Jeff: "Pokemon—now the second best-selling gaming franchise of all time—has maintained its popularity for more than a decade, and it has made new fans throughout the creating of each generation. The primary reason for this is simply due to new groups of kids becoming exposed to the franchise for the first time....."
Pokémon’s shift to 3D was a big mistake, as the series’ roots in 2D design make it difficult to transfer important game mechanics into a 3D overworld.
why do other games pull off 3D monster collecting JRPG games just fine? Look at Jade Cocoon and Shin Megami Tensei for examples.
BLG writes: "While it didn’t sell as well as the Nintendo DS, the Nintendo 3DS was nonetheless a wonderful system. And, while this may be a hot take, it’s easily my favorite handheld. Even more than a decade removed from launch, the system’s library has so many titles that feel as fresh today as they did back at release. While it was hard to narrow down, these 30 Nintendo 3DS games are emblematic of the system’s success."
The Pokemon Company has a solid thing going right now. Well, it’s been going on for a while, actually, but it has been a while since a new typing has been introduced to the popular monster-taming series. The latest one, Fairy type, was introduced back in Generation VI (Pokemon X & Y), so it does seem like it is time to bring in a new one. Check out Jason Capp's article for more.
Is Pokemon on it's last leg?
When your turning House hold appliances in "Pokemon" you've just gotten lazy
I feel like the game felt so different and refreshing when I saw the first few trailers for Pokemon X and Y that it didn't need stuff like Mega Evolutions.
If it's just a feature for the region where in this game then fair enough but it's not something I want to see in future games.
Still though I can't believe they don't want to make a console version. Imagine a huge map, hell half the size of GTAV would do where you can go out and explore, catching Pokemon and finding secret stuff/easer eggs :)
The pre orders that are now over 1.3 million would disagree.
The author's point seems to be "CHANGE IS BAD." He doesn't give a good reason why mega evolutions are bad, he just that they're there and that this is a bad thing.