190°

Faceoff: Battlefield 4 vs Call of Duty: Ghosts

Lazygamer has a faceoff between Batllefield 4 and Call of Duty: Ghosts, cast your vote to see who reigns supreme in the battle of the FPSs

Read Full Story >>
lazygamer.net
JustPlay43863d ago

COD: Ghosts for me just because I find it more fun and single player is always better the Battlefield's

They should just make battlefield a multiplayer Only game

TomShoe3863d ago

With the rumors that have been spreading about Ghosts on the X1 being 720p...Not so sure yet.

Will be getting PS4 version of both though.

snipab8t3863d ago

Hmmm although I have always been a battlefield man, BF3 really was the biggest disappointment I have felt in a game this generation. Also, COD Ghosts has Bot matches for split screen gameplay which is really the only reason I will purchase.

XB1_PS43863d ago

I had no idea people actually played against bots.

snipab8t3863d ago

Considering I only play really casually I never get good enough at games like COD so I usually end up just getting frustrated. The only multiplayer games I have ever really gotten into heavily was BBC2 and BF2.

Kleptic3863d ago

^what was it about BF3 that you didn't like, just out of curiosity?...and what platform did you play it on?

BF3 was a weird one for me...some friends and I all agreed to get it on PS3...and i wasn't initially blown away or anything...but we started a small'ish platoon, met some more people...then 18 months later it ended up my most played game of the entire generation...probably not my overall favorite game of this 'era', but its up there...

my competitive attention span only lasts as long as my 'teams' does...which is why i drifted from CoD after Cod4, and have stuck to class oriented team games ever since...There is no question for me that BF encourages, and rewards, complex team work more than CoD does...yet still allows decent enough lone wolf strategies to try out from time to time...

so just saying...if you're worried about 'not getting good enough'...i really think BF is the superior franchise for that mind set (although, i did see you played BF games before it)...because its one of the only franchises were you can mvp rounds, literally, without ever firing a primary weapon...and when you meet the right group of guys to squad up with, its so insanely addictive it should be illegal...imo, at least...

snipab8t3863d ago (Edited 3863d ago )

^ Personally I felt they messed up the damage and health stats of players in BF3 compared to BBC2. Also the guns had really frustrating recoil I just couldn't get my head around after using the weighty but accurate guns in BBC2. Also I hated how they implemented severs with alterable respawsn, which completely ruined the balance of the matches. Also, the destruction was disappointing, it had a campaign rivaling the worst of the shooters this generation.

Don't get me wrong, I admit battlefield could be fun with friends, however I just never got addicted to it like I did with BBC2 and BF2.

BTW I was playing on xbox 360. I probably should have got it on PC but the specs were too high for my computer.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3863d ago
Spinal3863d ago

Battlefield 2 was an Only Multiplayer game, Singleplayer was tacked on for those whiney lot.

But anyone who buys Battlefield to play singleplayer is lost in the world of gaming.

Battlefield destroys COD in every way possible. COD hasnt been good since Modern Warfare 1 & World at War.

GuyThatPlaysGames3863d ago

"CoD hasnt been good since Modern Warfare 1 & World at War." That is clearly your opinion and not a fact. If it's so bad, then why are there always hundreds of thousands of people playing CoD at ALL TIMES? CoD's gameplay is unbeatable. The pacing of the firefights is intense and fun. Battlefield, you gotta run around for 5 minutes just to see someone and then die and repeat the whole process.

XB1_PS43863d ago

@OVO there are a multitude of different maps, and map sizes in BF. You can play a cod size map, with fast gameplay, or play a huge map and fly a jet or something.

NeutralWaters3862d ago

@OVO

Hit the nail on the head! BF3 is tedious at the best of times, 5 mins to run to your death. And then, to make things worse, everyone is only playing one map on the same mode...
It's such a disappointment. Don't get me wrong, I brought the game... but we all make mistakes!

Spinal3862d ago

@OVO & Neutral,

Clearly both of you have only played the Console version of Battlefield which is a VERY POOR representation of the game. When you play it on PC on Ultra settings with 64 players you will see what Next gen gaming really is.

With 64 players you certainly don't run for 5 mins to find someone and also only if you're bad you would die right after spawning. You both sound very unskilled and probably the type of players in favor of playing against bots.

BF3 offers many types of matches close quarters smaller maps with 32 people is crazy frantic and still much more fun than COD, i tried Black Ops 2 and didnt play it again after like 20 mins. It's like an ancient arcades in one of those bowling alleys that never moved with the times. its a classic feel but a relic of old skool online shooters. It needs to move with the times.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3862d ago
SavageKuma3863d ago

I am going battlefield this time around. Everything that you can do in that game is no contest.

NeutralWaters3862d ago

Apart from it not being fun...

SavageKuma3862d ago

Thats your opinion of course, but I found it very enjoyable, which is why COD is trying to implement some of the features from battlefield into their game. Don't get me wrong I do enjoy COD's storylines more than the multi-player, but I am hoping the best with Battlefield.

RVanner_3863d ago

I always get both.

Battlefield when I've got a decent amount of time and fancy really getting involved (Weekends)

COD When got an hour in the evening and want some quick entertainment requiring minimal brain power after work.

xHoii3863d ago

These articles would never stop..
Just go for for what you like..
I know that in a few minutes everyone here is going to turn this into an argument of which game is the better one..
It's about prefrence and as the two games are so different there isnt really much choice for some people..
Glad I love both games :)

Show all comments (26)
150°

Battlefield 1, Hardline, BF4 Servers Are Being Taken Offline by Cheaters; EA Silent on Issue

Cheaters & hackers have been causing grief on Battlefield 1, Hardline & BF4 servers, with nonstop DDoS attacks among other things. Unfortunately, EA has remained silent about it.

-Foxtrot784d ago

Course they are silent, they are hoping people flock to 2042

gamesftw250783d ago

Maybe it was a inside job then haha.

jeromeface783d ago

wouldnt be the first time, titanfall 1+2 anyone?

PapaBop783d ago

Not even if they paid me.. EA always do this with old games with less money potential, if this was Ultimate Team, they'd address and sort it faster than stories could spread. Why invest time in their products when they will just dump it in the following years? Then again EA never could see the forest for the trees.

Inverno783d ago

I imagine after those games were given out for free a couple months back through Amazon, anything that makes people go to 2042 is a plus for them

XiNatsuDragnel784d ago

They want people to go on 2042. My theory

excaliburps783d ago

Nah. I think they can't do anything about it or they want to sink money into fixing it.

Pudge102888783d ago (Edited 783d ago )

EA owns all BF servers so yes, they can do something about it but they refuse to because they dont want ppl playing their old games instead of the new one. Its EA we’re talking about here

pr33k33783d ago

if this happened in 2042, they'd have something to say. which is weird, considering battlefield 1 has more players on steam right now.

Pudge102888783d ago

Its so obvious that EA is doing this or hired ppl to mess up the games so that we’d be forced to have just 1 Battlefield working.

FPS_D3TH783d ago

Honestly it’s probably the devs themselves. They did an update to bf4 way back that kinda made assault rifles doo doo in hopes that people would flock to BF1 cuz BF4 was too perfect

Show all comments (15)
60°

5 Great Shooter Games on Xbox Game Pass

The shooter genre is one of the most beloved videogame genres in the gaming community, and rightfully so. From DOOM Eternal to Battlefield 4, passing through The Outer Worlds, the Xbox Game Pass has a lot to offer when it comes to amazing shooter experiences. Come check out some great shooter games available on Xbox Game Pass!

Read Full Story >>
keengamer.com
MadLad798d ago

There's a bunch of great shooters on gamepass; both legacy and new.

A recommendation I have is a work in progress preview title called Anacrusis. It's a lot of fun, and has a cool aesthetic.

190°

All Call of Duty Games Ranked from Worst to Best

BLG writes: "Call of Duty has to be the most recognizable franchise on the planet. They didn’t get that way by only making a handful of games.

COD has a long and storied career. Launching as a PC WW2 first-person shooter, Call of Duty has gone through numerous makeovers and been on just about every system. The series has gone through some serious highs and tragic lows. I’ll be looking at each Call of Duty game, the good the bad, and the ugly."

Read Full Story >>
bosslevelgamer.com
UnSelf824d ago

Vanguard better be at the fkn bottom. Can’t believe ppl haven’t eviscerated that game with all its lacking

Minimoth824d ago

Yeah, it's close to the bottom. There are a couple of worse ones. Infinite Warfare definitely deserves its place.

KyRo824d ago

There's a number a lot worse than Vangaurd. It's also a lot better than that car crash Treyarch released before it.

XbladeTeddy824d ago

World at War is my favourite. Didn't know the N-Gage had a Call of Duty.

MadLad824d ago

Same for me.
I was never huge into Call of Duty, but I sunk a lot of time into WaW.
Both the campaign and the multiplayer are on point. Wouldn't mind a remaster.

I quit on CoD for a long while. Though I'm the odd man out that actually really enjoyed the campaign for WWII, being I got it through Humble monthly way back when.

TheLigX824d ago

I really enjoyed the Infinite campaign. Multiplayer... not so much.

Yppupdam824d ago

I agree, The Infinite campaign feels more like it's own thing that they slapped the CoD name on. If it stood on it's own, (sans the CoD name) I think it could have been it's own scifi franchise. And a damn good looking game, to boot. I never bothered to play the multiplayer.

victorMaje824d ago

MW 2019 apart from the desastrous file sizes is way better than AW.

MadLad823d ago

That was one I grabbed for Playstation because it pretty much just came out during the Redbox purge of videogames, and I got it for dirt cheap.

It was great coming home to an update every night, and watching one game eat up almost half my console's memory.

Amplitude824d ago (Edited 824d ago )

Will get disagrees but Infinite Warfare campaign was really good. Decent story, set pieces were amazing and if it didn't have the CoD game on it I'm sure people would have been more into it. Advanced Warfare was alright too. Titanfall 2 was just 1000 times better than both but I enjoyed them for their campaigns. I literally barely gaf about the story I'm in it for the set pieces and 5 hours of being stoned watching cool nonsense happen if I'm in the mood to play a CoD campaign. If I'm looking for a deep plot I'm gonna go somewhere else.
Ghosts was the worst story-wise though lol that cliffhanger ending was so bs.

Also MW 2019 was sick and is one of the best CoD games in yeeeears not sure why it's so low on this dude's list. Campaign was great, multiplayer was great and Warzone was fun for a while. Over it now but shrugs.

Beat the Vanguard campaign too but I can't even remember a single thing about it other than that it felt like it was 45 minutes long. Might be the most forgettable thing I've ever played lol just fully erased from my brain

Show all comments (17)