240°

Bungie Myths Debunked!

That Gaming Site writes: "Theres been plenty of talk recently about Bungie branching off, being bought out, etc. We here at That Gaming Site were rather embarrassed such facts were spread around the Internet with little to no research to back them up, let's clear things up, shall we?"
Elven6 - contributor
Published: 393 days 18 hours ago | News | PlayStation 3 | Xbox 360 | Wii | Gaming | PC
 
 

Showing: 1 - 15 of 15 Comments
Shut this user up Let user speak
Ichiryoka - 393 days 19 hours ago
1 - Why???
Why does sony need a game like halo when they have killzone 2, R2, Bioshock series which has recently been added, the COD Series which is multi platform as well, SOOO Who needs Bungie??? Ohhh right my fault, microsoft does.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Xelai - 393 days 17 hours ago
1.1 -
The sad thing about this is that the original sentences are completely taken out of context from the original interview, when in the interview it talks about who it is possible for Bungie to separate more and more along the road from Halo, the article approved in this site turns it into Bungie and Microsoft.

Pathetic.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Sitdown - 393 days 15 hours ago
1.2 - @Ichiryoka
The games you named are good and all.......but if Sony could get a game that has the same selling power of Halo.....would you want them to turn it down?
Shut this user up Let user speak
Forbidden_Darkness - 393 days 19 hours ago
2 -
@ article:

1. But for how long will Microsoft keep publishing them and if they keep publishing them forever and drop out of the console war they could still be multiplatform?

2. Yeah, im sure sony was never even thinking of buying them, they have enough first party developers anyways.

3. Of course, Microsoft owns the rights to Halo, no way it would ever let that go.

4. obviously Microsofts not going to state how long the deal is for.

"So their you have it, of course this doesn’t necessarily mean Bungie won’t go multiplatform, their could be something we missed completely. All we can say is until that day, get your facts straight!"

Exactly, they gave no solid proof that Bungie wont go multiplatform at some point and just because Microsoft has a share in them doesnt mean they couldnt mean they wont make a game on another platform, just look at Rare for example, their a first party and still made a DS game.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Odion - 393 days 19 hours ago
2.1 -
Rare makes DS games with MS IP's because MS allows them to, it gets the IP out there more, and brings in extra money.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Elven6 - 393 days 19 hours ago
2.2 -
Sadly, their are people out their (even on N4G) who think all of that is plausible.
Shut this user up Let user speak
thebudgetgamer - 393 days 18 hours ago
2.3 - while most of that will never happen
isnt this article speculating just as much as the other.
all im saying is i have much respect for the work bungie does and would love to see one of their games at the very least go multi and if not i plan on buying a 360 anyways

:)
Shut this user up Let user speak
Elven6 - 393 days 8 hours ago
2.4 -
Its not speculation, its fact :) They took their sources straight "from the horses mouth" in a sense (aka their press releases)
Shut this user up Let user speak
Sitdown - 391 days ago
2.5 - @Eleven6
"Sadly, their are people out their (even on N4G) who think all of that is plausible."

I am not trying to be the grammar police, but both usages of "their" you were wrong...you need to use "there"
Shut this user up Let user speak
Foliage - 393 days 18 hours ago
3 -
I agree Halo will not be on the PS3, but what is this crappy site?

The guy can't even spell "there". He got it wrong twice.

Here is a quote:
"So their you have it, of course this doesn’t necessarily mean Bungie won’t go multiplatform, their could be something we missed completely. All we can say is until that day, get your facts straight!"

Is this "writer" 14? Get your spelling straight!
Shut this user up Let user speak
steveg2564 - 393 days 17 hours ago
3.1 -
Those were the only ones you found? :-)
Shut this user up Let user speak
CliffyBs15YearOldBF - 393 days 15 hours ago
3.2 -
who cares about splelling?
Shut this user up Let user speak
Danja - 393 days 17 hours ago
4 -
I wouldn't want Halo on the PS3 ne ways , I just think Halo Franchise is synonymous with the Xbox brand and that's where it should stay , besides I would prefer a new IP ...
Shut this user up Let user speak
Marojado - 393 days 16 hours ago
5 -
It was stated that Microsoft would maintain first pick of Bungie developed games, so the chance of any decent Bungie games coming to other consoles is unlikely.

That said, thatgamingsite.com isn't exactly top notch. They previously reported the confirmation of "Dead of Alive Xtreme 3" with "one handed control scheme". This is all well and good but it listed Bad Joystick - a pisstake site - as the source. In the Bad Joystick article, they list their source as Scrapetv.com, another pisstake site who have published such articles as "heath ledger isn't dead" and "God suing Microsoft for copyright infringement over use of the term Halo".

Superior journalism guys, seriously...
Shut this user up Let user speak
KARMA2009 - 393 days 13 hours ago
6 - -
Bungie is already in the works with the PS3,new IP,new game,and will come out in 2009....
Add Comment (Gamer Zone)
Gamer Zone Posting Guidelines
The Gamer Zone is for members who want a more friendly and civilized discussion. This section is heavily moderated by the N4G staff, so leave your fanboyism at the door please. Members who are unable to behave in a mature and respectful manner will be temporarily or permanently restricted from posting in the Gamer Zone. Using words such as Xbots and Sony droids, or other words from the console war vocabulary, is strictly prohibited in this Zone.
Read More...
 
 
You must log in to post comments.
Username:  
Password:  
 
 
About N4G
N4G is a social game news site that covers the game industry 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
More Info... | Submit News