320°

Sony Confirms ICO HD for the PS Vita

Sony has announced that ICO HD will be playable on the Vita via a special remote play patch.

Read Full Story >>
rantgaming.com
Gamesgbkiller4254d ago

its remote play ,, not full game for VITA.
its the same game on PS3 .. there is going to be a patch then you can play it on VITA

guitarded774254d ago

Yes, but the title is horribly misleading.

blitz06234254d ago

They need more games to be patched for remote play on Vita. This feature has existed since the PSP and it's been terribly useless. I can turn on my PS3 from anywhere... and just stroll around the XMB not being able to play 90% of my games...

jeseth4253d ago

How about some NEW games?

Getting sick of re-release after re-release!

Wintersun6164253d ago

@jeseth,

Mad reading comprehension skills.

The title is very misleading though.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4253d ago
Nate-Dog4254d ago (Edited 4254d ago )

Unless I'm reading it wrong I'm pretty sure the article says that it'll be available to play on PS Vita through a patch for the HD collection on PS3. If that's the case and you haven't gotten the game then you've already missed day 1.

chazjamie4254d ago

omf, i was so excited..............damn it. patch should be in the HEADLINE.

fanboygamer4253d ago

Only way to get you to click on the link and get hits.

Well a little misleading, but same for most other headlines I guess.

Relientk774254d ago

Oh this is awesome news

first ICO, next Shadow of the Colossus

ABizzel14254d ago

THey need to make all HD Collections playable on PSVita. The games should have no problem running on the Vita, and in most cases I'd prefer them on the system.

Even if they don't have touch controls, just port them over.

asyouburn4254d ago

a thousand times this^^^

CalvinKlein4254d ago

they would use touch controls for the R2/L2 and R3/L3 buttons. For ps1 classics its different areas of the back touchscreen.

this is talking about playing the ps3 game on the vita through remote play not an actual version for the VIta. I think this is awesome as this is the first signs of more support of ps3 game remote play on the vita.

fanboygamer4253d ago

I guess its better then not having the option at all.

They need to make this available for all downloadable games. Or at least all Sony first party titles anyway.
Kinda pointless for games which require you to put a disk into the PS3.

LeonhartX4254d ago

and here i thought ps2 classics will be played on vita, but hey still great news

JellyJelly4254d ago

They can milk it more this way.

xursz4254d ago (Edited 4254d ago )

Really? How? It's a free patch...

BoNeSaW234254d ago

Since when is a 'FREE' patch milking!?
Can you Troll any harder?

GribbleGrunger4254d ago (Edited 4254d ago )

I find this really odd. Why would Sony do this on a game to game basis? Surely it's just a matter of allowing the Vita to receive the images. It shouldn't make any difference at all how the game is designed or even what resolution it's in. I smell a compromise from Sony here. Something tells me that 3rd parties are still unsure about Sony allowing this just yet for their titles too... I mean, they would want to make money back on their investments with the Vita.

We'll just have to wait and see. For all we know this patch may well allow streaming across the board.

@JellyJelly: Why don't you represent that one bubble with dignity instead of justifying it.

izumo_lee4254d ago

It just goes to show that this 'lazy' title placed on 3rd party developers this gen is kinda true. To make remote play work developers need to make a patch & sometimes do some coding to make sure the Vita 'understands' the language so to speak.

This may take time or resources and sometimes i think that the 3rd party developers just do not want to do it unless there is some sort of incentive provided by Sony. Also as you were implying it may be that the 3rd party see it as giving away a 'free' game if they do the patch & want some investment out of it.

Personally with the purchase of Gaikai that Sony may have probably figured out how to make it more accessible for next gen & offer it sparingly for this gen to give gamers a taste of what to expect.

Just my opinion....

Cryptcuzz4254d ago

I agree, I just wished they would come out and release a patch for the Vita so that it could have Remote Play on all PS3 games.

What I am thinking is, since some games are being released both on the PS3 and Vita, they did not want people to simply buy the PS3 version and Remote Play it on the Vita.

I don't know if that is a good idea, but my opinion is, those who have both a PS3 and a Vita would buy it on either the PS3 or Vita and not both.

If it would be up to me, I would release the patch to allow all PS3 games to be played on the Vita via Remote Play. Reason being, those who wants to play a game that is released both on the PS3 and Vita, but play it more on the Vita would go out and buy the game on the Vita simply because the picture quality is better, less input lag from streaming, etc.

Either way I am looking forward to this patch and finishing up ICO. That and the fact that it could open doors to Sony making most, if not all PS3 games work with Remote Play.

Show all comments (55)
150°

Sony Patents To Prevent You From In-Game Harassment By Reading Your Emotions

A new patent recently published by Sony wants to gather biometric data of gamers to track whether one is being harassed using AI tools.

Profchaos3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

I hope this is one of those patents that never comes to fruition.

I already dislike the fact you can pay a significant amount for a online service buy associated games and content on said service and get banned from that service over potentially a misunderstanding the bans are already handed out for flimsy reasons

I'd rather see money invested in a ban that simply removes the offensive players ability to communicate with unknown players allow them to continue party chats with friends but not with Joe blow on cod.

exputers3d ago

Agreed. Blizzard recently banned a college Overwatch 2 player who's dependent for saying "shit." Pretty harsh.

Profchaos2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

How rediculas really. You can't say a word that's allowed in most PG films and prime time TV but the game is based around killing the enemy team using guns, explosives etc.

It's just backwards.

just_looken2d ago

What your talking about is called block list

In 2006 a spaceship dropped of the playstation 3/xbox 360 i say that that generation was the last great gen with game functions/tech that has yet to comeback

Anyhow the playstation 3 if you block listed a id they could not talk to you in chatroom with either text or voice. But that was pre mind fucked 2018 when people were more human than sheep.

But hey gta 6 is coming out billion dollar budget without a single player custom character creator and without singeplayer coop off/online something saints row 1-3 had on the xbox 360.

z2g3d ago

Take my social security and bank account numbers too! Here’s a picture of my wife and our address.

phoenixwing3d ago

Cmon where's the pictures of your children. Don't hold out on them.

H93d ago

At this rate I feel Sony will eventually sell a room to play games in it where they can monitor your every breath

jambola3d ago

I genuinely get a bit worried sometimes when a friend says something that could be offensive In a party
Because I have no trouble believing some bans would happen when in a private party for saying something wrong

SegaSaturn6693d ago

I want them to censor erotic content by measuring my groin temperature so i dont get too distracted while playing black ops 2.

Popsicle3d ago

Terrible idea. Not only do I not consent to providing my biometric data, the potential for mishandling biometric data is almost a certainty. Positive stress and negative stress can produce similar changes in biometrics. Interpreting the precise emotion a person is feeling is not only invasive but could be easily misconstrued. I hope this never comes to fruition.

Show all comments (14)
130°

Sony Could Increase Your Game's Difficulty If It Sees You Complain About It

Sony has recently published a new patent that wants to dynamically handle the games' difficulty and gameplay based on the player's emotions.

jznrpg3d ago

This is something I might use. Sometimes I play some good games but they don’t have difficulty option and are a little too easy.

Profchaos3d ago

Souls games will be like that players struggling make it harder

PassNextquestion3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

I think if used correctly it could work well

jambola3d ago

cool idea
cool idea for horror games especially
the way it's explained here sounds like it could never be forced hopefully, so that's ok with me

Show all comments (8)
280°

Sony Taps Bungie's Head of Revenue to Lead Live-Service Games

Sony has recruited Bungie's head of revenue Jaremy Rich to head up its live-service gaming division, Rich has announced on social media.

Read Full Story >>
techraptor.net
ChasterMies24d ago

Please do not put Destiny’s monetization into Sony’s first party games. The monetization is what’s driving players away from Destiny.

just_looken24d ago

The new temp boss is the sony cfo bean counter so i can see this being a thing get every penny.

Cacabunga24d ago

PlayStation officially losing it.. fans will never support gaas games

just_looken23d ago

@car

The new boss did a interview in japan he wants to tap into the mobile market like nintendio so he give 0 fucks about gamers/fans

https://www.pushsquare.com/...

Redemption-6423d ago

@Cacabunga
You only speak for you and those who think like you, but most fans will support what they want. Playstation and PC fans are literally supporting Helldivers 2 and that is a gaas. Maybe you wouldn't, but many more would if they like it.

Huey_My_D_Long23d ago

@Redemption-64
Look, Im not making any judgement calls about this guy, but I will say that Helldivers 2 GaaS model is unique to Helldivers, and legit the only other game I can think of thats similiar was the Avengers game except HD2 pass is still better.
The fact that you can earn in game currency in a way that doesnt make you feel like you have to grind forever, as well you being able work on that pass that you bought...on your own time without a time limit...that right there is fucking huge to me, and I can't name any game other than avengers that avoided trapping players with FOMO logic...I think GaaS on HD2 shouldn't be compared to the rest of the industry...it should be copied.

Einhander197223d ago

Cacabunga

Helldivers 2...

Redemption-64

In Europe it's a 60 40 split favoring PC.
In the US its a 60 40 split favoring PS5.

So PlayStation owners supported the game just fine, it's not getting carried by PC or anything like that.

FinalFantasyFanatic23d ago

@just_looken,
I'm perfectly fine with the way Nintendo entered the mobile market, I never touched their mobile games, meanwhile, the console/handheld stayed the way it is. As for being a bean counter, he's probably going to reel in these massive budgets that Sony's studios have had lately, I haven't played Spiderman 2, but I cannot see how they almost tripled the budget for that game.

@Redemption-64,
That's an exception to the rule, I'm expecting a lot of these GAAS games from Sony to fail, to be fair, they only need a few to succeed, but I would have preferred that they put more of their resources into other types of games.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 23d ago
DivineHand12523d ago

True their monetization is driving players away and at the same time, their decision to chop out content and convoluted systems is keeping new players away from the game.

Joe91323d ago

I don't think that will happen based on how things worked out at Naughty Dog now that we know what we do, seems they had the option to fully commit to live service games or stay making single player experences so they gave up on their live service game. We are not sure how things came about with Bend making a live service game but I hope that was not a forced situation. Sony doesnt seem like they are forcing studios to switch up but we will see, Sony's bread and butter is single player games it is how they dominated the console market.

Obscure_Observer23d ago

Yeah, I though Sony learned something from all their failures in the LS segment under Bungie´s disastrous leadership and supervision which led to games been cancelled, studios closed and all the people laid off.

Looks like Bungie still plays a major role in Sony´s LS initiative and Sony is not backtracking on their GaaS plans.

S2Killinit23d ago (Edited 23d ago )

Are we forgetting that Destiny is also a highly successful franchise? I feel like that definitely deserves mention here.

Besides, there is no reason why a person cant learn from past experiences.

Joe91323d ago

I agree, people act as if Destiny flopped when it came out lol it took 9 to 10 years for the numbers to fall yet people are still playing it add the success of Helldivers 2 no wonder Sony is going forward down this path.

S2Killinit23d ago

Personally, I see no problem with Sony also having service games as long as they make good ones, and more importantly they deliver the AAA story driven games that they are known for. So yeah, I agree 100% with you.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 23d ago
Christopher24d ago

I mean, this person made some pretty bad decisions at Bungie. I hope they've learned from them because I definitely don't see those type of ideas as good for PlaySation in general.

CrimsonWing6923d ago (Edited 23d ago )

Honestly, what’s to learn from? How to make people happily continuously dump money into a single game over its life-time? Buy season passes continuously for several years with a smile on our faces?

GaaS is a design decision that is everything wrong with this industry. The fact that Helldivers 2 did so well and people defend the monetization because it was $40 and is a fun game, scares the sh*t out of me to see that the door is open and all shift will probably be to replicate that in future games. We already know the ROI for traditional game dev cost isn’t doing it for them.

I thought with Jimbo leaving we’d see a change for the better… I’m not so sure now.

S2Killinit23d ago

Service games are being offered by everyone. Sony cannot afford to only create single player AAA games. No one can. They already said they will be doing both.

Abnor_Mal24d ago (Edited 24d ago )

Ps5 gamers in 2023 seemed to play more live service types of games, so regardless to how people feel about them, numbers don’t lie and Sony is going where the money is. I mean look at the excitement around Helldivers2, people are showing that they want live service games.

Christopher24d ago

They play long-time existing live service games like CoD, Fortnite, Apex Legends, Destiny 2, and the like. Mass majority of new live service games are considered failures and aren't moving gamers away from older games.

just_looken24d ago

Yep the huge issue with live service is they need paid players along with a reason to play them.

You forgot mobile market that also taps into that player base as well as the eve online style games there is only a certain amount of krakens/whales blind supporters compared to the amount of live service games we have its not sustainable math wise.

700 restaurants making food for every seat for 1000-3000 eaters just does not work out

Einhander197223d ago (Edited 23d ago )

Christopher

I am not a big live service fan and literally own zero of the games you listed, but that is not true, unless you call games that aren't the top games to be failures.

There are tons of live service games that are profitable.

Games don't have to be the biggest game ever they just need to make more than they cost.

I challenge you to show professionally prepared data that shows that more live service games fail than make enough to keep going.

Because all the data that I have seen shows that live service is less of a gamble than making a big AAA budget game which needs to survive off retail sales.

FinalFantasyFanatic23d ago

I sometimes wonder if we're at saturation point, where it's hard for a new game to join those ranks unless it's particularly exceptional, people only have so much time and money to devote to these types of games.

romulus2323d ago

Correction, they have no issue playing good live service games

shinoff218323d ago

Lol it's not even a quarter of the ps5s sold. Helldivers may have been a hit but let's not say most are enjoying it because truth is most(the real most ) don't care about it.

S2Killinit23d ago (Edited 23d ago )

I play what is fun. If a live service game is good I’ll play it as long as its not a money scheme which Helldivers is not.

And Im a single player gamer.

mastershredder24d ago

How do you kill a franchise that already been killed?
Destiny’s grind, cash-in-on-playbass-cha-Ching, and pop-culture-insertion mainstream-me-too bs totally killed any rep Bungie had. Sony/Bungie, if you are doing this to ward-off players, it’s already working.

crazyCoconuts24d ago

Headline truncated:
"... off a cliff"

Show all comments (43)