150°

Wii U’s Third Party Struggle: Ubisoft and EA Express (More) Concerns

"Since Nintendo’s lackluster presence at E3 2013, the Wii U has been fighting an uphill battle to gain third-party support from game developers. Following last month’s big video game expo, Ubisoft decided to reduce its plans for Wii U titles.

Yves Guillemot, chairman and CEO of Ubisoft, told GamesIndustry International that his company’s exclusive ZombiU launch title failed to turn a profit – and thus won’t be getting a sequel."

Read Full Story >>
thediplomat.com
BullyMangler3970d ago (Edited 3970d ago )

Ubisoft disappointed at Nintendo because zomniU didnt sell well on the wiiU?

i dont get it .

just admit that you fugged up with making of zombiU ubisoft

zombiU got average scores everywhere, and sadly game scores determine if gamers will buy a game or not .

rare exceptions though like Metroid Other M got average scores too but damn . now that was a mistake . .

LOL_WUT3970d ago

No, the issue was not the game the reason it didn't sell to their expectations was because YOU guys just didn't go out and support it. Let's not try and spin it.

“The lack of online engagement that we see on Wii U [is troubling],” Moore continued. “It's so integral to what we do. They're so small it's hardly worth running the servers. The Wii U feels like an offline experience right now.”

Those are some pretty bold words by EA ;)

BullyMangler3970d ago (Edited 3969d ago )

poor game = poor scores = poor saLes < fact

with rare exceptions

like sales really matter to nintendo more than boasting about being the 1st ones to ever have THE MOST BAD ASS CONENT o n pLanet EartH .

Nintendo for some reason likes to show off their inventions. They get a kick out of (being the 1st ones who brought >IT <

sony and microsoft actually competing against each other, like animaLs <

only losers compete < fact

SilentNegotiator3969d ago (Edited 3969d ago )

Ubisoft, Activision, EA...that's only among the top publishers in the industry, giving very limited support to the Wii U. No big deal.
/s

The denial is getting pretty old. Nintendo isn't handling the Wii U right at all. It's time to stop blaming publishers.

deadeyes3969d ago (Edited 3969d ago )

Its true though, I played Black Ops 2 the other day and there where hardly 2000 people playing. The most l have ever saw was around 9000 during the Christmas season. I don't blame Activision for not being more supportive. l wish l had waited til later to get a Wii U (after good games come out & a pricecut). If it wasn't for my wife & daughter l woukd trade it in and put it towards a PS 4... The original wii was great, but Nintendo dropped the ball this time. With all the money they made off the wii, they should have been set this gen. They should have embraced online & competive hardware this time around.

Brasi19893969d ago

How about 3rd parties judge how well their products sell by releasing a comparable product, with the same release date, and the same price point. I don't think a single person can name one game that is a multi-platform game on the WiiU that has the same features, same price, and the same release date. Even Injustice which was released the same time as other consoles and was excluded from the DLC until last week. Still doesn't have all of the features available as its brethren on the other consoles.

@SilentNegotiator
Nintendo may not be handling the WiiU right at the moment. But to imply that the publishers are not to blame is blasphemy. They are to blame at least equal parts, and should actually hold MORE blame than Nintendo for their poor and misguided efforts. (Seriously EA release Mass Effect 3 the same time the other consoles receive the entire trilogy for the same price?)

SilentNegotiator3969d ago

"But to imply that the publishers are not to blame is blasphemy"

"Blasphemy"? Did you just make my sarcastic retort FOR me?

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 3969d ago
refocusedman3969d ago

Not necessarily true, scores arent always indicative of sales. Look at dead island that game went onto to do pretty well and the scores were abt a 70-71. Resistance 3 had and an avg of 83 and sold pretty poorly. The reason that it sold poorly is due to the fact that now most people buy nintendo for mario and company. It started with the Wii and is continuing with the Wii U.

deafdani3969d ago

77% is not average, it is a good score. 50% would be average.

Zombi U was actually a good game, and remains, to date, the best game to truly showcase what the Wii U is capable of (I'm talking about Gamepad integration here).

If Zombi U didn't do too well, it wasn't Ubi's fault, because the game was good, and had a ton of marketing behind it, and even had a Wii U bundle all for itself.

I don't always agree with LOL_WUT, but he's right on the money here: it's because of people that didn't support Ubisoft, people that didn't give Zombi U a chance, basically, people that didn't buy it. So Ubisoft is being more cautious with the Wii U now.

(And yes, I bought Zombi U and enjoyed it immensely. It's easily one of the most original game experiences I've ever had).

BullyMangler3970d ago (Edited 3970d ago )

you: No, the issue was not the game the reason it didn't sell to their expectations was because YOU guys just didn't go out and support it. Let's not try and spin it.

me: why would i support poorly executed game?
thats not how life works boi.

EA this EA that you? please . more quotes from the WORST COMPANY IN AMERICA 2 years in a row . .

BullyMangler3969d ago (Edited 3969d ago )

EA is trash < microSOFT is trash < like Reptillian ubiSOFT is starting to act like trash too < fact kus blaming their mistakes on others? at their age? man whomever is publishing ubisoft's comments needs to watch out. microsoft will fire that commentator (:

BullyMangler3969d ago (Edited 3969d ago )

there you go folks . ubisoft does it for the money . not for the passion of zombiU . . . instead of learning from their mistakes and making a better game ? it may just be to fool us into thinking they arent making zombiU sequel when they could possibly be . .

if not then yuve been exposed ubisoft (:

and watch dogs is generic for the money because ubisoft know majority of kids rite now buy shooters and city open world games etc . . shame shame shame ubiSOFT only for money not pleasure . .

rayman is diff story . . rayman is nintendos and rayman is coming to smash series

SilentNegotiator3969d ago

There you go, folks. BullyMangler has convinced himself.

deafdani3969d ago

He never had a mind to begin with.

CleverHaiku3969d ago (Edited 3969d ago )

How about someone other than my friend bullymangLer clicks "approve" so more people can get in on the discussion? Eh? C'monnnn ;)

KrisButtar3969d ago

I think rough waters are a head for Nintendo. Honestly I don't understand why they don't look at what the others offer(for online) and then improve on it and make it their own. Even if they didn't do it that way, I'm sure 3rd parties would have told them the direction they were taking and Nintendo should have done everything to ensure that they had a robust online service. Ubisoft would have told Nintendo about The Division and The Crew but Nintendo hasn't got everything up to the online standards that everyone else has yet. The same thing happened with the PS3, people wanted a robust online and the PS3 had to adapt or die. I really don't see how Nintendo couldn't learn from others mistakes and not just their own.

thomasmiller3969d ago

so long ubisoft and ea, hope you guys enjoy your unempoyment with THQ!!! wow! the sony and microsoft trolls are really getting desperate!! WHY HASN'T WARNER BROS. OR ACTIVISION, OR PLATINUM GAMES DUMPING THE WII U?? why are they not scared of losing Money?????? yeah or SEGA??? WHY ARE THEY STILL MAKING GAMES AND SUPPORTING THE WII U??? boy wait until the xbox one BOMBS, AND IT WILL BOMB!!! ubisoft and EA will run like little scared puppies with their tails tucked between their legs.. saying" WE LOVE THE WII U WE WE'RE JUST KIDDING!!! yeah just wait, but hey what ever helps the sony and microsoft trolls sleep at night!

Parapraxis3969d ago (Edited 3969d ago )

You think Ubi & EA will go out of business due to not supporting the WiiU?
This is a level of immature fanboyism that we as gamers do not need.
No rationality, no perspective, just blind fanboy drivel.

thomasmiller3967d ago

nope not blindness just stupidity on Ea and ubisofts part!! read it and weep fan boy!! http://readwrite.com/2013/0... see MICROSOFT IS IN DEEP TROUBLE!! so yeah if EA AND UBISOFT spend millions of dollars making x box one games and they lose millions and millions on such a bad system, and then yes!!! they will end up like
THQ!! DOES THAT EXPLAIN IT NOW, OR DO I HAVE TO DRAW A MAP FOR YOU?? I MEAN SERIOUSLY!!

Show all comments (28)
80°

There are no "thoughtful" ads in video games, EA

There are no thoughtful ads in Video Games, EA. Leave them be.

Read Full Story >>
videogamer.com
northpaws4d ago

I think the only type of games that can gets away with it would be sport games, having those sponsors ads on the side like on real life.

But don't put freaking Doritos ads in Star Wars or something, it breaks the immersion. If it is a pop-up ads, then big no.

Hofstaderman4d ago

EA can thoughtfully eff themselves.

Makersbreath24d ago

EA coming back for the crown of being perceived as the worst company in gaming.

Chocoburger3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

One of my favorite series is the THPS franchise, and it was packed with ads, but it didn't bother me. Posters for skateboard companies, JEEP, and Nokia phones. It did sort of fit in with the game world, but that was the past, these days ad would be intentionally intrusive or unskippable loading screen type of imagery. Ugh, I know EA would do it in a horrible fashion. Screw them.

210°

Ubisoft to Focus on "Return to Leadership" in Open World Genre, Expand Live Service Experiences

Ubisoft says they are focusing on two "core verticals," and that's to return as a leader in the open world genre, and live service games.

enkiduxiv6d ago

Calling Ubisoft a leader in open world gaming at any point in time would be like calling Dollar General a leader in retail.

excaliburps5d ago

Well, to be fair, they did pump out good open world games before. It was used as a template so much that people now know what it means when you say it's like an Ubi open world collectahon.

shinoff21835d ago

What though? I can't think of one game they had where I liked anything about it. Atleast since the ps3/360 Gen

Kornholic5d ago

If they have never been the leader in open world gaming, then explain me this: why does almost every open world game follow the same tired old Ubisoft open world formula?

Follow the Leader.

Aphrodia5d ago

YO dont' talk bad about the General. There'll be problems...

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5d ago
isarai6d ago

You were never the leader bro 🤣

shinoff21836d ago (Edited 6d ago )

I don't think they were ever the leader tbh. I've never really cared for any of their open world games. I do wanna try watch dogs 2 because it looks like it's set in San Fran. Looked interesting

Show all comments (36)
300°

Report: Sexual Misconduct Investigation Conducted at EA, Suspects Named and What They Did Revealed

EA senior staff has been investigated for sexual misconduct involving female coworkers, and these said people have been named publicly.

isarai9d ago

Aye just call Phil, i mean he somehow made Bobby Kotick's scandal disappear and gave him a few million dollar high five on the way out.

Cacabunga9d ago

I wonder if it will be censored with some in game ads.

MrBaskerville7d ago (Edited 7d ago )

Microsoft did, Phil Spencer played a minor part. He instigated the buyout that led to Kotick escaping all his controversies while getting a golden handshake.

Someone on Twitter calculated that the people hired in Tango and Arkane Austin could get a decent salary for roughly 17 years for the money Kotick was paid.

InUrFoxHole6d ago

Yeah some thing tells me Kotics $ was already guaranteed before MS made the deal. As for the studios... Let's be honest here... none of those studios made system sellers.

XiNatsuDragnel9d ago (Edited 9d ago )

EA about to go down like Activision and then Phil saves the day saying.this is good for the industry and consolidation will help create competition. /s.

MrBaskerville7d ago

Then they shutdown Codemasters and studio behind Jedi Survivor.

Atleast they could hardly do much damage that EA hadn't allready done. EA has shut down most of their studios by now.

ravens529d ago

What's up with all these horny creeps. You gon be horny, fine. Just not at work take care of that shit before you go in. Rub one out if you have to. Don't be a creep at all. ESPECIALLY at work. But don't be one AT ALL.

Extermin8or3_9d ago

I mean part of the issue is that things transpired outside of work....

MrBaskerville7d ago

That's the thing he mentioned about not being a creep at all.

KwietStorm_BLM9d ago

You think deviants care where they are? Work sometimes makes it an even better situation for them because they can abuse their power.

mudakoshaka8d ago

Nerds think they are Gods when they are making video games.

NotoriousWhiz9d ago (Edited 9d ago )

"it seems that according to EA, given the events transpired outside of work between two adults, and the fact that once investigation has started that the alleged perpetrators didn’t do it again, the investigation is considered closed. [...] The victim still has to work with the people that harassed her."

Yep, EA is disgusting.

Extermin8or3_9d ago

I mean the fact stuff happened outside of work puts EA in quite a difficult position legally. These women don't seem to have reported the matter to the police which kinda ties EA's hands on what they can do. If they don't file reports of the crimes then yeah from EA's perspective it is stuff that happened outside of work. The only exception is the guy that apparently referenced things in the slack channel for work, spending on what he said proving it may be very hard and he may well be able to get away with plausible deniability. I don't like EA and I think these people need to be dismissed but without any legal action being taken, EA can't really do much without risk of being sued themselves for unfair dismissal etc.

Show all comments (22)