1080°

Valve Not Even Bothering With The PS3 Any More

Kotaku: Valve, Valve's boss Gabe Newell and the PlayStation 3 have a history. A history of not getting along. And it doesn't look like that's about to change any time soon.

Here's a little chit-chat the Valve head had with host Geoff Keighley on tonight's episode of GTTV:

Keighley: Are you guys working on PlayStation 3 here now, trying to understand it, trying to get better at it?

Gabe: Uh,no. not in any real way.

There you have it. Not much wiggle room in that sentence.

Natsu X FairyTail5363d ago (Edited 5363d ago )

Theres Team forteress 2 and The Orange Box on PS3

Lmao , what did you guys want more?

edit: What Fiasco was L4D 1? the game received Good Reviews everywhere I checked.

It was a Fiasco to Ps3 fanboys because they couldnt play it. Thats N4G for ya.

MURKERR5363d ago (Edited 5363d ago )

no i dont want more,im very happy with the upcoming ps3 exclusives

that dude seriously needs a diet and a shampoo

Panthers5363d ago

He is genuinely ugly. Being skinny would not help that at all. Let him have his Mickey D's

MURKERR5363d ago (Edited 5363d ago )

especially the comment on motorstorm vs mgs4 sales....wtf? i dont think you should call anyone a fanboy, also google why there was a petition, i never said that the game never recieved good scores but clearly people arent happy in some respects which inturn led to the petition.

ps3 gamers are VERY well catered for in the games department with either exclusives or multis valve do not make or break a gaming library,

5363d ago
Mr_Bun5363d ago

Why are you the first to comment on so many PS3 related articles even though you don't own a PS3?

techie5363d ago

Is it me or does he look like the Nanny in Count Duckula? http://farm1.static.flickr....

Dragun6195363d ago (Edited 5363d ago )

Honestly, I don't really mind really If Gabe/ Valve doesn't want to develop for the PS3. PS3 has already others to develop for it such as

Naughty Dog (Uncharted 2)
Team ICO (The Last Guardian)
Santa Monica Studio (God Of War 3)
Polyphony Digital (Gran Turismo 5)
Zipper Interactive (M.A.G.)
United Front Games (ModNation Racers)
Studio Liverpool (Wipeout HD)
Guerilla Games (Killzone 2)
Insomniac (Ratchet and Clank: ACIT, Resistance 3)
Level 5 (White Knight Chronicles)
Sucker Punch Productions (Infamous)
Titan Studios (Fat Princess)
Media Molecule (LittleBigPlanet)
San Diego Studio (MLB09: The Show)
Eat,Sleep,Play (Twisted Metal)
Rockstar North (Agent)
Tetsuya Nomura/ KH team (FFvXIII)

It will only be valve's loss.

evrfighter5363d ago

wasn't long before a fanboy decided to bust out a list of titles nobody ever bothers to read lol.

I dont own either a ps3 or 360 but I'm here anyway....just cuz

masterg5363d ago

In the end Valve will loose.
Here is why.

Right now it might earn you a few extra bucks developing for the Xbox vs the PS3. But this holiday alone Sony will take a huge bite back at the gab between the to consoles. Just watch. It will happen.

This will ultimately result in better economy in developing for the PS3. This will however not even be an option. Valve will have very little experience at programming for the PS3 compared to other companies. Their games will suffer the same bugs as early PS3 multi platform games did, making them a very hard sell.

Other companies that supported the PS3 from the start are now experts in programming for it. Valve missed their window and they don't even know it yet.

sunnygrg5363d ago

Left 4 dead is a great game, but I dont see any particular reason for upgrading to L4D2 at a high price of $60.

That being said, Gabe doesnt even like the PS3, so I dont know why this news comes at any surprise.

rockleex5363d ago (Edited 5363d ago )

How is he a fanboy for listing games that people could be playing on PS3 instead of Valve games that obviously aren't coming?

I didn't see him bashing on any consoles. Hell he didn't even bash Valve.

I swear, N4G gets weirder and weirder everyday. -_-"

@sunny:

That's what I'm saying. Why do people feel the need to write 20 articles throughout the year about how Valve doesn't want to make games for the PS3?

Anyways, I'm out of here(this article). Tired of all the bickering on N4G.

DelbertGrady5363d ago (Edited 5363d ago )

I think we are witnessing a trend here. More and more developers realize that it's just not worth developing for a console that has higher development costs, a smaller install base than it's competitors and has the lowest software attach rate. The state of the world economy isn't really helping either.

masterg5363d ago

@Soda Popinsky

The xbox has an attack rate at 8.1
The PS3 has an attack rate at 7.9

The attach rate argument is not valid anymore.
If the PS3 isn't worth developing for this year it means the the Xbox wasn't worth developing for last year. A year ago the Xbox has an install base the same size as the PS3 does now and their attach rates are virtually the same. Unless MS is paying Valve for keeping their games Xbox/PC exclusives, Valve are just very poor business men.

Mr_Bun5363d ago

You know better than that!

table5363d ago (Edited 5363d ago )

Valve is the only developer who thinks this... stop being an ass. Their problem is that their programmers arn't learned with the ps3 hardware. I reckon they'll crack further into this console cycle and realise there's money to be made on the ps3.

I only play Valve games on PC since they play best on that platform. Orange Box on ps3 was horrendous, on the 360 it was mediocre but on PC it's excellent. L4D also feels at home on PC.

@fermcr11 - PC is best for RTS and also FPS, I agree. Fear2 for example is horrible on the consoles but it's not bad on PC. There are some exceptions like Killzone2 which feels right on console and CoD4 feels good with the controller. For all the other genres I'd play it on consoles(again exceptions like KOTOR etc). My point was only to express that I don't mind them not developing for ps3. I don't know why you brought up that I might be trolling...

5363d ago
ultimolu5363d ago (Edited 5363d ago )

Uh...who cares?

I certainly didn't care.

Love how 360 fans are disagreeing with people who said they don't care, lol.

cryymoar5363d ago (Edited 5363d ago )

http://odeo.com/episodes/21...
listen to that fatass even smack talk the xb360 saying things like:
-no large medium
-no mandatory HDD
-expensive to develop on
-windows vista sucks

But he praises the console now.

Gabe Newell is just a fat whiny baby.

JasonPC360PS3Wii5363d ago

Guess that confirms the fact you will never see any future releases from GOTY AAA games like Half Life, Counter Strike, L4D, Portal any anything else from Valve. It's got to suck for PS3 owners Valve is one of the most awarded developers in gaming. No developer has a community larger than Valve. It's ok you can still play their games on a PC that runs Microsoft Windows or an Xbox 360. At this point you can pretty much call Valve a Microsoft exclusive developer since PC is a MS platform along with the 360 :)

edhe5363d ago

How is the ps3 going to 'bite back' when it's constantly dropping in year to year sales whilst the 360 is performing far stronger ?

Last NPD the 360 sold not too far off double the ps3's amount.

That's not biting back, is it.

The slim can't triple ps3 sales forever.

Pennywise5363d ago

Bun I wondered the same thing about Natsu and asked the same question and spent the next few days in the open zone. I would still love to know...

/On topic - Valve is not going to budge this gen... I don't think this is news worthy. Call me when they are working with a new engine that isnt from Early 2000's.

SprSynJn5363d ago

Please do enlighten us with what Valve is actually known for besides Half Life and Left 4 Dead. Seriously, I could direct you to a horde of casual gamers who do not know who the company is. Just because they are popular with geeks on a website does not mean they are the next Nintendo.

Ghoul5363d ago (Edited 5363d ago )

"I think we are witnessing a trend here. More and more developers realize that it's just not worth developing for a console that has higher development costs, a smaller install base than it's competitors and has the lowest software attach rate. The state of the world economy isn't really helping either."

dangerous half knowledge right ahead, with proof.
seriously dude such statements make you look really uneducated and shortminded.

OH and BTW

Valve is a pc dev, everyone who plays theyre games on the 360 is wrong in the first place. All of valves games belong on the pc and that wont change in the future since valve holds steam wich is the pcs LIVE. The 360 ports are just money makers nothing else.

So fanboys around the world please get it together valve is NOT a 360 dev. They are a PC dev only making 360 ports of theyre awesome pc games.

5363d ago
masterg5363d ago

@edhe

Please stop talking NDP. We are talking worldwide numbers. Not North America alone. World wire the 360 is selling about 30k more than the PS3 per month right now. The 4th quarter is always were it happens. Meaning the sales here are roughly 3 times as great.

Lets do an example.
The PS3 double in sales because of price-cut/slim effect. This is by no means a high estimate. This would result in the PS3 selling 6 times as many consoles in the 4th quarter compared with the 3rd quarter.
The Xbox will of course also get great xmas numbers. But we already know their move. The Xbox Elite will be $299. This means the two will go head to head with the same price for the first time ever. If you ask me it's going to be a slaughter.

And keep in mind I have had 3 Xbox 360's, and although I like my PS3 better, Im not a fanboy by any means.

pixelsword5363d ago

If programmers can't or won't develop for the Cell processor now, these same programmers have no hope for the future. Out of the three main future chipsets (Cell B.E., GPU, and FPGA) The Cell Processor is the easiest to program for.

http://www.n4g.com/News-199...

All-35363d ago

Why does every developer --> have to develop for the PS3?

Aren't there some PS3 --> only developers? Do you dislike those developers just because they've chosen to only develop for the PS3?

Valve has the PC and 360 markets to sell to, and they also have their Steam service for digital distribution. If Valve needed more revenue, it could develop for any number of platforms, but has made the choice not to at this time. Just deal with it... it's not such a big deal is it?

5363d ago
guitarded775363d ago

Gabe Newell needs to spend less time with Twinkies and more time developing for the PS3.

jmare5363d ago (Edited 5363d ago )

Valve is primarily a PC developer. They are very good at it. But the downside to that is they are very resistant to trying new things when it comes to development. As the PS3 install base continues to grow, contrary to every 360 fanboy's dearest dream, Valve will be walking away from a considerable amount of market share. I'm not implying that the PS3 will suddenly be dominant, just that it's not going anywhere, just like the 360 and the Wii aren't going anywhere.

Valve just does PC and 360 because they are PC developers and the 360 is essentially a stripped-down specialized PC. I mean this as far as internal components. Valve does not want to learn anything new right now and they are happy with their sales, so why would they want to fcuk that up? It only remains to be seen how long EA keeps from putting pressure on Valve to develop for the PS3.

Everybody needs to calm down. Even people without a 360 can play Valve games on a decent computer. That is why Valve uses the Source engine: so they can put it on as many computers as possible. Valve minimum specs are usually pretty low.

EDIT: He comes off as an even bigger douche because 30 seconds earlier he's going on about how they didn't do right by PS3 users and they had a legitimate gripe with Valve.

sunil5363d ago

If Valve wants to go 360 exclusive good for them.
PS3 has plenty of AAA (my rating) titles either coming out this year or the early part of next.

I for one can sure do without any Valve games (though I own them on on PC).

5363d ago
techie5363d ago

Haha, not just me then. 23 agrees :)

njr5363d ago

This fat guy is lazy mentally as much as he is physically.

raztad5363d ago (Edited 5363d ago )

OK, not hating Valve in anyway. Indeed I'm going to get L4D1 for my PC in few days, but lets recognize that Valve has been living just milking a very old engine (Source).

Source is ALREADY ported to the PS3. EA did that work. Yeah the Orange Box is not awesome technically speaking but its quite playable. Source is such an old engine that even with a bad port form EA (one of the earliest) it runs on PS3, it just needs to get more from the Cell SPUs and it will be running perfectly on PS3.

My point is, it is not the technical part what prevents Valve to reach PS3 market. It's a conscious/business decision from Valve of just to develop for the PC and then port to 360.

pixelsword5363d ago (Edited 5363d ago )

I don't know if your comment was a sleight at me or not, but if it was, consider this:

I never said anything bad about Gabe, as a matter of fact, I can't think of a single game Valve has made that I didn't (eventually) like. Second of all, what I said about programmers was said generally. Valve never said that they won't ever develop for the PS3; it's already been established that they were thinking about developing on the PS3. On top of that, I never Mentioned the PS3, I mentioned The Cell Processor; which although is in the PS3 is not only in the PS3, just like Programmers don't all program for consoles. The fact that the future of PC programming, and therefore console programming, will emphasize multicore programming techniques that will become exponentially more complex in time (just like now) won't allow as much "catching up" time to people who aren't indoctrinated in these techniques already. So yeah; the 360 is very close to what PC games can do now, but advanced FPGA and GPU programming techniques (which are literally around the corner now) won't be anywhere near what people are familiar with.

Or just read that story in that N4G article I linked to in my earlier post; the person who wrote it has over two years programming on the Cell and has programmed on all three chipsets.

Dude4205362d ago (Edited 5362d ago )

My post wasn't aimed at you, if you look at the previous posts and even some after mine, you'll see why I posted this.

Edit: Wow, because of my previous post I'm losing my bubbles, bloody fanboys.

aldesko5362d ago

Valve is one of my favorite devs, but their games are meant to be played on PC. L4D was actually pretty good on 360 (minus the lack of content compared to the PC version), but I can't play HL2 or TF2 on consoles.

Also, this doesn't mean Valve won't release any games for PS3, it just means they won't port any themselves.

WaitStation 35362d ago (Edited 5362d ago )

Cry me a river.

You either get a 360 or upgrade that PC. Don't forget that video card, though. Make sure the Mobo has PCI-E 2.0 or videocard won't be worth it... and the right processor fits, and the same RAM is compatible. Don't forget to update those drivers and make sure SLI, if you have it, is enabled. Good luck with all that.

Valve games on PlayStation? Just wait, maybe next gen. ROFL.

potenquatro5362d ago (Edited 5362d ago )

I get your point, but you can play Valve games on PS3. You can play OB on PS3. Tha't basically the bulk of Valve games right now. Only thing missing is L4d, but all console owners are missing out on DOD:S anyway. PS3 owners should've gotten those updates though. Can't somebody with SDK port those updates to PS3?? I'm not saying a dev, just somebody from the community.

Nikuma5362d ago

Who cares if they don't make a single thing for PS3. You shouldn't be buying any valve games unless you're getting them on the PC anyways.

pixelsword5362d ago (Edited 5362d ago )

I wasn't sure, that's why I wanted to make sure I was clear on my points; hopefully, I didn't sound cross because I wasn't.

I'll bubble+ you, though; because, well, I can. :)

darthv725362d ago

If there was a petition for valve to make ps3 games then why isnt there a petition for insomniac to make 360 games? Unless...there is one nobody told me about.

Honestly there is a double standard from both factions. PS3 gamers who get games from other third parties as exclusives are mad at 360 gamers who get games from third parties as exclusives and vice versa. In the end if PS3 games want these so called exclusives and they are also available on the PC.

I would love to see what insomniac could do with the DS or wii or even the 360 but they have said that even though they are an independent third party, they CHOOSE to make their games for ps3. I can dig that which is why I have a PS3. Valve saying they choose to make their games for 360 and PC should be no different.

Also, those saying they will get the game for PC really arent getting their point across to companies like valve. You want it for ps3 and you are mad that it isnt coming, in the end still get the game for PC??? That is still a sell for valve. If you want to make your point known simply dont buy the product on any format.

It takes commitment in a cause to get the heads to turn your direction.

Kornholic5362d ago

My guess is that the PS3 just doesn't like fat bastards.

MGSR THE HD VERSION5362d ago (Edited 5362d ago )

what's with the exterior criticisms?

you know what never mind, ps3 gamers have already proven their true colors, they love to judge books by their covers.

http://www.n4g.com/NewsCom-...

"hmph" fvckin soul less fanboys.

coolirisGB5362d ago (Edited 5362d ago )

Geoff Keighley is a pro PS3 crybaby sympathizer. His inferior complex turns me off. He'll mention *what about PS3* or *PS3 too* when know one was talking about PS3. GK is a stealth PS3 fanboy he demands developers give PS3 the same respect and treatment as the 360 despite it not being his place. Developers have the right to do what they want just because they make AAA games doesn't mean they are obligated to support PS3.

LOL at the crybabies in here, oh nozzz

JustinSaneV25362d ago

@masterg

You do know that VALVe's main focus is on PC gaming right? In case you weren't aware, they own the most successful PC digital distribution platform on the market. I don't think they're missing much when it comes to potential PS3 sales.

iDystopia5362d ago

haha This is amazing. Go Gabe, go Valve, go 360.

DaTruth5362d ago (Edited 5362d ago )

They are a PC developer and probably wouldn't develop for any console, except for the fact that all they have to do is take a medium setting version from the PC, stamp it on a disk, and there is your 360 version and your 250 million dollars!

Simple as that!

ThanatosDMC5362d ago

I dont mind that Valve doesnt support PS3. As long as they keep me content on Steam.

usern4g5362d ago

Why would they?

It's time to accept reality, in the USA -- the largest market in the world -- the PS3 has utterly shiat-the-bed. It has a very very small user base compared to the Wii & Xbox 360.

This user-base problem woudlnt matter as much if Sony hadnt decided to make the developers jump through hoop by relying on DSPs instead of multi-purpose CPU Cores -- and that costs money. That money is being burnt by the millions and not being recovered.

Look at what happened to Haze FFS. That project destroyed the studio.

And, Killzone 2 only went as well as it did because Sony spent their own money helping the devs -- had they not, it would have failed too.

And, its likely that KZ2 has lost money too, rumoured to be the most expensive game ever developed.

Japan has gone almost totally handheld (this is why you see sony bringing so many big-IP titles to PSP). America is solidly Xbox 360 for HD and Wii for casuals/noncore.

It's time you guys realized this.

Valve is only daring to say it in public, but this is clearly not a unique nor unpopular idea in the halls of the Game Industry.

Do you think the CEO of Activision was just blowing smoke when he threatened to abandon PS3 without a price-cut (hence a install-base increase in a hurry)?

These things arent happening in a vacuum.

Pika-pie5362d ago

Its a shame really that Valve cant rise up to the challenge. Although the install base of the PS3 isnt as much as the 360 its still huge and growing rapidly. They are effectivly saying 'Meh' to 40%-45% of the hardcore market worth millions.

If they were smart the would hire some skilled PS3 developers or at least look to Sony for some support. The costs would more than outweigh the potential rewards.

5362d ago
5362d ago
evilmonkey5015362d ago

Ea did all the porting for them. This article should be called "Valve Not Even Bothering With The PS3." "Anymore" would infer that they "bothered" with it in the first place. Who cares anyway. I prefer C.O.D zombies to lfd . (and yes , I own a ps3 as well as an xbox as well you fanboys).

+ Show (53) more repliesLast reply 5362d ago
A_Little_Girl5363d ago

who is vavlve, do they even make good games i bet they dont

caRnAGEconcept5363d ago

oy-vey. In so few words, you've managed to say quite possibly the most incorrect statement I have ever heard ... about anything ... ever.

Natsu X FairyTail5363d ago (Edited 5363d ago )

I guess you are still Very very Young Little Girl who Dont know Sh1t about Gaming because Any Gamer that knows their Stuff would know that

Valve are Great devs.

Team forteress Series
Half-Life Series
L4D series
Portal
Counter Strike

which are all Great Games Series.

You need to STEP YOUR GAMING KNOWLEDGE UP ASAP!

PS: Disagree all you want that wont change the fact that you aint know Sh1t.

ps2: You may Disagree , Valve will not start making a new game for PS3 because you are disagreeing with me.

get your mind right.

N4PS3G5363d ago

@ A little Girl

..i think they created one of the best FPS of all times... whats the name? ehmm ....Half-Life 2

but oh boy! who are you kidding?..the clueless girl stealth troll account ...you know who they are ;)

A_Little_Girl5363d ago

thanks for clearing it all up, seems like they dont really make good games other than mindless fps. ps3 will be fine without another fps

Pizzagaki5363d ago (Edited 5363d ago )

Remember the game resistance ?
Resistance is a damn Half life rip off without depth.

Half life got depth, and invented the concept of alien indoctrination.
Also, Half life and Counterstrike are one of the most played online games ever.

Basically Valve earns the title, legendary developer, if you dismiss valve, then youre an idiot.
And i dont make love to idiot girls.

*edit*
Did you click disagree on me because i said i dont make love to idiot girls ?
Dont go begging, i am for real, i wont make love to you cuz your an idiot.

evrfighter5363d ago

being a pc gamer I've only seen 2 games on the ps3 and resistance was one of em. It was about as in-depth as Redneck Rampage...

Wait I lied

Redneck Rampage was at least somewhat humorous
http://www.youtube.com/watc...
Put a little spit and shine on the graphics and we have Resistance

Pizzagaki5363d ago

Lol yeh, redneck rampage was friggin hilarious.

rockleex5363d ago

evrfighter trying to label other people as fanboys. Funniest thing all day. ^_^

table5363d ago (Edited 5363d ago )

I'd say resistance is inspired by Halo CE more than anything else. Infact, I'd go so far as saying Resistance FOM is the true 3rd game in the Halo series. Of course all these games got inspiration from games such as Half Life.

edhe5363d ago

"mindless" and "Valve" do not belong in the same area. kthxbai.

rockleex5363d ago

Began as community mods.

Valve just picked them up after they got more popular. O_o

SprSynJn5363d ago

Why does this company, and the community for that matter, think themselves (Valve) so great when they have only two franchises under their belts? Only one of which is considered a classic. I would understand if it were Square or Capcom, but Valve?

Pizzagaki5363d ago

Valve = Counterstrike, Half life, L4d, Team fortress, Portal.

Only 2 franchises you say ?
I count 5 there, and all are very successful.

Nihilism5363d ago

we need an airdrop of droid-be-gone STAT!!, co-ordinates are:

longitude: Dev artcile section
Latitude: ps3 fanboy haven aka valve/ps3 article

Riddicrash5363d ago

Don't get me wrong, Valve are great developers and those are great games but of the 5 you suggested 3 weren't even created by Valve initially, Counterstrike was a mod initially as was Team Fortress and Valve picked up the idea (And the team I believe) for Portal from a game called Narbacular Drop! As I said, don't misinterpret me, Valve have done great things with those franchises, I'm just letting people know the facts!

II Necroplasm II5363d ago

"Did you click disagree on me because i said i dont make love to idiot girls ?"

lol Pizza, you're a trip.

raztad5363d ago

Valve is a PC developer. The highly acclaimed Half-Life series is from it. Valve is a God among PC geeks, if you like first person shooters some Valve games need to be in your must have list.

Get the Orange Box. On PS3 it is glitchy and with a lot of annoying loading times but it packs 5 games for less then $20 and games are playable.

Half-life2: Run and gun FPS. Some smart use of physics/puzzles. Annoying First Person platforming. Vehicle sections are meh. Very weak and unexciting combat but strong storyline.
HL2-EP1, HL2-EP2 are just episodic expansions of HL2. Valve promised a third episode yet to come.

Portal: Very smart FP puzzle game. Highly recommended.
Team Fortress 2: Multiplayer only. I dont like this game but you alway can try.

I'm not a Valve fan but you cant go wrong getting the Orange Box.

zag5362d ago

Valve are ok.

They are really only known for 1 game as that's is all they have made.

Which is Half life that came out in 1995 using a modded Quake 2 engine.

Then in 1999 they came out with Half life 2 using their "own" engine they may have modded another engine who knows, anyway Half life 2 was PC only till the 360 cam out, whihc they simply release the engine for the 360 as the 360 is a cut down PC, (there isn't anything special about the 360) anyway that's when a whole load of new console people started going nuts about it, thinking that it's only ever been released on 360 or something.

I finshed Half life 2 5 years before the orange box came out and I don't know why some many people went nuts for it as the later stages are just run and jump puzzles, in other words gets a bit simplerfied as you come to finshing it.

As for the team fortress etc Valve made that as an addon for half life 1, the other stuff have all mods made by other people and Valve have bought out or employed those people which is good but people are deluded into thinking Valve have made a lot more stuff than what they really have which isn't the case, seeing as Valve only made half life 2 that got released in orange box, team fortress which came out later isn't the only real other project they have done.

Left 4 dead is probably another ripped off mod for half life 2 engine.

dabri55362d ago

Yes, who's ever heard of Half life, Half life 2, Counter strike, Team Fortress, Team Fortress 2, Left for dead, and Portal. Seriously what a horrible track record as a developer.

+ Show (16) more repliesLast reply 5362d ago
kharma455363d ago

It's a pity Valve aren't going to bother with PS3 now, as they have some tremendous stuff, but it's Gabe Newell's loss, the fat twat.

edhe5363d ago

No risk = no loss.

Overall net gain as the whole team works on code for future releases and keep it unbranched for platform reasons.

Overall winner = gamers, for having higher polished products in the future from the company.

snp5363d ago (Edited 5363d ago )

Curious argument.

I'd go the opposite. There's plenty of potential risk and loss for Valve by not bothering to acquire expertise in new platforms/technologies.

I don't think it's at all 'overall winners = gamers' that a previously somewhat forward thinking company has limited itself to a very narrow range of baskets. In fact i'd say it'd almost be a certainty they'd pick up 'something' by learning the ins and outs of PS3 tech which they could not only apply to games for it, but also bring back to their staple platforms.

Alcon Caper5362d ago

The amount of resources it takes to develop for the PS3 is very high. The reason why first party devs (and some third party devs) have such success with the system is that they are subsidized by Sony Entertainment. This is where Guerilla got the sixty million ($60,000,000.00) to make Killzone 2. Other companies that have been subsidized by Sony are: Naughty Dog, Insomniac, and Factor 5 (for Lair).

Third party devs that DON'T get any subsidies, are forced to work with their own money. This is why third party titles have been less successful, because the amount of hours it takes to develop for the PS3 hardware far exceeds that of the PC or Xbox. Where do companies get the money to increase the hours/wages?

I suspect this is why Valve keeps their relatively small company (160 people), focused on these MS-based systems, as to not spread out their resources. It's a financial move and it today's economy, why risk bringing in "PS3 specialists" that may not be able to create a product that is on par with that of the PC specialists.

zag5362d ago

I take it Valve won't be fussed about using the extra CPUs/threads that the Core I7's have these days.

Oh well.

DaTruth5362d ago (Edited 5362d ago )

Ya, screw multiplat development. I find, it has hurt gaming more than it has helped gamers. It is only good if you buy every piece of trash that is released.

I prefer quality over quantity!

@Alcon Caper: Uncharted DF cost only 10 million to make and an average dev time of 2-3 years and it is considered one of the graphically best console games ever! Not to mention every other aspect of the game is amazing.

Alcon Caper5362d ago

what the f are you talking about $10,000,000.00 disqualifies a majority of third party devs!! That a hell of a lot of money for one game. Too much!

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 5362d ago
Lucreto5363d ago (Edited 5363d ago )

Meh it looks like Valve won't be getting my money this gen either.

It is good that even in recession and working in a high pirate platform they have enough money to avoid a platform completely and people call them professional game developers.

v1c1ous5363d ago

i guess david jaffe won't see a cent from me either!

we have to be fair afterall :D

usern4g5362d ago (Edited 5362d ago )

Are you really making an argument here?

Valve considered the Risk vs. Reward/Loss and decided that PS3 isnt worth it.

That actually makes them more professional. More professional than being force to hold back the Xbox 360/PC titles because they dont want to burn money eeking out equal performance on the PS3.

Making these decisions based on REALITY instead of your-type of drivel is what makes Valve so damn awesome.

Portal, Half Life, Left 4 Dead, Team Fortress are all top-tier titles, and I dont want to see their quality suffer because they are wasting time making PS3 games no one will buy.

Sir, you're comment just reeks of sore-loser. Dont blame Valve because you expect them to support your favorite, failed console.

hay5363d ago

Valve is so 2007. /jk

I don't really care about Valve doing PS3 games. Their titles have so low requirements that they can run nicely on older PC's so I always go with a PC for shooters when it's possible. No brainer for me here.

I also wonder why they're looking for PS3 devs since according to this one, they're not interested in PS3 development.

mastiffchild5363d ago

Well, it's a shame in two ways really-it's a shame that Valve won't push themselves into providing PS3 gamers with ANYTHING(they had nothing to do with the partially broken OB port PS3 owners had to suffer)as despite big Gabe crying that it was too hard for him I'm sure, in reality, they could have done a great job.

And it's a shame that Valve sticking with the faithful, but now showing it's age, Source engine left little room to prove themselves the great developer they and their fans feel they still are-iD are a similarly PC based dev risking their rep by trying out the PS3, Bioware, too, have a MS heavy heritage and they're taking the jump and the risk in trying as well. I do believe that if they both do it successfully people will wonder exactly why Valve won't do it-is it because they're not willing/uncomfortable in a dev process away from the similar dev tools for 360 and PC? Are they worried that a poor effort might tarnish their good rep? Or is Gabe, after a lifetime working for , and with, Microsoft just unwilling to either change or work for what he might percieve as "the enemy"?

Gabe was certainly not backwards in slagging off Sony so there's substance to the opinion that he either dislikes them/PS3 or just harbours to strong a liking for his former paymasters over at MS-IDK but found gis early comments, and the derisory laughter when they were asked about possible L4D on PS3 a little insulting to PS only gamers myself. Ut could be that Gabe and Valve realise that it is a change in programming to get the best from the PS3 and they aren't prepared for the change-after all they hardly do things quickly, do they?(L4D2 apart!)

I just think, personally that they're in a comfort zone and it's a bit sad that a great developer, for whatever reason, won't grasp the nettle and compete over more platforms but it's their prerogative to do whatever they like-thing is if they weren't going to make PS3 games why on earth did Gabe have to open his trap about this at all? It didn't look good then and after other devs great games on PS3 looks much sillier now. It's jus Gabes outbursts that puzzled me really as I don't see what the point was.

Thankfully anyone desperate to play Valve games can pretty much do so as the Source engine doesn't eat PC specs and most will run the likes of L4D just fine so there's little reason for anyone else to cry over any of this. Would have been nice to see if Valve coud have competed with the best on PS3 though, wouldn't it?

Pizzagaki5363d ago

Valve may be 2007 now, but for sure they have been working on a new engine for a new half life game.

Look how the rage engine put ID back on the map after a few years of absence.
When Valve shows their new engine and their next half life, Valve will be bigger and better then ever.

evrfighter5363d ago

Wow Mastiff I didn't bother to finish it because its 4am. But Your goin on as if Valve is a console dev...

Once you figure out what platform Valve makes their games on. All your woes and heartache are put to rest.

Show all comments (432)
40°
7.0

The Mildew Children Review | PC | NoobFeed

NoobFeed editor JW Kotze writes - The Mildew Children: Chapter 1 is a game that defies easy categorization, inviting players to explore its enigmatic depths and uncover the truths that lie hidden within. With its rich thematic tapestry, innovative gameplay mechanics, and immersive audiovisual design, it stands as a testament to the power of indie game development to push the boundaries of storytelling and immersion.

Read Full Story >>
noobfeed.com
40°
8.0

Nexus 5X Review | PC | NoobFeed

NoobFeed editor Jay Claassen writes - Nexus 5X is a great deep strategy with endless potential for the genre, and even more potential to ruin a few friendships in good-natured fun. You’re definitely in for a hell of a treat and a good brain massage with how much strategy you’ll need, but that’s what makes this release so great and also such a rarity.

Read Full Story >>
noobfeed.com
50°

Did Blizzard Just End This College Overwatch 2 Player's Career Over Minor Profanity?

Najam from eXputer: "Blizzard's decision to ban a collegiate player over minor profanity has caused a massive uproar in the Overwatch 2 community."