GT Sport was released in 2017 so how do explain that this video https://www.youtube.com/wat... from 2016 exists?

Dark_Knightmare21713d ago

Spoken like someone who hasn’t played sport

Imortus_san1712d ago

And those Paid demos, that fans try to hide and not talk about it.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 1712d ago
SCW19821714d ago

It became the best online racing community for console players and its an amazing achievment.

Keltech1714d ago

"Forza?" HaHaHaHaHaHaHa!! good joke!

kayoss1714d ago

Too early for an Aprils fool joke.

1714d ago
ElementX1714d ago

@solidgamerX That's really not very impressive. Somebody with an interest in cars plays racing games and becomes a race car driver. That's like saying "look at this guy, he played COD and now he's in the military"

Imalwaysright1714d ago

SolidGamerX

You must think that we're all stupid enough to believe that a game will turn anyone into a professional racing driver.

Prince-Ali1714d ago

FORZA!!! AAHAHHAHA !! Haven't i schooled you on this already before! You're still spewing nonsense on this threaddd looool

mcstorm1714d ago

Forza has always been better online than. GT and still is. Great to see PD try something different with GTS but let's face it this gen sonys racing games have been poor this then compaired to what Microsoft has had to offer. Forza 7 is one of the best racing games on xbox and pc but for me Horizon 3 and 4 have set the bar this gen. Of all the things microsoft got wrong this gen 2 of its racing games got a lot right and others are now playing catchup.

DarXyde1713d ago

It's debatable which is the better game. To me, Forza has the upper hand.

But in terms of online community and events? Ha. Don't lie to yourself just because you don't like Playstation.

1713d ago
1713d ago
Dark_Knightmare21713d ago

Lol not even close have you even played gt sport online?

Imalwaysright1713d ago (Edited 1713d ago )

SolidGamerX

You didn't need to confirm what I already knew: if you didn't think that we're all stupid you wouldn't make such stupid comments that only those that are dead from the neck up will agree with.

IRetrouk1713d ago (Edited 1713d ago )

Did he say gt could turn anyone into a racer? No he didnt, he asked what game has done it like gt has, which is true, gt academy done it throughout gt5 for a start. You need to do some research fella, cause your wrong.. again.

And lmao at element and the downplay, not even similar you crazy man, not even similar🤣 you realise gt has turned gamers into drivers from gt5? Go look at gt academy and tell me how that would be anything like someone playing cod and then joining the army, the downplay in gt articles is funny.

ElementX1713d ago

So you think he learned the required skills playing video games? I remember when people claimed children were learning how to operate guns because of video games, do you think that's also true?

IRetrouk1713d ago (Edited 1713d ago )

Two completely different things and you know it, it is a fact that gt has helped real gamers become real race drivers, the proof is easily available online and I'm not going round searching for links that has been posted many, many times before on this subject, Go and look at gt academy like I mentioned and you can see for yourself, they start out on gt and go from there, so yes the game gran turismo teaches you some driving techniques, now if you can find me a link where someone has been playing cod and went on to become a war hero, please let me know because I couldnt find anything, also do you have a link to where cod has a program to train soldiers? Like cod academy or something?, I couldnt find one of those either, maybe when you do then your comparison will actually make sense.

Imalwaysright1713d ago

IRetrouk

You mean the GT academy that provides training and licenses for a person to become a professional racing driver? The GT academy is how you go from being an average driving joe to become a professional racing driver not GT the game.

1713d ago
+ Show (14) more repliesLast reply 1713d ago
1713d ago
xRacer74x1714d ago

Forza owns the racing game scene in my area as far as video games go.

dekke1714d ago

Forza = Arcade
GT= Sim

why u ppl keep comparing those 2 games every time..

Keltech1714d ago (Edited 1714d ago )

GT owns the console sim racing scene in my area and around the world. Just ask a real race car drivers

https://youtu.be/2pC3-eCAdv...

LordStig1714d ago

Forza isn't a racing game. It's a car game.

1714d ago
+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 1714d ago
Hungryalpaca1714d ago

I’ll stick to sims. You keep playing with your hot wheels.

King_Noctis1714d ago

You forget that there are two Forzas, Forza Motorsport and Forza Horizon, which aims at different audiences.

King Nezz1713d ago

The usual response from someone insecure that feels their favorite racing game is nowhere near as good as it once was. I really liked Gran and played them all. Loved the Vector from part 2. But the franchise is not the same.

Gaming4Life19811713d ago

Yea Forza took over and is now the best sim racer with motorsport and the best arcade racer with horizon. GT was the best but it has been falling short for a long time and I'm not saying gt games are bad but no where near king like it used to be. I'd say forza motorsport 3 was the forza that really upped the franchise and forza 4 was when forza became #1.

I remember the glory days of gt but those days are long gone but it's still a good game just not the best. Of course ps fans will never admit it because they will die before giving MS credit.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1713d ago
Nacho_Z1714d ago

I do think they need some new creative heads in to give them some new perspectives, they seem stuck in a rut. It's a very high quality rut but they're still stuck in it.

LordStig1714d ago

The USA leg of the Gran Turismo World Tour is going on in New York right now. Go watch it guys, there's some damn good racing and crazy updates to come.

Nacho_Z1714d ago

I've seen some of it before and to be fair it's not much different to watching real motorsport so credit to them for that.

Heavenly King1714d ago

the MACH 5 :) GO SPEED rACEr!!

Show all comments (108)
320°

Gran Turismo 5, Gran Turismo 6, Wipeout HD, God of War 3 and more running on PC via the latest RPCS3

DSOGaming writes: "It appears that the best Playstation 3 emulator that is currently under development, RPCS3, received a new update recently. kd-11 has implemented new Surface Cache fixes to RPCS3 that reportedly improve the appearance of car reflections in Gran Turismo 6, and fix various graphics glitches in other games."

Read Full Story >>
dsogaming.com
1751d ago Replies(6)
gangsta_red1751d ago

If someone out there in internet land could make a decent PS3 emulator imagine what Sony could actually do if they put the time and effort in to make this happen for their next console?

It's definitely not impossible as we can see here. It should definitely be done since BC seems to be very important to Sony this next gen. Imagine PS+ free game offerings from Sony that could include the whole catalog from the PS console family..fantastic.

Silly gameAr1751d ago

Why waste time and money on it? Some people want to move forward, not go back.

Eonjay1751d ago

It's not a deal breaker but having the feature would be amazing. I would rather have it than not have it.

gangsta_red1751d ago

Not everyone feels that way and if Sony is making an issue of supporting PS4 games for PS5 why not support their other past games for people who still have them or a means to buy them and play them.

KwietStorm_BLM1751d ago

You literally just said some people. So I'd imagine you can comprehend that there's a larger subset of people not in that same "some" group. PlayStation used to be known for backward compatibility. Xbox made a big deal about support for their entire catalog. What's the issue with PlayStation, who has an even more substantial history in gaming, tapping into that market? We don't have this problem on PC. It's only a good thing for consumers to be able to bring their games with them through generations on console.

Silly gameAr1751d ago (Edited 1751d ago )

@kwietstorm

Yes, I said some people. What I said was MY opinion. I'm one of those people that couldn't care less about bc, but im not saying ALL people don't care about it. I think they should spend that time and energy for future features and games, but like I said, that's only my opinion.

Imortus_san1750d ago (Edited 1750d ago )

Not every body trows their games way every time the new gen cames along, and everybody that likes games like to be able to play their favorite games in the best possible way.

PS: Retrocompatability is the most requested feature in Sony Foruns, even Sony said so.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 1750d ago
frostypants1751d ago (Edited 1751d ago )

The question is would the return on investment be worthwhile? Are the number of additional consoles PS3 BC would push be enough to justify the cost of developing the emulation (and it would have to be bullet proof)? I like the idea of having it, but for my part not having it won't effect my purchase decision.

1751d ago
Eonjay1751d ago

You are asking the right question but the wrong way. For me, the addition of PS3 BC would add value as a customer and make it even more likely for me to buy a PS5. If it is valuable to the customer it is valuable to them.

Also, the way they are doing it would be way cheaper than a program like Microsoft had. The are emulating the hardware. Not the software.

gangsta_red1751d ago

"The question is would the return on investment be worthwhile?"

Sony could definitely make some extra profit selling PS3 games through their marketplace (the same way they have their other classics available). It's not about whether or not it will effect anyone's purchase decision, it definitely didn't do so for the PS4. But as others have expressed, it would be a nice addition to have for PS5 if Sony could open up their whole library digitally and physically to users.

ShadowWolf7121751d ago

Racing games should be some of the easiest to emulate and they're still not hitting 60fps with it, to say nothing of image flickering and occasional sound issues.

Still gonna be a bit yet before they have it fully up and running, it seems, and even then it may only work for part of the library. :/

1751d ago Replies(2)
Gwiz1751d ago

Is it possible to have PS3 emulation on PS5?yes depending on what kind of power it really has.
An i7 9700k is no slouch and the PS4 already has a God of War 3 running much better with less
power required because they converted CBE to X86 which is not something you want to be doing in the long run.

What power would be required to play these games emulated at said PS4 version?.
It's not an easy situation Sony themselves created and ultimately I believe they are happy this way because they
want you to use PSNow,that service is why you will not even get it. (let's not forget that it was a huge investment)

1751d ago Replies(1)
Show all comments (45)