240°

Battlefield:BC Beta Coming to Xbox 360 ; No PS3 Beta Planned

REDWOOD CITY, Calif.– March 13, 2008– DICE, a studio of Electronic Arts Inc. today announced the multiplayer beta test for Battlefield: Bad Company on the Xbox 360 video game system from Microsoft. Battlefield: Bad Company will launch on the PLAYSTATION®3 computer entertainment system and Xbox 360 in June 2008.

solar5889d ago

you lucky 360 guys! :D im a huge fan of the Battlefield series (which is why i hate CoD:4 :P ) and im excited and might actually jump into the online console realm to play this. even tho ill be free kills for anyone since i BLOW with a controller at fps's :(

Breakfast5889d ago (Edited 5889d ago )

Why dont you like both? I dont understand why people choose one thing over another. Both have there strong sides and week points but, theyre both good games.

O...and im really, really excited for this game.

5889d ago
ArmrdChaos5889d ago (Edited 5889d ago )

Is that your way of dealing with your pissed off feelings?....by posting the same ole regurgitated crap? If you don't have anything pertinent to add to the subject at hand (No PS3 Beta) then get the hell out of this thread...back to the open zone with you. In there you can pointlessly blabber about anything you heart desires...just like all the rest in the psycho ward.

etownone5889d ago

coming from an ex-pc gamer, the controller does take some getting used to. But once you do, it does have some adventages... like playing on your big screen while sitting comfortbly on your couch, and the rumble adds more immersion.

but if your stuck on mouse and keyboard, the Xbox has a hook-up called the XFPS connector that lets you use a mouse and keyboard (although i hear you must finely tune it to get it accurate) while the ps3 has what called FRAGFX (i think). Its a pretty cool set-up that uses a mouse and one handed controller that has an analog stick to move around and has rumble.

solar5889d ago

i dont see what the big problem is with console guys saying "i play comfortably sitting on my couch". i play my online PC games perfectly comfortably in my PC chair. thats one angle i cant grasp o.O i dont like controllers for online FPS's. you put the best controller fps player up against the best keyboard and mouse online player....and i will bet 100% on the keyboard and mouse player any day.

i play on a 1080p 46" Samsung right now for TF:2 PC version. yes the resolution isnt the same as a high end monitor...but seriously....why do console guys always fall back on "well im playing on a huge TV sitting on my couch" arguement?

perseus5889d ago

I think many people think of the average computer monitor as 27"-32", and the average TV as 32"-42". Anything bigger than those and you're getting into "rich person territory".

The vast majority of people can't afford to have a big TV and a big monitor, and so it's a pretty good point. It doesn't apply to everyone, like yourself, but it's still valid.

I'm an ex-PC Battlefield gamer too, by the way. It took me about 3 months with a PS3 to get used to the controls. I still suck compared to my old stats on BF2, but I'm having more fun now. Except when I play really good people. I tend to get slaughtered.

Guitarded5889d ago

For me it comes down to 3 things: 1)Cost to performance ratio. 2) Time consumtion. eg;Console:Pop any game in, possible 5-10 second update, then your playing. PC: DL from disc or web site, install, configure, DL patches, install, drivers, possible compatibility issues, CRASHING OF COMPUTERS ALL OVER THE WORLD... Sorry got carried away. To answer your question. 3) The same reason I don't have a Wii. I don't want to move my arms and/or my upper body to play a game. I game to relax, not get stiff and sore from a couple hours of gaming. Reclined in a chair or couch, is more comfotable than sitting upright or standing. Simple as that.

mikeslemonade5889d ago

360 getting these 3rd party betas isn't really selling point since not everyone will able to get into the beta, so not a huge deal in the grand scheme things. No body is going to walk into a store and say which system I can participate in betas because more often then not you won't be able to get in anyway.

lawman11085889d ago

Yet ANOTHER multi platform game that will be far and away better on the 360.

ikkokucrisis5889d ago

COD4 did not have a beta test period for the PS3, yet the final release turned out to be just as good as its 360 counterpart.

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 5889d ago
Massacre5889d ago

Damn..luck sobs....I will be getting it at launch then.

Guitarded5889d ago

Capcom has said they couldn't do a beta on PSN and it looks like no one other than PS3 exclusive game makers are getting the info needed to make things happen on PSN. Rainbow Six Vegas 2 360 has 16 player online cap and PS3 has 14 players. Sony seems to be holding back on third parties.

power of Green 5889d ago

How do you get invited to betas!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!.

iAmPS35889d ago

I said it once and I will repeat:

The reliability, quality and speed on PS3 gaming servers is unmatched by the other platform (read LagBox Can'tFixThis) and that is the reason Betas are a must for their system.

We just, Plug and Play.

Good luck in your Beta BOTS, hope they fix all the bugs for your system.

power of Green 5889d ago (Edited 5889d ago )

How though do I have to hang out in forums? to get invited?.

JasonPC360PS3Wii5889d ago

You sound sad.

COD4 remind you of anything.

Boo hoo, sniff sniff.

NovusTerminus5889d ago

I dont like how we get skipped for beta's. Its stupid, there is no reason for them to ignore the PS3. But whatever we still get the game.

kewlkat0075889d ago

I wish more gamers had the same attitude.

you know that "It is what it is" for now.

Your still getting the game..Right

xplosneer5889d ago

with both of you on both points.

pwnmaster30005889d ago

iamps3 atleast they have one im not a xbot im pro sony im just saying u cant say shiit wen we dont even have one

ps i still think pog is still a b!tch

power of Green 5889d ago

Its bot to you hence my user pic and my XBL pic.

iAmPS35889d ago

I see your point.

But some people think that Betas are a good thing other don't.

I personally don't like to Beta test, cause most Betas I took part I only got aggravated and disappointed with the game, cause like it or not you come into the game to test it and you will see all sorts of weird sh1t, and deep inside will make you think the game is not that wonderful. It's weird, it kinda brakes the magic of getting that sealed box on launch day and enjoy the experience as it's supposed to be, know what I mean?

Other people just love them case they get to play before anybody else.

Anybody else thinks like that?

pwnmaster30005889d ago

i agree with that comment srry for attacking u there. u make it more clear with the 2nd comment

iAmPS35889d ago

You see POG, In my opinion you are contributing to this community as much as a BLIND MIDGET to a BASKETBALL GAME.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 5889d ago
Show all comments (80)
70°

The Argument for Battlefield: Bad Company Remakes

With the franchise’s mainline entries failing to find their footing in recent years, now is the perfect time for a Battlefield: Bad Company remake.

Read Full Story >>
gamerant.com
thorstein121d ago

Of course there is no counter argument. This is what fans of the franchise have wanted for years. This and/or BF Bad Company 2.

When asked why there hasn't been another Bad Company:

“There's one thing that lingers with Bad Company that we've been asking ourselves: What is it that the people really liked about Bad Company?" DICE general manager Karl Magnus Troedsson told Eurogamer.

Troedsson says that he and his team can’t put their fingers on what it is that people loved about that branch of the brand. “It's hard for people to articulate what that is, which is actually hard for us,” he says. “It would be hard to remake something like that. Can we do it? Of course. We have our theories when it comes to the multiplayer."

(Source: Game Informer, June 24, 2014)

SonyStyled121d ago (Edited 121d ago )

I always activate the Black Weapon on BFV Solomon Islands for all the BC2 fans who hear/recognize it, thus starting the events of BC2 on BF5 :)

Derrrunnn. Derrrunnn.

Tody_ZA120d ago (Edited 120d ago )

What is so hard to understand for them?

Bad Company 2 is one of the best and most memorable games in the series because:
- It was class-based (duh)
- Heavy focus on squads
- Substance over map size or gimmicks
- Fantastic and realistic gun play
- Well designed maps
- Destructible environments (why has this been minimised so hard in the series? You could demolish buildings in bad company 2 with some well placed C4
- Great progression system and variety in play
- No stupid CoD imitations or focus on the store over the game
- It was *drumroll* incredibly good fun?
- It was unmistakably BATTLEFIELD

INMATEofARKHAM120d ago

Probably should add a fun campaign to the list.

390°

Battlefield Legacy - Sunsetting Announcement

EA: "As we close in on 15 years since the release of Battlefield 1943, and Bad Company™ 1 & 2, we are announcing that their journey is coming to an end."

darthv72408d ago

This reminds me... I have ME on my PS3 hdd. Never really played it, but it was free.

XiNatsuDragnel408d ago

Digital future ppl is good they say nope imo

Eidolon408d ago

And it still says nothing about being able to downloaded even when it's off the storefront, that's a huge ouchie for some who somehow still have it in their backlog...

Shane Kim408d ago

Dont make it an issue when it's not. If you haven't played it in 15 years, chances are you'll never play it.

isarai408d ago

That all digital future sure looks great!

/s

zidane1341408d ago (Edited 408d ago )

Online game servers shut off eventually all the time. Doesn’t matter if you have the disc or not. Even if you have the disc, it’ll be just paperweight unless the game lets you connect directly to a friend or LAN play.

isarai408d ago (Edited 408d ago )

Read the article bro. They are delisting the games, including mirrors edge which is an offline game. Online servers i can understand, not being able to buy/download the games anymore? Completely separate issue, especially seeing as how some these games had lengthy sp campaigns and not just mp.

zidane1341408d ago

@israrai, you can still buy the disc for less then 10$. Hardly a loss.

TheEnigma313408d ago

You shouldn't have to buy the disc, that's the issue.

OhReginald408d ago (Edited 408d ago )

Some brilliant minds created servers to keep these old online games alive. A lot of ps2 and ps3 games that had there servers shut down a long time ago have been restored by fans to keep it going. Warhawk, killzone 2, socom 2/ confrontation, resident evil outbreak series, etc.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 408d ago
DankSinatra407d ago

The disc still exist. I don’t understand the issue. You guys are upset about that “all digital future” yet these games are not “digital only”. Hell digital only is a minority in the gaming world and so far we haven’t moved into it, the only digital only games are games as a service or online only games, which end up failing in the end.

This is no different than a store that stops selling old games, just go and buy a copy somewhere else. So which is it, you hate all digital or you like it? Make up your mind.

isarai407d ago

Talk about missing the point entirely. I'm not going to sit here and explain it to you, figure it out.

DankSinatra407d ago

Talk about whining about something and not wanting to explain from an off handed sarcastic original comment.

I got the point just fine. You’re literally complaining about something that has an easy alternative to it.

ManMarmalade407d ago

I don't think you got the point

DankSinatra407d ago (Edited 407d ago )

@ManMarmalade

No I got it, it has to do with the push towards a future of all digital and reprocussions of losing games. Something I already stayed that hasn’t happened nor is it large enough right now to cause any issues as the games that are all digital are online only to begin with or make up the minority of games

So I’ll say it again, the disc still exists for these games that are over a decade old and can still be played easily. You guys are contradicting the whole “we don’t want a digital only future” crying when the dude I originally responded to stated:

“Read the article bro. They are delisting the games, including mirrors edge which is an offline game. Online servers i can understand, not being able to buy/download the games anymore? Completely separate issue, especially seeing as how some these games had lengthy sp campaigns and not just mp.“

So again, which is it? Do you hate all digital or do you want it?

Inverno408d ago

On PC I don't think it's much of a problem but I'm sad to see BF43 being shut down. I haven't played it in a while since it's stuck on PS3, but i preferred it way more over BF3. It was the lack of invisible barriers which made it better for me.

badz149408d ago

BFBC2 was still the best overall package offered by the franchise so far IMO

porkChop408d ago

Absolutely. BC2 was such a great game. It's a shame we never got BC3.

P_Bomb407d ago

I had a great run on Bad Company 2. Pound for pound, as solid a BF package as there’s been.

InUrFoxHole408d ago

Does anyone play the last BF anymore? I searched crossplay servers and it was 20 people the most on all the servers? Can never find a game

SonyStyled408d ago

The last BC you mean? I was still able to find 10v10 on ps3 2 years ago on NA servers during the evenings. I have all the free and paid dlc installed, but there want any matches in the Vietnam dlc.

Show all comments (35)
230°

Battlefield 2042 Is More Than Enough To Prove We Need Bad Company 3

With this multiplayer experiment going every way but right, it's time for Battlefield to return to what made it so great - a fun single player mode coupled with classic multiplayer.

Read Full Story >>
thegamebutler.com
DaCajun888d ago

Yes, because there is no way they could screw up a BFBC 3 like they just did the last 2 Battlefield games, right?. /s

They're not the same DICE devs they used to be they're just EA puppets. You will just keep getting COD/APEX/SEIGE BF games now, because idiots keep throwing money at EA for this garbage.

seanpitt23889d ago (Edited 889d ago )

BF is dead especially after this abysmal release.. what have EA done to this beloved franchise.. it’s really upsetting they are so far disconnected from what the actual fans want from this series.. such a same

If they would of made BC3 and stuck to the same formula as BC2 but gave it the next gen treatment it would of been a massive hit

LucasRuinedChildhood889d ago (Edited 889d ago )

Tbh, I think BF 2042 was a battle royale, and then they changed direction mid-development and didn't have enough time to finish it properly before EA's deadline. Specialists make more sense in a br, for example.

Like Halo Infinite before its delay, it needed at least an extra year of development. When you think about it, Infinite had 6 years and BF 2042 had just 3 years. It seems that's just not enough time to make a high quality AAA game anymore.

LucasRuinedChildhood888d ago (Edited 888d ago )

Here's evidence for BF 2042 originally being a battle royale game, heavily influenced by Apex Legends:
https://gamerant.com/battle...

ChubbyBlade888d ago

It did start as a battle royale. It’s pretty obvious. All the pieces are there.

isarai889d ago

Thing is i dont think they're capable of capturing what made those fun/different anymore.

Fluke_Skywalker888d ago

They actually admitted that in an interview a while back. They quite openly said they had no idea what made those games so popular and how to recapture it.
Maybe if they actually went and played BC2 they would find out.

RetroCaptainSteve888d ago

I mean, if they can bring back fun Star Wars single player games, anything's possible, yeah?

Gardenia888d ago (Edited 888d ago )

I think that says more about the people working on games nowadays. They have no idea what they are doing and aren't true gamers themselves. Because gaming is a billion money industry they follow the orders of the business men and investors who only look at making maximum profit of games.

Look at the beta and the launch of Battlefield 2042 alone; how can you not see the negative reactions of the community coming? That alone tells us enough of the people involved in making the game.

Yppupdam888d ago (Edited 888d ago )

Really? They don't understand what made the Bad Company games popular, or they just don't want to admit what made them popular...That is most likely what the creatively bankrupt writers of the Disney made Star Wars films say about The original trilogy. They don't want to admit that the people before them were just better and that ALL the things that make the Bad company games great are the same things that they probably deem "problematic". Just think how they would destroy Haggard if they made a new game? Everything about his character makes modern game developers sob and run for the first safe space filled with teddys and the soothing voice if Anita Sarkeesian piped in from a speaker in the ceiling.

Sheppard7t3888d ago

Like Ubisoft and the recent Splinter Cell rumors, I don’t trust EA/DICE in its current form anymore. They’d find a way to ruin Bad Company 3.

Azurite889d ago

Bad Company 2 was amazing but I'm afraid they'd mess it up with a new game.

Ninver888d ago

Better yet remake with new engine and new coat of paint. Plus all the bells and whistles of next gen

badz149888d ago

BFBC + BFBC2 remasters for next gen. skip last gen altogether. lower chance for them to screw it up rather than trusting them to make a new BFBC3

annoyedgamer889d ago

EA knows players want BC3 the same way Activision knows players want MW2 back. They will not make it because the goal is to make games built around MTX and Battle Royale.

Ninver888d ago

Very strong point. I see the light

Show all comments (34)