170°

Ten new OUYA Final Fantasy III screenshots

TotalOUYA has added ten new screenshots for the OUYA version of Final Fantasy III, in addition to new screenshots for every single OUYA game available right now, all browsable from the front page of the site.

Read Full Story >>
totalouya.com
Snookies124053d ago

I really hope those negative reviews from people who got the system early are just blowing smoke. I want it to be good, I want to buy one, but now I'm honestly a little hesitant...

zeal0us4053d ago

for $99 its a decent device for something that can stream videos(netflix,hulu,hbogo or etc) play games and run countless emulators.
--
FF3 on Ouya compared to other android devices really isnt improvement. Graphically it looks the same. Then again I wasn't expecting SE to give the Ouya a improve version anyway.

gameangel4053d ago

It's early days for OUYA. it started from Kickstarter and without loads of cash to get big AAA games, it's relying on the enthusiasm of indie developers.

It'll remain niche for a while yet, but eventually it will snowball.

And, let's face it, it's a cheap entry price at just $99.

Godmars2904053d ago

With intent to put out a new model every year so as to keep up with technical trends.

In other words, games offered on model 2 wont be playable on model 1.

gameangel4052d ago

It'll be just like iPhone/iPad in the sense that in real terms, most users won't need to upgrade each year. probably every other year.

I get some people don't like this, but I'm fine with it.

I'll just keep playing, until eventually the machine I own starts to chug a bit with the latest releases. Then I'll pay $99 for an upgrade. Not to sound snobby or anything, but $99 is nothing.

darx4052d ago

But it's omly $99...$40 more than current gen games. Not that outrageous!

spoonard4052d ago

Depends on how often they switch out the chipset. Ouya initially ships with a Tegra 3. But mobile chipsets are evolving at such an incredible pace right now that by the time the next model Ouya ships backwards compatibility may be an issue.

gameangel4052d ago

I think OUYA plans to go from Tegra 3, to 4, to 5 etc, and this will be on a yearly cycle at most.

Backwards compatibility will not be an issue. the only issue will be when you start to play new and advanced games on old hardware. At that point, you upgrade. easy.

then, years down the line, your console experience has managed to keep up with advances in tech, but you've not had to do the usual console thing of buying something completely new that needs all new games.

DeadlyFire4052d ago

I don't think backwards compatibility will be an issue. Forward compatibility might be though.

Its a nice business model really. A great way to stop back into time into the PSX/PS2 era of games. :)

Jockamo4052d ago

by the third year you would have gone through three ouyas for $300 just to keep up with the trends. meanwhile you could have spent that money on a ps3 or 360 both of which have a vastly superior library, better graphics, better controllers, and a proven track record. ouya hasn't delivered on ONE of the devs/titles that were requested in their survey. not one. until they can prove that their efforts have solidified reliable dev support, you will not find me wading through the sea of bad imitations that I can already wade through on Google Play. Shadow Gun? Like a poor man's Gears. Mass Effect Infiltrator? Read the reviews. Canabalt? Jesus... Ouya is messing up their launch w titles no one would want to poke with a stick.

Jockamo4052d ago (Edited 4052d ago )

Wow, who's defending this thing? Check out this gem from the Verge review...

"Worst of all, it makes buying things impossibly easy — you enter a credit card when first setting up your Ouya, and there are often no confirmation boxes or checks against you spending thousands of dollars. Oh, you hit Upgrade because it's right next to Play and the controller's laggy? Perfect. Thanks for your money."

Edit: also you cannot change your credit card information once it is on the system. What???

Edit 2: purchases are not handled by the OS but by individual applications. meaning if someone wanted to make a malicious app, then they could have it run silently in the background... This is very BAD. Purchases need to be regulated and apps need to be screened. I'm not letting my credit card NEAR that thing.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 4052d ago
delboy4052d ago

It's only 99$,and it's worth, if only for the media capabilities and emulators.
For guys that are complaining, you're just to cheap.
Skip the next CoD or BF game with DLC and you'll have the money for OUYA.

sarshelyam4052d ago

I bought into it for a number of factors, but for a dedicated box that can run Netflix, HBOGO, Hulu, Flixster, etc., $99 is a steal for output to a TV.

fossilfern4052d ago

I dunno about you guys but the only reason im getting an Ouya is for a small emulation box. Its very low power, small and one of the N64 emulators has been updated for the Ouya I believe.

https://www.youtube.com/wat...

https://www.youtube.com/wat...

LAWSON724052d ago

It looks exactly like the one on ios/android/ds. You know why? It is the same game thats why! What a pointless post.

370°

Square Enix Declares $140m Loss Amid Game Pipeline Shakeup

Final Fantasy VII Rebirth publisher Square Enix has declared a $140m loss based on a shakeup of its internal development pipeline.

Read Full Story >>
techraptor.net
Furesis9d ago

What are they doing over there? Sounds like they canceled something big. I read a rumor a while back about ff9 remake . Here "Final Fantasy IX has gone through a very challenging development, the game is still in progress but may undergo changes drastic enough that we won't hear about it for a couple of years."
This could be one of the reasons if the rumor is true. That was Silknight i don't know how credible he is but it's something and it would make sense.

-Foxtrot9d ago

I hope IX is still on the cards

Just a straight up remake which they expand a little bit nothing over ambitious

If IX dosent happen then VI and VIII will never be thought of.

Kakashi Hatake9d ago

6 and 8 were way more p popular games despite today's cult following of 9.

blackbeld8d ago

I want my FF8 remake! Can't believe they cancelled it.

TiredGamer9d ago

What are they doing? Sales are falling and the costs are out of control. Big releases need to be absolute sales home runs now, and Final Fantasy sales have stagnated.

Now we know why Square didn’t fall over themselves to remake the original FF7 all these years ago. It certainly wasn’t a license to print money, at least not with what the expectations were. Each of these full on remakes drains an enormous amount of company resources for a razor thin profit margin.

TwoPicklesGood9d ago

Breaking the game up into multiple parts was a mistake IMO.

blackblades9d ago

The loses came from cancelling games nothing else.

Tapani8d ago

They lost the magic in the remakes. And the story is incomplete. The original FF7 is still way better. The Remake / Rebirth are just fan service. Like an Anime/Manga with "optional" filler content. FF7 had pretty much zero filler, it was paced extremely well, and still today flows much better than the grindy story and spongey enemy battles in the remakes.

babadivad8d ago

If they released it at once on all platforms, they would have made all of their money back. Could have been on to an FF8 or 9 remake. Ready to cash in again on nostalgia like Capcom. This is their fault for trying to milk the title.

Once I head they were breaking it up into parts, I lost all interest.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 8d ago
neutralgamer19928d ago

I hope people understand usually when a loss is declared it means a game which had been in development got cancelled. For example Sony Santa Monica before GOW-PS4 had cancelled a project which Sony had spent 7 figures on

As far as square is concerned they release a bad game once a year. Forspoken anyone?

For those making comments on remake not selling well, I hope y’all realize that Sony is the only reason this remake is happening. If Sony didn’t fund it the remake wouldn’t be happening. Just like Konami didn’t want to remake SH2 because development costs of 100 plus million

shadowT9d ago

Do not miss Final Fantasy 16. Great game!

raWfodog9d ago

I'm waiting for them to release the complete edition bundle, but it's definitely on my list.

PhillyDonJawn9d ago

Wth is going on with the gaming industry?

mandf9d ago

Corporate investors taking everything

TiredGamer9d ago

Not rocket science. Compare sales numbers, development cycles, and budgets to the previous gens. We are all collectively burning up the industry from the inside out. Expectations are ludicrously high now for every release and sales are dropping for even the most prestigious of series.

We used to be satisfied paying $50-60 for a game that took 1/100th the budget and staff to make. Now gamers feel cheated if they have to pay the same for a game that took 100x the budget. We may be reaching the end of the line for this model of gaming.

wiz71919d ago

@tiredgamer I think your point is one that ppl don’t understand and you hit it on the nose .. some gamers don’t want to take accountability but it’s some of the gamers fault the industry is where it’s at .. we as gamers set the standards for the industry not the shareholders , ppl forget that the shareholders and the industry want and need OUR Money. Both the Xbox and PlayStation are seeing a drop in hardware , the industry is very stagnant right now.

Tacoboto9d ago

Speaking to Square:

Turns out their mismanagement wasn't related to the western studios they dumped to Embracer, but their own fault.

With regards to Xbox - a good way to kill your brand is to pull support on high quality titles and only dump B and C-tier titles to it

With regards to PC - Epic Games Story exclusivity for any duration and piss-poor optimization will hurt you.

With regards to FF Pixel Remasters - y'all messed up by barely releasing them on physical, like wtf that was free money!

And lastly, you don't help a franchise by releasing a mainline title that undermines every title that came before it. FFXVI was a DMC-like with bottom-of-the-barrel side quests and I can't imagine that helping Rebirth at all considering its marketing is directly tied to how big that game is.

Tacoboto9d ago

Sony is getting their best titles and with the most polish, so what about it? Nintendo gets their top properties too, for titles that can run on Switch hardware.

It's the other fanbases that get the second- and third-class treatment from Square. If that's due to agreements with Sony, that's not a Sony issue but a Square one for accepting those terms. Sony is doing its best to look out for Sony.

wesnytsfs8d ago

sales and stupid practices like exclusives.

TiredGamer9d ago

The industry implosion is continuing. Sky high budgets, prolonged development windows, stagnant sales numbers, and falling currency values (inflation) are wreaking havoc on the legacy industry. AAA games will slowly become the rarity.

CS79d ago

Sad. Rebirth was one of my favorite games in a long time. Should have sold more.

CrimsonWing699d ago

Oh I’m with you. What’s worse is they can say, “Well we tried to make this amazing game and spend all this money on, but not enough people showed an interest. So no more of these since we can’t take a hit like that.”

The industry is going to take a dramatic shift. Mark my words on this.

rpvenom9d ago (Edited 9d ago )

I think there is quite a large portion of individuals like myself who held out on buying it on PS5 because I can get it on PC eventually. To be able to mod the game and also have custom graphical settings to my liking

gold_drake9d ago

same

but im not sure if it matters at all. im sure they made sony pay a hefty sum for the 3parter to come on ps5 exclusively. so watever they made in sales, might have come bk in profits for square, but i dont know
and we dont know what "underperformed" even means for square.

Show all comments (43)
130°

Square & Bandai Namco Being Honest About Quality Is A Step In The Right Direction

Saad from eXputer: "After suffering from massive financial hits, Square Enix & Bandai Namco appear to be turning over a new leaf but I'm still unconvinced."

Nerdmaster10d ago (Edited 10d ago )

I was talking about games with some Japanese guys here in Japan, and it seems like around here Bandai Namco has a fame of making low-quality games, with the occasional gem.

About Square Enix, I believe they lack the capacity to improve. They should learn with Capcom (although even Capcom still makes some bad mistakes), but I don't think they ever will. They keep chasing whatever is new at the time (blockchain, AI...) to say "we innovate", without considering the public perception and if these things actually improve the games or not. Them releasing too many small games with no advertising also shows a lack of trust in its own products. Even with their biggest games, like turning FF into an action game with XVI and the very divisive plot changes regarding whispers and timelines in VII Remake, shows them trying to attract a new generation of gamers without understanding what made the series so big in the first place.

shinoff218310d ago

I want a true ff7 remake. With thatcsaid I'm way happier with 7 remake then I was with ff16. I'd still prefer turn based but square keep chasing these Lil kids

Snookies1210d ago

Man, it is perfectly fine to prefer turn based. Turn based is amazing. But there's zero reason to call anyone who likes action games "lil kids". Liking one gameplay system over another does not make you more mature in any way.

VersusDMC10d ago

People love the new FF's overall...the problem is the abundance of 7's they release that lose money or make very little like diofield, star ocean divine force, Valkyrie asylum, harvestella, foam stars, etc. Advertising wouldn't have saved those games. Apparently Forespoken had a big Advertising budget but we saw how that went.

shinoff218310d ago (Edited 10d ago )

Star ocean divine force actually sold well from what I've read not ff type numbers but well enough. Was a dope game to.

FinalFantasyFanatic10d ago

Bandai Namco is going to Bandai Namco, I do believe that Square Enix can't change without changing the entire management, they've had these issues for more than a decade and haven't learnt, I have very little faith they can course correct. I'll still buy their better remasters/remakes like Star Ocean 2 though (not FF7R).

Asterphoenix10d ago

Namco is just milking the same Sword Art Online with lack of budget as well as anime IPs that don't go to decent developers like Jujutsu Kaisen and My Hero Academia. Namco deserves their losses and no future Dot Hack or Xenosaga remaster :(.

Square allocated lot of their budget on Forspoken was a mistake. Square always had management issues. Star Ocean 2 was a great remake and I found their recent entries of FF(16 and Rebirth) better than 13 and 15.
I think they were better than 360/PS3 generation where Square went really downhill.

CrimsonWing6910d ago

I don’t know why NOW they decide on this, but I guess later is better than never.

80°

I’m Glad Atlus & SE Changed Dates To Avoid Competing With Shadow Of The Erdtree

Saad from eXputer: "I'm glad I don't have to choose between Square Enix, Atlus, and FromSoftware due to bad release windows and Shadow of the Erdtree."

H915d ago

More intelligent than guerilla games

raWfodog15d ago (Edited 15d ago )

Atlus is releasing their game one week before Erdtree, SE is releasing theirs one week after.

HZD released four days before Zelda, HFW released one week before Elden Ring.

It seems to me like they are still releasing their games too close to Erdtree.

VincentVanBro14d ago (Edited 14d ago )

What a word vomit, rambling, turd of an article that simply states the obvious. Classic exputer.