70°
6.0

Total War: Rome II Review - PCGMedia

There is a huge amount wrong with Rome II, and although it's easy to get caught up in the hype, as a strategy game it's pretty weak, and does little to innovate on the franchise. It falls into the same traps, and got delivered to us far too early, when it was in need of further TLC.

Read Full Story >>
pcgmedia.com
memots3903d ago

Lol , trying to get hit. I won't even bother

3-4-53903d ago

haha My brothers been playing this for days and hasn't seen any of the problems people are mentioning aside from slight lag in frame rate during huge battles.

60/100 = a games that isn't very good.

Rome 2 is a really good game with a few stupid bugs that will be fixed.

More like a 92/100 type game.

DasTier3903d ago

No its really not a 92/100 game, maybe when the iron out all the issues the score could rise a little, but I think a 6 is justified. I've had to restart my campaign numerous times and the combat just feels like such a mess in comparison to older total war games. I'm not saying the game is terrible, quite the opposite, you can see they have tried to implement many new ideas, but they have failed to implement them properly and the result is a game which you could probably convince most people is still in alpha.

I think the Guardians review of this game summed it up most accurately and with homage to the brilliant franchise,

"Rome: Total War is one of the most brilliant games I've ever played. Total War: Rome II inverts far more than the name. This does not channel the greatest military empire in history so much as the pale shadow of its ending; a bloated, technically corrupt and unfocused mess"
~Rich Stanton

3-4-53903d ago

Yea I was thinking more like 92/100 once everything is all fixed and patched, not currently, but 60/100 is way too low.

RogueSmurf3902d ago

The problems exist, regardless of how much of a hard on for Total War your brother has. Go watch Angry Joe's video review for footage of basically every point we brought up.

RogueSmurf3902d ago

There are two ways of doing things:
Tell the truth and piss off developers/publishers, or ignore a games faults in order to please them.

Do some actual research. Learn about the problems with Rome II. Ignore the hype. Otherwise, don't bother posting.

Jovanian 3903d ago

60/100 pre patch 95+/100 post patch I'd imagine. You can feel a good game trying to break out of that glitchy buggy undeveloped egg

80°

Total War: Rome II - Landmark RTS Hits 10 Years

Total War: Rome II launched 10 years ago today, and remains a staple in the grand strategy genre in PC gaming.

vTuro24256d ago

Ah yes, the game that killed all my interest in my once favorite franchise.

110°

15 Best Ancient Rome Games of All Time

From underrated Xbox One launch titles to absolute emperors of the strategy genre, history heads will love these games based around Ancient Rome.

Read Full Story >>
culturedvultures.com
Leeroyw391d ago (Edited 391d ago )

There's fifteen ancient Rome games?

LG_Fox_Brazil391d ago

Shadow of Rome was so freaking good

Sashamaz391d ago

I'm still waiting for the sequel.

HyperMoused390d ago

Ryse was awesome, i have no idea why it wasnt recieved well and why we havnt seen another, Rome conquered so much, you could take the action anywhere, and it looked great when xbox one came out, now would be even better.

190°

4 famous games that completely butchered history

Bárbara writes: "History-inspired games have been around for a while and I’m pretty sure every gamer has come across one or two in their lifetime. And while they can be incredibly fun to play, their historical accuracy is often pretty shaky. Don’t get me wrong, in recent years developers have started to work harder to get facts right, but we’re still far from reality. Today we will explore 4 big games that butchered the chapters of history they are based on."

Read Full Story >>
squadstate.com
1367d ago
Sciurus_vulgaris1367d ago

EA tried to market Battlefield 1 as an epic WW1 period piece. It was really just a hybrid of stripped down Battlefield 4 and Star Wars Battlefront (2015) disguised as WW1 shooter.

KyRo1367d ago (Edited 1367d ago )

I'm not sure what it was you played but it certainly weren't BF1. The campaign showing the different periods of the war through the eyes of different soldiers was a good way to show the harsh reality of a WW. Was it groundbreaking? No, but it was a good effort.

It also played nothing like SW and added a whole heap of things to the BF formula to simply be called a reskin.

Sciurus_vulgaris1367d ago

The “harsh reality” of WW1 was not shown by BF1. There is mission where the player is wearing tank-like armour that is repeatedly stated as being near impervious to damage. Metal armour existed in WW1, but was quickly abandoned as it wasn’t effective against bullets or explosives. Or the other reality breaking mission we’re you play as a man with superhuman speed....

BF1 streamed down the guns mechanics making all weapons easier to use. Classes were marginalized and team-play was stripped down. BF1 focused on chaotic gameplay with no emphasis on strategy, just like Battlefront. Reduced gun skill , again just like Battlefront.

HyperMoused1367d ago

So you you are telling me historically you cant jump off a ten story building into hay and live.

Unknown_Gamer57941367d ago (Edited 1367d ago )

Indeed. Ezio actually died in ACII when he jumped off that tall building in Florence. If I recall correctly, that one was actually a cart with a pile of flower petals. Everything that happened after that was him in the afterlife envisioning where life would have taken him had he lived. Clearly the guy had a grim view on his future...

lonewolf101367d ago

I should of read this before I juuuuummmppee................. ............................... .....