For so long, it's always been Battlefield vs. Call of Duty...but now, one certain game may have broken up the fight, for good. Which game was it?
Pokémon’s shift to 3D was a big mistake, as the series’ roots in 2D design make it difficult to transfer important game mechanics into a 3D overworld.
why do other games pull off 3D monster collecting JRPG games just fine? Look at Jade Cocoon and Shin Megami Tensei for examples.
BLG writes: "While it didn’t sell as well as the Nintendo DS, the Nintendo 3DS was nonetheless a wonderful system. And, while this may be a hot take, it’s easily my favorite handheld. Even more than a decade removed from launch, the system’s library has so many titles that feel as fresh today as they did back at release. While it was hard to narrow down, these 30 Nintendo 3DS games are emblematic of the system’s success."
The Pokemon Company has a solid thing going right now. Well, it’s been going on for a while, actually, but it has been a while since a new typing has been introduced to the popular monster-taming series. The latest one, Fairy type, was introduced back in Generation VI (Pokemon X & Y), so it does seem like it is time to bring in a new one. Check out Jason Capp's article for more.
Call of duty will always win because its an Arcade shooter...meaning anyone can pick it up and get 10 kills in their first match...with absolutely no effort...the media loves this and they will persuade fans to love it also
IMO killzone shadowfall will be bettrt then both...
Why not include Killzone in the debate? The comparison is justified, it is a fps!
Battlefield has ALWAYS had the better quality game since that copy and pasted excuse called MW3.... but unfortunately, in the days of Youtube and that CoD fanboy site IGN, better quality doesn't equal better sales... IGN and its slobberin, CoD lovin reviewers, will once again promote the hell outta CoD leading up to BF4's release and give BF4 a mediocre score... while the actual gamers will LOVE it.. callin it now..