720°

Valve 'sure' it'll develop for PS3 in the future

Valve is pretty high up on the hit lists of PS3 fanboys, due in no small part to the studio's refusal to develop PS3 games. The company has refuted the idea time and time again, but today has come a step closer to admitting that Valve may eventually bring its titles to PS3. In fact, Chet Faliszek is sure it'll happen.

Read Full Story >>
destructoid.com
saint_john_paul_ii5198d ago

maybe GOW3 and uncharted 2 slapped Gabe "Fatbell" in the face.

blitz06235198d ago

Gabe knows deep down he will enjoy developing for the PS3.

The problem is he is a typical 360 fanboy, so he hates on the PS3 but secretly has a liking to it, just like any other 360 fanboy.

young juice5198d ago

if the ps3 keeps on track there is no doubt in my mind somethings gonna happen with valve.

who the heck is Chet Faliszek?

marinelife95198d ago

That's okay Newell if you want to alienate potentially 50% of your sales audience you can keep your source engine games on a system where it's graphics won't get laughed at.

DaTruth5198d ago

I'll care when they make a game that interests me!

Halflife 3 please!

5198d ago
evrfighter5198d ago

I'm sure Valve dev's would be excited to work on the ps3 after continously seeing comments like johnpauls.

Don't be surprised if they decide not to in the end.

FamilyGuy5198d ago (Edited 5198d ago )

This seems like that type of title/topic that'll reach the top.

I don't know about Valve, What do they make besides Left 4 Dead and Counter-Strike, do we even need them?

raztad5198d ago (Edited 5198d ago )

Valve can keep the zombie stuff but I'd gladly buy Half Life 3 for the PS3 if ever comes out.

EDIT: Please Valve no crappy ports. Do it well or dont bother.

IdleLeeSiuLung5198d ago

Same old story re-baked into another article to feed the fanboys.

SnuggleBandit5198d ago

i ain't buying anything from them after all their crap statements.

I guess now the ps3's 35 million install base is just too much too overlook huh gabe? Not to mention the extra power and space on the ps3. But i guess they should have started over after the "complete failure" the ps3 is though right?? lmao

anh_duong5198d ago (Edited 5198d ago )

Valve decided to invest in ps3 development the moment ms ramped up their steam competitor

http://www.techspot.com/new...

"Games for Windows Live to compete with Steam, others

By Matthew DeCarlo, TechSpot.com
Published: December 4, 2009, 2:14 PM EST
Microsoft has announced that Games for Windows Live will receive Games on Demand on December 15, essentially becoming a full-fledged game distribution platform. As implied by its name, Games on Demand will allow users to purchase and download titles from their PC. "

steam is valves bread and butter and what generates almost all of its revenue.. MS launching games on demand for windows in december 2009 was a serious threat to valve.. seems like gabe isn't stupid and now realises that swallowing ones pride and supporting ps3 in the near future isn't such a bad thing - especially given that your previous wonderful 'ally' has actually just decided to do you up the proverbial..

Persistantthug5198d ago

No one on the PS3 is clamoring for Valve's overrated mods, including their money grab L4D2.
Keep that money grabbing crap on XBOX 360 where it belongs and where its business model is well more received and better accepted.....with XBOX LIVE'ers.

No thanks.

PotNoodle5198d ago (Edited 5198d ago )

For those saying Gabe is a 360 fanboy need to go back and find out where those PS3 comments started off from. They started off from him talking about how Microsoft don't make much effort to make things easier for software developers, and with the 360 not having a standard hard drive it was making it even worse for him.

Which brought him on to the subject of the PS3, yeah - he may not like the PS3, but you can't call him a 360 fanboy when its just a money maker for his company now, he is and always will be a PC fanboy.

Buying a valve game on a console is silly anyway..

The Lazy One5198d ago

valve hasn't really made any crappy ports. They've let other people make crappy ports for them though.

@all: you all need to chill out. Valve just wants to concentrate on game design rather than game technology. PS3 is a significant technology investment that would require large rewrites to their engine and distract them from their main focus, design.

Anon19745198d ago

I remember when Valve partnered up with ATI and suddenly Nvidia cards weren't good enough to run Valve's games properly, despite the rest of the gaming world having no problem getting their games to run on both brands of graphics cards. Valve was created by Microsoft millionaires and their ties to the company are strong.

I'm sure they'll launch games on the PS3 to earn a few quick bucks but given their history of shoddy support on products who they aren't specifically partnered up with I wonder if PS3 owners really need Valve titles on the PS3.

If they're really serious about brining titles to the PS3, then do it, but don't port your titles half assed for a quick buck. View

jcgamer5198d ago

after ALL that yip yappin out of Gabe's BIG MOUTH about PS3...if the game is a dud, it'll sink faster than Gabe on the TITANIC...

lol :)

himdeel5198d ago (Edited 5198d ago )

I'll believe them the DAY after their first PS3 game drops but not before. Call me Debbie downer or skeptical Susie all you want. I'm no fool :)

Besides I'm not interested in their current crop of games :(

XXXCouture5198d ago

evrfighter -> LMAO are you dumb? do you seriously think developers, sid and read comments from guys on (whatever website) and then says. "ohhh no some fanboy said he didnt want L4d on ps3, SO WERE NOT GONNA MAKE IT. STOP WORKING EVERYBODY ON THE PS3 VERSION, JOHN SAINT JOHN SOMETHING FANBOY SAID HE DIDNT WANT OUR GAMES!"

pangitkqb5198d ago

With over 30 million PS3's now in the hands of the public there are simply too many potential game sales in that demographic to miss out on. IN other words, the extra million or so copies of L4D2 that would have sold if the game was available on PS3 is just too much to ignore.

More sales always = better for business. Welcome to financial reality, Valve.

madpuppy5198d ago

Valve is a company started by a bunch of former MS employees.

I think that, in a way may contribute to the attitude that Gabe Newell and Valve has for the PS3 and Sony.

Even though, I really don't understand, usually Former Employees of MS hate the company.

ico925198d ago

i honestly couldnt care less if valve develops for the ps3 or not i've been enjoying their games on the PC ever since the 1st Half Life (classic game is classic)

jjohan355198d ago

Another stupid article or blog entry from destructoid. Are you guys seriously giving them hits? This site is worse than HHG.

Lykon5198d ago

gabe the hut will do it for money mabey, but who cares....left 4 dead will run on a ten year old pc anyway....half life 3 would be good,,, as long as they don't ruin the pc version with malware drm ..otherwise it'll be pirate copies all round.

pixelsword5198d ago

Look it up; I'm sure he'll develop for the PS3 like he did for the PS2, but he probably wanted to keep his investment secure first.

He's not an idiot.

Hanif-8765198d ago

I'll keep on playing Sony's first party exclusive games :-)

jessupj5198d ago

And I 'sure' as hell won't be buying their games after their pathetic, immature, unprofessional behavior. If they make a game worthy of my purchase I'll just buy it second hand.

morganfell5198d ago

Valve made their bones on technology created by someone else.

I don't care to help them move up in the gaming world by repeating the
process with the PS3.

Thanks, but no thanks Valve. Don't come crawling to Sony now. You should have thought before you opened your fat mouths and insulted a very large and potent fanbase.

ReservoirDog3165198d ago

Maybe it's not as expensive anymore? I don't know.

Yay for PS3 only owners.

mastiffchild5198d ago

Well, if it's the quality of their ports to PS3 being the stopping block then why do I find their 360 ports lazy, crappy undersupported(compared to PC) as well.

People go on about Gabe and crew being MS and 360 fanboys and though his career has heavy, heavy MS connections I don't believe Valve have ANY particular love for that console, or any console for that matter. We get 360 ports because it's EASY for Valve to knock them out cheaply and sell them to us at a higher price than the PC games. The 360 version of L4D I bought was £45 while I paid about £20 for it on PC off Steam-and the two are incomparable in terms of quality of experience. If more 360 only gamers knew how inferior the games are on the console they wouldn't be so ready to rally behind Valve and the same is true of PS3 fanboys yearning for a console version for them.

IMO the gap between the PC versions and console versions of Valves games on 360 is far bigger than other companies. Bioware and others manage a far closer imagining of their products than Valve-and iD will later this year too. The claims that it's !quality" concerns stopping Valve making PS3 ports is laughable to me when they can't be bothered making the 360 ones that great even with the happy situation of it having very familiar dev tools for them. Fact is, imo, the PS3 would be harder and more expensive for them to port to and they just aren't bothered about console gamers enough to put in that kind of effort especially when they know they alienated a lot of PS3 gamers by running their mouths off unnecessarily and unprofessionally about the PS3 and about the PS3 gamer's community as well! That Sterling is thick enough to believe PS3 gamers are angry over anything else is ridiculous-Bungie don't, or haven't made PS3 games and PS3 gamers don't hate them, do they Jim? Why not? Because they didn't get into an amateur sounding war of words over the console and it's gamers at a frikkin guess!

Look, I LOVE Valve's games and maybe if I didn't know how good L4D was on the PC I'd like it more on the 360 but I just can't say it's a good, quality port when I just don't see that. Graphically it's pretty weak on 360(weaker than most other PC/360 releases and further from it's PC version than most and, honestly, L4D isn't a GREAT looking PC game in any case!)and it doesn't run nearly as smoothly either-and I won't even get into the lack of support it gets on 360(community/mods/Valve themselves-either none or less on the 360).

I also feel the 360 version of The Orange Box was miles away from it's PC brother and got away with it's own shortcomings purely because the EA port to PS3 was so terrible. No, to me the 360 ports have been quick grabs for cash made with an attitude of "that'll do for console gamers" and if that doesn't change it isn't something 360 gamers should brag about or something PS3 owners should desire. Personally I wish they'd just get on with HL2 Ep3 for PC and stop all the console stuff as they're amazing PC devs where they can really shine with great ideas making up for the ageing Source engine but the cash from the ports to 360 must really be getting addictive-esp if they're seriously looking at PS3 ports in future.

Anyhow, I know people love L4D1 and2 on 360(which is fine)and maybe I would too if I didn't also play them both on PC but, as I do (and also just started ME2 on 360 which is so much closer to it's PC version than anything Valve EVER made for 360 that i's a little startling, frankly)I just couldn't tell PS3 fans to get excited by this(apparent) change of heart. Either stick to PC and get the game out that we ALL wanted in the first place(remembering what you said about getting episodes of HL out to us more quickly when you started the whole Episodes thing too Gabe!?)or, please, start worrying as much about console ports in real life as your staff claim to in the media nowadays.

There's a big hoo ha over Valve that they started themselves by needlessly baiting the PS3 crowd but, really, that shouldn't distract anyone from the evidence here and to me it suggests Valve will remain PC devs to the bone and until there's an attitude change there I don't see the same effort or care being put into any console ports they might make.BTW I never said the games were BAD on 360as a good game is a good game even when it's a bad version(hell, even the PS3 version of TOB was enjoyable for anyone who hadn't played it elsewhere). No, it's the disparity between the PC versions of their games being so much bigger than with any other dev I can think of that annoys me, and when you pay up to twice as much for lesser versions with fewer features and no mods or community support AND less support from Valve themselves it doesn't feel like value and it certainly doesn't feel like quality. Not to me anyway and if it's this holding up HL2 Ep3 then I'm even more annoyed;)

Kill me if you like, it's just my opinion that they don't give two sh1ts about any console and were the dev tools for 360 any more different to PC ones we probably wouldn't have seen any 360 ports from them yet either and as the Source engine's so old now I don't see why the gap between the PC versions and 360 versions has been so big when better looking PC games have ported to 360 looking much closer to their original forms than anything Valve have managed.My current advice? Buy Valve games on PC unless you only have a 360(though you don't need ANYTHING special to run their PC games tbh)-and then try to get them cheap somehow as , in my eyes, they really aren't worth paying more for.

JD_Shadow5198d ago

And Edge magazine, a mag that seems to always have it in for PS3 exclusives in their reviews and the one that broke the story, is just making this up, right? The man that wrote the Destructoid article, the same man who writes all those insane anti-PS3 articles as if he were making a comment on N4G's Open Zone, is just making this up and just PRETENDING that they read the Edge article, right? All the alt. sources are just making this up, correct? They're all in this conspiracy, right?

Sounds like you're scared about it possibly actually happening. After all, when someone who hates the PS3 needs a good quote to back them up, they go straight to something that Valve's said. They're the last big developer that has yet to move to the PS3, and many are beginning to wonder why.

For me, I don't know if I would buy the games or not if they come out on the PS3, but I would say to Valve: PROVE IT! Let's see what you can do with the system. You burned the bridges, but if you find the right things, you can build a NEW bridge. Don't make another dumbass comment, prove you're true to your word, get the lead out of your asses and learn something, and make us PS3 gamers forget that you even SAID anything about the PS3 at all.

Godmars2905198d ago

That was a lot to say for something that shouldn't require so many words.

Valve first and foremost is a PC developer. A PC dev who have been using the same game engine since they first came on the scene. They got someone else to do a port of Half-life for the PS2 and dragged their heels on Half-life 2 for the Xbox. If the 360's dev tools hadn't been so PC friendly they probably wouldn't have touched the system for the same reasons they made up for the PS3.

All that said, if they announced Left 4 Dead tomorrow...well, its too simple to say people would buy it. They've really done a ton of PR damage and no way in hell anyone would take them at their word much less ability that all they'd turn out would be a buggy mess with no extras.

Anyway, you could've just said "Fu*k em" and save the essays for school...

starvinbull5197d ago (Edited 5197d ago )

Frankly whatever Valve eventually do will be massively undermined by Newells comments on the matter.

Just as well that Valve don't NEED to develop for PS3 but when they do they are much less likely to be succesful at it.

And it would have to be something new. LFD2 or TF2 (with all the content) in a years time massively overdue and massively outdated won't be greeted with open arms.

morganfell5197d ago

Naughty Dog singlehandedly demonstrated that Newell is 99% full of crap and 1% full of himself.

Raoh5197d ago

its not a grudge on my part. i generally dislike people who talk trash...

epic is also a great developer and has chosen to make 360 games over ps3 games but they dont bash the ps3 and epic did make unreal tournament 3 for the ps3.

now UT3 may not have been a really awesome game.. but at early days of the ps3 woes epic managed to make a game that ran smooth, without the option install it provided, keyboard and mouse support as well as pc mods shared to the ps3 community.

gabe just talks trash without anything to back it up.. does valve make great games? absolutely. but gabe spoke without thnking just to back up either pc or 360.. if a pc dev like epic who sides with the 360 can make games for ps3 well i'm sure valve could without the trash talk.

+ Show (31) more repliesLast reply 5197d ago
iron_sheik5198d ago

does anyone care about valve anymore

the garbage game l4d2 couldnt even manage a 90 at meta

valve games sucks

valve is finished

young juice5198d ago

valve did say alot of sh*t about the ps3.

but left 4 dead is a decent game although im not necessarily looking foreword to it.

im sure there are alot of sony fanboys that would like to rub a left 4 dead game in the xbots face.

Defectiv3_Detectiv35198d ago

As much as I hate to agree with 12 year olds

Valve does suck. They used to be my favorite dev back in the original HalfLife/CounterStrike/TeamFor tressClassic days. But there is just no excuse for their output these days. I don't care who is defending it, L4D is a seriously mediocre game in every aspect. The downloadable title Zombie Apacolypse is more fun.

Ronster3165198d ago

If L4D 1 & 2 are "Garbage" then what does that make the following ps3 FPS exclusives............

Resistance 1.
Resistance 2.
MAG.

All of the above ps3 exclusives scored less than L4D 1 & 2, and 1 of them scored a LOT worse..... (MAG)

You talk nonsense Sgt. Slaughters right hand man.

dustgavin5198d ago (Edited 5198d ago )

Hmm...
You forgot the 360 exclusive shooters that also scored less.
Halo 3:ODST
Section 8(Which scored WAAY worse than MAG)

dustgavin5198d ago

Here is another stinker that got released in August for 360/PC. We all know how the bots love claiming exclusive titles that are also on PC.

Raven Squad
http://www.metacritic.com/g...

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 5198d ago
Raoh5198d ago

you know what gabe, i might have cared before.. and after the awesome orange box even the ea port made me happy and wishful of a valve/sony project..

but with so many games to play on the ps3..

you can either make one or not, i'm not that concerned anymore..

ps3 owners dont forget either.. your comments will not be forgotten may want a different spokesperson to represent valve for any ps3 games..

shut down your twitter and facebook etc

-EvoAnubis-5198d ago

Yeah, Gabe burned this bridge. He basically told all of us that that we were idiots for buying something that was 'a waste of everybody's time.' The man is living in a dream world if he think the PS3 fanbase (overall) would give a crap if they started making games for the PS3.

They wouldn't get so much as a quarter out of me, I promise it.

evrfighter5198d ago

well you guys would probably get one opportunity to experience what real dev support is like. No other dev does it better.

The problem is your goin on like they NEED your money. They don't and Steam makes sure of that. No matter what you do and say your only shooting yourselves in the foot while Valve continues to bring in truckloads of cash without the ps3 community.

table5198d ago (Edited 5198d ago )

You guys are holding a needless grudge. Valve make some of the best games and even though I don't particularly won't them to develope games for ps3(I'd prefer them to concentrate their resources on PC), many playstation owners would love the opportunity to play their games. Your average ps3 owner out there has no idea what they have said in the past, nor would they care anyway. A game is a game.

-EvoAnubis-5198d ago

I will agree that Valve's support for their games is incredible....so long as you're playing on a PC. Past that, they don't seem to care so much.

Major_Tom5198d ago

Naughty Dog does it better. Clearly.

Consoldtobots5198d ago

"well you guys would probably get one opportunity to experience what real dev support is like. No other dev does it better.

The problem is your goin on like they NEED your money. They don't and Steam makes sure of that. No matter what you do and say your only shooting yourselves in the foot while Valve continues to bring in truckloads of cash without the ps3 community."

do I hear a baby crying? oh wait.....just another bitter fanboy.

btw telling gamers "we dont need your money" = EPIC FAIL on so many levels. Then why they hell are they in the business?

aftrdark215198d ago

That's who I think of whenever I see a pic of old gabe.

I'm with you Evo

"They wouldn't get so much as a quarter out of me, I promise it."

Couldn't agree more....

jessupj5198d ago

We're definately not shooting ourselves in the foot because clearly PS3 owners are in no short supply of awesome exclusives.

+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 5198d ago
xaviertooth5198d ago

i can see gabe weeping hard after realizing how tool he was.

StanLee5198d ago

When Chet get's back to the Valve offices Gabe is going to sit on him.

FiftyFourPointTwo5198d ago

@xaviertooth I love the new avatar. Hahaha

avengers19785197d ago

As a ps3 fan i don't care if valve every brings any of there titles to the playstation. None of there games(except for half-life 2) are even worth playing, they are an overrated developer.

CaliGamer5198d ago

Might be too late for this, burning your bridges is something that isn't advised really. Life lessons.

Show all comments (203)
290°

Why Xbox believes it must cut costs and close studios

Companies, particularly public companies like Microsoft, need to grow.

Read Full Story >>
eurogamer.net
gold_drake1d 17h ago

i mean its pretty simple, they spent close to 30 billion in acquiring activision, they thought they'd make it bk no problem, and that didnt happen.

its just shit that because of MS's miscalculation alot of people lost their jobs.

Jingsing1d 13h ago

This is exactly what many people said would happen including the CMA and FTC. Lies lies and more lies and they allowed a $69 billion buy out to happen.

gold_drake1d 13h ago

oh yeh it was 70 billion. that was my bad haha even worse.

JackBNimble16h ago

MS has educated financial advisers, they knew there was little chance to recoup the 70billion just to break even on the Activision deal let alone whatever other nonsense is going on in MS.
This whole thing was to corner the market for leverage.

thesoftware7301d 13h ago (Edited 1d 13h ago )

gold,

You can't be serious, right?

Do you think that MS thought they would make 80bill in a year & Half? They haven't even released titles under MS yet, lol.

But in fact, that A/B revenue is already paying off, look at the last earnings call. That $80 billion is long-term money, my guy, no sane person/company would think they would make that back in any short-term situation, it's a long-term investment.

Let's play silly then. If MS's reason for laying off staff and closing studios was due(which it really was not) to the A/B deal, tell me what Sony's reason was for past studio closures, the recent 900-person layoffs, closing Sony London, shutting down Dreams, and closing Japan Studio? Zipper? Psygnosis? cuts at all their internal studios.

Keep in mind, you are claiming MS's reason is because of the A/B deal; please explain Sony's reason.

Hofstaderman1d 13h ago

You actually still defending them? Sheesh.....

gold_drake1d 13h ago

this is not a sony vs MS debate. dont make it something it isnt.

and of course not, but im pretty sure they thought they'd make more money after the deal. they didnt, and closed off some studios.

its pretty insane to think there is any other reason for the closure of studios in this case.

romulus231d 13h ago (Edited 1d 13h ago )

(It really was) due to the Activision Blizzard deal and the loss of physical sales due to gamepass. You keep bringing up Sony in all your posts about this, stop deflecting and trying to change the topic, this is about MS and what they are doing.

BehindTheRows1d 12h ago

Has nothing to do with Sony. Stay on topic.

notachance1d 12h ago

once in a while you see someone too invested in their make-believe console war that everything happened has to be connected to said war…

a bit of banter between fans is normal, this crusade you’re doing now isn’t.

Chevalier1d 12h ago

Wow idiotic. You bring up very old closures not that there haven't been recent ones from Playstations, but, seriously stop deflecting. This has NOTHING to do with Playstation.

Does Playstation got $3 trillion behind them and daddies wallet? No they don't so stop making a fool of yourself.

Xbox has never been profitable really and they just keep losing money so between their worst hardware sales, terrible 3rd party sales and now terrible 1st party sales.

Gamepass numbers that are no longer being announced shows their numbers after 3 years of missed targets has flatlined. Plus their recent gains up to 34 million were ONLY because they folded Gold members in too. Absolutely take your idiotic rhetoric out of here. Keep on topic without deflecting.

S2Killinit1d 12h ago

Ayayayay with these xbox/MS excuses.

Reaper22_1d 7h ago

How dare you mention Sony! Everyone here knows when Sony closes a studio and lay off workers it was the right thing to do. Even when they bought Gaikai and fired almost everyone it was the right thing to do.

Gamers can be such hypocrites sometimes.

andy851d 6h ago

Is it? That's revenue not profit. Completely different.

fr0sty20h ago

The earnings call only showcased how dire the situation is... Even with ABK and Bethesda, they still couldn't make enough to keep investors happy, gamepass subs are stagnant, and hardware sales are tanking.

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 20h ago
thesoftware7301d 10h ago (Edited 1d 10h ago )

Drake,

"this is not a sony vs MS debate. dont make it something it isnt."

You are correct that it's not an MS Vs Sony Topic, but when exaggeration and imagination mix from a one-sided social group, similar examples are needed to ground radical thoughts; in this instance, the example was that shutting down 3,4,5, even 6 studios during a restructure/ buyout/acquisition is not some anomaly(it can suck) that has to be dissected or spell doom and gloom.

"But I'm pretty sure they thought they'd make more money after the deal. They didn't, and they closed off some studios."

But they did make more money, a lot, actually; the last earnings call showed a huge growth in profit, almost all due to A/B revenue.

"its pretty insane to think there is any other reason for the closure of studios in this case."

The fact that they did make money, kinda throws this out the window, and besides, you don't wake up and say, hey let's close a studio, you look at the output, you look at the dev as a whole, the long term and short term, you weigh it against all other studios and goals, you keep key members, ect..then you close if they are the weakest links...which by MS analysis they were.

Again, I will make a small Sony comparison, just so some of you can understand and see past the bias; Insomniac, ND, and Bungie have made some of the best games ever created, yet Sony saw fit to cut jobs in every of these studios, even tho Insomniac & ND are the biggest producers of PS games, leagues ahead better than Tango and Arkane, yet, they saw cuts, mind you, while being the TOP produces of PS first party. They were told to cut costs, and more jobs may be on the line, and Bungie is being threatened by a hostile Sony takeover. Put that in perspective, as I know that layoffs and dev closures are different, but if the best of the best is getting cut off, it is less than surprising, that lesser studios are closing.

@Cheva,
My response fits well with your comments as well. You even went on to prove that the dev closures are not just due to A/B acquisition. Then you point out Sony has less money than MS, inferring that MS should keep devs open that they see as lesser earners, while Sony having less money makes it okay to close them. lol...it doesn't work that way.

gold_drake1d 10h ago

im not reading all of that. u have ur opinion, i have mine.

thats rly it.

but this aint sony vs ms.

ApocalypseShadow1d 10h ago

You're trying to compare a 100 billion company to a company that has 3 TRILLION worth. SIE has to live or die on their own. And in turn, PlayStation has helped the main company again and again. Sony has to balance out what is working and not working in the company.

While Xbox has Daddy Warbucks footing the bill to keep the platform afloat. They have been bleeding money from Nvidia hardware in the OG Xbox, the RROD fiasco, the attempted 2013 DRM nonsense and the lies about being the most powerful console in the world and the losses of paying out millions to prop up a service hoping it catches on with enough subscribers to justify its existence.

They're not comparable if Xbox isn't allowed to live or die by its actions. It's subsidized. Revenue isn't profit. And if they were profiting on their own, they wouldn't be closing developers. If they were profiting, they wouldn't need Daddy Warbucks spending 80 to 100 billion buying up 3rd party publishers to sustain a loss leading platform.

They stopped announcing game sales, stopped announcing hardware sales, stopped announcing game pass subscribers, they are putting games on their competitors platforms but you're telling us that they are doing great even after killing jobs and closing developers at Xbox.

Stop drinking the Kool aid. You're drunk.

Chevalier1d ago

Again at which point did Playstation have a $3 trillion company shift the market with a giant purchase?

"But they did make more money, a lot, actually; the last earnings call showed a huge growth in profit, almost all due to A/B revenue."

Lol. No they didn't. Increased revenue was ONLY due to adding Activision Blizzard revenue in. Growth was only 1 percent. It's idiots like you that have no idea what they're talking about is why Xbox isn't better than it is. You guys just make excuses continually.

If Xbox got so much profit then why did they stop announcing hardware numbers? Why did they stop announcing Gamepass numbers? Oh right because they're NOT profitable. Their sales in every category has dropped off the face of the planet. It's why Spencer will be closing more studios and canceling upcoming projects too.

The Wood17h ago

How can they be profitable when they're not selling enough hardware, software or subs. You need take a seat on this one my friend unless you can prove you angles

jwillj2k416h ago

Sony didnt shut down the studios you mentioned after they made last of us or ratchet and clank or destiny. Cutting jobs is not equal to closing studios. Sony cuts are a candle in the sun of Microsoft’s closures.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 16h ago
WelkinCole1d 5h ago

I am pretty sure MS knew this would happen and this was part of their plan. I mean if anyone with half a brain can see this happening I am pretty sure a multi billion company like MS knew this would happen

The whole strategy in buying Beth and Acti/Blizzard is for

1. Buy established games they can have under xbox because they have done a horrible job in building their portfolio internally for the past 15 years

2. Following from 1, try and boost xbox competitivenss against a dominat PS which MS after 3 tries still can't crack

3. Follolwing from 2, try and weaken Playstation dominance by taking out these massive multiplats from the PS

4. Following from 3, try and profit off from the PS domiance with selected games they will still have on the PS to make money like COD

5. Obviously get the IP's by buying them instead of creating them which again as I mentioned in number 1 they have been woeful in doing

None of these had anyting to do with keeping all the devs they accuried. MS has always been very shitty to Devs under them. Look at what happned to Bungie for example.

I believe MS in court truely mean it when they said they had to do something because PS was just too dominant. This was their last roll of the dice.

And from the looks of things. It has not panned out as MS had hoped. PS5 is still as dominant as ever and xbox is still behind. Worse still their MP's they got is not irreplaceable as they thought. Starfield? lol!. There have not been any major shift in momentum in this console war in their favor so now its time to start cutting their loses and it starts with the most expensive cost for any company. People.

Michiel19891d 3h ago

for a comparison, sony laid of a bigger % of it's staff this year than ms, it's what companies sadly do nowadays. If you think with GP and Bethesda + acti aquisition they were looking for quick cash, you couldn't be more wrong. It hasn't even been a year, "they thought they'd make it bk no problem, and that didnt happen." shows you have 0 understanding of how a business operates.

thesoftware73014h ago

@ Michiel1989

Exactly this!

I'm reading these comments, and it's mesmerizing how off-base most of them are.

I posted a few comments above, and their rebuttals have nothing to do with the points that I presented; when they start doing that, I just ignore them because, at that point, they're debating all over the place.

Profchaos20h ago

30 more like 70 to 80 plus 7 for Bethesda

Tzuno15h ago

meanwhile everything turned woke an inevitably went downward, i'd say it serves them well if they promote such kind of approach, mwuahahahahahhh!

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 14h ago
anast1d 13h ago

They are going to use AI for a large portion of the game development process. Upper management need bonuses and the shareholders need more money. So, people will lose their jobs.

Skuletor1d 13h ago

Maybe they were already using AI to make business decisions, which would explain why they closed Hi-Fi Rush's studio, then said they need more games like Hi-Fi Rush not long after that announcement.

Crows901d 12h ago (Edited 1d 12h ago )

They shouldn't have bought any studios. Some is okay...but they went on a shopping spree...stupid

Einhander19721d 12h ago

The better question is why did Microsoft buy publishers for a service they were subsidizing they knew couldn't support.

And why are so many websites trying to make people feel sorry for Microsoft instead of truly criticizing the fact they are closing studios and killing jobs that would have been fine if Microsoft themselves hadn't gotten involved.

Quit feeling sorry for Microsoft and start feeling sorry for the industry and the all the gamers who are actually losing out.

THIS IS MICROSOFTS FAULT.

RNTody1d 12h ago

The first thing that happens after any major acquisition or merger is a consolidation of the whole new portfolio, which includes cutting any excess, bloat or portfolios that don't fit the larger MO of the big boy. So far, it's been par for the course with Microsoft and that's why gamers have been so against this acquisition. Tango Gameworks is the beginning. You think Microsoft wants to pay to keep small timers like Ninja Theory in business?

There is absolutely zero evidence to suggest that Microsoft will improve any of these studios, but plenty to suggest that they will get rid of what they don't need and hold onto the IP. The real agenda of the acquisition was always to acquire The Elder Scrolls, Diablo, Fallout, Call of Duty, Candy Crush etc. that will create millions in passive revenue stream for Microsoft regardless of where the games release. Microsoft simply wants their cut.

Because of Games Pass Microsoft has no interest in investing in new IP which is risky and requires creative talent they can neither nurture nor manage. Game Pass has also not grown in the way Microsoft expected it to, even post acquisitions. Therefore the logical thing to do, without serious money makers to release, is to cut as much cost as possible.

Show all comments (47)
110°

7 Deserving Games That Never Got Backward Compatibility

Backward compatibility works for many games on newer consoles, but titles such as The Simpsons: Hit and Run have been left out.

90°

20 Best Survival Games of All Time

From base building to swinging willies, here are the best survival games around, which include a couple of less than obvious picks.

Read Full Story >>
culturedvultures.com
Vader822d ago

No 7 days to die is criminal