Arkham Origins is a rather odd choice for the title of a game that is neither about origins nor Arkham. The game will be a prequel to previous games, with Bruce Wayne already established as the hooded vigilante, and will not be set in Arkham Asylum or Arkham City, but will instead, the developers excitedly explain, be set on the streets of Gotham on the night before Christmas.
Suicide Squad Kill the Justice League is almost here, but I can't revisit the best Arkhamverse game on PS5 without sacrificing quality.
Not a fan of Orgins. Blame it on the absence of Conroy & Hamill. Blame it on the lack of atmosphere compared to Asylm. Hell blame it the devs thst dicked over Wii U owners like me that purchased the game only for support be dropped as a thank you to me. It's better than Knight but that's not saying much. I don't care for that entry either.
Even though its not the best arkham game in the series, its still an enjoyable game in its own right. What it do really well at though, was the crime investigations scenes. Which imo, were the best of the franchise.
I don’t know about best game but it definitely has the best story and boss fights.
Never played it and recently I've finally tried it via cloud on psn. It's not the best for sure, but it ain't bad either.
Batman: Arkham Origins launched 10 years ago today, and sadly doesn't stand the test of time as well as its predecessors.
I fail to grasp why this title is worse compared to Arkham City (according to the article) as the author didn't provide any argument to explain why aside from that it felt the bigger map compared to Arkham Asylum made the experience less tight.
More importantly, the author seems like he never played Arkham City since he described the game as linear (alongside Asylum).
Despite certain flaws, Batman: Arkham Origins is a splendid entry in the legendary Arkham series and deserves better than being forsaken.
It's the worst of the three in my opinion, but still really enjoyable. Definitely underated and gets far more crap that it deserves.
Should be included with the other Arkham games in the bundle.
I'm honestly enjoying it alot, my first time playing since I just decided to get a Xbox 360 slim for 65$, I cop some other gems too tho, I went into Arkham origins not expecting better than Arkham city but it does deliver plus the guy who voices batman did a good job aiming for the young Bruce impression
Actually the title makes perfect sense. It's not supposed to be an origin story of Bruce Wayne. It's an origin story of Arkham itself. It's showing how things got to the way they were in Arkham Asylum.
I really want to know what Rocksteady has to say about this. I find the "armored suit" a bit off putting mainly because I am used to seeing the other costume. If it's an origin, then why is Batman so hardened?
**Batman: Arkham Origins’ Won’t Be About Arkham or Origins**
then why name it 'Arkham Origins' ?!
I think they just decided to use Arkham name as to keep in the series, so people wouldn't think it was a different series.
I just hope they get Kevin Conroy to play Batman/Bruce Wayne, I'm really looking forward to this game, especially since I enjoyed the Armored Edition of Arkham City so much, and that is the one these guys worked on. Although if the game does have The Joker, it wont be voiced by Mark Hamill, he said he is done with that.
Then why name it Arkham origins -_-
Hey we named this game kill ants but it has no ants or killing