90°

Joss Whedon Would “Very Much” Like A Game Based On Firefly – MMO Just “Disappeared”

Speaking at a panel at Nerd HQ during this years Comic-Con, Joss Whedon has said would very much like to have a videogame based on his cult sci-fi show, Firefly.

Read Full Story >>
wolfsgamingblog.com
Morrigan-Aensland4301d ago

::tears up::

Please make it for the ps4 and not on console this gen.

::wipes tears::

WolfLeBlack4301d ago

That was pretty much what I was like when I was typing this news story up. Except for the PS4 bit. I was like, "Now, please"

Morrigan-Aensland4301d ago (Edited 4301d ago )

I'd like a game based on the "firefly" series without any compromise or limitations that a lot of devs had to deal with this gen. I also wouldn't like Kinect, wiimote , or ps move support in it to mess up gameplay.

I'd like all games that I'm interested in to be brought over to next gen system because I would love better tech than we have now this gen.

WolfLeBlack4301d ago

Hehe, yeah, I know where you're coming from. The thing is, a lot of the same limitations that dev's deal with in this generation are still actually going to be present in the next gen as well. But yeah, they'll have more room to work with, and if we wanted at least a two or three year development cycle on the game then it would almost have to be a next-gen game.

As I said in the news article itself, I'd personally love to see CD Projekt work with Joss to bring it to life, as I feel they'd suit the Firefly style very well. Bioware for many would be an obvious choice, and for good reason, but they've gotten to do their epic sci-fi games so let's let somebody else get a chance :D Not to mention that I feel CD Projekt handle moral decisions better: they understand that it's not just black and white, so that would fit into the Firely universe beautifully

Psycho_PS3Truthh4301d ago

Yup the PS4 which will be the greatest video game platform next gen would be the perfect system to develop this or any game in society. I am sure if sony get this game a exclusive it would extremely perfect.

FarCryLover1824301d ago

Disappeared just like the tv show :(

r214301d ago

just wanted to say, Cabin in the woods, was surprisingly amazing :D

Bathyj4301d ago

You cant take the sky from me.

WolfLeBlack4300d ago

Who would you lot like to handle the developement of a Firefly game and why?

110°

Why The Game Industry Needs In-Person Shows Despite The End Of E3

Skewed and Reviewed kick off 2024 with a look at the need for in-person game conventions with the End of E3 and compares the cost-cutting methods of Hollywood who still value in-person events.

gold_drake119d ago

so, this article didnt tell me why we NEED to have in-person shows like e3, other than the authors nostalgia and remembrance of covering one of these shows.

but it also doesnt mention everyone outside of america who have never had the chance to see it in person either haha
we had to watch the darn livestream, if they had it available, at 3am in the morning haha with lags amd crashes (not all the time)

while i think these shows are great and all, i dont really "need" to have them. people are busy, im busy. id rather watch a livestream than to book a flight, a hotel etc.

but theres still pax and all of that.

Garethvk119d ago (Edited 119d ago )

I did mention that you cannot have hands-on and meetings with key people and the excitement. Europe has Gamescom and had Paris Games Week and N.A
Needs an industry event again.

A Livestream does not even come close to what was lost. I much prefer seeing and playing the games in person and asking questions to developers and marketing people versus watching talking heads doing shtick on a scripted showcase with a carefully edited video.

gold_drake119d ago

"need" is a strong word for it, imo.

"good to have it" would be a better way to describe it.

and sure, gamescom is in se germanland, paris week in .. paris.

most people dont rly care for it anymore. they either tune in to a livestream or vod or read about it online.

but opinions are opinions. if u think we Need them, then there ya go.

Garethvk119d ago

I think the industry needs them. The rank and file public not as much but our coverage is greatly limited via livestreams compared to what it was to say nothing of streams. Hands on previews Re very limited as well as we used to play big games months before release.

ApocalypseShadow119d ago (Edited 119d ago )

I get what you're saying. In person is always preferable with a hands on. Because there are those like myself that like to try before buying. That likes physical mostly over digital.

But having said that, I think it's more *your personal need* than a need for the industry itself. You need to be the middleman giving your point of view, possibly your own personal bias or subjectivity or objectivity to the equation. *We* as gamers don't actually NEED it. We can come to the same conclusions, positive or negative about a game as you can.

Companies like Sony or Nintendo used to sit back and watch others give their take on things that were negative to the message or had an agenda. Especially during the PS3 era of website bias, swag bags, advertising hand shakes, biased video, free laptops, etc.

Companies like Sony took the reigns and decided to let their base see for themselves what the games look like, than through the eyes of some journalists, bloggers and vloggers looking to cash in on click bait and advertising.

Delivering their message directly to the consumer killed a lot of that nonsense. You see the developers, you see the game, and in many cases, you can speak to these developers on discord than worrying about some article's take on something.

It's not that I want you to become obsolete. But for some, I'm glad it killed their business practices. Also, we live in an era where these games could be streamed directly to the consumers after the presentation from Nintendo, Sony and Microsoft that gives that hands on of a game. They just have to implement that technology and make it high quality without latency. And *WE* as gamers can speak to each other on a preferred media platform and give our opinions on the gameplay we just experienced. Many journalists have not been fully honest on games before release because they fear losing their backstage pass and free gifts. We would know just by playing if a game is something we want. Remote play is possible now without lines, without expensive trips, etc.

To close, Sony has sold mostly 50 million PS5 consoles, over 110 million PS4 consoles and Nintendo has sold over 120 million consoles without a journalist take. They delivered their message and it's still reaching the consumers they are targeting without spending the millions of dollars on in person setup at a venue

I get what you're saying. I lived through the whole era when E3 was created and watched. But I don't need it and never been to one. And really don't need a journalist to tell me what to like or dislike.

EvertonFC118d ago

The ques for 1 game were 4 hours long for the most part, that's NOT fun.

S2Killinit118d ago

The problem with live shows was that it became all smoke and mirrors and a show of things not related to gaming. Therefore I would argue that it added a new layer of cost to the game developers and console holders that necessarily will need to made up for. Either we the consumer have to pay for that cost or the developer/manufacturer will have to bear the cost thereby taking away from profits leading to smaller studios dying out.

Remember xbox buying celebrities to make appearances? Thats a good example of unnecessary cost.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 118d ago
JackBNimble119d ago

You don't need to go to the movies either, you can sit on your ass and watch any number of streams but that doesn't make it any better then actually going out.

This generation has become so spoiled and lazy.

gold_drake119d ago

booking a flight and a hotel aint the same as going to the movies, but pop off i guess ha.

Garethvk118d ago

Streaming cannot replace the communal experience of event films.

EvertonFC118d ago (Edited 118d ago )

Actually it does, for one it's cheaper eating my own snacks at home than over priced pi** take cinema prices. 2 it's About £150 to take the family to the cinema or £15 for a new cinema release and watch at home on my awesome 4k TV.
3 We can pause the film when needed, sit in the warmth of our home and have no di*kheads talking through the movie.
That's called using your brain, not being lazy or spoiled dude.

TheColbertinator119d ago

I'd rather publishers send out closed betas to garner gamer concern and interest like how we had demos back in the day.

I don't miss E3 as much as I loved it at one point but that era is long gone.

Garethvk118d ago

There is a need but refinement was and is needed.

Zenzuu118d ago

Sad to see it go. It was a great event for gamers and developers all around the world getting together and celebrate gaming as a community.

The announcements of new games/hardware, hype, surprises and seeing live audience reactions, it's something only events like E3 are able to bring. It will be missed...

hombreacabado118d ago

if its going to be anything like the game awards where celebrities that dont even play games are there and its just full of fluff and commercial crap than no we dont need in person shows. we just end up watching the trailer montages the next day anyway.

Shiro173118d ago

To be honest E3 was one of my favorite times of the years when I was younger. I couldn't wait for all the big conferences and new announcements. It was hype even if nothing good was announced we had cringe moments to laugh at.

Show all comments (18)
60°

Talking Mortal Kombat 1 With Ed Boon And Thiago Gomes

During SDCC I spoke with Ed Boon and Thiago Gomes about Mortal Kombat 1 as part of a Roundtable.

60°

DC Heroes United and Borderlands Comes To SDCC

This sounds awesome. This afternoon, Genvid Entertainment announced two, all-new interactive streaming series at San Diego-Comic Con: DC Heroes United and Borderlands EchoVision Live.