190°

Ubisoft finally admits what most of us already knew; Splinter Cell is not a stealth game anymore

DSOGaming writes: "Well, we all knew that the latest Splinter Cell game was not a stealth game. The E3 demo proved what most of us feared. Ubisoft attempted to streamline the experience and introduce a lot of action sequences in order to attract more gamers to it. Naturally, the French company tried to convince everyone that this was still the Splinter Cell game they knew and fell in love with. However, the company revealed at the Eurogamer Expo event that the franchise is no longer centered around its stealth roots."

Read Full Story >>
dsogaming.com
NYC_Gamer4229d ago

I could tell Splinter Cell was no longer about core stealth gameplay soon as Conviction was announced

RedDeadLB4229d ago

Having played Chaos Theory recently, I must say that Splinter Cell got waaaaaaaay too simple and easy with Conviction. I still enjoyed Conviction, but it was dumbed down to hell and back.

Yi-Long4228d ago (Edited 4228d ago )

... cause they're not the Splinter Cell games the fans love and want!

They should have just made it a completely new IP, and then it would have found it's own audience.

Personally, I'm very sad about how they destroyed the series. Chaos Theory was pretty much PERFECT.

Not interested in the newer games. It just feels 'wrong' somehow.

JAMurida4228d ago

I was just going to say. I've finally gotten around to playing the Splinter Cell HD collection on PS3, (played them a long time ago when I was younger non stop), and I've been working on getting a plat for each one of the three. I have to say that it's beyond sad that they would take the series and change it up like that. But I'm not going to give the whole "games for the mass" speech that I'm sure as been said many times before. Just hope that one day it will return to it's roots.

On a side note, I bought the soundtrack to Chaos Theory and trying to find the first Splinter Cell's soundtrack. Love the music used in the games.

DARK WITNESS4228d ago

And that Sir is the reason I refuse to play the game anymore.

RIP Splinter Cell.

HarryMasonHerpderp4228d ago

I love the original Splinter Cell trilogy.
Not a fan of the new games though =/

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4228d ago
Cupid_Viper_34228d ago

That's a really sad thing for gaming in general really. Splinter Cell was one of the few games to do stealth gameplay so well. I was 100% tense the entire time I was playing the game, as every enemy you encountered represented a new sets of problems. From raising alarms to knowing where how you're going to dispose of the body.

Good Old times are gone I guess. I hope the new one succeeds in whatever new experience that it is trying to bring us.

Blankman854228d ago

No stealth, no Ironside, no buy from me.

scotchmouth4228d ago

I stand with you in your reasoning

iamnsuperman4228d ago

Shame really because I loved it routes of the first game and pandora tomorrow.

r214228d ago

As they say, admitting is the first step to recovery ;D

Blankman854228d ago

Accept in this case where the junkie believes its a good thing and not a problem.

kostchtchie_4228d ago

that is weird because i seen plenty of stealth movement in the game demo, there was 2 routes you can go through demo, they just showed the action style route stupidly first

oh wait you got be dark house in dark room for it be stealthy right? ah right, you got to have small corridor so you can do the splits above someone in yet again a dark hallway, on dark night for it be stealthy right?

please.....

the only issue people should have with this game is loss of Ironside

Kenshin_BATT0USAI4228d ago (Edited 4228d ago )

If the fans say it's not a stealth game, and the devs say it's not a stealth game...there really isn't an argument.

Just because you got two routes it doesn't mean it is stealth.
Look at metal gear solid for a prime example of a stealth game. Better yet. The original Deus Ex or even Human Revolution. THOSE are stealth games.

PiccoloGR4228d ago

Don't forget the Thief series ;)

Kenshin_BATT0USAI4228d ago

Ahh sorry. I never played the Thief series so it failed to come to mind. But I've heard great things about it :)

kostchtchie_4227d ago (Edited 4227d ago )

all these games do the same, mgs offers passive or hostile take downs, with corridor gameplay stealth, only original deus ex is tiny bit more open and gives few different routes to your objective again with hostile or passive take downs, same as the new deus ex, both play out like the new splinter cell, so i don't know what your trying to prove

this is one of the videos i watched of stealth play through splinter cell

http://www.youtube.com/watc...

nihonlight4228d ago (Edited 4228d ago )

Tweaking a game to keep it fresh is a good thing.
Completely changing a game and keeping the name sucks.
What's next? Assassins creed with machine guns?
Or prince of Persia with cars?

Splinter cell is supposed to be a STEALTH game!

I_LOVE_MYSELF4228d ago

I think the complete change from Resident Evil 3 to 4 was a great one. Metroid turning into a First Person game was also a brilliant choice and well executed. Sometimes it works. MGS4 didn't work as an action game either and I am gutted they changed that franchise too.

Zefros4228d ago

You dind't have to play it like action game... there is even a emblem that tells you to sneak trough the game without alerts to get it... It's allways good to have choices.

nihonlight4228d ago

Yea but I mean it's what the game is known for.
Metriod wasn't turned into a fighting game, ^^

JAMurida4228d ago

The thing with MGS 4 though was that you could play it action or stealth and still get the same satisfaction without feeling the need to play a certain way. THAT is giving the gamer choice.

I_LOVE_MYSELF4228d ago

A bulk of MGS4 for me was just forced action scenes and boss fights. Full on action plays a bigger part in MGS4 than any other numbered MGS title to date. Heck, you can play Splinter Cell Conviction without raising alarms. Doesn't change the fact the action has a bigger part in the game.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4228d ago
Show all comments (51)
130°

Tom Clancy's Splinter Cell - A Decade in the Shadows

Tom Clancy's Splinter Cell has been out of action for a decade, so it's time to look back at 2013's Splinter Cell: Blacklist.

CoNn3rB248d ago

Sam Fisher is evidently the most skilled stealth operative because no-one has seen him in his own game for years

kevco33248d ago

10 years, in fact. He must be, like, 60 by now?

phoenixwing248d ago (Edited 248d ago )

why make an inspired game that takes effort when you can half ass it with multiplayer gaas games and filler filled assassins creed games?

That question up there is the reason you don't see splinter cell games

zarbor248d ago

Yup, another example that Ubisoft has no idea what they are doing.

MIDGETonSTILTS17248d ago

The entire mark and execute system belonged in another game.

It’s cool, but the polar opposite to how Sam Fisher initially handled.

The original trilogy made shooting very, very difficult, yet a viable option, which ultimately motivates stealth.

The mark/execute system makes shooting stupid easy, to the point of why would you even bother trying stealth as an alternative?

FYouDad248d ago

Because Ghost is the method fans of the series actually prefer? IMark and execute is never forced upon the player you liiterally never have to bother using it even once throughout Blacklist.

Tody_ZA248d ago

The sad part is that I actually really enjoyed the last game, Blacklist. It may have lacked the iconic voice but the gameplay was excellent, and blended stealth, action and a mix really great compared to most games, where none of the three options felt like the wrong way to play. I really hope they either produce a remake of the original game or a proper sequel.

Rikimaru-00248d ago

Isn't UBI Soft remaking splinter cell.

Show all comments (9)
70°

Ranking the Splinter Cell Games From Worst To Best

The stealth icon has gone too stealthy of late, but the best Splinter Cell games still rank among the best games ever made.

Read Full Story >>
culturedvultures.com
160°

Sam Fisher Deserves Better

Alex S. from Link-Cable writes: "Ubisoft, we need to chat. Please, have a seat. Thanks. Ok, so I think you know why you’re here. No it has nothing to do with all those game delays, we’ll talk about that later. What? No it’s not about the Skulls & Bones and Beyond Good & Evil 2 falling off the face of the Earth, just listen. We need to talk about Splinter Cell. Don’t give me that look, you know this conversation needs to happen. The way you’ve treated the series, its fans and poor Sam Fisher himself is sad, infuriating and just plain disappointing and it needs to stop."

Read Full Story >>
link-cable.com
Fist4achin1488d ago

The Fish!!!

I'd love to see a remastered edition of those games as well as something new. It's about time.

UltraNova1488d ago

MGS is done, at least as we know it so it's now or never Ubi, give Fisher the reboot it deserves. And for Gods sake, don't you dare turn Splinter Cell into another Division/Ghost reckon online abomination instead of a SP focused steath action game!

Psychonaut851488d ago

You know they will though. This is Ubisoft we’re talking about

zachyBROosevelt1488d ago (Edited 1488d ago )

I would love a new splinter cell, maybe even a reboot at this point. Sam Fisher deserves it

Profchaos1488d ago

I think reboot the entire franchise the games were great but every time they try to make him human like a father or something it comes of as unbelievable

hiawa231488d ago

They added damn near every SC game to Xbox1X back compat enahnced list. That is a lot of Sam enhanced and I am loving it, but Sam deserves a new next gen game.

Show all comments (18)