650°

Crytek announces Crysis 2 for consoles and PC

Today EA and Crytek announced Crysis 2 for the PlayStation 3, Xbox 360 and PC.

The next instalment of Crysis will be the first game built on Crytek's CryENGINE 3 and will be released for the PlayStation 3, Xbox 360 and PC. EA will publish the game.

Read Full Story >>
gamezine.co.uk
BRACHATTACK5440d ago

Gamers rejoice, this game will be amazing!

Imagine how it will look on the ps3?

*ORGASMS*

5440d ago
techie5440d ago

That is NOT what they've said.

Daoshai5440d ago

That comment really does reek of dirty beaver

Ninver5440d ago

@ ^^^

Umm if my memory is right that was along the lines of what they said. Regardless they did say the CryEngine3 if used by them will be optimised to take full advantage of each console. And we all know what happens when the cell is released from it's beastly cage.

theEnemy5440d ago

err dude, Crytek didn't "made it clear" that the PS3 version will be superior to the 360.

I don't think they will even say that.

solideagle15440d ago

it will take the crown for Killlzone 2 or not. well i think not but killzone 3 will take it back in any case.

thanks

Montrealien5440d ago (Edited 5440d ago )

What do you guys think? It will be a 2D side scroller on the 360?

I tell you, "enthusiasts" have no limits and are truly sad sad people, they are not gamers, thats for sure. Polite or not, this kind of banter is why the open zone was created, here you are just irritating. What matters is that we get a great shooter and everyone will have a chance to play it, I am willing to bet that the game looks fine and playable on all consoles, cause I am not an idiot.

WhittO5440d ago

No i think Uncharted 2 will take on the next "best looking console" game award.

Crysis 2 best looking PC game...

I have a feeling it wont look that good on consoles, will look great but nothing like the PC version, they simply dont have the time/resources to enhance the ps3 version, thats why it is always the exclusives to ps3 which end up looking amazing, because they are putting all of their resources toward one platform (which ultimately ends up looking better than 360 games)

SL1M DADDY5440d ago

Not a bad idea! Make it in the likes of Mega Man and I am in!

5440d ago
Halochampian5440d ago

maybe you should take your own advice because you couldn't even interpret what Crytek was saying.

techie5440d ago

This is the quotation Beaver is talking about:

"So the PS3 will run slightly better here, it'll look and feel probably the same, but the engine is diverting computation needs to power subsystems available to the PS3, and the 360 differently, and PC differently."

http://www.gamezine.co.uk/n...

However they said after that the PS3 will run CPU computations slightly faster, and the 360 will run GPU faster.

De La Chance5440d ago (Edited 5440d ago )

the game isnt even out yet...we havent seen a single screenshot...one hour ago we didnt even know this game existed....and the "my version is better" blabber has already started...

Cant wait for the 1600° threads on N4G to spot which version has an extra facial hair on some guys face

xwabbit5440d ago

lol even tho i love my ps3, since I'm a pc gamer and have a pro rig, ill get it for that, unless a lot of my ps3 friends get it and it has a pro multiplayer

crazy-eyez-killah5440d ago (Edited 5440d ago )

Sad day for PC gamers...........good day for ALL (ignoring wii-toy) console owners.

SCThor5440d ago

if the PS3 version isn't better than the other console version, is because developers aren't trying hard enough and that means a rushed game or a tone down version so both look equally. Any of both cases I won't buy it.

ShabzS5440d ago (Edited 5440d ago )

stfu man .. u have no idea what you're talking about .. Stop quoting fictional statements from crytek .. jeez

SL1M DADDY5440d ago (Edited 5440d ago )

Dirty Beaver - "PS3 owners rejoice since crytek has made it clear the ps3 version will be the superior console version and will benefit most thanks to the computational abilities of the cell processor."

deep - "So the PS3 will run slightly better here, it'll look and feel probably the same, but the engine is diverting computation needs to power subsystems available to the PS3, and the 360 differently, and PC differently."

http://www.gamezine.co.uk/n...

He might be talking smack but at least it's an educated form of smack. Gotta give him credit for that at least.

Montrealien5440d ago (Edited 5440d ago )

Crytek says...

"So the PS3 will run slightly better here, it'll look and feel probably the same, but the engine is diverting computation needs to power subsystems available to the PS3, and the 360 differently, and PC differently."

Much a do about nothing? yep. Both games will run pretty much the same on both consoles, and no matter what console you have you will get to experience some super suit FPS action. If you actually think that the word "slightly" means anything when comparing two games, you lack some form of gaming education.

Gantrfaxx5440d ago

If it was only on Ps3 and Pc i would expect far more from it. Multiplatform titles all look similar on both, the X360 and Ps3 and i don't think that in this case we will really see what the Ps3 is capable of.

SL1M DADDY5440d ago

If something is slightly better, it's still better no matter how slight. Kind of like saying slightly few more players of the PS3 version will have a reliable gaming experience rather than those playing the version on the 360...

Montrealien5440d ago (Edited 5440d ago )

Can we pls stop with this whole "what the Ps3 is capable of" crap with multiplat games?

We have seen what the PS3 is capable of, its called Infamous, Motostorm 2, Heavenly sword, MGS4. I mean I love the system and all, but it is not limitless, if it was I would be playing my favorite game of the year thus far, Infamous, in Full 1080p 60 fps and Zero draw in.

And Slim, wow, just wow. Do you eat your semantic pie with Ice cream?

5440d ago
Lifendz5440d ago

Can't wait to see what those guys do on a console. If the game is even close to the PC graphical goodness then they can gladly get my 63 bucks for yet another FPS.

5440d ago
SL1M DADDY5440d ago

à la mode it is Monty, and thanks for asking. Better to understand a word at its literal meaning than to cast a gray cloud over vocabulary.

5440d ago
aksmashh5440d ago

The Graphics Are Going To Have To Be Amazing, Otherwise With Killzone Already & MAG,COD MW2 Coming Out Theres Not Much Space But For 360 Its Probably Already Game Of The Year

All-35439d ago (Edited 5439d ago )

Cevat Yerli, Crytek CEO and President, explained how the engine could adapt to development on the different platforms:

"The CryENGINE 3 runs currently at more or less the same quality bar. I say more or less because the engine still optimizes itself to power of the platforms' intrinsics," Yerli told IGN.

"So the PS3 will run slightly better here, it'll look and feel probably the same, but the engine is diverting computation needs to power subsystems available to the PS3, and the 360 differently, and PC differently."

---

Mark Atkinson, Crytek’s director of technology said:

“It’s been tricky, but we’ve got a strong PS3 engine with all the major systems running on SPUs. With middleware, what you want is for someone else to do all that so the developer can just concentrate on making games. We have parity between the platforms now: both run at the same speed.” Although this ’same speed’ clearly depends on what the engine is doing at that particular time. “If the game’s shader-heavy it runs a bit faster on 360; if it’s compute-heavy with physics and particles, then the SPUs take over and it’s a bit quicker on PS3.”

---

"So the PS3 will run slightly better here, it'll look and feel probably the same, but the engine is diverting computation needs to power subsystems available to the PS3, and the 360 differently, and PC differently."

http://www.gamezine.co.uk/n...

--> He might be talking smack but at least it's an educated form of smack. Gotta give him credit for that at least.

Oh really?

What does this line mean --> it'll look and feel probably the same <--

Notice that was stated even after taking into consideration, the various computational requirements of the PS3, 360 and PC hardware.

--> It'll LOOK and FEEL probably the SAME <--

Montrealien5439d ago (Edited 5439d ago )

I am, and will always be Montrealien...

*busts a move*

This is looking to be an interesting few days here on our beloved N4G, I will try my best to not be a douche.

*rolls eyes*

specialguest5439d ago (Edited 5439d ago )

I'm just posting here to agree with 1.20.

Tito Jackson5439d ago (Edited 5439d ago )

i cant imagine it reaching its full potential on the static hardware of the 360 & PS3.

@montrealien(above): youre not a douche. you never have been. your just opinionated.

cmrbe5439d ago

a long as they push the PC again to the limit i am ok with it. Good for those that don't have a good rig to play it but i am playing it on my PC. PC is how anyone should experience Crysis.

Ju5439d ago

Quote: “If the game’s shader-heavy it runs a bit faster on 360; if it’s compute-heavy with physics and particles, then the SPUs take over and it’s a bit quicker on PS3.”

This scares me a little bit. If they do not feed geometry into the SPU (-pre-processor) and don't add HDD streaming I fear you might see more details in the PS3 version while visually it might have an edge on the 360.

While this might satisfy both sides, it does not take full advantage of the PS3.

I do not believe, this is completely possible with one engine for all. But maybe they do. If the vertex processor (and shader) is a virtual shader processor which can distribute to either the ATI, NVidia and SPUs, this might be possible - but they would have mentioned that. They also did not mention any kind of deferred rendering, which uses pixel (lightning) setups on the SPUs.

Could still mean better explosions, more collisions and simply more particles with a steady framerate on the PS3, though. I hope so, but its not the full potential.

DaTruth5439d ago

I expect it will suck on all platforms! Like Farcry 2! It will look nice, but you will kill a bunch of guys, drive five minutes away and when you return, they will be waiting again in the exact same place. It was the same on 360, PS3 and PC!

I feel sorry for PC owners, as they have few titles they can call their own and now they have one less and it will be ruined!

Nihilism5439d ago

i hope you console gamers are happy, crysis 2 will look like a supernintendo game in comparison to the original now because it will be scaled back like a (insert relevant thing here), yes even ps3 is weak compared to any 2 year old pc, if my 1gig card doesn't run crysis perfect, the sh!t 256meg one in ps3 will suffer bad, then again it will only run at 1280*768 on ps3...tisk tisk

+ Show (34) more repliesLast reply 5439d ago
s8anicslayer5440d ago

Let's see if Crysis 2 for home consoles will be the graphical benchmark like Crysis is for the PC

belal5440d ago

not when its a multiplatform game...

Ninver5440d ago

@ belal

I agree about the multiplat statement but i do recall an article about crytek stating the CryEngine3 will take full advantage of each of the consoles. It's all about the devs really.

PtRoLLFacE5440d ago

i just want hear someone saying the ps360 version is better

Statix5439d ago (Edited 5439d ago )

I'm surprised it's not called "Trysis."

As for your question, multiplatform projects NEVER fully exploit a console's hardware.

DaTruth5439d ago

It will have to be three completely different games. Or at least, pretty different games! But enough that playing it on another platform would change the placement of characters and size of maps.

What they did in the last one is not even possible on consoles and my statement has nothing to do with graphics!

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 5439d ago
Cajun Chicken5440d ago

Nice. I haven't had the fortune to play Crysis but I'll be easily up for the second one.

Ju5439d ago

Don't think you missed much, though.

They have to change the controls. Crysis is a pain with a controller. And the suit control just don't fit onto a controller (you need to open a menu for essential commands - this is tedious).

UnblessedSoul5440d ago

Nice, was gonna happen sooner or later

Deviant5440d ago

too many shooters :( .....

DARK WITNESS5440d ago

not of this quality...

there are lots of shooters in general, but that does not mean you have to own all of them.

Statix5439d ago

Well, this year alone I've already bought Killzone 2 and Riddick, and am looking forward to Operation Flashpoint 2, Borderlands, and MAG. I really don't think I'll have room to get this game if it comes out this year.

Show all comments (188)
100°

The Crysis Trilogy Joins EA Access Vault

Featuring the complete nanosuit experience, The Crysis Trilogy has now joined the EA Access vault as a title that's free for those that subscribe to the EA service on Xbox One consoles.

Read Full Story >>
gamerheadquarters.com
Games1st1382d ago (Edited 1382d ago )

Just in time for those that got the month trial.

DrDeath1382d ago

Wait? There is more than one? lol

210°

Here are Star Wars The Force Unleashed, Crysis 2, RAGE & Resident Evil 2 Remake with Ray Tracing

YouTube’s members ‘Digital Dreams’ and ‘Jose cangrejo’ have shared some videos, showcasing Pascal Gilcher’s Reshade mod – which adds Ray Tracing/Path Tracing effects – in some really old games such as Star Wars The Force Unleashed, Crysis 2, RAGE and Resident Evil 6.

Read Full Story >>
dsogaming.com
traumadisaster1766d ago

I'm still learning how to look for the differences. At first I was focusing on shadows for some reason but I don't think that changes much, is it reflections that change?

rashada071766d ago (Edited 1766d ago )

It is supposed to be simulating how light actually works- so yes if light is reflecting off a surface accurately it should show reflection or an effect that matches what you are looking at in the environment. Next time you play a game look at a puddle of water there may be just a "baked" in texture that if you aren't paying attention seems like it is reflecting but it isn't. I would say though if the light is reflecting more accurately I would think that would give more accurate shadows as well.
I am still not 100% sold on it- it looks okay but I can't get over the hardware price jump for better reflections..

Taz X141766d ago

While games won't look immensely better, it opens up more possibilities overall. Understandably, the price jump is huge. But, that can be said for being at the forefront for any new technology. I'm currently using a 2080ti and while I've played a few games that enable it, the gpu also plays everything else incredibly well so it's not like you're buying this tech for ONLY that option. Enthusiasts will pay top dollar to check out the newest things, but this will eventually become an everyday consumer and by then they'll have optimized and become a lot cheaper.

warriorcase1765d ago

Ray/path tracing can be used how the developer wants it to be. Tracing can be used to calculate shadows/lighting, reflection and even audio, where audio waves are calculated on the bounce off material types to simulate enviroment and echos accuratly.

Should also keep in mind that this ray/path tracing system is different and less accurate option from Nvidias RTX branded type. McFly's is a reshade that layers over the top of the game and therefor the quality will vary drastically. For example you can see nice reflection in the Star Wars demo here but it then introduces colour clipping with the light saber. On a video of GTA 5 for example it was incorrectly projecting a reflection of a red car onto the road which caused a very faint red glow on the ground around the car.

If you want to see a good example of a game developed with ray tracing reflection and lighting in mind then you could look up the youtube video of "Control - Exclusive E3 RTX GAMEPLAY Trailer".

DigitallyAfflicted1766d ago

It supposed to add more realistic light Not actually more light effects and explosions

traumadisaster1766d ago

I hate to say it but I’m fine with fake lights, shadows, reflections. I just kind of like the effect, it’s also great it saves resources for other things.

I’ve been checking out some original Xbox games on x360/x1x and the engine has fake light streaming in through a stained glass window, and I love it even though I know it’s not real time lighting. Heck it even shifts as I move about.

I’ve about convinced my self rt and hdr just doesn’t work for me. Before hdr I would even complain damn why are the headlights killing me they are so bright.

I notice most frame rate, then jaggies, then resolution; with the last two interchangeable depending.

Other day watched an enthusiast rave over 4k and the poor guy was in 1080p. I played the same game the night before and thought wow this is clean, I wonder if it’s 4k, but knew differently and I thought wow even resolution is not always important. The next day he apologized and was surprised he could be fooled.

RaidenBlack1766d ago

EA should have released the Crysis Trilogy Remaster for this gen.

FGHFGHFGH1761d ago

How come the lightsabers don't give off any light? Even in the EA star wars game the guy uses it to light up a dark cave. I guess if it is using frostbite it will support rtx cards.

80°

13 Awesome Games Set In Real Places

Jum Jum from Unleashthegamer writes: We gathered the best real setting games we could think of if you’re looking for something in a familiar location to soothe your thirst for real-world games.

Read Full Story >>
unleashthegamer.com