1050°

Sonys Ego Cost Them Their Own Halo

Sony has had a ton of opportunities to capitalize on Microsoft some worked, and some didnt' but the most crucial missed opportunity was having Call Of Duty all to themselves. Sony would've been in such a bigger position than their in now but a couple of slip ups has kept them away from even greater strides they would've currently had.
hiphopgamer - contributor
Published: 46 days 18 hours ago | Video | PlayStation 3 | Xbox 360
 
 

« Previous1234
Showing: 151 - 167 of 167 Comments
Shut this user up Let user speak
lucifon - 46 days 6 hours ago
1 -
Haha awesome. This guys hilarious although I don't think thats his intention. Theres no way CoD would be an exclusive to any platform, activision make FAR too much money off all the platforms, and the 360 is the lead sale platform by a long shot. It wouldnt make logical business sense to even let any platform have exclusivity of CoD.
Shut this user up Let user speak
FF7numbaone - 46 days 5 hours ago
2 -
Don't know if it would be a halo of ps3. IF they could have made MW 2 exclusive then yea....
Shut this user up Let user speak
skatezero246 - 46 days 5 hours ago
3 -
My avatar clearly explains how I feel about that over-rated crap known as Halo
Shut this user up Let user speak
lightningsax - 46 days 5 hours ago
4 -
It's okay, everyone, you can all chill out about the Halo/COD comparisons now. One's exclusive and one isn't, they're both good FPS franchises, and they both make an aircraft carrier's weight in solid gold every day. I don't play either of them because it's not my cup of tea. That's about it.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Enigma_2099 - 46 days 4 hours ago
5 - Oh... THIS guy again...
... I was about to say "we didn't WANT HALO," but what's the point?

Besides, the following is far more appropriate...

"Page hits whore is whoring for page hits..."

That is all.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Shmotz - 46 days 4 hours ago
6 - But
If it was a Sony exclusive and Sony was funding I'm pretty sure that Activision wouldnt even be in the picture as they only publish the games. If it was a PS3 exclusive I bet Sony would publish it, then again I dunno if Activision owns the CoD franchise or not.

Anyways what should have happened and what did happen are different and both have come and gone. Enjoy the game if you have it, thats all.
Shut this user up Let user speak
molsen81 - 46 days 3 hours ago
7 -
So people don't like Hip Hop Gamer for various reasons. The way he talks, because he wears his hat tilted to the side, etc. Yeah, I get it. Would you like him more if he was a white guy with streaky hair, tight skateborder jeans, and a guitar in his hand? Yeah, that's what I thought. Show your true colors.
Shut this user up Let user speak
HypnoticMonkey - 46 days 3 hours ago
7.1 -
I think the main reason why people don't like him is because he's full of crap..that's it.

Every one of these shock titles are there to gain hits, there is no evidence in anything he ever says.
Shut this user up Let user speak
pixelsword - 46 days 2 hours ago
7.2 - @ HypnoticMonkey;
I don't think that's it, gametrailers.com has been caught several times maligning multiplatform games in favor of the 360 and lied about Super White and Full Color options not making a difference for PS3 images; when caught and confronted one time they blatantly stated that "there's nothing you can do about it". They also never gave a PS3 game over a 9.5, even though they themselves even admitted that some of those PS3 games were the best of or better than games that got a higher review score; but you don't hear the same calls of people demanding gametrailers to be taken off of N4G, or people insulting the staff for being provable low-lives.

Or how kotaku used to act, or how 1up used to be; no one called them disingenuous or spastic in terms of consistently; yet they made some of the worst articles known a year or two ago; which resulted in 1up being re-tooled, and the estrangement of Sony from kotaku for misusing Sony's trust a while back which subsequently made Sony pull advertising from kotaku... which resulted in kotaku posting a slew of negative Sony articles. Yeah, that's true journalism for you: fair and balanced all the way.

Or even the most extreme of fanboy B.S. articles (destructoid) from that guy jim sterling, he makes-up stuff without fact nor quote and yet none of his articles have been banned, nor have any articles been written about his obvious lack of journalistic integrity.

Yet, if another article is posted from any of those sites, not even the same magnitude of insults.

There is something more to it, as molsen81 suggests.
Shut this user up Let user speak
HypnoticMonkey - 46 days 3 hours ago
8 -
So this is just another "What if..?" article? Wow, great for a news site.
Shut this user up Let user speak
fallenchicken - 46 days 3 hours ago
9 - But?
Would Call of Duty be as popular if it was a ps3 exclusive? Think how popular resistance and uncharted would be if they were 3rd party.
Shut this user up Let user speak
MonopolyRSV - 46 days 2 hours ago
10 -
I don't know why yall hate on hiphopgamers videos. This particular one raises a good point of discussion.

There are probably alot of variables that came into play in the decision at the time. COD had/has a bigger install-base on the Xbox 360. Modern Warfare 2 would not have had quite as big of a launch had it been exclusive to PS3. Also, 360 fans would be in too much of an uproar and would demand the game be made for 360 as well. Look at how PC gamers are angry at their decisions. There are alot more 360 players than the PC gamers, the outrage would've been huge.

Or, perhaps the offer of "exclusivity" really meant more along the lines of having a delayed 360 port, in which case, it could possibly benefit Microsoft in the long run when you think of the particular online experience with friends that is synonomous with Xbox Live.

If 360 fans were willing to wait 6 months to a year, depending on how well Sony could migrate the user base to the PS3 Slim and improve their online experience in that time, the Microsoft fan base could use that against Sony by saying, "you know, you got it first, but we waited 6 months and you still don't have inter-game voice chat up to par" or stuff like that.

Also. Sony has already taken certain financial risk with the console itself and in pushing Guerrilla Games and Naughty Dog etc. Those 2 developers in particular spent alot of time and effort in making Killzone 2 and Uncharted 2 graphically and generally overall superior to the 360s offerings, and are a proud mark for the PS3 brand. Whereas Infinity Ward has now made MW2 graphically as equal as possible between both platforms. They may have been more persuaded to make a better game if they signed an "exclusivity" deal perhaps, but then would Killzone 2 and Uncharted 2 have stood out as much? In the 2009 time frame?

I'd like to hear one of the top Sony execs respond as to why they have adopted that philosophy of not acquiring exclusivity rights from their investments in 3rd party developers.
Shut this user up Let user speak
molsen81 - 46 days 1 hour ago
11 -
I want to know why people assume Modern Warfare 2 will not sell as well on PS3. I can't wait to see some legit sales numbers. I don't think any games should be exclusive anymore. I'm missing out on 360 exclusives because I refuse to buy another 360 after my RROD x2 experience. Not really fair IMO.
Shut this user up Let user speak
ASSASSYN 36o - 46 days ago
12 -
I got to admit. Hippyhop has a point. Sony F'ed up.
Shut this user up Let user speak
orange-skittle - 45 days 22 hours ago
13 - Do You Guys...
Actually listen to this moron. This guy is a joke. I am black and I find his interviews very unprofessional and borderline annoying. I wouldn't even answer questions from a grown ass man w/ his hat backwards if I were representing my company. When you give a journalistic interview you have to be articulate and ask the questions everyone is thinking. Not sucking the snot out of the developers d*ck and saying "Yo, Is it true dat...."

His remarks and headlines are misleading and god awful. Look at this one, Call of Duty was never a Sony only release and the only reason this came up is because of the GOTY that was just released. He would have a better argument if he said "What If GTA Stayed on the Playstation?" This dude is a joke and I refuse to read the rest of his dumb articles. I never get past the openings because he's such a douche.

Hip Hop Gamer, you are a disgrace and you offend me. Grow the f*ck up
Shut this user up Let user speak
Stunt - 45 days 21 hours ago
14 - Uhm
Does this guy have an "Approve Squad" or some group that gets these stories posted? I mean, they're usually full of crap and the textual breakdowns are usually written at (like others have said) a third-grade level.

I'll tell you why these events HHG described don't even have a probability of being true. Infinity Ward can't go to Sony and offer them an exclusivity deal on Call of Duty. Infinity Ward does not own Call of Duty, Activision does. I highly doubt Activision, being the money lovers they are, would offer Sony exclusivity on a Call of Duty on a game when they can easily triple their profits with two other versions of the game.

HHG. No.
Shut this user up Let user speak
ASSASSYN 36o - 45 days 18 hours ago
14.1 -
HAHAHA Approve squad! He must because I would never approve this speculation junk.
Add Comment (Gamer Zone)
Gamer Zone Posting Guidelines
The Gamer Zone is for members who want a more friendly and civilized discussion. This section is heavily moderated by the N4G staff, so leave your fanboyism at the door please. Members who are unable to behave in a mature and respectful manner will be temporarily or permanently restricted from posting in the Gamer Zone. Using words such as Xbots and Sony droids, or other words from the console war vocabulary, is strictly prohibited in this Zone.
Read More...
 
 
You must log in to post comments.
Username:  
Password:  
 
 
About N4G
N4G is a social game news site that covers the game industry 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
More Info... | Submit News