90°

Horror Is Not Mainstream

Kotaku: With each new year, it feels like I’m watching another horror series becomes less horrific. Resident Evil, Alien, and most recently, Dead Space. What started out as pure, hardcore horror becomes a fun, popcorn-munching good time.

But hey, that’s OK. It’s the natural way of things. Horror isn’t mainstream.

Read Full Story >>
kotaku.com.au
user54670074298d ago

Is this guy actually trying to justify the co-op and the over the top acrion pieces in DS3....wow iust wow

Give them the benefit of the doubt.....why, they must of saw the backlash from RE5s co op and yet they still did it. Come on, your basically bringing the backlash on yourself. They should olf learnt from Capcoms mistake.

Lord_Sloth4298d ago

In defense of Dead Space 3, it's co-op is optional and they don't stick an AI with you if you go it solo. I don't care for the Cover Based shooter aspect of it at all but the co-op is kinda justifiable in that regard.

user54670074297d ago (Edited 4297d ago )

You know I hear that argument a lot but it dosen't matter

Optional or not the game is still built up around co-op meaning if you play solo it's most likely to be crap. Imagine if RE5 had optional co-op it still would be bad because it was designed for two people.

Lets not forget that god awful character who is your partner, the typical soldier grunt who tries to be funny with his one liners but ends up being annoying, is still in the games story during cutscenes. It wouldn't be so bad if it was Ellie.

WeskerChildReborned4298d ago

All i know if if DS2 and DS1 sold well, we probably wouldn't have any co-op in Dead Space.

--Onilink--4298d ago

well you can hardly blaim them.
RE5:
Backlash from some fans VS Biggest sales in the franchise history

We may not like it, but from a bussiness perspective, they are not really doing it wrong

Lord_Sloth4297d ago (Edited 4297d ago )

What if it's built like a single player game that just drops in a second dude which just spawns more enemies though? I know this is just speculation on my part but still...

I'm not arguing that it's still a survival Horror since it's obvious that it's not, I'm just saying the problem might not to be the co-op.

user54670074297d ago (Edited 4297d ago )

Co-op is either the problem or part of it

The feature has always got to be the problem someway...you just can't have a survival horror game with the feature.

So it has to be the problem or part of it in someway.

If you want to fix something in life you must first get rid or remove anything which stands in the way of it being fixed.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4297d ago
Kyosuke_Sanada4298d ago (Edited 4298d ago )

People need to realize that some gamers actually have "fun" being immersed in a well-tailored frightfest. Is it impossible for gamers to gain the same amount or even more enjoyment from playing a great survival horror by themselves, far from it. Beauty is in the eye of the beholder so please don't get the idea that you have to be with someone in order to increase "fun" factor......

WeskerChildReborned4298d ago

One of my favorite genres is survial horror and i dislike how their are barely any for consoles.

BitbyDeath4298d ago

Pretty sad that Sony is one of the only publishers left that let developers take chances.

Bathyj4298d ago

Horror never was mainstream in any medium.

Abandoning your horror roots for not being mainstream is just a weak copout.

Show all comments (25)
140°

Resident Evil 5 - 15 Years of Being the Most Misunderstood Resident Evil

Resident Evil 5 launched 15 years ago today - and it continues to stand as a stepping stone from the good to the bad.

TheBrainZ53d ago

One of my favourites because of the co-op. Then Resi 6 arrived and the series nosedived further.

Knightofelemia53d ago

I enjoyed the game co-oping with a friend I know the game in solo the AI can be an idiot but RE5 is way better then RE6. I played RE6 with a friend if it wasn't cheap when I got I would have avoided RE6.

thesoftware73053d ago (Edited 53d ago )

5 was excellent, still play Mercs with my brother.
I would love a fully remastered RE:5, with some added, reworked content. The DLC for 5 was also excellent.

6 was awful.

CrimsonWing6953d ago

I never understood why the game was misunderstood. It was a fantastic game at launch and is still fun today to play. It’s as action packed as Resident Evil 4 was, yet that’s regarded a masterpiece 🤷‍♂️

chobit_A5HL3Y53d ago

it was "misunderstood" because they introduced co-op into the franchise at a time when people loved to have fake rage about co-op. like, you could play the game as a solo experience, but people chose to have their bandwagon rage because it was cool at the time lol

-Foxtrot53d ago (Edited 53d ago )

What the hell are you talking about? Fake Rage? Bandwagon? Come on.

You can play it solo but you are forced to carry around a shitty AI partner you have to micro manage. It wasn't as fun solo.

Co-op sucked all the horror, tension and suspense from the game because having a partner covering you was like a safety net. Enemy trying to sneak up on you? No sweat the AI will just automatically lock on, alert you while they shoot first telling you where they are basically.

It was the start of Capcoms fall with the Resident Evil series where it basically become an over the top generic action game which betrayed it's own survival horror roots. Least RE4 had a good blend of both but Capcom just went the wrong way with RE5, especially going off what they were going to do during the RE4.5 beta phase before co-op was added.

franwex53d ago

At least the game was a ton of fun tho. If the game was bad, the outrage would’ve been justified. They simply pivoted for a couple of games. At this point it’s bad because it’s called Resident evil 5? But if was called something else it would’ve been good? Please.

chobit_A5HL3Y51d ago

like i said: fake baby rage and bandwagon hate. res4 wasn't really that scary, either, and was already taking the series into more of an action-oriented direction at the time. 5 was a good game that people fake-hated because of co-op that you didn't even have to play lol hence the fake rage and bandwagon hate. i mean, it obviously did well enough for capcom to go ahead and make 6 the way they did, right? if 5 was so bad, they would have changed what 6 was during development. the difference is that 6 was actually just bad.

people "hate" 5 because res4 was so good, and 5 was just unfortunate enough to be its successor. like i said, 4 wasn't scary, either, and relied more on tension than horror, but it was already more of an action game. if you don't wanna like 5 because it's not scary or whatever- that's fine, but it wasn't meant to be strictly a horror game anymore at that point anyways. the gameplay was a lot faster-paced than 4, so saying that the ai helping you by potentially shooting someone that was sneaking up behind you is a moot point. there were more enemies that were more aggressive, along with newer threats.

5 isn't as good as 4, but it's not a bad game by any stretch.

Tody_ZA27d ago (Edited 27d ago )

What? I always thought RE5 had fake controversy because it was set in South Africa and you shot a bunch of black zombies. I live in South Africa and thought the game was absolutely awesome, played the whole thing co-op with my brother.

@Foxtrot I think you're confusing the garbage Dead Space 3 with Resident Evil 5. Resident Evil 4 was already a hyper action game and had zero fear factor other than the grotesque appearance of some enemies.

Show all comments (16)
40°

Sclerosis the Amnesia VR Remake Now Available for Free

Sclerosis, the Amnesia: The Dark Descent VR remake by modder Deesice is now available for free, you'll just need a copy of the original game.

Read Full Story >>
xrsource.net
50°

The Best Co-Op Horror Games You've Missed in Halloween

Try to cope with your friend through terror with this list featuring the best horror Co-Op games you can play today.

Read Full Story >>
altarofgaming.com