320°

E3's Biggest Games Reviewed Now: Killzone 2, Gears 2 & More (GamesRadar)

GamesRadar writes:
"You know the problem with E3? You have to wait months before you find out if a game that looked great in July is going to kick ass or blow goats when it finally arrives in November. And it it sucks, you feel deflated. If only you could read, right here and right now, which games are really worth eagerly anticipating and which you should just start fitting for cement shoes right now. Wouldn't that make the world a better place?

Well congratulations Johnny, because now you can! After years of exposure to inhuman levels of liquor, cigarette smoke, and E3 cafeteria food, we've actually developed the ability to see into the future. Here, for the very first time, are the exclusive first reviews for all of the games you're most excited about this very E3."
n/a
MK_Red - contributor
Published: 529 days ago | Review | E3 2008 | PlayStation 3 | Xbox 360 | Wii | PC
 
 

12Next »
Showing: 1 - 50 of 59 Comments
1 Blademask | 529 days 3 hours ago - User only got 1 bubble - Show
Shut this user up Let user speak
joe382 - 528 days 21 hours ago
1.1 - STUPIDEST IDEA I HAVE EVER SEEN
RIDICULOUS IDEA TO BASE A REVIEW OFF 5 MINUTES OF RANDOM GAMEPLAY.
Shut this user up Let user speak
herbaldoctor7 - 344 days 20 hours ago
1.2 -
these guys suck get a new job (gamesradar)
Shut this user up Let user speak
Wildarmsjecht - 529 days 3 hours ago
2 -
LMAO..basing a review off a title you play for 5 minutes, in one particular level that has been used since the beginning is smart /sarcasm.

I don't remember people complaining about always seeing the middle east in MGS4 or playing it at various demo kiosks. And what did the scores there show, Hmmmm???

If going 5 minutes in one play session should equal a new level, the game should have 100 just to keep me satisfied. Silly Gamesradar...
Shut this user up Let user speak
ChampIDC - 528 days 23 hours ago
2.1 -
It does help to read the little disclaimer at the bottom. It was meant to give a little insight into the games and for fun. FUN being the key word here.
Shut this user up Let user speak
crck - 528 days 21 hours ago
2.2 - No it was meant to generate some hits
Giving out review scores on preview builds is an irresponsible stunt. That brings into question gamesradar's already questionable reputation.
Shut this user up Let user speak
TheExecutive - 528 days 23 hours ago
3 -
give me a break lol. Gamesradar is retarded. Eric if by any chance you read these forums please do us a favor and start flipping burgers.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Wolf873 - 528 days 23 hours ago
4 - Seriously....is that guy serious..lol
I mean even if he did review games based on few minutes of demo, could he seriously consider Killzone-2 worthy of 6? That looks way better Gears, I mean seriously he appreciates how everything looks grittier in Gears but complains about the samething in Killzone. WTH? Damn, those guys would wag their tails if M$ held up a bone for them.
Shut this user up Let user speak
TheExecutive - 528 days 23 hours ago
4.1 -
I think both games look fantastic but to even consider what we have seen from KZ2 a 6 is just plain retarded.
Shut this user up Let user speak
VirusE - 528 days 23 hours ago
4.2 -
Maybe it was based on game play rather than graphics? Going by your standards Crysis warhead was the best game of the show. Did any of you guys play KZ1? Have any of you read any of the previews that all seem to point out that is bland and unoriginal? KZ 1 was about a 6-7 why would part 2 be any different? Guerilla HASN”T MADE ONE GOOD GAME YET YOU BRAIN DEAD IDIOTs!?!?!?!? Why is it so hard to believe that KZ 2 will be more of the same trash those of us with brains have seen guerilla pump out for years? If you played Tiny toon adventures Dizzy’s Candy quest by guerilla raise your hand otherwise STFU with this killzone must be great cause it’s shiny BS. You would have to be blind to not see the disappointment that killzone 2 will be. Read the freaking previews for god sakes! Everyone who has played it seems to say the same things. Those who have not played it seem to think it is the 2nd coming of Christ.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Wolf873 - 528 days 22 hours ago
4.3 - @ Virus
First of all Virus, there is no need to be calling anyone "Brain Dead Idiots", we can talk without having to foul mouth anyone. And secondly, no ever said Crysis doesn't has the best graphics, it does, imo. Also, having a history of bad games doesn't mean that the next is a definite failure, maybe they'll come around this time, who knows? But as it stands, Killzone -2's demo from the looks of it deserves a 7 to 8 at the least. The fact that whoever is playing that game manages to get around and kill some soldiers means that the game is at least playable rather than condemning it for horrible gameplay. And my only argument was that the reviewer found similar aspect of the game positive in Gears but negative in KZ.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Gun_Senshi - 528 days 23 hours ago
5 - Don't you know
Pro reviewers like Gamesradar can review a game from the name ONLY
Shut this user up Let user speak
klashawnd - 528 days 23 hours ago
6 -
6 for Killzone? They just insured that today will be their biggest day for web hits this month lol.
Shut this user up Let user speak
ChampIDC - 528 days 23 hours ago
6.1 -
Well, I'm doubting the game will get a 6, but so far, I'm feeling that it's going to get similar scores to the first game. All in all, that'll mean it's a solid game. It just won't be what everyone is hyping it up to be, just like almost every game except the rare few that actually live up to the hype, such as MGS4.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Halochampian - 528 days 22 hours ago
6.2 - @6.1
if it is getting the same scores as the first one.. that means around 6 or 7. Everyone is having the same complaints about the game.

and people.. stop actually taking all these reviews like actual reviews. They are just fun factors right now.
Shut this user up Let user speak
hotshot127 - 528 days 23 hours ago
7 - oh man, so they gave killzone 2 a 6 and said it was a call of duty clone
so now all of a sudden the fps genre has to do more? JUST when its a ps3 exclusive huh.....
i swear, they purposely put the score that low just to get hits and they put gears a 10 to try and show that its miles better.

only reason they gave little big planet a 10 is because its not competing with there favorite 360 games.

ign said killzone 2 is satisfying and they never felt bored and they they cant wait for it to come febuary. and as far as im concerned, ign is the only review site i can trust so this fanboy shi# has to stop. so everytime its a ps3 game, it has to be completely new and refreshing. then i guess gears 2 will fail since its basically the exact same as the first.......
Shut this user up Let user speak
RAY017 - 528 days 23 hours ago
8 -
WTF, WTF, WTF, WTF!!! A F@$&* 6/10!!! this people are on crack!!! As a PS3 fan I admit that GOW2 looks good, but is not superior to KZ2.
Shut this user up Let user speak
VirusE - 528 days 23 hours ago
8.1 -
Again maybe they are going off of how fun the game is rather than how it looks?
Shut this user up Let user speak
Halochampian - 528 days 22 hours ago
8.2 - @ virus
I think that is what they are going by.

"Hey... if we make the best graphics.. that means everyone will think our game is fun.. when it may not be!!!"
Shut this user up Let user speak
VirusE - 528 days 22 hours ago
8.3 -
Halo it's sad that so much time is wasted on KZ2 when games that are actually going to be good like resistance 2 and LBP seem to go over looked. People say MS hypes up halo yet at least halo comes from a proven dev with millions of games sold and a loyal fanbase unlike KZ2. KZ 2 is 100% hype and zero % substance from what has been shown and said. KZ 1 was hyped just as much and “halo killer” was tossed around by Sony very recklessly and then it blew up in their face. KZ even getting a sequel surprised the hell out of me. It would be like MS making a sequel to shardowrun. The gfx are simply amazing and possibly the best on a console but i don’t buy games from companies with proven track records for sucking and If I wanted to buy a game for gfx alone it surely wouldn’t be a console game considering 2560x1600 has 4 times the pixels of 720p. I learned my lesson about buying into hype from junk companies from buying games made by acclaim as a kid. Guerilla is the acclaim of this gen; they have never made a good game yet people love to talk them up.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Boink - 528 days 23 hours ago
9 - so
you hate them for their KZ2 quick review and they totally suck, and are obviously wrong, so does that mean the 10 they gave to LBP is wrong too?

Gears and resistance look awesome though.
Shut this user up Let user speak
vasilisk - 528 days 22 hours ago
9.1 -
Dude everything is wrong.
This is plain retarded and they're doing it to get some hits. Pretty pathetic if you ask me...
Shut this user up Let user speak
DJ - 528 days 23 hours ago
10 - *Smirk. Whadya know, another Killzone hater.
Well as we all learned from MGS4, the first level is Always representative of the entire game. And how did Gears 2 get a 10? IGN reported that the game has serious framerate issues when there's too many enemies onscreen, and that the enemy AI seemed glitchy.
Shut this user up Let user speak
VirusE - 528 days 23 hours ago
10.1 -
Having played both KZ1 and GOW1 i dont see how this score is even slightly out of line. Gears on metacritic (I know metacritic is owned by MS BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH BLAH have a tissue) got a 94 and kz1 a 70. Crazy how history seems to repeat itself!
Shut this user up Let user speak
thor - 528 days 23 hours ago
10.2 -
What's more, the first level of KZ2 looks amazing, and from what I've read it plays amazing as well. So I don't see what their complaint is... it's all the same apparently... yeah all 5 minutes of it...
Shut this user up Let user speak
zypher - 528 days 22 hours ago
10.3 - @ VirusE
forget the first Killzone for a minute. please tell me you're not taking any of these reviews (be they good or bad), based on a few minutes of gameplay seriously are you? how would you expect people to react if you said a game sucked and you hardly even gave it a try?
Shut this user up Let user speak
TheExecutive - 528 days 22 hours ago
10.4 -
Hey VirusE get over it, just because games in the past by a developer werent completely and utterly awesome doesnt mean that every game they ever make will suck.

Oh yeah, and before you go calling people brain dead idiots maybe you should take a course in logic. Why you ask? Because your conclusions use some rediculously obvious fallacies (Non sequitur).

Lets pretend for a minute that what you say is average or other say is average is actually FACT, which it isnt, and lets take a look at this little argument here:

Here I will spell it out for you:

1. Every game made by GG is average

therefore,

All the games ever made by GG will be average

Do you see how retarded that sounds? go ahead, say it out loud to yourself.
Shut this user up Let user speak
VirusE - 528 days 22 hours ago
10.5 -
No i am not take the reviews seriously at all but the killzone fans are. This just further proves what i have said about KZ2 from day one. I am not a Sony hater; i just think killzone is trash.

TheExecutive, great logic LOL, way to pump yourself up over nothing. If it looks like sh!t and smells like sh!t why would you want to step in it? I don’t need to waste my money playing games from devs who are proven time and time again as junk. Fool me once shame on you…… If kojima announced a new game wouldn’t you want to check it out simply based on his resume? In the REALLY REAL world away from your mom’s house and the net a resume is VERY important and if your resume sucks most people will not give you chance regardless of how pretty you are on the exterior. If you continue to fail and get a name based around failure chances are you won’t even get an interview. Nice try though. Here you say this out loud: Next time i am at a new restaurant and i get food i do not like i will continue to come back and buy the same dish even though it continues to taste like crap and never feels worth the money. All of a sudden your "logic" and "facts" seem more like childish ignorance mixed with a desire to be EXTREMELY stubborn in the face of over whelming defeat rather than a form of intelligence.
Shut this user up Let user speak
TheExecutive - 528 days 21 hours ago
10.6 -
Lol overwhelming defeat? In the really real world this is a video game. In the really real world, when you say something is going to suck and try to explain it without taking into consideration new facts some people are going to point out what is wrong with your statement.

GG's have made two games in their existence, this game seems to improve on everything everyone had a problem with the last game. I didnt even really like the first game but you seem to ignore the changes and just say, "this game is going to suck because the last games did" without looking at the improvements and differences that are presented to you. Which not only makes you look stubborn but the way you attack people makes you look childish in the process
Shut this user up Let user speak
RememberThe357 - 528 days 21 hours ago
10.7 - @Virus
I'm sorry man, I know everyone is on your case, but I gotta say your a little off. If you look at the game play videos you can see that this game looks really solid. Granted it's only a video, you can still get a good idea of what the game will offer. Have you seen the character animations they got? you shoot a guy in the knee and he acts like he got shot in the knee! Thats f*ckin cool. That alone makes me want to play the game.
I think the big point is that the author knocks on Killzone 2 for the same reason he like Gears of War 2. How does that make sense to you? Your point don't really make complete sense, they're like a half finished sentence, I think I know what you were saying but I'm not quite sure. However to be fare, your opinions are your own and although many people here would respect that you try to hide you bias behind logic, and we all know how well that works out.
Shut this user up Let user speak
VirusE - 528 days 21 hours ago
10.8 -
RememberThe357 I agree that it does in fact look awesome. I will not take that away from the game. That being said i thought Killzone one looked awesome, i went out bought it and low and behold it wasn’t awesome. I have been playing games for 26 some years of my life and i have seen MANY games with awesome graphics come out that are a let down. GFX are NEVER a substitute for good game play. Guerilla has fooled me more than once and i am not buying into the same old BS again. With SOOOOO many good games on the horizon why waste my time getting pumped over a game that is being called bland? I will be playing gears 2 and resistance 2 so killzone will have to be awesome to even warrant my time. If it comes out and gets great reviews i will rent it. If i like it i will buy it end of story, I can admit being wrong and have done so before. I thought Lair would be awesome because it had dragons and lots of killing, I thought the n64 would beat the ps1, I thought the dreamcast would do well and the list goes on. That being said Killzone 2 has to PROVE it is worth my dollar with more than shiny gfx based on the trash guerilla has put out in the past. Sorry i am going by real world experience not hype sony is shoving down my throat. I am not saying killzone can’t be good, I am saying I am not calling it a good game until it has proven itself simply based on the fact that the other killzone games have been mediocre at best. I don’t pay to see Uwe Boll movies for the same reason I don’t give Guerilla my money.

Why is it okay to have a positive biased towards a game made by a good studio but not negative biased towards a game made by a bad studio? MGS4 had 10s before it came out just based on our faith in Kojima why can’t it work the other way around? No one is willing to touch my comments about guerilla never making a good game because we all know it’s true.

PS gears got game of the year and is one of the highest rated next gen games from the makers of unreal and UT. KZ1 was a flop from a dev with a history of flops. The difference is very obvious. Gears is a much fresher idea than killzone. Neither is revolutionary but KZ has been done much more often than gears. How many games got a cover system post gears? Better question how many games got regen health and a dedicated nade button post halo....... And neither game brought anything new to the table uhh huh.
Shut this user up Let user speak
TheExecutive - 528 days 21 hours ago
10.9 -
hey virus i can understand your point that graphics are never a substitute for gameplay but why cant ya have both?

Check out this article that was just published by meus, it has to do with the online portion of the game:

http://www.n4g.com/events_e...
Shut this user up Let user speak
VirusE - 528 days 21 hours ago
10.10 -
I agree dude, it does look good i am not saying it doesnt. Again i honestly thought KZ 1 looked awesome too and it wasnt. I dont think the game will get anything under an 80 but i will bet a million bucks both Resistance 2 and Gear 2 will both be rated higher and will both sell more games. Any takers?
Shut this user up Let user speak
happyface - 528 days 23 hours ago
11 -
Killzone recieves a 6 and is called boring. Sony and Gorilla better get their act together

Gears 2 recieves a 10, is it really that much better than Killzone?

very disappointing if you're a ps3 owner
Shut this user up Let user speak
Panthers - 528 days 23 hours ago
11.1 -
OMG your right. Extreamly disappointing. I am going to sell my PS3 now. This article changed my view on gaming.

I dont see anyone here taking this seriously.
Shut this user up Let user speak
happyface - 528 days 23 hours ago
11.2 -
dont sell your ps3 just yet

resistance 2 looks like it could be good, it got an 8

little big planet got a 10, but it looks very kiddie and I'm not into kiddie stuff
Shut this user up Let user speak
RememberThe357 - 528 days 21 hours ago
11.3 - lol @ Panthers
You totally should! There are like no games coming out anymore. Ever. Yeah, I'm totally going to move into the mountains and cut my self off from society. This article changed my view on the world.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Mr_Showtime1 - 528 days ago
11.4 - @Happyface
If anything I would say it's a bad time to be a an Xbox owner based on microsofts E3 conference, to me it looks like thier slightly pushing that "hardcore" audience like myself aside in favor of a more casual market, if you think about it they showed Fallout 3, RE5, and FF13, all games coming to the PS3 aswell, thier exclusives that thier trying push scene it? your in the movies? LIPS? or those silly avatars and maybe you good include more Portal but they didn't say anything about what it would be, but I dont want to play this stuff, I want more of the quality titles MS had last year.

whereas on PS3 theres titles like Socom, LBP, Resistance 2, Bioshock, Infamous and God of War on top of Fallout, RE5 and FF13 to fall back on even if KZ2 isn't great(which i'm confident it will be.)

Sometimes dude it good to form your own opinion on things rather than listening to what others are telling you.
Shut this user up Let user speak
blakstarz - 528 days 23 hours ago
12 - Very poor review based on 5 minutes a game.....
That review just reeks of suspect...come on now...a 6/10 for Killzone 2, but a perfect 10 for Gears? Obviously, some fanboy payola....just based on what was shown, KZ2 merits more than a 6...and I highly doubt Gear is a perfect ten, I have the 1st one, while good no doubt, not worthy of ten, especially with the skimpy multilayer.
And Resistance 2 an 8? After seeing that Leviathan level.....YEAH RIGHT DUDE!!
Shut this user up Let user speak
assassin223 - 528 days 23 hours ago
13 -
well what did you expect this is gamesradar. but what i can't understand is how you can review a 6min game. and also what i can't understand is why even try reviewing a game that has 6 months left of development matter of why even review any of those games.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Halochampian - 528 days 22 hours ago
13.1 - did you read the whole article??
based on your comment.. I dont think so.
Shut this user up Let user speak
assassin223 - 528 days 21 hours ago
13.2 -
yes i did read the article. in my comment i am just asking what's the point in making a fake review for 6 to 10 minute demos, wouldn't it have been better if they did a previews or give there impressions of the games instead
Shut this user up Let user speak
Halochampian - 528 days 21 hours ago
13.3 -
because they wanted people to know on a scale of how much they enjoyed it. What is so wrong with that?
Shut this user up Let user speak
fermcr - 528 days 22 hours ago
14 - LOL
Let the conspiracy stories begin ... :)
Shut this user up Let user speak
achira - 528 days 22 hours ago
15 -
lol. obviously they are fanboys. kz2 destroys geow2 in graphics. and i am sure in gameplay, too. gears 2 looks like ut3 on ps3, nothing new.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Halochampian - 528 days 22 hours ago
15.1 - hahaha
your comment made me laugh. The only thing you know about KZ2 is the graphics and you are already saying the game is better than Gears of War 2. They weren't giving the scores on graphics!!

They are giving scores on how fun the demo was and gameplay!

and if they are fanboys.. why did Banjo get a 5 and LBP get a 10?!?
Shut this user up Let user speak
VirusE - 528 days 21 hours ago
15.2 -
"and if they are fanboys.. why did Banjo get a 5 and LBP get a 10"

Dude seriously, don’t bring logic into this. If the only thing that will ever sit under your TV is ______, regardless of what changes happen in the industry and regardless of how many good games come out for other systems then chances are you are not to be reasoned with or objective. Overly proud singles system "gamers" (doesn’t that imply it's about games?) wont let logic mess up a perfectly terrible argument.

On a side note MS has got to be kicking themselves over the purchase of Rare LOL. At first i thought the big N was crazy to let them go but i am starting to see why they let them go.
Shut this user up Let user speak
tudors - 528 days 22 hours ago
16 - I agree....
I am not that impressed by what I have seen in KZ2 because of the colours scheme and the AI, but to give a actual review at this stage is daft, anyway it's the multiplayer that I am interested in, I am already sold on Resistance 2 because of the multiplayer, the graphics are good enough just not great so far, if the multiplayer is good in KZ2 then the PS3 will end up in my collection.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Asurastrike - 528 days 22 hours ago
17 -
"The reviews contained here are not official reviews, obviously. Those will have to wait until the games are actually finished. These are merely conceptual placeholders generated for your amusement."
Shut this user up Let user speak
Halochampian - 528 days 22 hours ago
17.1 - thanks you!
at least some people read the whole article.
Add Comment (Gamer Zone)
Gamer Zone Posting Guidelines
The Gamer Zone is for members who want a more friendly and civilized discussion. This section is heavily moderated by the N4G staff, so leave your fanboyism at the door please. Members who are unable to behave in a mature and respectful manner will be temporarily or permanently restricted from posting in the Gamer Zone. Using words such as Xbots and Sony droids, or other words from the console war vocabulary, is strictly prohibited in this Zone.
Read More...
 
 
You must log in to post comments.
Username:  
Password:  
 
 
About N4G
N4G is a social game news site that covers the game industry 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
More Info... | Submit News