1250°

CONFIRMED: Gear of War 2 Scans Ingame

Interview by radio station (KFAN) with the editor of the Game Informer Magazine.

Discusses Gears of War 2 and other big name games

To download the part on just Gears of War 2:
http://www.filesend.net/download.php?f=9a6a23244fbb84eeef66fc7a8fb2483c
Cocozero - contributor
Published: 605 days 18 hours ago | Podcast | Xbox 360 | Gaming | Industry News
 
 

123Next »
Showing: 1 - 50 of 148 Comments
Shut this user up Let user speak
Meus Renaissance - 605 days 18 hours ago
1 -
I'm looking at the scans and I don't think anyone doubted they were in-game. They look great but nothing that would cause an uproar of disagreements like e.g. that KillZone 2 trailer did. Those visuals in the scans are more than doable on the platform.
Shut this user up Let user speak
GiantEnemyCrab - 605 days 18 hours ago
1.1 - The uproar
came because the E05 trailer was said to be in-game when it wasn't. Nothing more and nothing less. Gears 2 is going to impress, like the first one set the bar in graphics, I am sure the second one will as well.
Shut this user up Let user speak
JsonHenry - 605 days 18 hours ago
1.2 -
Looks like an Unreal Engine game to me. Who thought it was not ingame?
Shut this user up Let user speak
TheSadTruth - 605 days 18 hours ago
1.3 -
The scans that I saw were scanned extremely poorly so I don't know how you can make such a harsh judgment(Or have better quality scans been released?). Regardless, based on the graphics of the original I would say it will be one of the best looking games across all platforms and it deserves more respect.
Shut this user up Let user speak
sonarus - 605 days 18 hours ago
1.4 -
LOL how is this news. Who doubted the shots were in game? To be quite blunt i really don't see what the hub bub is about. Those scans are realistically what everyone expected gears of war 2 to look like. Looks like Gears 1 and maybe marginally better. Marginal in the sense you need side by side comparisons to tell
Shut this user up Let user speak
meepmoopmeep - 605 days 17 hours ago
1.5 -
i never believed it would be super-duper-way-ass-kicking better than Gears 1 graphically. And it won't be. It will be a little bit better but Gears 1 was impressive as it is. What Epic should concentrate on is the gameplay and frame-rate above all else. Having that many enemies at the same time is hard to handle and i'd like to see them do it without frame-rate problems.
Shut this user up Let user speak
hazeblaze - 605 days 15 hours ago
1.6 -
Based on those scans, Gears 2 will not be setting the graphical bar again... sorry to dash any feelings. But both KZ2 & Resistance 2 have already shown far more graphical detail from their games. The recently released R2 trailer is simply amazing. Resistance 2 will likely be the best looking game across all consoles this year.
Shut this user up Let user speak
wow4u - 605 days 14 hours ago
1.7 -
"I'm looking at the scans and I don't think anyone doubted they were in-game. They look great but nothing that would cause an uproar of disagreements like e.g. that KillZone 2 trailer did..."

The scans are horrible quality. Printed and reproduced, they look like shiat.

Now, the fake-pre-rendered bull-video that Sony tried to pull over on people, yeah, that caused disagreement that caused Sony to have to admit they were pulling bull-video.

But, nice try at subtle FUD Meus.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Thoas - 605 days 13 hours ago
1.8 - @GiantEnemyCrab
The unreal engine is not all that and a bag of chips, Gears of war is the best looking game on Xbox 360 but not the PC or PS3. UTIII didn't look that good to me on PS3 or PC. So why do think Gears of war 2 with a slightly better unreal engine upgrade over UTIII is going to amaze?
Shut this user up Let user speak
Richdad - 605 days 11 hours ago
1.9 - YEah those where ingame
But they looked far better than the old one when I matched the HD version Gears2 has an improvement over Gears1 what COD4 had over COD2. One more aspect is the levels are and draw distance is far huge and one stage was said to have A Brumak following you in Jungle with tress falling apart. But yeah more has to be revlealed but still the screens look way better than Gears was or UT3.
KZ2 looks so good because of postprocessing and UE3 is now equipped with it now.
Shut this user up Let user speak
DJ - 604 days 22 hours ago
1.10 - Actually, killzone looks that great because
Of how its dual rendering engines handle lighting (hundreds of dynamic lights, as well as indirect bounces from those sources) and because of the accuracy of its physics and animation blending.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Meus Renaissance - 604 days 22 hours ago
1.11 -
I was talking about the E307 trailer for KillZone 2, not the one a few years back. I remember last year, some of you were still spouting that it was CGI. In fact, I wouldn't be surprised if many still believed it was CGI.
Shut this user up Let user speak
bishop-br - 604 days 22 hours ago
1.12 - @Richdad
Are kidding right? It almost looks like the same to me...

And the falling trees, it just amazes me on Crysis where it's really well done. One level where you can cut then down was on Uncharted and as much as the game amazes me, the tree thing was almost passed by unnoticed.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Breakfast - 605 days 18 hours ago
2 -
? Which scans?

Edit: nevermind...its the ONE big story i didnt post on...lol. I wont let it happen again.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Lord Anubis - 605 days 16 hours ago
2.1 -
heh do you have a link to the scans? heh
Shut this user up Let user speak
toughNAME - 605 days 18 hours ago
3 -
I didn't know it was possible to see lag from screenshots
Shut this user up Let user speak
Breakfast - 605 days 18 hours ago
3.1 -
I was gonna say something dumb/funny, but after hearing the podcast...i just get a little more hyped for this game.

2008 - Year of the Good Graphics.
Shut this user up Let user speak
sonarus - 605 days 18 hours ago
3.2 -
I don't feel like listening give me a run down
Shut this user up Let user speak
Breakfast - 605 days 17 hours ago
3.3 -
Just download it from the link...its 5mb download...its about 5 minutes long...listen please...for me :). The dude sounds pretty hyped.

Edit: The way the guy explained it, made it sound like it was better than what the scans looked like. Scans didnt blow me away either.
Shut this user up Let user speak
sonarus - 605 days 17 hours ago
3.4 -
alright just for you cus you are extra yummy in my tummy :| lol
Yea listened to it. Sounds like a great game lol. I need to get a copy of game informer to see the scans for myself the ones i saw online didn't really blow me away were pretty much what i expected it to look like
Shut this user up Let user speak
Truckasaurus - 605 days 18 hours ago
4 -
No one is falling for the Epic lies about their Unreal Engine 3 'ingame' screenshots this time.

What Epic claimed UE3 based Gears of War looked like:
http://scr3.golem.de/screen...

How bad the game looked actually running:
http://image.com.com/gamesp...
Shut this user up Let user speak
Fishy Fingers - 605 days 18 hours ago
4.1 -
I wouldn't say it looked "bad". o_O
Shut this user up Let user speak
JVIDICAN - 605 days 18 hours ago
4.2 -
"less good" would be a better word
Shut this user up Let user speak
OpiZA - 605 days 18 hours ago
4.3 -
Welcome to the gaming industry...
Shut this user up Let user speak
hazeblaze - 605 days 15 hours ago
4.4 -
Even with UT3, the pre-release screens were vastly better looking than the actual game. Gears 2 will look good. And MAYBE it will be the best looking game on the 360 when it comes out. But it definitely won't be the best looking game on all consoles.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Zolin - 605 days 15 hours ago
4.5 - Yeah
the graphics look superb but i do hope that resistance and killzone look as good or better then Gears of War 2.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Thoas - 605 days 13 hours ago
4.6 - LOL
It does look totally different. Epic is a Epic fail.
4.7 GameDev | 605 days 6 hours ago - User only got 1 bubble - Show
Shut this user up Let user speak
DJ - 604 days 22 hours ago
4.8 - Yup, that's exactly how I remember the game looking...
And I was amazed at the perfect 10s it got in the graphics department. I've seen Epic do the same thing with Unreal Tournament 3. Looks decent enough in-game, but nothing close to what they published in Magazine screenshots.

I'm really just waiting for in-game video footage, because that'll be the true determinant of how it compares to the likes of Killzone and Resistance (once we get updated footage for those titles at E3).
Shut this user up Let user speak
bishop-br - 604 days 22 hours ago
4.9 -
We all now you should not see it from the distance you have from your computer now (and that is why it looks way so worse) but I do agree... Gears don't looked that great to me... For sure, it was a push back in 2006 but really, Resistance has already better models and less crispy images (just look at the weapon, try to forget that Marcus's odd/dirty ear and hair in front of you).

I'm not calling out Gears Of War or Gears of War II, but really, in my mind the outstanding in gears was the level design (offline), a smart use of the colors, pretty fresh (not really original) gameplay and they was amaze enough to put in a game style and narrative that attracts the Halo guys to it, which put a big amount of people playing it online (and we all know that the online success of some games depends on the number of people playing it, COD4 could be as good as 1 billion dollars in my wallet, but if no one played it, we would just let it go and moved away to the next fragfest).

But back to the point Gears stop amazing me back in early 07, from that 'till now we have many really graphical pushes, why should someone expect Gears 2, in the same old engine with little adjustments, to amaze us? I don't think it gonna be the best looking game even on 360 only, because Bioshock is already a little better that Gears 1, if developers now try and make their own way (read it: no more unreal engine shortcuts) to tap 360 hardware, they can easy pass Gears 2.
Shut this user up Let user speak
niall77 - 605 days 18 hours ago
5 - looks good but you know they are tweaked to look there best (like most screenshots these days)
just hope the poor texture pop in from most UE3 games can be fixed, and that it runs at a nice frame rate of about 60 FPS.

thats what I want to see, look at mass effect the screen where "Fracking" amazing but in motion it lost so much due to jumpy frame rates
Shut this user up Let user speak
Richdad - 605 days 11 hours ago
5.1 - YEah
Mass Effect looked great but the frame rate issue where only when too much action was there and UE3 engine upgrade was not there and even then it was having huge open world environments. Also just think Mass Effect looked better than Gears and even UT3 and especially the characters where best in any game.
Shut this user up Let user speak
GIJeff - 605 days 11 hours ago
5.2 - yea
see, epics '05 bullshots were in game....on a high end PC running at less than playable framerates, with details turned on that todays high end rigs can hardly accomplish. See, the engine is capable in it(as far as i can tell), its just not playable yet, especially on the 360.
Shut this user up Let user speak
thor - 605 days 18 hours ago
6 -
Yeah games don't look like their screenshots _all_ the time, they've just arranged the shots, picked the best ones and done a bit of post processing. But we know that the level of graphical detail will be about the same.
7 LaChance | 605 days 18 hours ago - User only got 1 bubble - Show
Shut this user up Let user speak
JVIDICAN - 605 days 17 hours ago
7.1 -
it might be
but dont be expecting a "huge" jump in graphics
epic stated after making Gears of war that they had reached about 80% of the 360s potential. im confident gears 2 will reach that 100% marker but it might not have the same efect there was in jumping in 30-40% to 80%. if u get what im saying.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Alcaponedyou - 605 days 17 hours ago
7.2 - gloss, glitter, make up
that's why it looks good. That's unreal engine for ya.
Shut this user up Let user speak
jmare - 605 days 17 hours ago
7.3 -
That is a foolish thing to say. Gears is only the biggest game this gen for 360 fanboys. Sony fanboys couldn't care less aout Gears. And reasonable gamers will agree, that while it was good, Gears is nowhere near the biggest game this gen. Especially this year when GTA4 and MGS4 finally release. Lastly, Gears simply took the mechanic from Killswitch and prettied it up, but more importantly, it came far too early in the generation for it to have a lasting impact overall for it to be the top game/series of this generation. Nobody knows what we will have next year or later. It's still too early to tell.

Edit: If you disagree, then man up and say why, phantom disagreers.
Shut this user up Let user speak
vloeistof - 605 days 17 hours ago
7.4 -
clearly is the BIGGEST game of this gen hands down (that is sales , hype etc ).

ever heard of final fantasy xiii
Shut this user up Let user speak
GiantEnemyCrab - 605 days 17 hours ago
7.5 - @7.1
""Cliffy B declares in an interview that "I think we've only scratched the surface of what we can do with the 360. There's far more potential down the road to do more stuff. As amazing as I think Gears is, I think we'll definitely push it much further""

http://digg.com/gaming_news...
Shut this user up Let user speak
JVIDICAN - 605 days 17 hours ago
7.6 - giantenemycrab
and thats what we call back pedaling =P
Shut this user up Let user speak
meepmoopmeep - 605 days 17 hours ago
7.7 -
this gen just started and you already boast such rubbish?
a game that had no current gen competition, hell, a console with no current gen competiton would stand to do fairly well.

Gears is great for its time and it deserves to be compared to... but this is just the beginning.
by Holiday Season it will be replaced by another game to be compared to.
talk about the best when this gen is over and we start the next.
7.8 Alcaponedyou | 605 days 16 hours ago - deleted by mod -
Shut this user up Let user speak
hazeblaze - 605 days 15 hours ago
7.9 -
Perhaps you've been absent from the internet for a while... But Uncharted took the gfx crown from Gears nearly 1/2 a year ago.
Shut this user up Let user speak
wow4u - 605 days 14 hours ago
7.10 -
"Gears is only the biggest game this gen for 360 fanboys. Sony fanboys couldn't care less aout Gears. And reasonable gamers will agree, that while it was good, Gears is nowhere near the biggest game this gen. Especially this year when GTA4 and MGS4 finally release."

That is just fcuking dumb.

Gears of War won *piles* of Game of the Year Awards. "Reasonable" gamers know that Gears is one of the best games of the last two years, bar none.

And, when I say "one of the best" I mean better than anything on the PS3 _at all_.

Gears of War has 94/100 on Metacritic -- it is considered by *REASONABLE* people to be better than *ANY* game released on the PS3 _to date_.

Take your nonsense ->
Shut this user up Let user speak
Ariexv - 605 days 12 hours ago
7.11 - rofl
lmao @ MGS4 being bigger then Gears 2... the last MGS did something like 3.5 million with a 120 million install base the last gears did 5 million with a 10 million install base. Gears WILL DESTROY MGS4 In sales and possibly review scores as well. The ONLY competition for gears this year is GTA IV.

KZ2 will be crap just like Kz1.
MGS doesn't have the huge user base they used to, and they have 1/10th the install base now.
R1 got destroyed by Gears 1 and R2 will as well.
Shut this user up Let user speak
GIJeff - 605 days 11 hours ago
7.12 - Umm
im looking on the back of the COD4 PS3 box and it states the following:
"Winner of 40+ E3 Awards Including:
Best of show -G4
Best Action Game -Game Critics Awards
Best Shooter and Best Graphics -Gamespot and IGN.com
Multiple game of the Year winner...."

I think COD4 is the new winner. And honestly, it has much cleaner visuals than Gears, running at 60fps in 1080p with 18 players online. In a year people will still be playing COD4 A LOT, and across all platforms.

PS.
"One of the deepest online shooters of all time" -IGN.com
Shut this user up Let user speak
mistertwoturbo - 605 days 10 hours ago
7.13 -
COD4 was only able to achieve those visuals at 600p native resolution. Gears was actually at least true 720p with very detailed environments and character models. The only thing it could have used a bit more anti-aliasing, but it doesn't matter too much when playing at normal viewing distance. Gears 1 set the benchmark for graphics though. But it wasn't just the graphics that made Gears a huge seller, it was the fact that the 360 didn't have such a great library of games at the time, and the actual gameplay of gears was pretty innovative.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Talyboy - 604 days 23 hours ago
7.14 - ^^^7.13^^^
WTF?! 600p? We're not talking about gaylo. You don't know jack about what you are talking about. COD4 reached native 1080i and an upscaled 1080p resolution. That 600p crap is bullish. Only everyone and your guys' moms are playing COD4. And so they have been for the months since its release. Its been #1 on the online services for more that a quarter, and soon 1/2 a year.

And LaChance and all the other MS horndogs have got it all wrong. When games like Uncharted came out, and games like Killzone 2 were revealed, it was sorry @sses like yourselves that were trying to compare them to Gears. Cause that's all you had to compare, which wasn't much considering what you were comparing them to. So don't go spinnin the facts around. Uncharted already OWNS for being better graphically and is a much better game. To top it off, the developers of the game made sure the experience was "lasting"...that is, took more than 4 hours to beat.
Shut this user up Let user speak
GIJeff - 604 days 22 hours ago
7.15 - turbo
perhaps running at 600p(is this even a valid res for tvs?) on the 360...i dont know, i admit gladly that i do not own one. I already own a windows based PC and its WAY better than that POS plus it cant red ring. If i got the video card thats in the 360 i would be downgrading a generation, and i only have a 7 series card(7950gx2). I dont want a x1600 in my system, its crap. Midrange when it launched, laughable now. as for the 360 having "more ram" as the fans like to say. it doesnt. And my 4GB kills it too. All im trying to say is, theres no reason for a lot of people to be in the least bit interested in another windows machine. I will never be convinced to get a xbox of any kind, mainly because i have taste.
Add Comment (Gamer Zone)
Gamer Zone Posting Guidelines
The Gamer Zone is for members who want a more friendly and civilized discussion. This section is heavily moderated by the N4G staff, so leave your fanboyism at the door please. Members who are unable to behave in a mature and respectful manner will be temporarily or permanently restricted from posting in the Gamer Zone. Using words such as Xbots and Sony droids, or other words from the console war vocabulary, is strictly prohibited in this Zone.
Read More...
 
 
You must log in to post comments.
Username:  
Password:  
 
 
About N4G
N4G is a social game news site that covers the game industry 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
More Info... | Submit News