1150°

Is the Xbox 360 reaching the limit of its capabilities?

There is only so much time that can be put into wringing that last ounce of capability out of consoles. And it must be true that now developers are nearly getting the most out of the 360.
Bruceongames - contributor
Published: 478 days 9 hours ago | Article | Xbox 360 | Dev News
 
 

123Next »
Showing: 1 - 50 of 149 Comments
Shut this user up Let user speak
Chris Hansen - 478 days 9 hours ago
1 -
"Is the Xbox 360 reaching the limit if its capabilities?"
bruceongames with his sh*t grammar
1.1 theKiller | 478 days 5 hours ago - User only got 1 bubble - Show
Shut this user up Let user speak
edhe - 478 days 3 hours ago
1.2 - Stooopid
You can max out a CPU with a few simple instructions.

Pointless 'metric'.

It's not about what the hardware can do for you, but what you can do with the hardware.

Did the ps2 peak at GT3, GT4? God of war 1? 2?

The software will improve year on year on year until there's no incentive for it, no matter what platform.
Shut this user up Let user speak
gaffyh - 478 days 3 hours ago
1.3 -
I'm not even going to read this guys article, just reading bruceongames is enough to know that the article will be a pile of sh*t.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Fox01 - 478 days 2 hours ago
1.4 -
bruceongames, Kotaku, SonyDefenceForce (SDF = Homeless in French, just throwing that there), HipHopGamer all on the same pile ... of s***t
Shut this user up Let user speak
marinelife9 - 478 days 1 hour ago
1.5 -
Epic isn't saying the games won't look better in the future. They're just implying that the difference in what your seeing today and what you'll see in the future on the 360 won't be as big.

There was huge jump in graphics from Perfect Dark Zero to Gears of War and Bioshock.
Shut this user up Let user speak
thewhoopimen - 478 days ago
1.6 - @1.5 agreed
A year ago.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Maddens Raiders - 477 days 18 hours ago
1.7 - As much confidence as I would -
like to put into this article, it is totally nullified by finding it on "bruceongames.com".
Shut this user up Let user speak
deno - 477 days 18 hours ago
1.8 - Stupid article!!
The ps2 and gamecube have not reached their limits so that should answer the question to this stupid article.
2 krackchap | 478 days 9 hours ago - deleted by mod -
Shut this user up Let user speak
LordMe - 478 days 9 hours ago
3 -
Why did this get to the front page? This guy has no clue what he is talking about.
Shut this user up Let user speak
jtucker78 - 478 days 7 hours ago
3.1 -
It's bruceongames.

I managed to stop myself before I clicked on the link. He aint getting hits from me.

Not read the article, WooHoo.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Ozzyb - 477 days 20 hours ago
3.2 -
Same here. If I wanted to see a steaming pile of crap, this is the internet, I have other options.
4 Fux4Bux | 478 days 9 hours ago - User only got 1 bubble - Show
Shut this user up Let user speak
power of Green - 478 days 9 hours ago
4.1 -
It reached it's limit because you say so, for obvious reasons.

Like a made up talking point Fox news would make up trying to pass missinformation as popular opinion and facts.

PS3 is not as powerful, its strenths *in theory* will be just physics. PS3 has inferior Memory use, an inferior CPU and an inferior video card.
Shut this user up Let user speak
radio0o - 478 days 8 hours ago
4.2 -
360 has obviously reached near its limit, the visuals on it havnt advanced since Gears of War and part 2 looks exactly the same meanwhile PS3 games are just getting better and better. cant imagine what things will look like by the end of the generation
Shut this user up Let user speak
SixTwoTwo - 478 days 8 hours ago
4.3 -
And heres PoG right on time for his beef>>>chicken arguments.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Ri0tSquad - 478 days 8 hours ago
4.4 - Lol, PS3 isn't even brought up and this article has nothing to do with the PS3
Leave it to this guy.
Shut this user up Let user speak
el_bandito - 478 days 7 hours ago
4.5 -
Motorstorm only utilizes 20% of the PS3 CELL’s power, Uncharted around 33% and Killzone 2 45%....

Yeah right Yoda...
Shut this user up Let user speak
consolewar - 478 days 7 hours ago
4.6 - Maybe it should...for
PS3 sakes
Shut this user up Let user speak
kevanio09 - 478 days 6 hours ago
4.7 - Yes but...
Motorstorm only utilizes 20% of the PS3 CELL’s power, Uncharted around 33% and Killzone 2 45%....

Do you really think that this will make games look 55% better than Killzone 2?

Personally i think that both consoles are completely underpowered. But then again i think guild wars is an amazing looking game ^_^

I think that extra 55% would be used by better animation, better physics ect....not necessarily better graphics.
Shut this user up Let user speak
SuperM - 478 days 5 hours ago
4.8 - @ 4.7
If a game used 100% of the ps3 capability that would not be 55% more then KZ2 with its 45%... Thats well over 100% more power. So theoreticly the game could look twice as good as KZ2. But ofcourse all this power will not be used only on graphics. Better physics and all of that will probably use some of that power, but the games will definately look better aswell.

But they will never reach a 100%. Yet if they manage to push it 80-90% then thats alot and i mean alot more power then what we have seen being used in games so far. PS3 games are going to outshine 360 games by a wide margin this generation as developers learn to use more of the ps3's power.

I know there are certain ignorant individuals who try to deny this nomather how obvious it is. All i got to say is keep believing that. The games will speak for themselves, and it feels good to know that you will never be able to enjoy these games because you are to pride or to ignorant to try them. Please say what you want, but keep in mind that you are talking to air. I have better things to do then listening to a generic message of how ps3 sucks and xbox owns.
Shut this user up Let user speak
NowGen - 478 days 5 hours ago
4.9 - what ever happened to the games
you guys spouting all these #'s like 45% this and 55% that all sound like losers. have people been so consumed over some fake ass gaming war and number battles that they forgot what really matters? i dont care if my 360 has reached some proverbial peak or not, as long as it keeps feeding my gaming habit. and my ps3 can have as many flaws as people may want to mention, but if it gives me some fun ass games its not like i'm gonna go looking up some #'s to verify whether i just had fun or not.
Shut this user up Let user speak
el_bandito - 478 days 4 hours ago
4.10 -
Sorry mate we might sound nerdy to you but that is why we are under a thread that has a phrase "limit of its capabilities" in its title. The numbers I just threw in and I just happened to read in some article about a NEXT GEN console, has just made me wonder what a video game would look like if they go beyond those numbers. I don't see anything wrong with that.
Shut this user up Let user speak
The Lazy One - 478 days 1 hour ago
4.11 - I like when...
people throw out percentages without actually knowing how the cell works, or what it's being used for.
Shut this user up Let user speak
thewhoopimen - 478 days ago
4.12 - @4.11
Enlighten me Lazy Gamer
Shut this user up Let user speak
The Lazy One - 477 days 23 hours ago
4.13 - ok
The Cell isn't used much for graphics, as it's architecture isn't designed to push for it. It's also subject to diminishing returns because of the single PPE. While you might only use half the cells for those games, you won't get double the power from using all of them, as the PPE won't be running twice as fast with them.

Also, the EIB isn't fast enough to let the cell work at it's potential peak performance.

edit: disagrees mean you love me <3
Shut this user up Let user speak
potenquatro - 477 days 23 hours ago
4.14 - pls people...
don't confuse good grafics with good art direction. gears, like uncharted, have great art direction. they look very nice, but they don't push the hardware to it's limits. i've played gears on pc and you don't need a high-end rig at all. meanwhile a game like gta4, wich nobody claims has incredible grafics, runs sub-HD on ps3 and has ridiculous pop-ups on 360. on-topic: xbox, the most dev friendly console, has been in developers hands for more then 3 years. it has to peak. however, assimilating that with the thought of games not evolving or not getting better is ignorant imo.

@superM : we all have better things to do then read about how ps3 is obviously better and lame unfounded percenteges that proof nothing on how good a game is. it's not like there aren't a million ps3 fans on this site claiming what your claiming.
Shut this user up Let user speak
skulldrey - 477 days 16 hours ago
4.15 - @power of green
Dont be mad that the ps3 still has more life left in it than the xbox. 10 year life-cycle baby.

As far as xbox goes. Youll be seeing the 720 here pretty soon.

Sony went with hardware first, software second. Good choice. Software can be updated via them. Hardware can't. Good game.
Shut this user up Let user speak
thewhoopimen - 477 days 8 hours ago
4.16 - @4.16
I c... So the cell is not for graphics. Then what is it for? Why have 7 of them running if there is a PPE that can do everything a xbox360 triple cpu can do (albeit slower?) What about the EIB? What does the PPE need the EIB for if it runs general operations and doesn't need to delegate to the SPE? Why do developers talk about doing most of the calculations in the SPEs and outputting it to the RSX to display on screen?
Shut this user up Let user speak
The Lazy One - 477 days 2 hours ago
4.17 - @whoopimen
exactly my point in 4.11
Shut this user up Let user speak
timmyrulz - 478 days 9 hours ago
5 -
This headline has been posted abiut 6 times on here over the past few months, not this exact thread but the headline from different sources, if the x360 has reached its graphical limits so be it, graphics dont make a game
Shut this user up Let user speak
themyk - 478 days 2 hours ago
5.1 -
correct they don't make a game. but they do play a HUGE part. like it or not.
Shut this user up Let user speak
themyk - 477 days 20 hours ago
5.2 -
the only reason you guys disagree with me is because your graphix suck. so of course you disagree.
Shut this user up Let user speak
The Lazy One - 477 days 19 hours ago
5.3 - @ above
graphics and art aren't the same thing. The graphics in PoP aren't really exceptional by any means (except some effects). The art direction is what makes it good. Visual appeal is more about art than graphics.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Lich120 - 477 days 9 hours ago
5.4 - Its never ending...
I think it's funny how you don't really see PC gamers on here mocking everyone because the graphical power they can get can blow all the systems out of the water. I doubt they're more mature, maybe they just got sick of people telling them it costs way too much (which it doesn't have too...). Regardless, I've played through crysis on max settings, it looks amazing. However I still think WoW looks awesome because I really dig their art direction. Life doesn't have to be a squable people. I wonder if sony and xbox fans really think they're companies are so great. Theres no honor in big buisness, just money. They don't care about you, they care about your money.
Shut this user up Let user speak
00 - 478 days 9 hours ago
6 - wow
Is this guy bad, he should get banned from N4G.
Shut this user up Let user speak
power of Green - 478 days 9 hours ago
7 -
The 360 is always reaching it's limit, it depends on what is happening in the market or the current status of the console(A huge push in just days due to price drops is most likely causing this anti MSFT desperation from certain media and Sony fans).

I remember when GoW was the 360's supposed limit, despite games like Star Ocean 4, Alan Wake, CoD4, Far Cry 2, RES5, Bayenetta, Dungeon Hero etc.

3 years from now when devs better learn multi thread/core development and actually use the 360's greatest capabilities, the same media and fanboys will be saying the same thing regardless of the jump from current engines and skills vs future skills and engines.
Shut this user up Let user speak
tetsuhana - 478 days 9 hours ago
7.1 -
Star Ocean 4-No gameplay shown/Timed exclusive anyway
Alan Wake-Nowhere in sight
Cod4-Multiplat/didn't even look better than gears
Far Cry 2-Multiplat
Shut this user up Let user speak
solidsnakus - 478 days 9 hours ago
7.2 -
well resistance 2 isnt pushing any graphical boundries. looks nowhere close to cod4 IMO.
Shut this user up Let user speak
power of Green - 478 days 8 hours ago
7.3 -
Funny how no one pays attention to the fud on this site outside of Sony fans.

@7.2 I'm not understanding why you would bring up a game that looks like an PS2 title.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Idonthatejustcreate - 478 days 8 hours ago
7.4 - @power of Green
"PS3 is not as powerful, its strenths *in theory* will be just physics. PS3 has inferior Memory use, an inferior CPU and an inferior video card."

lol dude, inferior??? All I have to say is Killzone 2, Heavy rain and Infamous. Could they be done on another console? No. But they must look like PS2 games to you huh? go figure...

Advanced is a better word to describ the PS3's CPU, memory and maybe video card (unsure about that). Advanced is nessecarily not "better" but harder to develop for. But saying it's inferior is just BS. The only framerate problems i've seen on a console was on my xbox 360 and gamecube. The PS3 has not ever had an issue with frame drops.

@solidsnakus lets make a comparison...
Screen of Cod4
http://blog.al.com/techcete...
Screen of R2
http://bebicorp.com/SonyRum...

Imo Cod4 looks much worse. But saying that R2 looks like a PS2 game is just ignorant.
Shut this user up Let user speak
solidsnakus - 478 days 7 hours ago
7.5 -
ohhh shure, comparing cod4 running at a craapy resolution to a doctored screenshot that the resistance team put out. did you see the sony e3 confrence? that resistance demo looked like a complete pile of garbage IMO. the graphics on all the buildings were piss poor spiderman for ps2 style.

now look at your doctored screenshot and compare it to a real screenshot of R2 in action http://talkplaystation.com/...
pretty impressive graphics huh, LOL
Shut this user up Let user speak
outlawlife - 478 days 7 hours ago
7.6 -
fanboyism not withstanding, i'm with solid on this one

resistance 2 looks nothing like that screen you posted, it is actually quite unimpressive from the videos of ACTUAL gameplay we have seen

people complain about gears bullshots, resistance is just as bad

the e3 resistance demo wasn't very impressive and didn't get me very excited at all, however the gears demo was pretty much the cats pajamas
Shut this user up Let user speak
Snukadaman_ - 478 days 7 hours ago
7.7 - idontjustcreate
You honestly think this is a real picture ingame??
http://bebicorp.com/SonyRum...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wik...
Shut this user up Let user speak
Idonthatejustcreate - 478 days 5 hours ago
7.8 - @solidsnakus
Crappy ingame shot? It was taken as a screen dump directly from the 360 console. If your comparing PC to console then sure every game will look better on PC obviously. Anyhow that picture you used came as an Off screen foto with a crappy camera so thats far from what it looks like m8.

@Outlawlife
I dunno what kind of footage you have been looking at but take a look at this =)
http://www.gamersyde.com/st...
It's still offscreen but atleast in HD instead of those Youtube clips.

@Snukadaman_
Nope I don't think so but I just took the first picture I saw from R2 but heres some in-game pics for all three of you. (It's hard to find in-game screen grabs instead of off screen)

http://o.aolcdn.com/gd-medi...
http://i293.photobucket.com...
Shut this user up Let user speak
ChefDejon - 478 days 5 hours ago
7.9 - if u wanna see
a playstation exclusive that is pushing graphical boundaries go look at killzone 2. if u want to see a game with decent graphics but has such bomb features as 60 player multiplayer and 8 player online co-op and 2 campaigns look at Resistance 2.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Bombibomb - 478 days 9 hours ago
8 -
Bruoce is the man (whenever he writes TRUTHFUL articles like this one, at least).
Shut this user up Let user speak
edonus - 478 days 8 hours ago
9 - This is the formula....
The more time put into developement the higher the level of quality of the product. This goes for the 360 and the Ps3 even the Wii. The advantage the 360 has is its easy to develope architecture. The only reason the Ps3 is so hard to develope for was because they wanted to add Blu Ray. If they ran code of off DVDs they would be just as easy to develope for as the 360.

The games that make ppl think that the Ps3 is more powerful than the 360 are games that be in developement for really long periods of time like MGS4 and Killzone 2. If MS put the same amount of time in as those games they could do the same things. This guy just wrote an article to make a point about nothing. The 360 is super powerful an like he said and i've said it before myself; there is no game system since the NES that has ever reached its full power before the New system came out.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Avto - 478 days 8 hours ago
9.1 - The X360 "super powerful"?
edonus you make me laugh both PS3 and X360, are barely "powerful" let alone super they are like last gen PC all of our modern PCs can run games at three times the resolution at least two times the frame rate and higher graphical level, and yet you call X360 "super powerful"
Add Comment (Gamer Zone)
Gamer Zone Posting Guidelines
The Gamer Zone is for members who want a more friendly and civilized discussion. This section is heavily moderated by the N4G staff, so leave your fanboyism at the door please. Members who are unable to behave in a mature and respectful manner will be temporarily or permanently restricted from posting in the Gamer Zone. Using words such as Xbots and Sony droids, or other words from the console war vocabulary, is strictly prohibited in this Zone.
Read More...
 
 
You must log in to post comments.
Username:  
Password:  
 
 
About N4G
N4G is a social game news site that covers the game industry 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
More Info... | Submit News