320°

Ubi: PS3 Blu-ray And Hard Drive Big Help In Far Cry 2 Development

"Far Cry 2 is an upcoming first person shooter that will be put out by Ubisoft on PS3, Xbox 360, and PC next month.

In a recent interview with CVG, Tech Director Dominic Guay talked about the process of developing for PlayStation 3, and he admitted that the Blu-ray was a big perk.

"The hard drive and Blu-ray are making our life easy considering FC2 is an open world continuously streamed around the player," said Guay."

NitrogenB5918d ago

Remember that "Big Gamble" of including the Blu-ray and MANDATORY HDD....pretty much startin' to pay off. Yyyyyyyyyyyep, pre-t-much.

TheHater5918d ago

yeah I agree. But MGS 4 will be the first game to full up an 50GB blu-ray disk.

sonarus5918d ago

did this guy just say far cry 2 comes out next month lol.
Meanwhile blu ray is definitely a big plus for ps3 however i believe mgs4 will mostly be filling space with their audio. Not to say the core game would be in the (GB range probably more like 15GB but the rest of the disc is most likely audio and cinematics and what not. So far thats the only thing they have emphasized they are doing with blu ray though. I cant wait for mgs4 though remember the pod cast where they said they are doing something never done before with cut scenes. Playstation 3 fans this is the game you have been waiting for if you have a ps3 and you don't get this game then you need to be committing japanese ritual suicide. We all know the ratings will be between the 9-10 range. Haters will give it 9's but the rest have gotta respect.

games4fun5918d ago

farcry 2 next month that is the most important news but second would be what they said about streaming the game hopefully they pull a naughtydog

marinelife95918d ago

That's like a race car driver saying having more horses under the hood and better shocks sure came in handy during the competiion.

It's rather obvious that the Blu-Ray disc capacity and standard data streaming rate along with standard hard drives are a huge help for developers trying to make the best game possible.

Kleptic5918d ago

One of the production reports for MGS4 stated that the game will be the first to stream uncompressed textures...but I can't remember if they were being used for rendering the real-time cutscenes...or for the actual game...or both...unless environmental textures are reused constantly, it seems very unlikely that all will be uncompressed...but who knows...I am no developer...and in fact I don't see what kind of advantage this would be, other than saving some processing power that would be used to unpack the textures...I possibly just answered my question though...maybe that is the point...

but in either case...uncompressed high res textures would take up a pile of space...and knowing MGS will have hours of cutscenes, that is likely a huge chunk of the 50gb platter...

QuackPot5918d ago

if the ps3 had no bluray it would have been a lot cheaper and would have been released at the same time as the xbox 360 in nov 2005..........and by now the 360 would have been a distant 3rd place with the Wii rapidly catching up on ps3 sales.

Oh, what could have been...

ravinash5917d ago

All i can say is thank god they didn't....otherwise PS3 would be suffering the same disk drive space issues the 360 has.
Its better to wait and get something better than to rush out and get something thats half the quality.
The fact that the PS3 has a blueray player, saves me a lot of money in the long run as now I don't have to get a stand alone player.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 5917d ago
Joey Gladstone5918d ago

for Microsoft to not have included a HD in their 360 as standard, rather than optional......it just seem like it would have made both the consumer and developers lives a lot easier......
..
..
....."The JOEY has Spoken"

mighty_douche5918d ago

well they could of added one but it may have pushed the price up by $10 or so... so whats the obvious thing to do...?

Promise people they'll never need one (*cough* Burnout) then charge them $70 for 20gb...

Simply put, $10 more or $70? which do you think M$ would choose?

TheHater5918d ago (Edited 5918d ago )

"Simply put, $10 more or $70? which do you think M$ would choose? "
70 dollars more
Edit: Why did you disagree for. MS would have you pay 70 dollars more.

radzy5918d ago

microsoft's PR group sucks.
i cant believe they favor the core owners more than the premium owners.
microsoft , if your reading this , look up the word premium in the dictionary.
core owner = basic setup , doesnt include all the goodies
premium owner = recommended setup , includes all the main goodies
elite owner = preferred setup , includes all the main and extra goodies

for those who played lost odyssey, did anyone notice how long it took to load the fight scenes. bloody rediculous. i stopped playing it because of unbearable loading times.how about mass effect?
how is alan wake gonna play with out streaming off hard drive?

if microsoft dont start favoring the elite and premium owners and the developers wishes in using the hard drive, then i most probably am jumping ship.

sony should be praised for letting the developers use the hard drive.
THIS IS A BIG DEAL.@#$%^&*&^%$ MICROSOFT

f...k everyone that cant wait 20 minutes for dmc4 to load.
and when you finished the game , delete the loaded content , or just get a bigger harddrive. sony let you replace hard drive for more gigs, microsoft bann's you.

Kleptic5918d ago

I thought it was Epic that had a lot to do with MS dropping the HDD as standard...

MS had a production window, in terms of price, that they wanted to meet...and Epic was just starting to put together gears of war back then (although at that point it was still some fps under the Unreal name)...the 360 dev kits were centered around the production 360 having a 20gb standard HDD, and 256 megs of GDDr3 ram (half of what it ended up having)...and Epic was able to get MS to drop the HDD in favor of doubling the ram...and offer the HDD as an upgrade...

but Epic later commented that they didn't think MS would support the core so much...and later in its life having games that required the HDD...either way, MS would have ended up getting bad press about it...but it is suprising that they are still forcing devs to make the games fully functional for non HDD equipped the 360s...

kornbeaner5918d ago

But MS being the ring bearer at the time should have done what they were gonna do and include a HDD despite what EPIC was asking for.

I'll take a line from Sonny chiba from Tokyo drift. "For the want of a nail the horse was lost". No developer no matter how good the game was perceived to be at the time is worth cutting the life span of a console.
Because when you think about it and this is from first person knowledge.
the 360 is a lot easier to work with than the PS3. If MS would have gonna ahead with their plans and built the machine the way they wanted to not only would the machine have a longer lifespan but Gears would have still been released on the 360. MS put up money for the rights to that game. EPIC in that sense only had 2 options make the game with what you have or say goodbye to the money MS just handed you.

What would you pick???? Cause as much as I love the industry, I would never be a sellout and rehash games (not saying that epic does this, cause they try their hardest to make something different) but if MS, Sony or Nintendo threw a huge wad of cash my way, my reaction would be "Coo, what tools do you have?" "....................&quo t; "Oh yeah. I'll see what I can do".

solidt125918d ago

Exactly, the original xbox had a hardrive standard so why go backwards on the second one. Especially since it is still using DVD. If the Hard drive was standard then uding DVD-9 wouldn't be that big of an issue because they could always just copy data to the drive and have downloadable maps and updates for the core game.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 5918d ago
gamesR4fun5918d ago

Far Cry 2 is an upcoming first person shooter that will be put out by Ubisoft on PS3, Xbox 360, and PC next month.

Thought this one was delayed still dont really think it will be out next month... Cant wait to see it in action tho.

Kleptic5918d ago

yeah...its definitely not next month...I would be happy if it was this year...

Bleucrunch5918d ago

this game looks great and has potential so I will be getting it.

Cartesian3D5918d ago

same folks last year :

"blu-ray isnt needed for GAMING , and just increase Hardware price point .."

same folks This year :

" THANKS SONY "

Show all comments (72)
90°

Which Far Cry Should I Start With? - A Beginner's Guide 2023

If you’re new to this long-running franchise, we’ve got you covered.

Read Full Story >>
gameluster.com
masterfox411d ago

Farcry 3 and literally thats it! lol

GamingSinceForever410d ago (Edited 410d ago )

I recently tried 3 for the first time but the frame rate was a turnoff.

I liked 5 and 6 though.

banger88410d ago

If you have a Series X or S, the Xbox 360 version runs at 60 fps with fps boost. It's a shame the remaster doesn't.

isarai411d ago

2 and 3, pretty much the only ones i really enjoyed. 1 was amazing for the time but aged quite poorly. 4 has the elephant gun, all i can praise from any entry after 3 lol

cooperdnizzle410d ago

Ummmm 3 than stop.

Okay maybe two as well. But yeah probably 3 and then move on.

JEECE410d ago (Edited 410d ago )

Far Cry 2. People constantly rant about games now being too easy, holding your hand, having too many unnecessary RPG-lite leveling features, etc. People specifically complain about open world games being too focused on tons of collectibles and "checkmarks" that just waste time.

Far Cry 2 is an answer to all of those complaints. It was made by Ubisoft before they fell into all the traps discussed above (and before they started inserting towers into their games to defog the map). It has respawning enemies, weapons that degrade, and the collectible diamonds are very useful in the game (which you find in a similar way to the way you find shrines in BOTW with a radar system). The map you have is an in game item you pull out while playing, not a pause menu that is unnecessarily detailed. Also the enemy AI and physics are much better than later entries in the series.

It has a mixed reputation because people at the time said it was too hard, the weapon degradation was annoying, and then respawning enemies were annoying. FC2 came out in 2008, so this was before games like Dark Souls and BOTW had come out and made it cool to like these types of features.

XbladeTeddy409d ago

Far Cry 2, the one with the AI that find you through walls and trees, can one shot you from a mile away and have 100% accuracy? That was frustrating not fun because cheap AI.

JEECE409d ago (Edited 409d ago )

Uhh, I mean, it isn't one of these games where once the enemies have detected you they will magically forget you exist because you walked behind a wall or went into a bush. And yeah the AI isn't stormtrooper level accuracy. Again, these are positives, not negatives to me.

To be fair, I'm really directing this at the people most critical of "Modern Ubisoft" or "Modern Open World" design elements. Like the type of people who fawned all over Elden Ring because it had a clean UI because they are so burnt out by the "checkbox" type of open world design.

If you like those types of games, then a later FC game like 3 and especially 4-5 would be more your style.

Show all comments (11)
220°

10 Old Games With Outstanding Graphics

GF365: "There are some games with extraordinary visuals that impress us to this day. Here are old games with outstanding graphics."

Read Full Story >>
gamefreaks365.com
ShwaaMan457d ago

Bioshock still looks fantastic, one of my all time favorites.

Yui_Suzumiya457d ago

Beyond: Two Souls on PS3 can compete with modern day graphics.

SonyStyled457d ago (Edited 457d ago )

Same as Killzone 2 and 3, uncharted 2 and 3, Infamous 2, Heavy Rain, Resistance 3

jasonismoney457d ago

I wish this was entirely true, but you might want to load up Killzone 2 and Resistance 3 again.

SonyStyled457d ago

@jason I watched some gameplay videos of KZ2 and R3 on my full screen. They are on par or succeed graphically to the first person shooters mentioned in the article that also launched on the seventh generation of consoles. Try the same and see what you think

cthulhucultist456d ago

Killzone 3 was super impressive! I could not believe the graphics back then as I was regularly pausing the game to stand in awe looking at the surroundings! Resistance however did not impress me that much. Heavy rain is also another amazing graphically speaking game. It almost felt next gen

Fist4achin457d ago

I always thought the first 3 Gears of War games looked great and still hold up for today.

SonyStyled457d ago

They did for their day. I recently played gears judgement with on the 360 and the draw distance was so blurry. The characters up close look great though

JEECE457d ago

Far Cry 2 was awesome. In addition to having demonstrably better physics and AI than later games in the series, it had a lot of design decisions that, criticized at the time, have since been praised in games like BOTW and Dark Souls.

iNcRiMiNaTi457d ago

It might not be super amazing by today's standard but I thought Mgs3 looked really good

JEECE457d ago

In terms of art style it still holds up.

Show all comments (13)
430°

Far Cry’s best game gets brutally realistic as mod remakes Ubisoft FPS

The Far Cry series’ best game – not Far Cry 6 – just got more brutal and realistic thanks a mod than revamps and remakes the classic Ubisoft open-world FPS

Read Full Story >>
pcgamesn.com
lonewolf10579d ago

Far Cry 2 where your guns never ever jammed until you got into a gunfight is their best? I disagree.

MIDGETonSTILTS17579d ago

I liked 3 more.

The malaria angle was more annoying than immersive.

And, the enemy AI had too good of eyesight to allow any stealth. They’d spot you a literal half mile away, I hated it.

lonewolf10579d ago

Yeah, some weird mechanics for sure, some did really enjoy it, I certainly didn't.

bloop578d ago (Edited 578d ago )

The map was designed badly and an absolute pain to navigate from what I can remember too. You ended up having to go to the same few places all the time and there was a huge inaccessible area between them that you had to go around.

It definitely had the best physics system of the entire franchise, but a lot of the mechanics took the enjoyment out of it.

LordoftheCritics579d ago

It was fun for its time but a bunch of those systems today won't survive a launch weekend.

Profchaos579d ago

I'd say it was their most ambitious and had the best setting to date next to the original island.

But gameplay wise it was clunky and maybe it was released to early if the teams had modern systems to build it on the game would have been much better less corridors more open and less gaurd outposts that auto regen

Knushwood Butt579d ago

How do you use guns when not in a gunfight? Shooting trees?

lonewolf10578d ago

Yes and you could do that for hours in FC2 with a gun and it wouldn't jam, not hard to grasp is it.

Knushwood Butt578d ago

I see.

I haven't spent hours shooting trees.

I must try it.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 578d ago
MajorLazer579d ago

Love Far Cry 2 on Infamous difficulty.

Hikoran579d ago

This should be an opinion piece. Not news.

Gwiz579d ago

Blood Dragon is much better.

Pedrof579d ago

Far Cry 2 may certainly not be the most "fun" game in the series but from a narrative standpoint it definitely is the most interesting of the bunch. FC2 couldn't be further away from the pointless fragfests that the following episodes turned out to be.

Show all comments (29)