Danes488

Trainee
CRank: 5Score: 1490

User Review : Resident Evil 5

Ups
  • Upgradeable weapons{Return of Classic Enemy's{Co-Op Play
Downs
  • Boss Fights{Mostly Predictable{Ammo wasting moments

Resident Evil 5: The last of a long line

I came into Resident Evil 5 with an open mind (having never really played through the first four) and high hopes (having read about it quite a bit).

In my play-through I played co-op with a friend of mine. And it worked really well. The game was obviously made to be played as a co-op experience. But it was so well done that it never felt forced upon you. One of Valve's newest games, Left 4 Dead, is a good example of this. While being a fantastic game, it had the dependency of having to have human players in order to win on the harder difficulties. The subtle inclusion and the way the two of you could play almost independently, but chose to work together to win makes this a beautiful close to this part of the Resident Evil series (which includes Wesker, whom I learned about).

The graphics in the game are what can be expected of any game at this point in the console's life. They aren't terrible, but they aren't particularly beautiful. They're adept. The music in the game is also good, but nothing special. It keeps with the atmosphere. However it hasn't ever taken me where I sit back and think, this is really cool music.

The controls also work pretty well too. The quick access to your weapons through the D-Pad make the game a bit less clumsy than the previous versions were. The Melee attacks were well done as well, on both the AI and on Chris' and Sheva's side. It was also nice with how the weapons and finishing moves were made distinctly different. You can tell Capcom put in a lot of play-testing into this game. The in-depth weapon upgrades and the variety of weapons make the game feel original every time you play it as well.

Being that these enemies weren't technically Zombies, broke a bit with the norm of the games (I realize RE4 enemies also weren't technically Zombies). And they were fairly intelligent, and quite varied. However I found the classic enemy's of the game were the most feared. I.E. the lickers. When my co-op partner and I first came upon the Lickers we were scared out of our minds. The fear instilled in us from the previous games, came through here. However, the enemy's that were armed with firearms felt like a thin veil of an excuse for there being enemy's who are shooting at you. Which leads to my next point, the Replayability of the game.

This game, is so fun and immersive that there's an intense urge to play the game again. The fact that you get to keep your weapons and ammo from other play-throughs (which includes all upgrades) is very cool also. However the only major obstacle to playing the game again, are the bosses. The bosses feel not so much like bosses but the game, and therefore the developer's, saying "Hey, you have too much ammo, here's a reason to use all of it." Instead of making them feel like an integral part of the game.

Score
8.0
Graphics
The game played well in co-op. And was one of the best Co-Op experiences I've ever had. The subtle and deft way they did it was very well done.
8.0
Sound
Good graphics, but nothing too special.
7.5
Gameplay
Again, the sounds were good. The music in the style of the game. But nothing spectacular.
9.0
Fun Factor
It's hard to beat the feeling of having a bullet take a Zombies head off and watch him walk another few steps before finally falling down. Or stomping their head in when they feign death. Beating the mini-bosses would have felt better if it weren't so ridiculously hard.
8.0
Online
Again, the Co-Op was well done and plays well online. I'd have to say it plays better onine because you still feel dependent without it being forced upon you.
Overall
8.0
Snatcher5538d ago

This sentence is wrong. The graphics are one of the best this generation mate.

I would have given 10/10 to the graphics.

The boss fights are fun and some of the bosses are incredible huge and scary.

I love this game, because of the variety. You get to fight against: Many different Majinis, Reapers, Dogs, Chainsaw maniacs, Lickers, huge creature + more.

HBK6195537d ago (Edited 5537d ago )

Good review, and I agree on a lot of your points, and they actually mirror my thoughts on most too(Which I will put into review form somewhere down the track).

Firstly, the enemies, it was a strange thing, I agree the lickers were very good and really enstil fear in you from the first moment you see them, and you always feel like your going to need some luck to get out of it, the other enemies, especially the majini's with the guns make the game feel a bit forced, as if they said "Well the enemies are like 'zombies' but they can't be completely brain dead" and it leaves an awkward stage where you get smart enemies(One's that can still drive vehicles and shoot weapons competently) and just plain stupid enemies who can do nothing but walk up to you and grab your face, although I will say the evolution of enemies works well(In that you face a good variety just as it starts to get tedious with another enemy).

Boss battles I really do agree with, some are good and fun and I loved the flamethrower battle, that was brilliant, but overall the majority are too use up 1000 bullets and it dies, and the biggest issue too is that half the time your not even sure if your doing the right thing because the boss doesn't really react to the shots.

Graphics are a tough one, at points it has some really great looking graphics and I LOVE the fire effect in this game, probably the best I've ever seen in a game, but then there are points where the game just looks meh, the water has to be the main point there, haven't seen much worse water before in a game, also there are a a lot of dev cut-backs that I noticed with the graphics too, whether this is for hardware or time or money reasons who knows, but there are a lot of things you can point out that is fairly shoddy.

I will say this, your very lucky you played in co-op with a friend(I have done both non-friend and friend co-op) and the NPC friendly AI is shocking, one of, if not the worst I have ever played with, and it is really limited too, so if you replay the game, try not to do it with the NPC friendly AI.

140°

Resident Evil 5 - 15 Years of Being the Most Misunderstood Resident Evil

Resident Evil 5 launched 15 years ago today - and it continues to stand as a stepping stone from the good to the bad.

TheBrainZ76d ago

One of my favourites because of the co-op. Then Resi 6 arrived and the series nosedived further.

Knightofelemia76d ago

I enjoyed the game co-oping with a friend I know the game in solo the AI can be an idiot but RE5 is way better then RE6. I played RE6 with a friend if it wasn't cheap when I got I would have avoided RE6.

thesoftware73076d ago (Edited 76d ago )

5 was excellent, still play Mercs with my brother.
I would love a fully remastered RE:5, with some added, reworked content. The DLC for 5 was also excellent.

6 was awful.

CrimsonWing6976d ago

I never understood why the game was misunderstood. It was a fantastic game at launch and is still fun today to play. It’s as action packed as Resident Evil 4 was, yet that’s regarded a masterpiece 🤷‍♂️

chobit_A5HL3Y76d ago

it was "misunderstood" because they introduced co-op into the franchise at a time when people loved to have fake rage about co-op. like, you could play the game as a solo experience, but people chose to have their bandwagon rage because it was cool at the time lol

-Foxtrot75d ago (Edited 75d ago )

What the hell are you talking about? Fake Rage? Bandwagon? Come on.

You can play it solo but you are forced to carry around a shitty AI partner you have to micro manage. It wasn't as fun solo.

Co-op sucked all the horror, tension and suspense from the game because having a partner covering you was like a safety net. Enemy trying to sneak up on you? No sweat the AI will just automatically lock on, alert you while they shoot first telling you where they are basically.

It was the start of Capcoms fall with the Resident Evil series where it basically become an over the top generic action game which betrayed it's own survival horror roots. Least RE4 had a good blend of both but Capcom just went the wrong way with RE5, especially going off what they were going to do during the RE4.5 beta phase before co-op was added.

franwex75d ago

At least the game was a ton of fun tho. If the game was bad, the outrage would’ve been justified. They simply pivoted for a couple of games. At this point it’s bad because it’s called Resident evil 5? But if was called something else it would’ve been good? Please.

chobit_A5HL3Y74d ago

like i said: fake baby rage and bandwagon hate. res4 wasn't really that scary, either, and was already taking the series into more of an action-oriented direction at the time. 5 was a good game that people fake-hated because of co-op that you didn't even have to play lol hence the fake rage and bandwagon hate. i mean, it obviously did well enough for capcom to go ahead and make 6 the way they did, right? if 5 was so bad, they would have changed what 6 was during development. the difference is that 6 was actually just bad.

people "hate" 5 because res4 was so good, and 5 was just unfortunate enough to be its successor. like i said, 4 wasn't scary, either, and relied more on tension than horror, but it was already more of an action game. if you don't wanna like 5 because it's not scary or whatever- that's fine, but it wasn't meant to be strictly a horror game anymore at that point anyways. the gameplay was a lot faster-paced than 4, so saying that the ai helping you by potentially shooting someone that was sneaking up behind you is a moot point. there were more enemies that were more aggressive, along with newer threats.

5 isn't as good as 4, but it's not a bad game by any stretch.

RNTody50d ago (Edited 50d ago )

What? I always thought RE5 had fake controversy because it was set in South Africa and you shot a bunch of black zombies. I live in South Africa and thought the game was absolutely awesome, played the whole thing co-op with my brother.

@Foxtrot I think you're confusing the garbage Dead Space 3 with Resident Evil 5. Resident Evil 4 was already a hyper action game and had zero fear factor other than the grotesque appearance of some enemies.

Show all comments (16)
270°

Complete Global Saturation! Is Resident Evil 5 Really the Best Choice for the Next Remake?

An exploration of whether RE5 is truly the most logical next step for a remake, or whether there are others in line who deserve their day in the sun.

Read Full Story >>
twinfinite.net
ocelot07235d ago

Remake of Resident evil outbreak as well as file 2. Same gameplay as the recent remakes. Choose what ever character you want to play as. With online co op.

DarXyde234d ago

I've been dying to see Outbreak come back for years.

Even RE Zero and Code Veronica would be excellent.

But for the love of God, not RE5 or RE6.

One they get around to the aforementioned games, why not remake the original Devil May Cry trilogy? That would be a much better use of time. At the very least, the first two games.

justsomeoffdude235d ago (Edited 235d ago )

code veronica should be the nest remake

neutralgamer1992235d ago

CV is good candidate for a remake but requires way more work for today’s standard. People look at CV through their tinted glasses. I think capcom wants to remake every game up till 6 and fix the plot holes so they can continue the series in one straight story path

Also not sure why only RE have to get remade when there are other capcom games that would be better suited for remakes like oninusha

DVAcme235d ago

That's PRECISELY the reason Code Veronica needs a remake. All the other RE games aged pretty well, considering the limitations of the time, but Code Veronica is the game that would be served the best bybremaking it because it feels so archaic these days.

neutralgamer1992235d ago

DVA

But it depends if capcom wants a big project or a quick remake. CV will require a lot more work than RE5

IMO they should remake other games before doing RE5

TheEnigma313235d ago

how many times do we have to say CV is the next best one?

CrimsonWing69235d ago

Nooooo! Why the hell can’t they do Code Veronica? I just don’t understand.

1Victor235d ago

RE5 is the closest to the bottom of the pot(a little smoky flavor but passable in a emergency) before we get to the burned crust that is 6 that not even the pigs would eat

CrimsonWing69235d ago (Edited 235d ago )

Unpopular opinion here, but I enjoyed 5 and 6. I just think, in terms of Remakes, the classics are the one that should get the treatment above the modern takes of the franchise.

Don’t get wrong, RE4 definitely was an outstanding Remake, but RE5… I just get less excited about a Remake for that over something like Code Veronica.

RaidenBlack235d ago

Nope.
Rather remake other past Capcom & non-mainline RE games ... IF they have to continue churning out Remakes.
I'd rather want a new 3rd person RE spin-off
Dino Crisis and Onimusha Reboot
New IPs after Pragmata ships

jeromeface234d ago

show this man the door... he overserved himself.

Show all comments (38)
240°

Why fans feel a Resident Evil 5 Remake might not be a good idea

Though CAPCOM has been hitting it out of the park with their Resident Evil remakes, fans are rightfully skeptical about RE:5.

Read Full Story >>
tryhardguides.com
-Foxtrot370d ago

I just think Capcom have finally got back on track survival horror wise and if they remake RE5 they will most likely make it a full blown co-op game again where they'd be repeating their mistakes with the original RE5.

The original RE4 came out and it was a universally praised game so when they announced a new one people thought they would add onto the good things RE4 brought in and maybe add a touch more horror as RE4 was more action like but still found a good balance. However RE5 didn't, they upped the action, got way more ridiculous and added co-op where if you played single plater you were forced to have a shitty AI follow you around and baby sit. It wasn't scary at all.

They even got rid of RE4s hub like areas (Village - Castle - Island) and had some sort of mission by mission gameplay where you could only buy/sell weapons at the end of the completed mission, it was very chapter select like. It just become so generic and action like, even the puzzles had been cut back, just replaced with a lot of "two people need to operate this, work together" moments which is not fun single player.

Also story wise, the fact we had Ada's betray at the end of RE4, something they doubled down on more in the remake where she decides to not give him the master plagas sample, we find out in RE5 that he has some form of it anyway, he just went to the Island himself and got a sample of Krausers body instead, you know the Island that blew up and most likely had Government officials crawling all over.

I'd prefer it if for the RE5 remake they go more off the RE4.5 concept art, change the story, keep it single player, deviate from canon and create a brand new RE5 featuring Barry, more Jill, Zombies, Tyrants etc like it was supposed to. If people really want co-op then ask for a Outbreak remake, its the perfect game for it.

RE5 is a good co-op game but it's a bad Resident Evil game

RaveTears370d ago

You should search up the history of RE5. It was originally a single player game that was more survival than action. But due to issue and controversy that Capcom had to make changes to RE5.

-Foxtrot370d ago

Oh trust me I know all about it which made me dislike the game more after I played it, like I said the RE4.5 concept art is a fantastic look inside the original version

https://www.relyonhorror.co...

Yeah the controversy really did shape the development. I mean picture this

The very first reveal trailer showed Chris in an African village, you had enemies coming at him and it pretty much set the game up like it was in the 4.5 info we have in the link above. This was 2005.

Then we had the whole backlash that a white man, in Africa was killing black civilians

2008 we get a new trailer, they have now added co-op and Sheva, a previous NPC character similar to Josh in the final product is now the second player, a main character.

I think it's safe to say they added her to try and downplay the racism controversy and they even added white / Asian enemies in the villages which made no sense. They were in villager clothing.

I do miss some of the survival elements they were going to add like sensitivity to sunlight or not staying in the sun far too long. Like if you rushed out a door and you had been inside for too long your screen would be blurred to adjust to the sunlight.

TallDarknWavy370d ago

If they're going to remake RE5, they should actually remake it completely and use the power of new hardware to take advantage of their original vision. We already have a remaster of RE5 and 6. Those are too recent to consider developing a remake this soon as they're only 2 generations old on PS3/360.
Co-Op takes all the fear out of the game as you now have a companion to always lean on. It takes the intensity and isolation away from the game. You need to feel like you're the last line of defense, that you won't have some companion always there to save your ass, it just takes away from any fear or intensity and you get frustrated with the shitty AI.

CrimsonWing69370d ago (Edited 370d ago )

Man, I’m a massive old-school RE fan and I loved RE5. I will not understand the hate for that game while RE4 gets praised.

KicksnSnares370d ago (Edited 370d ago )

Based on the ending of the RE4 remake, it looks like the RE5 remake is the next game, which I’m excited about. RE5 is my favorite RE game, and I could care less about all the hate it gets

thesoftware730370d ago

Yes it's an awesome game, I still play Merc mode lol.

RE 5 is my 2nd favorite,
REmake 1 is my favorite, and still holds up well today.

lucian229370d ago

they really need to just make a couch co-op +online mercenaries only game with most of the cast and all the best maps of RE history. Would be amazing

thesoftware730370d ago

Lucian, absolutely !!!

But it has to be very very similar to Mercs in 5, just expand, don't change the gameplay much, QoL and tons of unlocks is all they need imo.

Revelations Merc was not good, and 8 mercs was fun but single player, same for the others.

lucian229368d ago

oh i think re4 remake merc is very good actually too; only part i enjoyed in 6 was really it's merc also lol. game would be so amazing just plain merc

TheEnigma313370d ago

It'll be better than 6, that's all i know. RE5 was actually good, but not a real RE game. With the whole woke thing nowadays, this won't be able to be in Africa like the original.

jambola370d ago

That's not true at all
It will just be invaded by white men

chrisx370d ago (Edited 370d ago )

I love RE5 and I definitely want a remake! Updated controls and some changes here and there like the 4 remake. They should definitely keep the Africa setting. And Sheva is awesome 👍🏽

Tal169370d ago

I loved this game - especially the opening level, but it fell apart in the 'reeds' section.

Show all comments (27)