GenGAME writes: "On paper, Wii Sports Club sounds like a great idea. It incorporates Wii MotionPlus into every sport, meaning the depth of control is greater and games don’t boil down to timed waggle. It adds competitive online multiplayer, meaning play isn’t limited to solo practice or drunken Wii parties. And it’s all in HD. I’m actually pretty much down with everything I’ve seen on the software side, and I’m pretty likely to purchase Wii Tennis and Wii Bowling when they’re available on November 7.
"The problem is that, beyond being a better version of Wii Sports, Wii Sports Club seems wrongly-poised in just about every other aspect."
The Switch just isn't equipped for a killer sports title like the Wii was
A lot of the points made here are true, yet let's give it a chance, because like the author said, the Wii was a motion control console and everyone did view it as such while the switch is not, so the way people view the game determines how much they invested in it, so again let's give it a chance and see
Wii sports was truly atrocious and you're saying Switch Sports will be even worse? It does not bode well for Switch Sports indeed.
Wii Sports was ok for screwing around, but the games lacked depth. Also I'm not sure why it seems like they decided to stick with the automatic player movement so all you need to do is swing to hit something. Very noob friendly but not as much fun IMO.
Wii Sports was THE game for casuals. I don’t feel many casuals own the Switch. I can’t see this doing the numbers Wii Sports did.
Course it won't, the Wii was a phenomenon. Something new with the motion tech. A curiosity to almost everyone. Obviously Switch sports won't create the same impact.
Nintendo could be sitting on a gold mine with a past favorite.
Because we all miss accidentally throwing our Wiimotes at the TV, so let's throw some Joy-Cons.
I was always confused by Nintendo’s decision to kill the franchise. “Super” stayed with Mario titles even after the Super Nintendo. They can still use the Wii name. Hell it’s been so long that releasing a new one, or even an HD remaster, will tap into that nostalgia market.
Super was never because of the Super Nintendo. Super Mario Bros launched on the NES. The Super is because it's an indirect sequel to Mario Bros.
They can just call it Nintendo Sports or something, but using the Wii name would be a bit confusing.
Yeah i agree but i don't think Nintendo will be bringing wii sports to the Nintendo Switch samething goes for diddykong racing
A look at some of the best games that launched beside a new console.
Missing Spider-Man: Miles Morales for PS5 in this list. Love this game!
They probably didn't include it (and a bunch of others) because of their criteria for "lasting influence on the industry".
SMMM is a good game, but it doesn't stand out enough to have THAT huge of an impact on the industry as a whole - especially when compared to games like Mario, Halo & Tetris.
i would also add Sonic and Crash (pun intended lol) ...Sonic 1 on MD is a all time classic game that helped MegaDrive to separate itself and explode in sales... also Crash Bandicoot ...while not exactly a launch game..it was pretty close to launch for PS1 (in Europe was almost a launch game as PS1 released later here) and trademarked the start of PS era
Totally agree - those two games were huge for the industry & direction of platformers.
p.s. love the irony of your name for this post :P
Sonic was not a launch game. I keep seeing people say it was, but maybe they were so young it’s when they got the console. Crash bandicoot definitely wasn’t even close to being a launch game . These games are system sellers though.
@Sonic-and-Crash
Neither Sonic nor Crash released anywhere close to the launch of their respective consoles. Crash released a full year after the western launch of the PS1 (and two full years after Japan's launch), and Sonic released two years after Genesis in US, and a year after Mega Drive in PAL regions.
I knoe it wasn't a massive influence on the industry, but Condemned: Criminal Origins on Xbox 360 is one of my all time favorite launch games.
Ok you love it, and that's great but I think you are missing the point of the article... In any case to judge something like this I think you need time, currently we can see the tree but not the forest
That game has aged like a fine wine. Still go back to it all the time on my Dreamcast.
Super Mario World is still my my favorite of all Mario games and in the discussion for best side scroller ever.
So, they took what was basically a free (bundled) game at launch last-gen (and is now a $20 game), re-announced it with basically zero fanfare and no actual marketing finesse right after GTAV came out at $50 for the whole package as a download-only title that will therefore lose most of its visibility to the average consumer? (This is a franchise built on the backs of the average consumer, mind you.)
What in the actual hell.
The $2 rental and flexible pricing are great ideas, as are most of the updates. Everything about the marketing and positioning sucks otherwise.
Im sure they have a Wii Sports Club bundle up their sleves for the mass market.
I somewhat agree, however most purchasers of the Wii U already own the Wii system, so having the necessary controllers shouldn't be an issue.
I do agree that it is priced a little expensively, however on the flip side, if you only like Tennis, Bowling and Golf, you can get the games you want for less than a full priced game.
I only want tennis. My GF will buy bowling and baseball herself if she wants it. And come on there is well over 40 million wii remote plus out there already thats more remotes than wii u's. It will do fine.
What the hell are they doing?