400°

1080p Is Clearly Better Than 720p, But Why Is The Media Downplaying It?

Gameranx: "It's simple math, and yet many in the media are attempting to downplay the differences between 1080p and 720p. Why is that?"

Read Full Story >>
gameranx.com
xHeavYx3849d ago

I think it's only fans who downplay it. I remember back in the day when everybody talked about how good COD looks on the 360, the superior master ultra version... Now that tables have turned, all of the sudden graphics don't matter anymore

Grown Folks Talk3849d ago

That's funny. When PS2 had the weakest specs out of the 3, graphics didn't matter then either.

Xsilver3849d ago (Edited 3849d ago )

PS2 had each and every single game dufaq you talking about when you say lower graphics :/.

Edit: @VENOMACR
how may times do we have to keep saying this Yes the PS3 was stronger than the 360 but the 360 shined because the PS3 cell processor was hard to use now the difference with PS4 is its more powerful and the easiest to use so i don't see your point?

VENOMACR12273849d ago

@Heavy

I think its Sony fanboys (yourself) who are blowing it out of proportion. Play BF4 on 1080 and 720. The difference will be minor, something you wont pay much attention to when your running around with 64 players and things are blowing up around you. Not going to stop and say "man, that debris falling looks much better in 1080." PS4 is more powerful. Just like the PS3 was more powerful. But the 360 and PS3 versions looked nearly identical. I don't know how anyone can look at both version and go "wow, PS4 looks way superior and better." Both look amazing with the PS4 having slightly better graphics when images are compared side by side. When your running for your life, it won't matter.

KingOdin893849d ago

@Veno

It'll matter when that sharp jaggy bullet pierces your player, causing massive damage.

scott1823849d ago

It's funny how 720p vs 1080p and 720p vs 900p is a small difference. It's almost comical to hear at this point. Last gen there were tiny, tiny differences in resolution favoring the 360 on multiplats a lot of times and that was HUGE ammo for people back then.

MysticStrummer3849d ago

@Venoma - Much was made of smaller differences this generation, but I guess it was ok then because 360 had the multi plat advantage. Whether it's noticeable or not, and if you're being honest it is noticeable, the differences are there and are evidence of the power gap we've read about since the specs started coming out.

AlexanderNevermind3849d ago (Edited 3849d ago )

We will know for sure when the X1 games hit the streets on 11-22-2013. The truth will be told MS won't be able to buy their way out of it. That being said being a PlayStation gamer since the original, I honestly didn't care about if the Xbox graphics (or the PS) were better. Didn't even care if they got DLC 1st. I only worried if (see Skyrim), the game experience was better. When I wanted the best graphics I would buy the game on PC (see Skyrim) anyway.

Of course I pick on the Xbots for fun when their down (COD 720p for next gen...lol) but its all just for shyts and giggles.

Death3849d ago

I'm fairly certain the same people that made a big deal of the differance last gen are the same making a big deal this gen. Let's face it, it was the PS fans that bragged about the super powerful PS3 and how it trounced the 360. Sure, a couple Xbox fans may have pointed and laughed when the Xbox 360 version was better on the inferior console. Fast forward to today and that same select and chosen few are waving the superiority flag again. Here's the thing. No one really cares. That is why we see the same articles saying the same thing over and over and over again. You guys are seeking validation for your claims. No one cares.

Think about it. If it trully mattered, don't you think everyone would simply pay less and get a PS4? It's not like you guys were born into this exclusive club. It costs $399 and is available to anyone. Get over yourselves. No one cares.

Godhimself_In_3d3849d ago

it did but lets agree on the truth shall we nintendo had poor poor 3rd party support fact. gamecube disk had space issues fact gamecube.xbox was just starting out fact.sonys ps2 was already out fact and had crazy momentum behind it fact.xbox ran games better and looked better fact but not enough to sway ppl away.most ppl would just say hey it looks better but not by that much and i can get the game on the system i have already fact. dreamcast had a lot of problems it was great but not a lot of 3rd party support fact. there games scratched way to easy fact. specs and resolution matters now because there launching a week apart in the same year no year for headstart for Sony like the ps2 or Microsoft with xbox 360 no dropping the price on your rivals release date nothing. its fair this time around. i don't care im getting both day one but to be up here lying because you can probably only by one and need to justify your purchase is simply sad.if Sony wins or Microsoft wins what do you get lol.

Angels37853849d ago

Plus 360 fans said that their version was vastly superior even though it ran at 110p higher...now tat ps4 runs at nearly 50% higher the difference is neglegable

Biggest3849d ago

It's not just fans. It's the media. Tech websites like Ars Technica are allowing their writers to produce op-eds that explain why anything about 720p is pointless. All you have to do is back up a few feet and it looks just as good. A tech site that makes their money doing benchmarks and claiming flawless victory for the GPU that pushes one extra pixel. . . 1080p isn't that big a deal anymore. IGN is doing it. Gamespot is doing it. Random internet guys are doing it. It's amazingly bizarre that the PS3 was bashed for being $100 more and slightly "weaker" on multiplats, while being superior on first party games, yet now the Xbone is being coddled for being $100 more expensive and significantly weaker in every facet. Mind boggling.

gamer20133849d ago

48 idiots disagree with that fact

CGI-Quality3849d ago

Show me a forum full of PS2 fans claiming such and I might give you a little credit. Otherwise, the smoke you're blowing has hit a peak.

Ch1d0r13849d ago

I was probably playing Rainbow Six on PC, it mattered to me. But the PS2's library was amazing. I even went to the extent of trading my 360 for a PS2 with a ton of games just to catch up. But to each his own. At the end of the day it's if your having fun or not. Even if your wife loves her SD programming, you still lover her very much ;-)

Have a fun day!

Biggest3848d ago

The PS2 was not weak when it was released. It didn't have the Xbox or GameCube to compete with. That argument has to stop. Sony did not release an intentionally weak console. Sony did not release an underpowered console. The other console manufacturers released more powerful consoles after the fact.

darthv723848d ago (Edited 3848d ago )

the argument of 1080p vs 720p isnt really much of an argument. Native 1080 is better than upscaled 1080 just as native 720 is better than upscaled 1080.

Its what the developer do within that resolution that should matter. i have seen HD games that are not very fun to play. They are all look and no substance. Just as i have played games that are low res but a hell of allot of fun.

Many seem to think that just because we are getting new gen consoles that everything needs to be new and improved. that isnt always the case. if a developer has found the balance of their game runs better at lower res then so be it.

Just because a game is lower does it make the fun playing that game lower as well? should the next gen of games run at 1080p all the time? It depends on the game but some would say yes.

will there be more games that run 1080p than 720p? That remains to be seen but there is a greater potential for yes over time.

does resolution have any bearing on the fun factor? Not in the least.

Maybe its my experience growing up with gaming since pong that has made me appreciate the creativity and gameplay than the visual fidelity.

I appreciate graphics as much as the next gamer but I dont swear my unholy allegiance to the graphics. i care more about the fun factor and that is something you cant "see".

Brazz3848d ago (Edited 3848d ago )

well... when you have, in a form "almost unquestionably", the best games of the generation as exclusives ( GTA : Sandreas , GTA III , Kingdon Hearts , god of war , GT , Final fantasy X / XII , etc.). graphics really become secondary .

X- 1 and ps4 , they have a similar level in the quality and quantity of games at this point graphs eventually become important as a differentiator , so it is rather importate see who has the best graphics , but only after you are sure that there some good games on the console .

Ps2 is a case of " almost unquestioned domination " ! The number and amount of games, in my humble opinion , crushed the competition so pitiless . this scenario , graphics are not going to save a console that has less quality titles . ( I dare say that even if we add all titles in Xbox / gamecube / dreamcast still this way , we would have more quality titles on PS2 , but of course this is very subjective and some still prefer the xbox / game cube / dreamcast )

J-R3848d ago

I don't think the media is downplaying this issue at all. I have seen countless articles about the 720p vs 1080p issue.

Graphics matter. If they didn't why buy a next-gen system. For the people who don't care if their version of COD is 1080p then purchase it for your PS3 or 360.

Hicken3848d ago

The problem with your argument, darth, is that the XB1 versions of games aren't getting better textures or anything like that. There's no extra AA getting added in to compensate. It's the same game- if not worse, graphically- in a lower resolution.

Meaning: the console is not (apparently) capable of doing the exact same thing as the PS4 at the exact same resolution. You can try and twist it into a positive as much as you want, but it's simply not true.

It'd be a different story if it were the debate between Drive Club and Forza. There's an argument to be made there(kinda), because it's two different games on the different hardware. But when it's the same game on different, same-generation hardware, the disparity shouldn't be so huge.

And 1080p vs 720p is MASSIVE.

miyamoto3848d ago (Edited 3848d ago )

That's funny. When PS2 had the weakest specs out of the 3, graphics didn't matter then either."

*ahem

are you intentionally forgetting about the Sega Dreamcast?

OT

better graphics at $100 less

justify the xposed one all you want

+ Show (16) more repliesLast reply 3848d ago
Hellsvacancy3849d ago (Edited 3849d ago )

Funny old world aye, I mean, my tv can output 1080p, I thought the games this gen were supposed to be 1080p etc

I want "next gen" not "next gen: with a little bit of last gen"

kazuma9993849d ago

Lol if the games were 1080p then what then? will we no longer need an upgrade from 1080p. Their is the 4k tv but 15k for it is not worth it.

falviousuk3849d ago

So to you next gen is just more power tp push more pixels, get a powerful PC then.

I want more features, more extras, a proper next gen console that can do a lot of things.

Media consumption is increasing over the internet and these boxes need to do it all. Both consoles have thier own media apps coming, and very welcome they are too.

The ability to switch seamlessly from gaming to watching a film or some tv (if it works as planned and explained) will be excellent. An the bility to do two things at once ala snap mode will be very useful.

To me this is what defines a next gen machine, not jsut a ramp up in specs.

Both machines will have excellent games and both will have turkes.

As far as resolution goes, once devs get to grips with the hardware things will improve, visual fidelity should improve a bit just like it did with the PS3.

And playing on a tv below 40" i beleive will not make a big difference between 1080 an 720 upscaled so im led to believe, though if this is incorrect, i apologise for that.

I only have a 40" and most people gaming will have something similar or less.

T23849d ago

@falviosuk - no, most of my friends have 50 or 60" tv's now all LED and 1080p, they can be had for 600$ now... I have a 42" and mine is the smallest of most of my friends.
and yes features are also important, but ps4 will have loads of features for less money... Amazingly it will also allow you to switch from movies to games, LOL...
buy both of course if you can but for me the money is best spent on ps4

Death3848d ago

Once again, if next gen to you is simply resolution, hook a PC up to your tv. I have one on mine, but still game more on consoles due to the ease of use and community.

Take a deep breathe PS faithful. Not all PS4 games are 1080p. If you are slamming the Xbox One for having some non 1080p native games, what is your excuse on your chosen platform? Keep in mind both systems are using a hardware upscaler to bump output to 1080p regardless of their native resolution.

Hellsvacancy3848d ago

Next gen isn't not about resolution for me, it's about improvement, I want better then what I had before, if 720 is standard for this gen 1080 "should" be standard for nest gen

Same goes for framerate, I want improvements from what I had before, in all areas

miyamoto3847d ago

PS4 will make the most out of yer HDTV man, good investment to maximize your TV

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3847d ago
Kayant3849d ago

@VENOMACR1227

You can say that but you will notice the difference in AA. As someone who didn't know that much about AA until now seeing PC/PS4 BF4 footage & XB1 footage I can notice the jaggies on XB1. That part is not changing and is noticeable.

Gazondaily3849d ago

Who is downplaying anything? This whole resolution 'debate' (if you want to call it that) is widespread.

"Now that tables have turned, all of the sudden graphics don't matter anymore"

Says who? Stop making stuff up. It does matter and that's obvious considering just how big this news is.

Gameranx makes a sweeping statement that the media is downplaying it and you eat it up? Learn to think for yourself Heavy.

@Gameranx...if you're going to make this kind of headline, at least provide concrete evidence for your assertions. Don't just make a sweeping statement and then point at 'some gamers, especially on reddit'.

xHeavYx3849d ago

I'm not sure you got my comment (the one you quoted)
What I meant is that people who used to talk about how good COD looked on the 360 and how bad it looked on the PS3 are the ones saying that graphics don't matter anymore. I didn't say that graphics don't matter anymore

Drekken3849d ago

Come on Septic, you are smarter than that. Look at the Edge article from yesterday trying to downplay it. I have seen a bunch of xbox fans talk about how graphics aren't as important as fun. Well how about BOTH? What about the last 8 years of listening to the BS about PS3 multiplats not having grass in a spot the 360 had grass? Or load times faster... or less pixels? It all mattered this gen.

Now? Now that their beloved box doesn't push 1080p and is clearly inferior from a power perspective... it doesn't matter. They can take that hypocritical crap somewhere else. Call it tin foil hats or whatever you want... I see it clearly and so does anyone else without horse blinders on.

Gazondaily3849d ago (Edited 3849d ago )

@both you guys above

Heavy- actually, I apologise. I jumped the gun in my comment. You are right when you said "I think it's only fans who downplay it."

How I missed that (it was the first line of your sentence ffs) I do not know so again, my sincere apologies.

I agree, some fans are desperately trying to downplay it but they just look ridiculous. I think the masses agree that the resolution disparity is definitely worthy of note, especially as far as COD is concerned.

@Drekken

I haven't seen the Edge article but if what you say is true, then you should have written this article for Gameranx because the article makes no mention of it and vaguely mentions reddit. Can you link the Edge article please?

Biggest3849d ago

Hello, Septic. I apologize for your broken internet. Somehow you missed the articles posted on N4G on the subject. I will do my best to operate the internet for you:

http://arstechnica.com/gami...

http://www.edge-online.com/...

http://www.tomshardware.com...

http://www.extremetech.com/...

Notice how the difference is "subtle" or "minimal" or even "if anything, the Xbone looks better because it pops." This is coming from websites that claim decisive victory for games that end up with a frame better or a literal handful of pixels higher. Stupidity at its most obviously compensated.

Gazondaily3848d ago (Edited 3848d ago )

@Biggest

Right Mr. Operator. Let's see where you're taking me:

1) Arstechnica: I don't see anything wrong in their article.

Firstly, they are right in what they say:

"Resolution aside, the games look practically identical, with similar textures, apparent polygon counts, frame rates, and particle effects (like smoke)."

Tell me how they are wrong?

2) Edge article- a very good read and its more of a commentary of the schoolyard-type fanboy rivarly more than a comprehensive argument about the resolution wars. Did you read the article? Please mention where there is any substantive content attempting to 'downplay' the resolution disparity issue? Have we now switched roles? I feel like I'm the operator here.

3) Tomshardware- they acknowledge that the PS4 has the technical lead but rightly make point to the 900p resolution diluting the so-called 'victory'. Is this really downplaying the disparity?

4) Extremetech- whilst I don't agree with the nature in which they made their statements, they are actually relying on Digital Foundry's assessment. They still recognise the PS4's lead.

From the way you were ranting, I was expecting a stronger 'downplaying' of the resolution debate but alas, it was nothing of the sort.

Thanks for offering your services as the Internet's operator. However, you're more akin to the lollipop woman but I'm the one that can read between the lines of the zebra crossing.

Biggest3848d ago (Edited 3848d ago )

Septic says: Who is downplaying anything?

Septic quotes: Resolution aside, the games look practically identical, with similar textures, apparent polygon counts, frame rates, and particle effects (like smoke).

From EDGE: A slight difference between two versions of the same game is all NeoGAF needs – there are countless threads on the web’s biggest games forum comparing the different versions of Battlefield 4 and Call Of Duty: Ghosts already.

From Tom's Hardware (and holy crap they do benchmarking as well!!!): The PlayStation 4 will have slightly better looking graphics than the Xbox One at launch.

From Extremetech: So, if you’re torn between which version of BF4 to pick up, though the PS4 version performs a little better, the choice should come down to which console’s controller you prefer

I ask you, Septic, what do you think downplay means?
down·play
ˈdounˌplā/Submit
verb
1.
make (something) appear less important than it really is.

If resolution and graphic fidelity are not important to video games, and the tech sites listed here have never used graphic fidelity to claim a victor in game comparisons I am wrong. If they are, and the tech sites listed here have in the past used graphic fidelity to claim a victor in game comparisons, I am very right.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 3848d ago
s8anicslayer3849d ago (Edited 3849d ago )

What's really a kicker is way back when Ghosts was announced people from Microsofts or IW's camp said that the game was made utilizing the X1's hardware implying that it was the superior version being it was made for that one first. http://www.oxm.co.uk/60480/... (check out the link) Now, the excuse we get today is that "clearly IW didn't have enough dev time with the X1 cause MS sent out their dev kits late, so that's why it looks inferior"..smh! If it was made on X1 first wouldn't it mean that they had more time with the X1? Now I just saw a post that MS didn't allow them to make the game 1080p??WTF http://n4g.com/news/1384966... I know it's only a rumor but come now, enough smoke and mirrors.

GW2123849d ago

Well I think you know that, in my case, the tables turned and the graphics still matter. So I did the reasonable thing and went with what I believe to be the best experience (PS4).

Mr Pumblechook3849d ago (Edited 3849d ago )

Good article. Some of the industry is corrupt.

stuna13849d ago

Boy I'll tell you, if this was a court of law, most of the people on here would have been put in jail for perjury! Like you said xHeavyx, graphics in General has been the biggest talking point this generation. At every turn has been that the Xbox 360 was literally stomping the PS3 in resolution, graphics, frame rate, draw distance! Whatever that could be used for the Xbox 360 to wave the flag of victory, but now that it seems that that cycle is about to be broken this coming generation, we have those denying that the pointed out issues of the PS3 were never really issues after all.

The sadness of the situation has been that Microsoft proliferated a lot of the fighting going on between the fans of their respective consoles that they support! This of course doesn't excuse the more rabid fans! You know who you are! But for those who are being taken advantage of through the lies, and deceit, I truly feel for them.

JasonKCK3849d ago

What media? Because all I see are fan blogs.

JackISbacK3848d ago

yeah the graphics does not matter that much until the game looks same and gorgious on all platforms we all will have fun with our respective consoles ,now have fun.

TheGrimReaper00113848d ago

I personally dont care. I mean, graphics are nice and all, but if the gameplay is good, great graphics are like the cherry on top.
Now that you mention it though, that really bothers me
Xbox fans were laughing how ps3 had the lesser versions of a multiplat game (with some exceptions)
Now its the other way around, so Playstation fans make fun of the xbox and are labeled fanboys?!
I am really curious to see how next gen will turn out

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 3847d ago
MorePowerOfGreen3849d ago (Edited 3849d ago )

No one is downplaying anything. No one has seen both versions yet. 1080p is better in games only if nothing was sacrificed to achieve that resolution. Sony maybe forced to use the highest resolution possible due to PS4's inferior scaler. When games get more graphically advanced and 1080p get harder PS4 will suffer being forced to try to get naturally high resolutions.

People can't forget the XB1 version of games are also running more advanced social and kinect features with these games that also use system resources.

Deividas3849d ago (Edited 3849d ago )

Why would you use a scaler when you can naturally hit 1080p?

Why do you all keep trying to find excuses to validate the $500 purchase....BE PISSED OFF instead of defending MS...Its understandable to be pissed off at all this...

ziggurcat3849d ago

Are you seriously trying to argue that native 1080p is inferior to upscaled 1080p!?!?

Wow...

MysticStrummer3849d ago

Yeah I've seen several delusional people make that argument.

wenaldy3849d ago

You just met a delusional xbot aka greenpowerz.

Drekken3849d ago

This has got to be MS's idea. They have released the shills to try to play this angle. Its really pathetic and makes anyone saying it look stupid as hell.

Ron_Danger3849d ago

The thing that people don't seem to realize yet, is that if the PS4 can output a launch game natively at 1080p and the XBox One is doing it at 720p upscaled, what's gonna happen down the road when games become more complex and are outputted on the PS4 at 720p? Does that mean then that we're going to see another Halo Reach situation where the XBox One will have to run games at sub 720 and upscale them?

Both systems are powerful no doubt, but if one runs a game at a higher resolution, don't blame the game programmers for it. Blame the console maker for not lending a hand to the programmers.

Early last gen, the PS3 struggled because it was so different than the 360 and PC, but Sony would send programmers from SSM and Naughty Dog to 3rd party devs to help sort out issues. If Microsoft isn't willing to help 3rd party devs program their games more efficiently (and instead use the cash to advertise), then guess who's fault it is.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3849d ago
medman3849d ago

Hahahaha...can you believe this guy? Trying to justify paying more for a system that will offer lesser visual fidelity. Hahahahah.. good luck son. You're going to need it.

kingdip903849d ago

People would have rather had those system resources used on better looking games than those kinect and social features.

Microsoft miscalculated

DaGR8JIBRALTAR3849d ago (Edited 3849d ago )

^The realest comment i've read all day.

BadlyPackedKeebab3849d ago

This scaler thing is a bit of a smoke and mirrors.

On ps3 with my 1080p tv, when I launch into a game I get a little notification on the TV saying it has gone to a 720p source. The TV is then doing the scaling up to 1080p. This has never been an issue before so I dont see why people are clinging to this idea that a hardware scaler in the Xbox One is some magic bullet.

Sci0n3849d ago

I keep on seeing xbot fanboys say bu bu but the scaler, DX and the power of the cloud will make multiplats shine the brightest on the xbox done. Its quite comical and sad at the sametime.

Drekken3849d ago

Here we go with 8 years of excuses worse than the last 8. I hope that MS paycheck is worth it because you really sound desperate.

pyramidshead3849d ago (Edited 3849d ago )

lol it's come down to the secret sauce scaler.

Also that's true if you're still using the Digital Foundry comparisons to make judgement, but with every other person who did direct capture...then nope. :).

bicfitness3849d ago

Really? You're onto this scaler nonsense? You realize both the PS4 and X1 use the SAME basic scaler technology as their AMD 7X derivatives, don't you? First it was the cloud, then it was the secret dGPU, now its the magic of a scaler?

I'd ask you to stop, but your posts are pure comedy. They always bring a smile to my face.

P.S. Upscaling always looks worse. Always. That's the cost of stretching an image and interpolating data.

neocores3849d ago

Just like when you ran a ps2 game on a fat ps3 backwards look like shit

DoesUs3848d ago

@Green. OH...MY...GOD!

You utter idiot. You know what, i don't even think you are a shill, even after all these years. You are just...well, words fail me. This generation is going to be all tears for you my friend.

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 3848d ago
bicfitness3849d ago

After almost a decade of the US+UK media fawning over MS, it will take a while for the paradigm shift.

Gamer-centric + more powerful + cheaper price tag = better than a TV box that also plays games.

MS only ever cared about gaming as a means to an end, and its hilarious that after their initial "vision" was revealed and the countless 180s that any reasonable person would still hold them in any esteem let alone pay more for less.

But there's no separating fanboys from logic, so the X1 will still sell to its base. I don't think that base is as large as MS is banking on though.

Grown Folks Talk3849d ago

Reasonable people could think for themselves & determine whether or not the original vision impacted them. Which it wouldn't have for the majority of complainers.

BattleTorn3849d ago

I went to an Xbox One Kiosk yesterday, to voice my great displeasure at all the recent resolution news.

The guy had no clue what I was talking about. He had no idea that BF4 and CODG are lower resolutions on X1.

At one point I was talking about the PS4 demo, and he had to ask what "Knack" was, and even after describing it - he said he had never heard of it.

How can he be marketing for Xbox and not know the competitor's launch software?!

Belking3849d ago

It all depends on your viewing device. It's better but not a huge jump in visuals. Going from 30 FPS to 60FPS is more noticeable.

Drekken3849d ago

BS. People are buying 1080p TV's and they want 1080p visuals. Not blurry upscaled crap like MS is trying to sell us.

DeadIIIRed3849d ago

Power lines and other distant objects is where 1080p matters. Go watch the demo of the driving sequence from BF4 single player when they pass under the power lines on the Xbone, the PS4, and then the PC. Jagged power lines and distant buildings are my biggest graphical peeve.

Kenshin_BATT0USAI3849d ago

I thought I was the only one who noticed the distant building showing up in quite literally blocks of walls. Looked so freaking bad. I'm sorry, BF4 can be the best looking shooter, it still looks average on everything IMO(this includes PC, I mean have you LOOKED at the water...eww)

Xsilver3849d ago

I bought a 1080p TV for Next Gen so it would be disappointing if these consoles cant do 1080p tbh :/

StillGray3849d ago

Bingo. That's the gist of my argument here. I think it does everyone a disservice to say 1080p isn't a big deal because to the consumer, it clearly is a big deal.

n4rc3849d ago

Good thing any image that 1080 set displays is 1080.. Lol

Drekken3849d ago

Read a book or something. You clearly have no idea what you are talking about.

n4rc3848d ago

Lol... Nice try.. You obviously don't have a clue what you are talking about..

A 1080p TV has 1080 physical lines of resolution.. They don't magically disappear... All images are scaled to the native resolution of the TV.. Either by the cable box, console or tv itself

BadlyPackedKeebab3849d ago

I did screen grabs of 1080 and 720 under the same settings and then scaled up the 720 to 1080 on the PC right back when the consoles were announced and we were talking about what the power difference might mean. There is a real difference and yes it wont ruin the game and all that but also a skoda will get you and your date out for dinner just as well as a lambo but why take the skoda when you have a choice of a lambo.

MasterCornholio3849d ago

Same here except in my case its a 1080P computer monitor. After seeing 1080P direct feed footage of Killzone Shadowfall I can say that the game would look incredible on my screen.

Nexus 7 2013

T23849d ago

I bought a 1080p tv like 5 years ago and you can damn sure I was already pissed last gen by the lack of 1080p titles...

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3848d ago
Show all comments (139)
190°

All Call of Duty Games Ranked from Worst to Best

BLG writes: "Call of Duty has to be the most recognizable franchise on the planet. They didn’t get that way by only making a handful of games.

COD has a long and storied career. Launching as a PC WW2 first-person shooter, Call of Duty has gone through numerous makeovers and been on just about every system. The series has gone through some serious highs and tragic lows. I’ll be looking at each Call of Duty game, the good the bad, and the ugly."

Read Full Story >>
bosslevelgamer.com
UnSelf819d ago

Vanguard better be at the fkn bottom. Can’t believe ppl haven’t eviscerated that game with all its lacking

Minimoth819d ago

Yeah, it's close to the bottom. There are a couple of worse ones. Infinite Warfare definitely deserves its place.

KyRo819d ago

There's a number a lot worse than Vangaurd. It's also a lot better than that car crash Treyarch released before it.

XbladeTeddy819d ago

World at War is my favourite. Didn't know the N-Gage had a Call of Duty.

MadLad819d ago

Same for me.
I was never huge into Call of Duty, but I sunk a lot of time into WaW.
Both the campaign and the multiplayer are on point. Wouldn't mind a remaster.

I quit on CoD for a long while. Though I'm the odd man out that actually really enjoyed the campaign for WWII, being I got it through Humble monthly way back when.

TheLigX819d ago

I really enjoyed the Infinite campaign. Multiplayer... not so much.

Yppupdam819d ago

I agree, The Infinite campaign feels more like it's own thing that they slapped the CoD name on. If it stood on it's own, (sans the CoD name) I think it could have been it's own scifi franchise. And a damn good looking game, to boot. I never bothered to play the multiplayer.

victorMaje819d ago

MW 2019 apart from the desastrous file sizes is way better than AW.

MadLad818d ago

That was one I grabbed for Playstation because it pretty much just came out during the Redbox purge of videogames, and I got it for dirt cheap.

It was great coming home to an update every night, and watching one game eat up almost half my console's memory.

Amplitude819d ago (Edited 819d ago )

Will get disagrees but Infinite Warfare campaign was really good. Decent story, set pieces were amazing and if it didn't have the CoD game on it I'm sure people would have been more into it. Advanced Warfare was alright too. Titanfall 2 was just 1000 times better than both but I enjoyed them for their campaigns. I literally barely gaf about the story I'm in it for the set pieces and 5 hours of being stoned watching cool nonsense happen if I'm in the mood to play a CoD campaign. If I'm looking for a deep plot I'm gonna go somewhere else.
Ghosts was the worst story-wise though lol that cliffhanger ending was so bs.

Also MW 2019 was sick and is one of the best CoD games in yeeeears not sure why it's so low on this dude's list. Campaign was great, multiplayer was great and Warzone was fun for a while. Over it now but shrugs.

Beat the Vanguard campaign too but I can't even remember a single thing about it other than that it felt like it was 45 minutes long. Might be the most forgettable thing I've ever played lol just fully erased from my brain

Show all comments (17)
90°

Call of Duty Multiplayer This Decade Ranked (2010-2019)

Call of Duty multiplayer ranked from worst to best! 2019 is coming to a close and MP1st ranks the best COD multiplayer games this decade.

100°

Ray Tracing in Monster Hunter World, Deus Ex Mankind Divided, Watch_Dogs 2, COD: Ghosts & more

DSOGaming writes: "YouTube’s members Benchmark PC Tech, Jose cangrejo, WillTalksTech, Zetman and MissinInAction have published some videos, showing Monster Hunter World, Black Mesa Xen, Watch_Dogs 2, Call of Duty Ghosts, Need For Speed Hot Pursuit, The Sinking City, Remember Me, Deus Ex Mankind Divided and Dishonored 2 with the ray tracing/path tracing effects that Pascal Gilcher’s Reshade mod introduces."

Read Full Story >>
dsogaming.com
Pyroxfaglover1780d ago

Wore implementation I've ever seen,.. guess it just does not work all that great on every engine

MarkyMark891780d ago (Edited 1780d ago )

Agree, but this gives me hope that one day Ray Tracing can be a software based feature and not require some type of proprietary hardware to achieve. Software will always outpace Hardware so it could happen, but I feel like its going to take a lot more time to achieve the same level that RTX has already shown glimpses of so far. Really just waiting for Cyberpunk to see if RTX is actually something viable. I think if anybody can truly showcase RTX Features it would be Projekt Red.

zeal0us1780d ago

Too bad it doesn't make Mankind Divided a better game.

starchild1780d ago

It doesn't need to, the game was already fantastic, imo.

zeal0us1780d ago

Human Revolution was a better game and not to mention longer.

isarai1780d ago

Reshade is not raytracing, its a screen space post processing effect. Thats like calling SSAO "global illumination"