Modern Warfare 2: PS3 vs. PC comparison HD

crazy1704 - 49 days 20 hours ago

I dont think so, PC version looks too crisp, I like the smooothed out ps3 look

Agree(13) | Disagree(11) | Report

iMad - 49 days 20 hours ago

XBOX 360 >> PS3 versions
360 > PC versions

Agree(5) | Disagree(78) | Report

Amp - 49 days 19 hours ago

Maybe you will be able to sleep at night !

Agree(25) | Disagree(2) | Report

SL1M DADDY - 49 days 19 hours ago

Looks identical. But then again, I am not looking at the screen shots through fanboy glasses like the 360 fans.

PS3 = PC = 360. Good for Infinity Ward for doing it again.

Agree(18) | Disagree(4) | Report

Zedux - 49 days 19 hours ago

if thats in a high config pc I am totally disappointed with this game!

Agree(10) | Disagree(0) | Report

iron_sheik - 49 days 19 hours ago

PS3 version> x360 version in graphics

but PC >>>> console versions

Agree(15) | Disagree(3) | Report

Raf1k1 - 49 days 19 hours ago

PC version looks too crisp?
You do realise it's running at a higher resolution right?

The smoothed out slightly faded look of the PS3 is what makes it look worse than the 360 version which is a bad thing but you compare it to the PC and all of a sudden it's a good thing?

edit: the PC version was running at a lower res?
I'm not too keen on these comparisons since you can't properly compare the two without knowing what effects are running on PC.

Agree(0) | Disagree(6) | Report

MAiKU - 49 days 19 hours ago

Unlike it's PC-ish counterpart, the 360, the PC will always have superior graphics due to the fact that you could have the same gaming PC with changeable parts such as the graphics card and update when the latest one comes out.

But that is both a strength and a weakness.

-I'd still buy the ps3 version-

Agree(5) | Disagree(0) | Report

iron_sheik - 49 days 19 hours ago

http://www.n4g.com/News-425...

ps3 version also looks much sharper. ofcourse PC version looks even more crisp than the ps3 version . However PS3 version easily looks better than the x360 version

Agree(4) | Disagree(1) | Report

divideby0 - 49 days 18 hours ago

iMAD....sorry you really need glasses and well thats enough for now

Agree(2) | Disagree(0) | Report

sikbeta - 49 days 17 hours ago

Now that's what I called delusional

PC > gimped down pc in a white box = xbox lol

Agree(3) | Disagree(0) | Report

DaTruth - 49 days 17 hours ago

Now they've really screwed up! It is difficult to tell those apart! The PS3 actually has more junk littered about in some shots.

The PC community should be really upset!

Question; Did it ever occur to anyone that when developers make the game, they keep the fact that most PS3 owners have RGB turned on full, and that if they made the game for the limited range, the game wouldn't look as good on the PS3 full range? People who are incapable of putting the RGB to full probably have a television where the difference would be unnoticeable. As I have a Wega and a Bravia, and the Wega always looks washed out! This is in reference to the PS3 vs 360 comparisons where they use the out of box settings.

Agree(0) | Disagree(1) | Report

ThanatosDMC - 49 days 16 hours ago

I'm not even gonna bother writing something that will "try" to prove ^ wrong. It's just too sad.

Agree(2) | Disagree(0) | Report

Information Minister - 49 days 16 hours ago

@ divideby0:

He already has glasses... Microsoft brand.

Agree(3) | Disagree(0) | Report

thewhoopimen - 49 days 16 hours ago

This game was dumb downed for consoles so the PC version doesn't look any different from the console versions beyond higher resolution it seems. That being said, I like how the particle effects on the ps3 look better (in the flames). That's just an opinion and doesn't construe the ps3 version being better

Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report

DaTruth - 49 days 15 hours ago

Good thing Iron Sheik posted a link that proves me right, so I wouldn't have to do it if Thanatos decided to man up and try and prove me wrong.

Only thing that's sad is your fanboyism! I posted a good topic of discussion, with no fanboyism involved and didn't even say anything bad about any console. I even backed it up with the basis for my opinion, which is having two televisions, one that supports RGB and one that doesn't!

I'm not even buying this game, like I never bought the last one or any COD ever; So I don't even care, all versions can suck if they want!

@The Woopiman: All PC games are dumbed down for consoles. That is why there are stark differences between PC exclusives(Crysis) and multiplats. That is why I feel sorry for the PC community; All that money for upgrades and the best they can get is higher resolutions!

Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report

dirthurts - 49 days 18 hours ago

You only play exclusives?
You're missing out bud...

Agree(2) | Disagree(7) | Report

dirthurts - 49 days 18 hours ago

Whoever disagrees has never played a pc game.
I would like to see the honest comparison instead of scaling back the pc version to give PS3 a chance.
1920x1080 at 4xaa or 8xaa (PC)
vs the 1024x600 at 2xaa (PS3)
and I would like to see the video too, showing frame rates.
120+ fps (pc) vs 30fps, or maybe 60? (PS3).

Agree(3) | Disagree(1) | Report

DaTruth - 49 days 17 hours ago

Well, if this is scaled down, that would explain it. I thought they just made a terrible PC version!

Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report

Feral Gamer - 49 days 18 hours ago

Maybe you should lower your standards. Looks fine to me, much better than a number of other military games.

Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report

dirthurts - 49 days 18 hours ago

Owns killzone.
So don't even start that.

Agree(3) | Disagree(8) | Report

iron_sheik - 49 days 18 hours ago

why compare a console game to a PC game?
can you name a console fps that rivals killzone 2?

Agree(7) | Disagree(0) | Report

HDgamer - 49 days 17 hours ago

because he's not bright. Crysis isn't on consoles, and even so it owns killzone 2 in graphics department it owns all 360 games then.

Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report

skeletonss - 49 days 17 hours ago

Smokes killzone.

Agree(2) | Disagree(4) | Report

Redempteur - 49 days 14 hours ago

lol no...

the source engine is outdated .. i was fun 4 to 5 years ago .. but now many engines did better ...

Agree(1) | Disagree(1) | Report

TABSF - 49 days 13 hours ago

your right about what little love they have for PC ( even though PC made them successful) and that its the same engine as CoD: 2 may be CoD.

"this just shows the PC was a port of the consoles, and they didnt want to put more love into it."

The game is made on Computer (the same as PC) then ported to consoles.

"no servers" there will be dedicated server whether IW support it or not.
"no mods" it is impossible for the game to be mod free.

"no graphical improvements for those with better hardware"

This comparison was most likely done at 1024 by 768P (4:3 aspect ratio) or 1280 by 720P (16:9) on medium setting with 2xAA or No AA

Should of been 2560 by 1600P with highest setting with 16xQ AA and AF x 16 minimum.

I really wonder why they thought PC users would buy this?

well there is hundreds of thousands of people on steam at the moment playing or waiting for the Digital version to be released.

Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report

TABSF - 49 days 13 hours ago

Most likely 1024 by 768P (4:3) on medium setting with 2xaa or non
It should be 2560 by 1600P (16:10) on highest setting with 16xQ AA and AF x 16

That's a real comparison, all games maxed on all platforms.

Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report

theEnemy - 49 days 19 hours ago

But the PS3 and 360 version of the game are not in HD.

Agree(2) | Disagree(0) | Report

Darkeyes - 49 days 17 hours ago

Get over yourself, I have seen the colors actually look darker when you put it on Full RGB on my Plasma.. Hell I even saw MW2 and the changing from Limited to Full RGB makes the pale colors look darker like the 360 version. If you are still hanging on that LOT comparison, then sadly you are in denial cause this comparison is more legit....

Besides I personally feel that the lighting in the PS3 version is a tad bit better and I hate the bloom and haze in some of those 360 shots... Looks like a tactic to probably cover Jaggies....

Agree(2) | Disagree(1) | Report

digger18 - 49 days 16 hours ago

This is what RGB on full does:

RGB on limited:

http://i63.photobucket.com/...

RGB on full:

http://i63.photobucket.com/...

Notice how the colours and textures pop out. Look at the sword handle, you can nearly count the red thread work with RGB on full. The picture with RGB on limited looks washed out and very blurry.

Also look at his helmet, in the RGB full one, you can see light bouncing off it, but very dull in the limited one.

Agree(1) | Disagree(0) | Report