80°

Forgotten Games: MAG

FruityGamers:
How The Massive Action Game Ended Up Being The Massive Flop

The Massive Action Game, or MAG, was released back in 2010. PS3 fans were ready and couldn't wait to get their hands on the FPS shooter that would allow 256 players to be on large-scale battlefields at once, simultaneously. It was going to be great.

Read Full Story >>
fruitygamers.com
HellzRazor4195d ago (Edited 4195d ago )

According to vg chartz it sold 1.26 million copies which is probably 2million coming from them, either way a new exclusive ip selling that much with no advertising like usual from sony, no single player campaign and online only is nowhere near a massive flop.

I enjoyed the game more than kz3 and bf3, much more team work and i would say more fun, when the enemy took points A and B your team had to retreat to defend C and that's when the enemy could parachute in and boy was it funny seeing them dodge sniper fire while coming in lol, just so many players anybody even the worst players could get lots kills.

Anyway i have no idea why it didn't hit the big time, the game worked, less lag if any compared to other games, few bugs and i look forward (i hope)to MAG 2 next gen.

BlackTar1874195d ago

MAG was a great game and shame on whoever is Disagreeing. THe game had a lot of strong points and was alot of fun with a good group. MAG had very few bugs very little lag and ran with hella people.

pixelsword4195d ago (Edited 4195d ago )

MAG is excellent; this game was the only game that ran 256 people with modern graphics before PC games did, and when mods tried, they only got to 128 with massive lag with Valve's engine; they broke it in 2011 with Battlefield 3, but the lag is worse than MAG, of course.

But it proved one thing: That this gen is way more powerful than last gen, and not too far behind the PC in a lot of aspects, because if it were so, then it shouldn't have took the release of Battlefield 3 for the 256 player breakthrough.

At any rate, not only is MAG not a flop, that's the only game I've played that improved my FPS skills on both PC and console shooters.

I still play MAG to this day, and got a platinum out of it, too.

Sure the servers aren't as full, but like Razor said, I hope they make MAG 2; because if they do, I'm getting it.

This article really needs to do research before wrongfully tagging games.

rbluetank4195d ago

i love MAG. i had more fun with MAG then any other game this gen. FYI why is Blk Ops using MAG points kit system in their game? MAG points kit system adds layers to a game. this proves that MAG had some very good gameplay elements. MAG was not a flop in my mind but you have your own point of view.

MysticStrummer4195d ago

MAG is great. I was playing the other day and was thinking what a shame it got such a bad rap. Even so, it still did well for a new IP that's online only. It did well enough to justify a sequel so I hope there eventually is one, if not on PS3 then PS4. There's still nothing else like it on consoles. Though I liked the DLC modes, they should have added more maps instead. A snowy area, desert area (like that one DLC level), and maybe an ocean level with islands and boats instead of the APCs. They could also let the 2nd and 3rd place factions unite against the dominant one, or add another faction and have 2 allies vs 2 allies.

MastaPiff4195d ago

Glad it said "massive flop" before I linked to the article... saved me a min or 2 of wasted reading. I think it's funny that somebody wasted time to rag on a old game that wasn't a flop by any means as mentioned above. Anywayz...

Anyone who reads this comment should go to their nearest used game store & give MAG a shot. Here's why...

1. Cost less than $10 used, you could trade a PS2!? game in and get MAG free!!!

2. Servers are still running. Not hard to get a 128 player game going on weekends, 64 player games are going on with hardly any wait time all day, til the servers are turned off.

3. Nobody knows when the servers will be turned off but it probably won't be anytime soon because the game still costs $30 @ PS store!? (Don't buy it there fool! Get the disc! See #1...)

3. Proximity chat! Any teammate or enemy near your character can hear you! (THIS is what every online FPS should have IMO!) Tell that enemy with bad aim why you're T-bagging him, WHILE you're T-bagging him!

I could go on & on... It's only average graphics wise, but lots of FPS action for very little money. Aiming is great but so is everyone else's so it while take a bit of patience will be worth it. Fast paced with the ability for HUGE killstreaks. How couldn't you like that!?

MastaPiff4195d ago

Glad it said "massive flop" before I linked to the article... saved me a min or 2 of wasted reading. I think it's funny that somebody wasted time to rag on a old game that wasn't a flop by any means as mentioned above. Anywayz...

Anyone who reads this comment should go to their nearest used game store & give MAG a shot. Here's why...

1. Cost less than $10 used, you could trade a PS2!? game in and get MAG free!!!

2. Servers are still running. Not hard to get a 128 player game going on weekends, 64 player games are going on with hardly any wait time all day, til the servers are turned off.

3. Nobody knows when the servers will be turned off but it probably won't be anytime soon because the game still costs $30 @ PS store!? (Don't buy it there fool! Get the disc! See #1...)

3. Proximity chat! Any teammate or enemy near your character can hear you! (THIS is what every online FPS should have IMO!) Tell that enemy with bad aim why you're T-bagging him, WHILE you're T-bagging him!

I could go on & on... It's only average graphics wise, but lots of FPS action for very little money. Aiming is great but so is everyone else's so it will take a bit of patience but it will be worth it. Fast paced with the ability for HUGE killstreaks. How couldn't you like that!?

Show all comments (9)
470°

MAG was one of the most ambitious shooters ever and deserves a PS5 sequel

Zipper Interactive were once one of Sony's most important studios and became a household name due to their work on the SOCOM U.S. Navy SEALs series during the PlayStation 2's heyday. Their most ambitious title was MAG. Could it make a comeback?

Read Full Story >>
gamerevolution.com
yellowgerbil1564d ago

Best game ever. I had put over 1700hrs into that game before it deteriorated too far with cheaters getting out of the map and sadly decided it was time to let it die (Zipper had already been closed down by that time).

_SilverHawk_1564d ago

Amazing game. Hopefully sony makes a sequel

XisThatKid1563d ago

This is the game in modern gaming that even got me into shooters i spent literally days with this game Raven All the way. War against the the mighty D ride oh so edgy S.V.E.R.

NecrumOddBoy1564d ago

Original Battle Royale. No microtransactions. Definitely ahead of time.

XBox4eva691563d ago

It's almost as far from battle royale as you can get. o_O

frostypants1563d ago

It didn't have a BR mode.

Da12RespectA1563d ago

That wasn't a battle royale game at all.

rdgneoz31563d ago

3 teams of 32 fighting it out would be considered Battle Royaleish. If you're gonna saying teams are OK when you start doing teams of 2 or 3 or 4, then 32v32v32 should work. And on besides that, it had 128 v 128 which was insanely fun.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1563d ago
Muzikguy1564d ago (Edited 1564d ago )

I personally hadn't played much of it. I did spend a lot of time in PlanetSide 2 though (somewhat like MAG). Games like these tend to get overrun by cheaters and then ruined too often.

Teflon021564d ago

MAG didn't have that issue as far as I remember. I use to love the 256 matches. That game had an amazing community. Everyone actually communicated and played together. No one B****ed at the team. Everyone understood there was so much going on that if things are going wrong. Everyone had to think of new strategies.
Fav moment was when all 3 other squads 32 took their objectives but we were struggling with ours and had one more to blow up. The other leaders were communicating asking if the 2 nearest squads should send ppl. Our leader was like Naw I got a idea. So he told us all to die and set ourselves at the nearest hills prone without being seen. So we all did and surrounded the areas.
He said everyone on his count throw your grenades. Then snipers go all out and everyone else run in. They won't be able to get everyone and if needed the snipers go in about 10 seconds after.

Everyone did that and I got to the objective and set it off. 9 of us survived and got it. felt amazing to say I got the objective, cover me in that moment. Wish it was PS4 so I could have saved that moment
It was literally the coolest moment I had in a online shooter, closest since was BF4.

Muzikguy1564d ago

@Teflon

That does indeed sound like an awesome moment. One that makes games like these memorable for sure. It does seem like MAG had a lot more cooperation than most any online shooter

Teflon021563d ago

It did because you absolutely can't get no where in it without teamwork. It also didn't have an extremely big base of players. Everyone who played really wanted to play. I really hope they bring it back and do the same thing to only have serious players get into the big matches again

UltraNova1564d ago

Wow, what a run! This game looks better than PUBG!

Muzikguy1563d ago

Watching that video you wouldn't think the game was on PS3.

Spenok1564d ago

I adored this game too. Some of my best FPS online memories on it. So freaking good.

I'd love to see another game like this come out at some point. And NOT like Planetside... M.A.G. was something special.

yellowgerbil1564d ago

Yeah problem is if it existed now adays, it would likely be riddled with xp boosts and dance moves and all that other pay garbage...
MAG and Warhawk are the only 2 online games I ever got into, and both need a PROPER sequel on PS5.
Remember the first time I got 100 kills in a match, was in a turret with a repair kit and just mowed down wave after wave on Valors map.

1563d ago Replies(1)
1562d ago
+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 1562d ago
PrinceOfAnger1564d ago

I had so much fun with this game

TGGJustin1564d ago

This is a game that was ahead of its time. Had it came out on PS4 it would've done much better. I put hundreds of hours into this despite the problems it had on PS3.

UnholyLight1564d ago

Really interesting as an Xbox owner at the time. This game had captured my interest as a kid but I never got a chance to play it. Being on PS4 and soon possibly PS5, I would love to see this franchise brought back to life. I imagine with the power of next gen it would be really quite fun.

From what I hear and what I remember, this game was FAR ahead of it's time. A real shame it never truly took off from my understanding.

grifter0241564d ago

I'm an xbox boy since mech warrior but got a ps3 slim for mag. If you liked halo or cod you'd have had a blast in mag. Was one of the first games you could actually do something other than shooting and still make a difference in game.

spicelicka1563d ago

PS4 needs something like it. In the multiplayer space it's far behind the Xbox, there are no quality multiplayer games on it that aren't on other consoles.

Dirtnapstor1564d ago

Yes, yes, and yes. Way ahead of it's time. Would love to see a PS5 variant of this game.

Show all comments (100)
120°

Modern Warfare Ground War mode has MAG vibes

Erina Rose, Sausage Roll writes, "Call of Duty: Modern War introduced a new, improved, Ground War game mode this weekend that reminds us of the old PlayStation 3 classic, MAG."

Read Full Story >>
sausageroll.com.au
ilikestuff1689d ago (Edited 1689d ago )

I never played mag, I did play this beta however, and if mag was like this beta then (fart noises) for mag.

1688d ago
TheGamez1001689d ago

Man do I miss mag and zipper.

TheSinsibleOne1689d ago

Seriously though. Nowadays this and next gen are practically begging for a new MAG.

zodiac9091689d ago

How did we go from having games like resistance 1, 2, warhawk with 30 vs 30 player battles, and M.A.G. with 128 vs 128 players, ON LAST GEN to now having 20 vs 20...such a step back.

JEECE1688d ago

Because Sony hadn't figured out how to market their exclusives yet. Plus at that time COD craze was at its peak. So "generic high school bro #7," who was the primary purchaser of FPSs at that time (or at least represented a crowd necessary to sustain a playerbase), if he even had a PS3, would have just seen a game like MAG as a "copycat of Black Ops, man."

Not to mention MAG was pretty terribly uninviting for new people after awhile, because it was more skill-based. This was great for veterans, but if you weren't willing to put in the time getting destroyed for awhile, you would never appreciate the game. The Battlefield: Bad Company and BF:3 games out during that gen were far more accessible to lower level players.

Vegamyster1688d ago

Battlefield 4 was at the start of the generation and had 64 players, to me it depends more on how the map/gameplay is utilized, i enjoyed the 20vs20 modes more in the MW Beta than the 64 player ground war mode.

1688d ago
moomoo3191688d ago

It feels absolutely nothing like MAG lol. Way more battlefield vibes

xX-oldboy-Xx1688d ago

And even those are very small vibes, it still feels like COD at the end of the day.

390°

MAG: The Greatest Game You Never Played

Almost 10 years ago the greatest first person shooter came out and most of you probably never heard of it, never got to play it and never will.

Read Full Story >>
sausageroll.com.au
FiLTHY ESKiMO1808d ago

Who would the next gen version nor that Zippers gone?

_SilverHawk_1808d ago

I remember this game and it was amazing. I would like it if Sony would make another one because this game was ahead of it's time.

RememberThe3571807d ago

It was an amazing concept and it was a cool game, it was just ahead of it's time. I played the sh!t outta MAG, but the game itself played just okay. I'd love to have seen a sequel, even just a spiritual successor, especially with the next gen coming and the way cloud computing has advanced a game like that nowadays would be awesome.

Elwenil1807d ago

It may have been amazing if you played for SVER, but if you played for Raven or Valor, it was an unbalanced mess. I had some fun with it, but the player count was an illusion at best and false advertising at it's worst. The map and faction balance was so ridiculously skewed you knew who was going to win as soon as you saw what team you were against. It definitely had some interesting ideas, but was far from an amazing experience in my opinion. I would have much rather Zipper have made another SOCOM game rather than MAG.

darthv721807d ago

that game would make for a great battle royale release. So many players all at once... it was ahead of its time for a console shooter.

TheGamez1001808d ago

Was such an underrated game. One of my most favorite fps of last gen. So unfortunate zipper was closed down. Imagine if it was a success and thered be a 2nd game by now.....

TekoIie1808d ago (Edited 1808d ago )

I can think of many better games that I've yet to play...

"Almost 10 years ago the greatest first person shooter came out"

HAH. So is Planetside 2 now the best FPS ever? Because it does everything MAG can and does it far better. I'm afraid that MAG is basically your standard FPS but uses scale as it's selling point. The vast majority of shooters that focus on smaller scale matches have gameplay leaps and bounds better than MAG so it is definitely not the greatest FPS.

I know many people are going to try and refute this by telling me to look at the three factions but MAG has literally no character. The game is call 'Massive. Action. Game' for gods sake which is a contender for 'The Worst Title a Game Could Have' award. I've never been a fan of Zipper but I hear great things about them from their PS2 days. However, with MP gaining popularity in the generation that followed I think it says a lot that they couldn't keep up with the competition.

Knushwood Butt1808d ago

'HAH. So is Planetside 2 now the best FPS ever? Because it does everything MAG can and does it far better.'.

It was released years later.

Was there anything offering what MAG did when MAG was released?

TekoIie1808d ago

"Was there anything offering what MAG did when MAG was released?"

Yes, Planetside 1.

Knushwood Butt1807d ago

Fair enough.

Can't say I've played it, but I enjoyed MAG for a while.

FantasticBoss1807d ago

MAG was one of the very few games trying to do scale like it did, but I think it missed the mark. Wish it could have had a sequel though as they may have been able to iterate on it to create something pretty neat.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1807d ago
Profchaos1806d ago

Sony had a awesome approach to online in the PS2 days with SOCOM co op that had games working together to achieve a tactical goal they pioneered voice chat on the PS2 for SOCOM but as they steamrolled ahead it was clear team Deathmatch would take over in popularity which shifted zippers approach so all their experience amounted for not much when designing online in the PS3 era.
It still was a decent game but couldn't stand out compared to cod which had millions of players consistently

yellowgerbil1808d ago

Loved mag had over 1700hrs into it across many accounts, remember my first 100 kill sabotage game, was insane

BLow1807d ago

Yes, so do I and not that game they released on PS3. I'm talking the one Zipper did and not Slant Six. At least Slant Six tried to do the series justice once they fixed the issues.

The one Zipper did didn't feel like Socom to me. It felt more like Ghost Recon to be honest. I absolutely loved the voice commands and I figured they would be even better on next gen hardware. They didn't even bother doing anything.

Maybe, I just wanted it more grounded and not so techy if that makes sense. I just wanted to go into jungles or missions just using my wits and patience and not have to use a bunch of gadgets. I wanted to be able to give orders with my voice to squad members. Yeah, they can at least have earpieces lol.

It's hard to explain but I know the old school Socom players know what I'm saying. Socom just had a certain feeling and the new game didn't feel that way. Slant Six yes. Zipper no...

We can only hope but if they bring it back they have to do it right. If not don't bother and just make something new. I rather have the memories I had with Socom be mostly positive than negative. Unless you pull a God of War, don't bother lol.

I've already said too much but that goes to show how much I loved Socom. Especially 1 and 2.....

Deathdeliverer1807d ago (Edited 1807d ago )

Game was simply ahead of its time. If mag came out now with improved graphics people would be blown away. Back then people whined about the graphics even though it had players literally everywhere. It was several great games in one. Battlefield, Ghost Recon, and Call of duty.

Hungryalpaca1807d ago

What exactly was it ahead of its time in? Player count? Planetside released in 2003 and and played count per match was over 300.

xkvcq1806d ago (Edited 1806d ago )

The BETA for MAG was one of my fondest gaming moments. I was highly anticipating the start of the beta servers but I had school that day. I had started downloading it that morning as soon as it was available and just when it finished downloading I found out school was cancelled, last minute, because of weather. BEST. SNOW DAY. EVER. I played the beta all day, continuing to put off my homework :P

TekoIie1806d ago (Edited 1806d ago )

Well have I got news for you pal! Planetside 2 has been available for nearly 4 years on the PS4 and longer on PC and people still aren't blown away. Maybe the novelty of scale is actually overrated and people don't care as much about it which is why MAG failed when multiplayer shooters were at peak popularity during it's lifetime?

If you were blown away by 256 players in 2010 why would you not have been blown away by 1000 roughly 2-3 years later?

Show all comments (84)