1070°

Confirmed: Nintendo Power review score of The Conduit

The first review of The Conduit is officially in. Numerous pictures of the upcoming issue of Nintendo Power prove that this score is the real deal.
Alternative Sources:
Valay - contributor
Published: 218 days 18 hours ago | News | Wii | Gaming | Industry News
 
 

12Next »
Showing: 1 - 50 of 80 Comments
Shut this user up Let user speak
morganfell - 218 days 21 hours ago
1 -
"Best, pure first person shooter on the Wii"

Of course they fail to realize that actually isn't saying much.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Pandemic - 218 days 21 hours ago
1.1 -
Wait, what did Nintendo Power give this game out of 10?
Shut this user up Let user speak
Menchi - 218 days 20 hours ago
1.2 - @Pandemic
They gave it an 8. Cited a number of flaws however, and the review sounded more like a 6~7.5
1.3 Maxned | 218 days 20 hours ago - User only got 1 bubble - Show
Shut this user up Let user speak
CobraKai - 218 days 19 hours ago
1.4 -
I was expecting this kind of score. There is nothing in the gameplay and art design that makes it really stand out. At least they polished the game so that it was still a fun romp, unlike Red Steel.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Timesplitter14 - 218 days 15 hours ago
1.5 -
Has anyone really been far even as decided to do look more like?
Shut this user up Let user speak
morganfell - 218 days 11 hours ago
1.6 -
^^^^Kids, remember. Drugs can be bad for you.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Buttons - 218 days 10 hours ago
1.7 -
Wasn't really expecting too much from High Voltage, honestly. They haven't done much worthy of awesomeness. Interestingly, I live in the same town where they're located in (Hoffman Estates, IL)
Shut this user up Let user speak
sidar - 218 days 8 hours ago
1.8 -
Buttons, they have been living of on other licenses.
An 8 for their inhouse IP can't be considered bad at all.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Buttons - 218 days 7 hours ago
1.9 -
No, it isn't, you're right. The way the summary was worded made it look worse than the 8 it was given
Shut this user up Let user speak
scissor_runner - 218 days 6 hours ago
1.10 -
Nintendo power does not give out high scores like most gaming mags. Also the guys over at NP are not really into FPS are they?

Seriously if you have a blog you should go to E3 and play it your self.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Avenged Sevenfold - 218 days 6 hours ago
1.11 - @ Buttons
Hoffman Estates?? I live in Schaumburg and go to Conant Highschool. =P. Small world.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Buttons - 218 days 4 hours ago
1.12 -
Haha, cool. I go to Hoffman (And I know our football team sucks)
Shut this user up Let user speak
BWS1982 - 218 days ago
1.13 - I'm near Hoffman Estates too
I went to school in Schaumburg at the Art Institute where some of the HV guys went too (though they graduated a few years before me)....

I think to look at the attempt made (whether the game is "amazing" or not) is noteworthy, simply because of the game's target console. At least they didn't succumb to making more shovelware and garbage for the Wii. They are/were trying to push graphics and an engine on a system that has been condemned to virtually purely, casual gaming and one of the least hardcore systems Nintendo has ever put out. The system needs a void filled, why should we hope that void remains?

I say whether the game is a real 8 or not, props for defying the stereotype to the best they could. Better than watching the Wii's hardcore gaming hopes wither and die, maybe this will push other devs somehow...It'll be interesting to see a broad spectrum of scores for this within the coming weeks, or better yet, to try the game myself one day (don't have a Wii though).
Shut this user up Let user speak
Tiberium - 212 days 3 hours ago
1.14 -
So I guess MP3 is still the best fps on the wii (it got a 10 from NP). *sigh*
Shut this user up Let user speak
knox - 218 days 21 hours ago
2 -
ill admit im surprised. really thought the review was a fake :\

oh well, maybe the sequel will be better.
Shut this user up Let user speak
swiftshot93 - 218 days 19 hours ago
3 - LOL
And after all that hype sheesh.

Looks like Metroid Prime 3 is the best first person game on the wii
Shut this user up Let user speak
mrnintendo96 - 218 days 16 hours ago
3.1 -
What is so bad about a 8? It is still a good score, and beats most other Wii FPS games out there (most, not all). I am still buying it.

Just remember that IGN, X-Play, GT, GameSpot, GameInformer, Destructoid, etc still have to review the game. Who knows??

Still awesome, and this leaves room for a sequel.
Shut this user up Let user speak
SuperMario290 - 218 days 3 hours ago
3.2 -
An 8 really isn't a bad score, it's actually pretty high. I personally think that Metroid Prime 3 will be better, but I guess I'll just have to judge when I pick it up.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Nikuma - 218 days 18 hours ago
4 - .
Man I kind of feel bad for all the Wii only owners out there. I'm sure this game is pretty decent, but doesn't hold a candle to FPS on the other 2 consoles. I really hope E3 has something nice in store for the hardcore gamers on the Wii. As of now I'll only dust off my Wii to play MH3...but I'm not even sure if I'll do that. :/
Shut this user up Let user speak
bigjclassic - 218 days 7 hours ago
4.1 - Dont feel bad about us...
We still get gems like NMH, Madworld, TvC etc. While the HD consoles get FPS after FPS or TPS after TPS. The Wii has more fighting games and better platformers/adventure games than the HD consoles so it evens out.

I actually own 13 consoles and the Wii and DC, get more playtime than the PS3. KZ2 and SFIV are the only reasons I touch PS3.
Shut this user up Let user speak
scissor_runner - 218 days 7 hours ago
4.2 -
The other consoles don't hold a candle to the tech above them either, I mean what is your point? Yet this game does have what we wanted great controls and more polish. I think this was a good effort by HVS. It will only get better.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Jadaking - 218 days 18 hours ago
5 -
Go wii!
Shut this user up Let user speak
LeeZer - 218 days 18 hours ago
6 -
if yoiu bough a wii when your intrested in FPS'ers you'd have to be pretty stupid the same goes for RTS's as they contain studying and tactics, where most wii games are sertanly lower quality and definatly casual pick up and play for an hour or so. I didn't think Halo wars was amazing, i liked the controls and i found it cool and familure at first with the story and easy controls however. i soon fond the game not as fancy as say red alert 3 on the PC. and rather predictable with pretty much no origanality. i'd have given it a 7 as it didn't beat modern pc based RTS games. if this news was based on another format rather than a wii based ipinion then it would have had more credablity.
7 YeOldeGamer | 218 days 18 hours ago - User only got 1 bubble - Show
Shut this user up Let user speak
LeonSKennedy4Life - 218 days 16 hours ago
7.1 - Wait...
You mean what Tribes did years before Halo 2?
7.2 YeOldeGamer | 218 days 5 hours ago - User only got 1 bubble - Show
8 deafphat | 218 days 18 hours ago - User only got 1 bubble - Show
Shut this user up Let user speak
RecSpec - 218 days 18 hours ago
9 - An 8 out of 10...IN NINTENDO POWER
That's definitely 5-6 territory.
Shut this user up Let user speak
caladbolg777 - 218 days 15 hours ago
9.1 -
Albeit a little harsh, the same thought had crossed my mind. If NINTENDO POWER is making statements like...

- Doesn't measure up to “big guns” of the genre.
- Predictable story.
- Unimpressive AI.
- Little innovation.
- Lack of destructible environments is a disappointment.
- Level of detail in locales can be inconsistent.

Then I wonder what a non-Nintendo magazine is going to say. That's a little disconcerting. However, best not to judge until after release.
Shut this user up Let user speak
mrnintendo96 - 218 days 14 hours ago
9.2 -
Lack of destructable environments?? Uhhh...hello?? Most games don't have destructable environments. Only Red Steel and Strangehold really have this.

Doesn't live up to the "big guns" of the genre?? How come it seems that Nintendo Power talks about Microsoft and Sony alot. Weird.

I will give the game a review when I get it. I think that the game is really suited for multiplayer, so I will play with all of you guys to test this. Killzone 2 didn't have a great single player, but awesome multiplayer, so I'll see how that goes.
Shut this user up Let user speak
BrotherNick - 218 days 9 hours ago
9.3 -
They did seem to focus too much on the engine and controls and online. May their sequel be better. Some of NP's review shows that maybe they don't realize that the system isn't as powerful, and decided to focus on awesome controls, multiplayer, and make it look as best as they could haha. I think it's a pretty awesome score for their first new IP.
Shut this user up Let user speak
tiamat5 - 218 days 17 hours ago
10 -
Wait, wait. The Enemy A.I. is bad, no innovation,predictable story, doesn't measure up, level details inconsistent and it got a 8/10? If Sony had done this it would have gotten a 5 at the most.
Shut this user up Let user speak
sidar - 218 days 10 hours ago
10.1 -
But then realise how many games rated high havn't done much innovation either.

Reviews and Ratings aren't important...what is important that people try A game themselves.
Shut this user up Let user speak
scissor_runner - 218 days 3 hours ago
10.2 -
Actually infamous has these same problem even with the lame evil deed scripting LOL.
Shut this user up Let user speak
deshon09 - 218 days 17 hours ago
11 - dose
not sound bad good new for hardcore wii owners
Shut this user up Let user speak
LeonSKennedy4Life - 218 days 16 hours ago
12 - Wow
They were really kind with this one.

If Haze came out on the Wii...it'd "blow them away"!
Shut this user up Let user speak
wazzim - 218 days 15 hours ago
13 - lol@the marketing
That's a 6,5 people. Even ET the game would get a 8 if it came on a Nintendo console.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Sickr - 218 days 12 hours ago
14 - WTF?
- Great adventure, but doesn’t measure up to “big guns” of the genre.
- Predictable story.
- Unimpressive AI.

And they still give it an 8? WTF?

I'll wait for more reviews.
Shut this user up Let user speak
bjornbear - 218 days 11 hours ago
15 - Hey! Who knows =D
I'm guessing either the score is too high or the review is inconsistent (obv xD one or the other) but don't beat the game down! Ok it isn't a KZ2 or a Halo 3 but give the little Wii a break.

So much time people spent complaining "ewww no hx games on the Wii!! Wii!'s for casual gamers booo"
Well now they r trying! And taking risks! Who knows maybe sequel will be improved apon the mistakes of this one..

Then agen, I would agree w most of you...its gna get beaten to a pulp by other reviewers if Nintendo Power has this to say...R.I.P Conduit..xD
Shut this user up Let user speak
sidar - 218 days 11 hours ago
16 -
Sure lets all be an ass because of a rating...
I'm still gonna play it myself to give my own verdict.
Shut this user up Let user speak
mastiffchild - 218 days 10 hours ago
16.1 -
Yes, Sidar. It has a different job than FPS on PS360 does and only really had to get the basics right to be the first fyll package Wii shooter-which I'll bet it's done.

Nobody ever said it could look like KZ2 or that it would be a "Halo Killer"-those are irrelevant to HVS. They are doing their first big self funded game, no licenced stuff this time and they've really tried to push the Wii. That not everything has fallen together isn't shocking but I'd bet, again, that the controls(the MAiN reason to even bother with a Wii game in this genre)are tight as you like and will carry this first outing. The MP, if better than what Wii has so far had(and I think it should well be with a couple of decent modes)is something I'm still looking forward to as a change from Killzone2-we haven't had a game really work as an online shooter just yet for Wii.

Bottom line is that they needed to get the basics tight and only the AI seems to be lacking as far as I can see so 8/10 might be very fair and iot certainly isn't a disaster so I'll be giving this a good go-I suspect that it could well be a real hit online-at least I'm still hoping.
Shut this user up Let user speak
sidar - 218 days 10 hours ago
16.2 -
A game should just be enjoyable and if it is i don't see why people are being such asses about it.

Many said it feels like GE or PD, seriously i need to try this out.
If it can give the same feeling as i had on the N64 with those games then i don't care if it gets a 1/1000000.

Its pathetic that some actually go by ratings.

While in fact a 7 is considered DECENT.
From a scale from 1 to 10, 6 is actually already above the "bad" zone.
8 is good so, if people are really swayed by ratings. I can't see why they are bashing this game.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Seferoth75 - 218 days 10 hours ago
16.3 -
Already got mine paid for. Its telling that the kids crying over an 8 are Sony fans. Yet when WKS got a 67 it was all fake. Couldnt be real for that AAA must own.

I'm not really buying the reivew anyway. If its from Nintendo that is really sad. Taking off points for something very few FPS contain is just a little too much imo. Of course it works out great for SOny fanboys. They can act like an 8 is horrible even though that is the same thing most PS3 games get.
Shut this user up Let user speak
caladbolg777 - 218 days 6 hours ago
16.4 -
Seferoth75's icon fits him perfectly. Rather than bashing PS3 titles, which he does almost incessantly, he should be talking up all the great Wii titles (which in MY opinion there are MANY great Wii titles, but what do I know? I'm a PS3 fanboy). He's a perfect example of a gamer who would rather QQ and spew negativity than play games.

Enjoy your games, Sef. I'll enjoy mine. PS3 fans will enjoy theirs. 360 fans will enjoy theirs. Multi-plat owners will enjoy them all. There's no reason to piss on anybody's cornflakes.

@Sidar: It's not the rating that is putting people off. Everyone universally agrees that an 8/10 is still GOOD. What may put people off is the content of the review. When NINTENDO POWER, of all publications, is using words and phrases like "Doesn't measure up", "Predictable story", "Unimpressive AI" and "disappointment" then one has to wonder about the quality of The Conduit.

It'd be like PSM saying that Killzone2's graphics were "disappointing" or that it's enemy AI seemed "unimpressive". These publications are clearly lenient toward the console that they represent. If these publications are disappointed, then what does that say for magazines that choose to cover all platforms equally?

Magic 8-ball says, "Outlook not good."
Shut this user up Let user speak
sidar - 218 days ago
16.5 -
@calad,
I still say, try the game yourself.
Shut this user up Let user speak
caladbolg777 - 217 days 19 hours ago
16.6 - @Sidar
Agreed. Truer words never spoken.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Seferoth75 - 218 days 10 hours ago
17 -
Hey at least this game is better than Infamous "70
Eurogamer
There is more charm to inFamous than Cole's face and voice suggest, but basking in the glow of the end credits, there are also a lot of painful memories to recall; of too many missions that funnel you into shooting galleries, of difficulty spikes and enemy-spamming, and of staring at the upgrades page rather glumly, aware that for the most part you're only being invited to make things strike harder or across a broader range.
Read Full Review
70
Games Radar (in-house)
InFamous shows huge potential, but it’s ultimately held back from greatness by too-sticky controls and its surprisingly bland ruin of a city. It’s still fun, but there’s a lot of room for improvement in the strongly hinted-at sequel.
Read Full Review
" So Wii owners shouldnt worry. At least your hyped game scored in the 80s and not the 70's
Shut this user up Let user speak
TomAB - 218 days 3 hours ago
17.1 -
You can't be serious
Shut this user up Let user speak
Hockey11 - 218 days 2 hours ago
17.2 -
Yes disregard the other 50 reviews that are 8's and 9's and the fact that it is rated higher than every exclusive for xbox 360 this year and will probably remain that way for the rest of the year. http://www.metacritic.com/g...

Halo 3 got a 78 and a 70

netjak-
The best thing I can say is that if you never really cared about the single player game in the first place, you can expect to have a great time with Halo 3 for years to come. If however, you are looking to “Finish the Fight”, and don’t plan on paying for Xbox Live Gold, you would be best served to wait for a price drop or two… or three.
score-78

GameCritics-
The ads promise an epic tale of tragedy, sacrifice, and heroism that Halo 3 really had no hope in hell of ever delivering. More troubling, however, is the fact that after playing the game, I can suggest with some certainty that they promised a game that Bungie didn't even
bother trying to produce.
score-70
Add Comment (Gamer Zone)
Gamer Zone Posting Guidelines
The Gamer Zone is for members who want a more friendly and civilized discussion. This section is heavily moderated by the N4G staff, so leave your fanboyism at the door please. Members who are unable to behave in a mature and respectful manner will be temporarily or permanently restricted from posting in the Gamer Zone. Using words such as Xbots and Sony droids, or other words from the console war vocabulary, is strictly prohibited in this Zone.
Read More...
 
 
You must log in to post comments.
Username:  
Password:  
 
 
About N4G
N4G is a social game news site that covers the game industry 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
More Info... | Submit News