Modern Warfare 2 On Fox

Keith Olbermann - 47 days 15 hours ago

this should come as no surprise. Personally, I detest fox and the fact they pretend to be a legitimate news outlet is a joke. Dont they have something better to do like organize some tea party rallies?

Agree(9) | Disagree(11) | Report

HolyOrangeCows - 47 days 15 hours ago

Now people are going to make comments about FOX in my blog because of my ONE point that has more to do with gametime than the scene itself.

Agree(1) | Disagree(0) | Report

sltPoison - 47 days 15 hours ago

I thought we've moved past them and their lopsided reporting, fixed debates and shoddy reporters. Hey Fox, let's focus on something that is a actually news, well what the hell? You people call anything news these days.

EDIT
at you disagreers. Fox lost all my respect when they excluded Ron Paul from debates and cut his responses on the re-airs so they wouldn't be seen on TV. It's alot more than video games, I know most people on this site really don't have a clue about what goes on outside of their house.

Agree(7) | Disagree(10) | Report

HolyOrangeCows - 47 days 14 hours ago

Almost ALL media is bias one way or another. Quit acting like it's only FOX.

EDIT
"Fox lost all my respect when they excluded Ron Paul from debates and cut his responses on the re-airs"
Wow, that's BS! Ron Paul is genius!
Gotta say....that does kinda make me pissed at FOX.

Agree(4) | Disagree(3) | Report

sltPoison - 47 days 14 hours ago

I honestly try to keep away from most main stream media.

Edit: Are you being sincere about Ron Paul?

Agree(1) | Disagree(1) | Report

devilhunterx - 47 days 14 hours ago

You are an xboy. I would definitely call that "weird behaviors".

Agree(1) | Disagree(3) | Report

Minute Man 721 - 47 days 13 hours ago

2012 Restore the Republic

Agree(4) | Disagree(2) | Report

Darkstorn - 47 days 13 hours ago

Ron Paul? LMFAO!
This guy preaches individualism, but there's an enormous cult of personality around him. Sounds like collectivism, eh? Plus, all these internet libertarian types just go on the internet and engage in groupthink on the Cato institutes website. Groupthink is also a collectivist institution.
Also, Ron Paul wants to get rid of the federal reserve, which despite it's poor regulatory record since Volcker was fired, is an important part of the U.S.'s regulatory program. Without it, we would have to have a gold standard, and the gold standard is very fragile, as evidenced by the multiple recessions that rocked the Gilded Age: http://en.wikipedia.org/wik...

Agree(1) | Disagree(6) | Report

Maddens Raiders - 47 days 11 hours ago

just ClusterFox, being ClusterFox.

Agree(1) | Disagree(2) | Report

himdeel - 47 days 11 hours ago

...able to tell you what their shows were rated when they were young :) Showing my age I can tell you that the A-Team fired about 4,500,3448,399 bullets and had only 1 person wounded - HM.

I've never gone out and shot up anyone or jumped my van across any broken bridges. Blame the parents or blame society! But blame the parents first.

Agree(1) | Disagree(0) | Report

Milo Garret - 47 days 15 hours ago

The american dimension, sadly.

Agree(11) | Disagree(10) | Report

toaster - 47 days 15 hours ago

Fox News!

Wanna hear another one?

Modern Warfare 2.

Agree(6) | Disagree(11) | Report

Darkstorn - 47 days 13 hours ago

Why all the disagrees? I find it hard to believe that there are more fans of Fox News on N4G than those who can recognize it's far-right agenda.

Agree(4) | Disagree(3) | Report

Armyless - 47 days 11 hours ago

As opposed to what? Your left-wing agenda?

Agree(5) | Disagree(1) | Report

Minute Man 721 - 47 days 15 hours ago

Van Jones did

Agree(8) | Disagree(1) | Report

bpmurr - 47 days 13 hours ago

Glenn Beck FTW!

Agree(4) | Disagree(0) | Report

peeps - 47 days 15 hours ago

and it even allows u to skip the offending mission.

bottom line is that the games for mature audiences (still hasn't stopped squeeky kids online tho lmao)

Agree(4) | Disagree(0) | Report

LeonSKennedy4Life - 47 days 15 hours ago

...unless you're Kanye.

Agree(5) | Disagree(1) | Report

Milo Garret - 47 days 15 hours ago

I recommend you try a foreign news channel, american news channels are trash, common knowledge. Or, even better, read newspapers, written american journalism is unmatched.

NY Times, Financial Times, Washington Post, are all good choices that harbor some of the finest journalists and reporters in the world. They all offer slightly different views of the world, but by reading several newspapers which adhere to different extremes of the political left/right you're able to perceive the world around you more correctly. FOX is a clear cut (republican)party instrument reminiscent of the way media is and has been used by communist states.

I think anyone that watches FOX news regularly as a legitimate source of information should be declared mentally challenged, no joke.

Agree(2) | Disagree(12) | Report

Armyless - 47 days 15 hours ago

Do you know what a Libertarian is?

Agree(6) | Disagree(1) | Report

Captain Tuttle - 47 days 15 hours ago

The problem with Fox is that they CLAIM to be "Fair and Balanced" and they're probably the worst of the lot (although MSNBC has been giving them a run for their money from the left). I used to watch it for laughs until I realized that millions take what they see on Fox as the gospel truth. Same with that asswipe Limbaugh.

Agree(5) | Disagree(7) | Report

Minute Man 721 - 47 days 15 hours ago

posted one time that Obama was right leaning. So Armyless don't waste your time with him. He got the E.U. flag as an avatar nuff said. Captain all the news outlets push nothing but propaganda.

Agree(7) | Disagree(3) | Report

Gish - 47 days 14 hours ago

The problem is idiots dont seem to understand fox's news programs from their commentary programs. Their news is spot on most of the time, of course their commentary (Beck, Hannity) have a VERY biased view, thats why they are called commentary shows. I find it funny that people attack fox and they are the ones who are the idiots who cant even understand that.

Agree(3) | Disagree(2) | Report

Darkstorn - 47 days 13 hours ago

@10.2-
A Libertarian is an idiot. Someone who rejects basic social psychology and works toward a more individualistic country, where you SHOULDN'T help an old lady across the street if it doesn't benefit you in some way. In other words, it's rationalized greed.

Agree(1) | Disagree(9) | Report

Armyless - 47 days 11 hours ago

Wrong

Agree(5) | Disagree(2) | Report

Milo Garret - 47 days 11 hours ago

@Armyless:

Yes, I know what a Libertarian is, do you?
I've noticed the word is being tossed aroung in american media lately by people who don't really seem to understand what it means. I seriously doubt the general populace of n4g does. The most common expression of Libertarian values in politics today is usually through neoliberal policymaking, which both the democratic and republican party engage in on occasion, obviously the republicans do it more. It is not necessarily a good thing, for example, the current economic crisis is blamed on the global neoliberal (libertarian in this context) regulatory environment of the fiscal system.

For a great introduction read Will Kymlickas 'Contemporary Political Philosophy', it should be in any respectable university's library, it might also be available in some highschools.

@Minute Man 721: Jikes, good thing you know how to read... I said that despite many americans thinking Obama is a socialist (which is retarded if you know ANYTHING about political theory), in a international academic context he's considered more part of the right than of the left.

quote of self:

"I find calling Obama a socialist is an insult to 5 years of education and sleepless nights spent writing papers. It's so ignorant it hurts, it may come as a complete surprise to you but Obama is actually part of what is generally percieved as the right wing of politics in the academic sphere"

Next time try and finish the sentence before making silly comments.

Agree(2) | Disagree(6) | Report

Armyless - 47 days 11 hours ago

What's your political standpoint? How do your personal views fit with the current political strata?

Agree(2) | Disagree(0) | Report

Minute Man 721 - 47 days 10 hours ago

Obama is far leaning left. You are wrong. And blaming libertarian policy for the finicial crisis? It's the Government who wanted every American to own a home that mandated banks to give loans to pepole who couldn't pay it back caused all this. It's all apart of the plan

Agree(5) | Disagree(2) | Report

Armyless - 47 days 10 hours ago

"Hey, Obama has just nationalized nothing more and nothing less than General Motors. Comrade Obama! Fidel, careful or we are going to end up to his right"

-Hugo Chavez, on a live national television broadcast.

Agree(3) | Disagree(1) | Report

Milo Garret - 47 days 10 hours ago

Nowhere, you see I'm a political scientist, as such, it becomes very difficult to choose one "side" over the other because during the course of your studies you've learned all the good and bad stuff about every major political perspective. Without giving too much away, I work in public administration assessment and evaluation, which pretty much demands a neutral standpoint.

Who do I vote for? Depends on the context at hand.
Voting is a huge issue for me, so many factors have to be taken into account. Usually I settle on the choice which I, as objectively as is possible, perceive as the one that'll benefit me and the largest amount of people for the longest period of time in an effecient manner, without sacrificing core democratic values and principles as I understand them.

In the last american elections I would have voted for Obama, yes. I would, without a doubt, support the health care reform. I guess these are choices which in america are (incorrectly) understood as being "left", nevertheless, it doesn't mean that in face of the next set of choices I wouldn't vote "right".

I hope this answers your question.

@minuteman: Again, finnish reading the sentence. It's not that hard. I understand that in an american context he can be perceived as left, I get that, read what I wrote. You are making statements from an egocentric point of view.

Agree(1) | Disagree(4) | Report

Armyless - 47 days 9 hours ago

You may not realize how arrogant your 'tone' comes across. I say this is the kindest possible sense because I believe what you're saying is well-thought out. I've never bought into the 'science' of politics, as politics in general is a sea of moving targets, where perception IS reality. I don't believe that my government should be the answer to most of life's difficulties, and in many ways (in my opinion) only contributes to them.

I believe that the human individual is the highest form of self-governing, and that a man should be free to do whatever he wishes with his life, so long as it doesn't maim or steal from another man's person or property. I believe that the mind of man is a mystery, fashioned in a universe of cause and effects to betray the essence of the material from which he sprung, to contribute to the creative process which had born him. I believe that humans (and life itself) defy the second law of thermodynamics, and spontaneous generation. I believe that we are blessed with a gift we do not fully understand, and are responsible for a purpose to which we can only define for ourselves.

In this way, I believe that government is not a solution to man's problems, but a hindrance to it. And that the left-right spectrum to which so many affiliate (incorrectly) to a hierarchy of Fascists and Leftists, Dictators and Potentates, makes more sense (and leaves less room for individual interpretation) when understood as a spectrum where total-government control rules on one end, and Anarchy cascades on the other.

I do not believe a fair government can be found. I believe that humans are fallible, and in so ruling our governments, naturally seek to expand their powers as merely a product of their being. Governments (and the people in their chairs) seek solutions to problems and challenges by seeking ever newer powers.

I believe that the human being, the individual, is responsible for every great thing the human race has accomplished. He alone. And government is the force by which these gifts are used for the distribution, and retention of power over him.

Agree(4) | Disagree(3) | Report

Darkstorn - 47 days 8 hours ago

@10.10-
You don't think Greenspan's low interest rates and the deregulation since Reagan has had anything to do with this recession? You sir, need to read up on some good, unbiased economic trends. In addition, Obama is not even a liberal in this country (look at his policies - no universal healthcare?), and on the world stage, he would be considered center-right.
@10.13-
I used to believe that same thing, that the 'individual is god,' yadda yadda, but that was before I attained my social psychology degree. See, in basic social psychology, we learn that for a healthy individual there needs to be a balance between individual responsibility and obligation to community. Since every healthy human identifies his/herself as a part of an abstract group, he/she must have an either mutual or altruistic personality when interacting with members of that group in order to gain prestige. That being said, radical individualism is inherently unnatural, as we are social beings and require group involvement to function. But collectivist institutions (such as religion) subjugate the individual to a higher authority. Most social psychologists conclude that the healthy individual has a communitarian standpoint on the world's issues, and can successfully be independent without being needlessly self-interested. It's all about balance, you see. The same can be said about governance.

Agree(1) | Disagree(2) | Report

LeonSKennedy4Life - 47 days 15 hours ago

They specifically say ON THE PROGRAM that parents shouldn't be buying it for their children and that, if you're mature enough to handle it, it's a great game. : (

Some people.

Agree(7) | Disagree(1) | Report

LeonSKennedy4Life - 47 days 15 hours ago

But you ARE the terrorist here. You're not watching it.

If you're a responsible parent, you probably won't play COD:MW2 at ALL around your 6 year-old son.

Agree(7) | Disagree(0) | Report

silvacrest - 47 days 14 hours ago

at that age i dont think it matters

can you honestly say you remember anything from the age of 6 till now?

Agree(0) | Disagree(4) | Report