100°

EA reports Q2 results

Electronic Arts Inc today announced preliminary financial results for its fiscal second quarter ended September 30, 2008.
-Net revenue for the second quarter was $894 million, up $254 million as compared with $640 million for the prior year.
-Net loss for the quarter was $310 million as compared with net loss of $195 million for the prior year. Diluted loss per share was$0.97 as compared with diluted loss per share of $0.62 for the prior year

Q2 PLATFORM NET REVENUE MIX (In millions)

360 224
PS3 98
PC 88
PS2 54
NDS 43
PSP 36
Wii 33

Read Full Story >>
files.shareholder.com
Odion5663d ago

Everyone was saying EA was selling more on PS3 but clearly not thats not true.

green5663d ago

Wow you have to combine the revenue that EA got from the PS3,PC and Wii to even get close to the revenue they got from the 360.360 really does push software.

Beast_Master5663d ago (Edited 5663d ago )

This is not gonna be good.

FLAME ON!!

Promising that PS3 is second and with Mirror's edge and Dead Space selling well the numbers will be a little better, but with L4D being basically a 360 console exclusive we may see these same margins. boy they should give up on the Wii though Boom Blocks was an exclusive and they also got Rockband in May (Q2) and all the Sports titles, and still where in last place.

Beast_Master5663d ago

Did any one see this!!
YOY%
Xbox 360 +3%
PLAYSTATION 3 +476%

Year over year change up 400+ percent this title is EPIC FAIL FOR NOT POINTING THAT OUT!!!

Gam715663d ago (Edited 5663d ago )

That shows how bad that year must have been.

All ps3 numbers have been up since last year, HW, SW, because they had a bad year to build from.

FCC5663d ago (Edited 5663d ago )

Just to think a week ago, PS3 fanboys were gloating because the Xbox 360 no longer pushed as software as the PS3 therefore it's dead... The numbers really do show... This is embarrassing, I'll link the original article.

http://n4g.com/industrynews...

Wow... That's more embarrassing than I imagined... Shame on you ThatCanandianGuy420 and the 136 people who agreed with him.

I feel a little embarrassed for you guys too...

vasilisk5663d ago

And I feel a little embarassed for you...
When he wrote the article he didn't have EA's Q2, did he?
So when the article was written, according to Q1 numbers and last year's Q4, which were the only numbers he had at hand, he was actually right, wasn't he?

FCC5663d ago (Edited 5663d ago )

vasilisk, maybe you don't understand who I'm currently addressing. I clearly state PS3 FANBOYS in my comment and I link to the comments on the article.

I feel even more embarrassed for you because you have no reading comprehension... I wonder how you get your bubbles...

Nice try on the spin spin spin spin spin spin spin spin.

Don't reply again unless you're apologizing, honestly.

EDIT: I see your disagree vasilisk, apologizing isn't that embarrassing, in contrast of what you did. Apologizing only makes you the better man and it's over with. I won't judge you.

vasilisk5663d ago (Edited 5663d ago )

Dude, I'm not spinning and the only fanboy I'm seeing between us is clearly you. And as far as the reading comprehension comment, everyone with a little bit of common sense can clearly see who's lacking in that department.
All I'm saying is that when the article was written he didn't have EA's Q2. Did he? Nope, and I really feel sorry for your reading comprehension.
If you actually read the report you would see that for Q1 the revenue was 81mil for the 360 and 139mil for PS3. As for last year's Q4 it was 128mil for 360 and 159mil for PS3. Were these the numbers he had at hand when he wrote the article? Yes, and now I'm really really feeling sorry for your reading comprehension.
Actually take the time to actually READ what other people are saying before posting next time.

Be Reasonable5663d ago

Jesus Chirst, Moderator you can ban me I don't care anymore but honestly, YOU STILL FAIL AT READING COMPREHENSION. Maybe I didn't clarify clearly enough, I meant comments on the N4G page on the link. Not the article itself. It's a misinterpretation but still honestly if I thought the comments inside the actual article was PS3 Fanboy then obviously it'd be reading comprehension fail, but it's not the case.

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 5663d ago
Nineball21125663d ago

If you notice, on page 19, the Year Over Year (YOY) % change for the PS3 platform has improved 476%.

Q2 FY08 = 17
Q2 FY09 = 98

Yeah, that's FAR below the units sold for Xbox 360, but that's definitely the right trend! :-)

Hey, I gotta spin it the best I can, right? ;-)

Mozilla895663d ago

Any improvement is a good improvement. But still aren't most companies releasing their Q3 profits now? So why is this Q2?

creeping judas5663d ago

ill give you a bubble for being honest about the spinning!!!

allthough it is a good point, EA will see the reason to make more games on the PS3 and make them better at the same time.

Nineball21125663d ago

Thanks Creeping Judas.

Bubbles back at ya!

kewlkat0075663d ago

"If you notice, on page 19, the Year Over Year (YOY) % change for the PS3 platform has improved 476%.

Q2 FY08 = 17
Q2 FY09 = 98 "

Always a bright side..eh

Some have to remember EA was putting out inferior products on the PS3 early so seems like they are redeeming themselves. Still Xbox 360 brings home the Bacon.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5663d ago
Lord Xire5663d ago

EA knows the 360 is a breadwinner.

Without the 360 getting that close to 1billion$ would have been impossible.

Just make sure a hefty sum of that goes towards Dead Space 2 and Mass Effect 2.

FCC5663d ago (Edited 5663d ago )

True, quality is really improving on the PS3 since the dreaded Orange Box. Before anyone starts getting overboard and starts claiming Dead Space was on PS3 lead meaning the PS3 is better, (happens a lot when Dead Space is mentioned) it was actually 360 lead and was polished beyond polished on the PS3 version.

http://www.videogamer.com/n...

"He added: "Right now we're leading and building and doing everything on the 360. Pretty soon in a month or two we will switch and lead on the PS3. That is so that you're not downgrading the PS3 later. We're putting all our engineering muscle into making the PS3 great, and then we'll know that the 360 will be great."

However, when asked if there will be any differences between the PS3 and Xbox 360 versions, Schofield said: "The plan has to be, and it will be, on parity with the 360.""

Just a little snippet.

gamerdude115663d ago

EA makes a point to have you focus on the non-GAAP numbers because they do not include revenue deferrals. EA feels that the non-GAAP numbers give a better reflection of how their business is operating. The GAAP numbers were posted last quarter as well, and they incorrectly showed the PS3 had outsold the 360.

non-GAAP revenue.
360 224
PS3 166
PS2 77
Wii 60

Darkseider5663d ago

Score an agree and a bubble for someone who knows what GAAP and Non-GAAP refer to!

cellfluid5663d ago

Im confuse by these numbers what's really goin on?

FCC5663d ago (Edited 5663d ago )

The Analysis from 4 days ago was looked to be a pseudo-truth article but it really was just a guesstimate... they said the PS3 is making MORE money for EA but not more than the Xbox 360 I'm pretty sure, or their lying.

http://www.n4g.com/industry...

GiantEnemyLobster5663d ago

360: $224 million
Ps3: $98 million

Well, I guess we know who the true winner is, as usual.

Guitarded5663d ago (Edited 5663d ago )

You weren't supposed to come in this thread. The SDF doesn't want this story to get hot so your orders are to stay away. Their going to rank you down now. Got to give you some credit though. You got balls to come in here and be humiliated, yet continue to try and defend yourself or change the subject to draw attention away from the fact that you were and are WRONG! Good thing you ran out of bubbles. It was starting to get embarrassing. Funniest comment ever, Air1 comment 7.0

Show all comments (73)
60°

Indie Game of the Month Awards April 2024

“April was an indie-heavy month and it was hard to pick the best games but here we go! Hope you have fun and see something you like.” - A.J. Maciejewski from Video Chums.

Read Full Story >>
videochums.com
100°

Abiotic Factor: Hands-On Impressions - Coworkers, Office Chair Races, and Really Tall Enemies | TNS

The Nerd Stash: "Abiotic Factor combines some of the funniest and more challenging elements into a facility where dimensional barriers have dissipated."

Read Full Story >>
thenerdstash.com
210°

Games That Were Bad on Release, But Are Now Great

BLG writes, "Some of the most popular games have had a rough start, with some of them being downright unplayable.

Despite that, developers have managed to turn it around for them and make their game worth playing. Here are some games that had a rough start but were pretty great."

Read Full Story >>
bosslevelgamer.com
Terry_B7h ago

Good list..hoped to see Street Fighter 5 there..and it is.

Vits6h ago(Edited 6h ago)

Sea of Thieves... I'm not disagreeing that the game has improved in terms of content. But I feel that the most significant change between now and its release is actually the public perception. Nowadays, most people are aware that the game is a multiplayer PvP-focused experience first and foremost, and not "Black Flag made by Rare". Consequently, people dismissing the whole experience because the single-player aspect is lacking or the story is plain are much less common.

darthv724h ago

Several years ago, i submitted an idea to Rare that would change up the mechanics of battling opponents in the game. whereby if you died in battle, you turned into a skeleton warrior and had to fight your way back to the land of the living. It was an interesting twist on respawning and would allow the player to experience both sides of a battle.

I keep hoping to see something like that get added to the game.

Kaii6h ago

They consider FO 76 & ME Andromeda to be great now 🤭

anast3h ago

Every game in the last 2 decades...

INMATEofARKHAM32m ago

It's sad that this quick retort is more often than not true... The industry's acceptance of release and patch has gone too far.