1070°

IGN: Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 Review

IGN writes: "Over the years the Call of Duty series has set the bar for immersive, action-packed, cinematic FPS gaming, and no matter what camp you're from there's no denying the franchise's influence on the industry. When Infinity Ward moved from the classic World War II setting and blazed new ground with Modern Warfare we saw the first obvious split within the world of Call of Duty. The series dropped its historic focus, created a new cast of characters, and began treading on new ground by taking the first-person shooter genre to new locales, and pushing the boundaries of what military games are willing to show. With Modern Warfare 2, the sheer amount of hype has been practically inescapable, with preorders alone setting it up as one of the biggest selling games of all time, the addition of even more multiplayer modes and features, and the game's new Special Operations mode has set Infinity Ward's lastest up as the game to beat this year."
9.5 / 10
Cyrus365 - contributor
Published: 47 days ago | Review | PlayStation 3 | Xbox 360 | PC
 
 

« Previous1234Next »
Showing: 101 - 150 of 168 Comments
Shut this user up Let user speak
Halo3 MLG Pro - 46 days 22 hours ago
0.1 -
Please enlighten me than how you think Warhawk is not a fraction of MW2. Oh man this should be fun. :)

EDIT* First of all your complaining about $20 and your 27 years old??? Secondly if you had a problem with this game than why did you buy it? It seems like your the type of person that just complain about minor things like this so you should of waited till a few reviews to get the scoop.
Shut this user up Let user speak
The_Zeitgeist - 46 days 21 hours ago
0.2 -
Dude I'm 27 years old and I am pissed that I spent 60 bucks of my hard earned cash on a game that could easily have been released as an online only game and spared me 20 bucks.
Shut this user up Let user speak
nolifeking - 46 days 21 hours ago
0.3 -
Warhawk was always known as an MP only game and was sold for $40. you fail at simple comparisons.

Edit:And it scored lower so what the hell is your point?

Edit2: limited levels? You mean the ones that were as big as 3 COD maps? Weapons? Okay Cod has more granted, but it should considering a lot of them are variations of each other. The gametypes in COD are the same ones we've been playing for years with different names, I'm not impressed. Having a campaign for the sake of having a campaign isn't really something to boast about.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Halo3 MLG Pro - 46 days 21 hours ago
0.4 -
Okay so your saying Warhawk's limited levels, weapons, gametypes, and zero campaign was worth $40???

But you have a problem with MW2 that has MUCH more levels, weapons, gametypes, and a campaign for $20 more???

Hypocrites. You guys are just complaining to much.
Shut this user up Let user speak
kornbeaner - 46 days 21 hours ago
0.5 -
Know what you get for $40. Huge maps, It would take about 5-6 CoD4 maps to measure out to the same of a full Warhawk map. Vechicles: Warhawks, Tanks, Jeeps, Motorcycle W/side cart. Dedicated servers which hold 32-player fights with actual ping numbers not meters so you know what your getting as far as connection. Weapons: Sniper rifle(that has a purpose), Auto-Rifle, Land Mines, Bazooka's, C4, hand guns. And you still have $20 left over which is enough to buy all 3 DLC packs which offers new maps, locations and Map specific weapons. If you bought early enough and some are still floating around out there you got a bluetooth head set which was functional enough to use on all your PS3 games and still had $5 left over to buy yourself something to eat. For $60 bucks it seems like you get a whole lot of game with Warhawk.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Pumbli - 46 days 18 hours ago
0.6 -
Well I didn't like Warhawk much myself, it's a good game, just not my style. I bet there will be hundreds of people out there who will keep enjoying Warhawk even though MW2 is out.

I think MW2 will be better (since I enjoy FPS more then TPS) but that's just my opinion.
Shut this user up Let user speak
DaTruth - 46 days 17 hours ago
0.7 -
Half the people on my friends list still play Warhawk! To be fair, half the map is a mirror of the other half.

I skipped RFOM's multiplayer, because I wasn't into multiplayer. Warhawk made me spend hundreds of hours and was completely its own game, unlike these other games that are just copies of Doom!
Shut this user up Let user speak
voice_of_ reason - 46 days 22 hours ago
1 -
10-Graphics: MW2
"What was already an impressive graphical engine has only improved over the last two years. More effects, grander environments, and a truly spectacular overall visual offering."

9.5-Graphics Killzone 2
"Phenomenal visuals prove that Guerrilla either met or surpassed that infamous E3 trailer. Some technical issues hold it back from being a completely flawless masterpiece."

I fail to see the logic in such scoring. They say KZ2 met/passed the quality of a CGI video, yet, was held back by "technical issues". Am I to believe then that MW2 is technically flawless and a graphical masterpiece? I have no problem with them giving MW2 a 9.5 (or even a 10 if it merits it) but I can't stand ridiculous double standards. Why does MW2 get a pass on (as IGN says in their review) a weak storyline, short campaign, etc... but KZ2 does not? I have played both, KZ2 and MW2, and graphically MW2 does not hold a candle to KZ2. MW2 does however offer a much better overall package and is just fun as hell to play (KZ2 isn't everyone's cup of tea). I just wish the hypocrisy would end. If you knock a game for one thing, then you better knock another game for the same thing.
Shut this user up Let user speak
The_Zeitgeist - 46 days 21 hours ago
1.1 -
Agreed.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Mr Tretton - 46 days 21 hours ago
1.2 -
agreed voice of reason...the answer?...is advertising money. One company has more to offer in those regards, therefore they get better, illogical praise.

Gaming journalism is f*cked. With that being said, I'm not one to have ever he a part of all this BS anyway. I'm a gamer, tried and true, and my copy is in the mail this afternoon.
Shut this user up Let user speak
kraze07 - 46 days 21 hours ago
1.3 -
Yeah, it sucks. This is why I stopped paying attention to reviews. Whenever I have the money to spare and I'm curious to see how good a game is I buy it. Most of the time the games tend to be better than how good or bad reviewers say they are.
Shut this user up Let user speak
voice_of_ reason - 46 days 18 hours ago
1.4 -
Obviously it is all about money, otherwise they would not still be in business. Which is fine, that's not my gripe. I don't think there is some grand conspiracy at IGN or in the gaming industry... it's just there is absolutely zero standard grading scale.. it is all subjective. They have broad categories to judge a game off of, and there is little coordination between people in the gaming site. For example, if they give Uncharted 2 a 10 in graphics, then that should be the current standard and everything else should get lower than that unless it is actually better. Clearly, MW2 does not look better than Uncharted 2. Guess I'm just nostalgic for the way they rated game in magazines, before the internet took off lol.
And, I wish I could stop paying attention to reviews, but games cost way too much to just wing it and buy a game without a little research.
Shut this user up Let user speak
flirt_games - 46 days 17 hours ago
1.5 -
Thats because IGN are idiots...
Their brand of journalism needs to die an instant death...
I hope their website dies... Dont visit their site to give hits... or if you are addicted...visit using adblock...
Shut this user up Let user speak
LiQuiFiedArt - 46 days 17 hours ago
1.6 - I have MW2
the graphics are not killzone, uncharted, MGS4 or any other big namer ps3 game's level.

The xbox fans are grasping at straws, because of an overall inferior system. With a (PAID FOR) SLIGHTLY superior operating system.
Shut this user up Let user speak
kornbeaner - 46 days 21 hours ago
2 - Rent this game.....
I preferred MW1 on PC but seeing as they butchered the MP on PC. I'll rent to play SP might jump on MP for a few battle, but doubt that it will be much different then MW1 to the point I would want to pay $60 for it.
Shut this user up Let user speak
MajestieBeast - 46 days 21 hours ago
3 -
Some of the reviewers already fapped off on there copy off mw2.
Shut this user up Let user speak
njmzhang - 46 days 20 hours ago
4 -
10 for graphics?
Do you have eyes or brain?
Shut this user up Let user speak
Fozzy25 - 46 days 20 hours ago
4.1 -
Well is it better than Killzone 2 in graphics, cause according to them it is.
Shut this user up Let user speak
voice_of_ reason - 46 days 19 hours ago
4.2 -
According to them it is technically flawless and a graphical masterpiece. Read my above post if you're wondering where I came up with that!
Shut this user up Let user speak
RadientFlux - 46 days 19 hours ago
5 -
Quick it's a highly-rated multi-platform game, time to call it overrated.

I can understand some of the negative posts, as some people really hate FPS and you can't please everyone.

Though I have no doubt that the majority of the posts are from trolls that automatically hate anything that is multi-platform. Only games from their chosen system deserve a score above 90%.
Shut this user up Let user speak
nycredude - 46 days 12 hours ago
5.1 -
Radiant flux

Maybe you should pay attention. No one is knocking the final score, they are knocking the 10 for graphics, which is obviously BS, Unless you only have the one console with subpar graphics.

Roybatty

If 30 fps is shiat then MW2 is shiat because the framerate is NOT locked at 60 fps, it goes down to 30 in high intensity scenes. Duh. Besides I hope you are gaming on the PC if framerate is that important to you that you think 30 fps is shiat, because pc is where it is at then.
Shut this user up Let user speak
TheMailman - 46 days 19 hours ago
6 -
Tanks God Games reviewers don´t score movies... I bet Rambo IV would be the most acclaimed movie ever made...

I think nowadays reviewers have brain damage…
Shut this user up Let user speak
roybatty - 46 days 19 hours ago
7 - I TOTALLY AGREE with the 10 for graphics.
Graphics are not just visuals, it's implementation too. And if a game with good graphics has zero V-Sync issues and runs at 60fps then that make great graphics. And no kiddies, 30 fps is not as good, it's SH1TE.
Playability over prettiness any day, and the graphics are awesome anyway
so great graphics+60fps+no tearing = FANTASTIC graphics. All the COD4 graphics haters should STFU.

p.s. Even though IW are going with the LAME/SH1T console method of online play for the PC version...sigh (no dedicated servers, 14 yo racists hosting and then quitting per to peer servers) I'm still getting the PC version, so I will be seeing huge frame rates and better graphics and WAAAAY better controls than both of you 360 and ps3 moaners.
Shut this user up Let user speak
voice_of_ reason - 46 days 19 hours ago
7.1 -
Actually, a stable frame rate, be it 60 or 30, is great. The problem is when it is an unstable 30fps (an "unstable" 60fps probably won't be noticed) and the game freezes or pauses sometimes. It's annoying.
And by implementation I assume you mean art direction? In which case that is completely subjective and basically impossible to put a numerical value on.
Also, non-game related, it is a shame that you have a Blade Runner name/avatar and only 2 bubbles to show for it... anything related to Blade Runner deserves better representation than you, a person who uses little logic.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Teh Cell - 46 days 19 hours ago
8 -
"Graphics 10.0
What was already an impressive graphical engine has only improved over the last two years. More effects, grander environments, and a truly spectacular overall visual offering."

OMG OMG, BUT NO IMPROVEMENTS????? LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL COD 2.2!!!!!
Shut this user up Let user speak
robser73 - 46 days 18 hours ago
9 - Ridicolous Review
10 in Graphic is absolutely a worst vote.
So Uncharted 2 would get 13/10 !!!
A good vote for graphic is 8.5 and stop.
9.5 in Overall is exagerate.
A good Overall will be 9.
Shut this user up Let user speak
flirt_games - 46 days 17 hours ago
10 -
IGN is a joke...
Actually games journalism is a joke played on idiots.

Only idiots will buy this expansion pack ...
Shut this user up Let user speak
Grandreaper9999 - 46 days 17 hours ago
11 -
Call me a jerk, but I was really hoping this game was going to get piss-poor reviews despite the hype. Would've sent IW and Activision a nice message. Eat it up, you'll be getting two every year from now on, with less and less features.
Shut this user up Let user speak
SportsFan - 46 days 17 hours ago
12 - I will buy this expansion pack
Say what you want....but I will buy this game, even if it is considered a expansion pack. This is MUCH better than ODST (No offense) and the best shooter to date.....until Battlefield: Bad Company 2 releases next year.
Shut this user up Let user speak
thehitman - 46 days 17 hours ago
13 - lol....
What w/ all the hate comments its a really good game dont be pissed if u cant afford it. Got mines yesterday (found out place was selling it for a week already....) and I think so far its better than CoD4 so haters should just shut up and go away.
Shut this user up Let user speak
nycredude - 46 days 12 hours ago
13.1 -
Your comment is arrogant and don't even hold any truth. to think someone might be hating this game cause they can't afford it is juvenile. Maybe it's the fact that it's the same as cod4, or that the online still has problems, or the fact that the sp is just 5 hours long, or maybe that they gimped the pc version, or raised the price in certain regions, but because people can't afford it? That is retarded. I have the game but haven't played it yet, so I'll judge for myself how the game is, but it's obvious from videos and the trailers on tv that this game doesn't look as good as Killzone 2.

FY
Shut this user up Let user speak
thehitman - 46 days 12 hours ago
13.2 - lol.
its the same as cod4? have u played it?? if not then stfu.... stop coming up w/ conclusions based off crap u read on the net. Also I never said it looks as good as KZ2, doesnt change the fact thats its a really great game and doesnt deserve the hate at all.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Tion21 - 46 days 16 hours ago
14 - I expected that score lol.
I agree KZ2 and U2 have better graphics and MW2 is just hyped. Also is it the same reviewer who reviewed KZ2? if so then we can complain about the graphic scores. Just like the review of Disgaea 3. That reviewer hated rpgs yet still played it. There are many reviewers in GN. You just should not look at reviews so much. Only to see what are the major flaws and whatnot. What do u see on N4g? tons of people actually hate COD, and are tired of it. I am one of those people. 9 months later and KZ2 is still better than MW2. eve though MW2 got made in 10 months. I mean it could not have taken them long to make the same game right? Campaign is prob great and movie like but thats it. why do u think it took forever for them to show multiplayer gameplay...
Shut this user up Let user speak
TheMailman - 46 days 16 hours ago
15 -
And you know what´s best? Next year will have CDMW3!!! Rip me of Activision, rip me of!!!!!!!! hahahahahahahahah what a joke...
Shut this user up Let user speak
Relientk77 - 46 days 16 hours ago
17 -
holy f*ck it looks sick!
Shut this user up Let user speak
bjornbear - 46 days 16 hours ago
18 - Hype score
Lets face it. If it got less than 9 people would throw a fan fit bigger than any fan fit ever thrown (even bigger than PS3 fanboy fits...oh yeah)

Don't deny it =) It's an amazing game but...its a score out of fear and hype, not true analysis.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Nunalho - 46 days 16 hours ago
19 -
I ve been playing the campaign for more than a day now and i feel sorry for these hype reviews. No where on earth this game should get more than a 9 in graphics, it has some nice effects but overall it looks old and simple, quite far from the top looking games.

This is the day i stoped caring for reviews as they all lost their credibility. IGN 10 in graphics and GT 9.8...big LOL. I knew MP games get free passes but this is over reaching.

It´s GTAIV all over again, although it actually a better game.
Shut this user up Let user speak
renegade - 46 days 16 hours ago
20 -
I think activision drop some money for the score on the grafics,
a ten? Cmon IGN you're anoying, you know that the grafics are outdated as hell almost 3 years old engine... LOL
Shut this user up Let user speak
TROLL EATER - 46 days 16 hours ago
21 -
Ultimate GAME OF THE YEAR 2009
Shut this user up Let user speak
FwanK - 46 days 15 hours ago
22 -
Graphics 10?

What a joke IGN is...
Shut this user up Let user speak
etownone - 46 days 15 hours ago
23 - the definitive GOTY!!!!!!
the definitive GOTY!!!!!!

(so many sony kiddies being haters as usual on this site)
Shut this user up Let user speak
nycredude - 46 days 12 hours ago
23.1 -
Dude this game is multiplat, what does IGN selling out have to do with Sony fans. Give is a rest already. I have both consoles and I have this game. It's NOT a 10 in Graphics and that's that. Only a cod (Infinity Ward, anti Tryarch) fanboy would think otherwise.
Shut this user up Let user speak
N2NOther - 46 days 15 hours ago
24 -
It looks great to me. 10 for graphics it is. And yes, I have Uncharted 2 and I think those graphics are a 10 also. Now what?
Shut this user up Let user speak
jellycopter - 46 days 15 hours ago
24.1 -
Ah, I see what you've done wrong there. You've admitted to liking both MW2 AND Uncharted 2. That's WRONG. See..? :)
Shut this user up Let user speak
nycredude - 46 days 12 hours ago
24.2 -
I have Mw2 and Uncharted 2 also, and 80 other games from just this gen and I think Uncharted 2 is 10 and Mw2 isn't. Now what?!
Shut this user up Let user speak
wingman32x - 46 days 14 hours ago
25 -
So... the leaked review score was spot on. I expected this. Even though I'm not that big on shooters I think this one looks really good. And I knew it was going to get 9-10's everywhere.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Gamer_89 - 46 days 14 hours ago
26 - what the hell 10 for graphic ?
the graphic looks so dated is ugly as hell first i tough its was my tv but it is the game the graphic are really bad specially the snow levels
Shut this user up Let user speak
crazydrummerlad1 - 46 days 14 hours ago
27 - ok im happy for da game but....
I find that its complete BS how ign is grading things now. this gets a 10 in the graphics department....but kz2 gets a 9.5!!! im sorry but IGN's reviews r sum complete BS!!! n kz2 only got a 9 in sound??? wen they have 7,1 surround sound?! n mw2 gets a 10?!?! such BS these reviewers r now!!! i want all these games to b graded equally. theres no denying mw2 is good but its unfair to grade it higher jus cuz of all da hype.
Shut this user up Let user speak
etownone - 46 days 14 hours ago
27.1 -
another sonykid crying da blues..

except it, MW2 has better graphics and sound then KZ2... hahahahaha!

MW2 - 2009 GOTY!!!!
Add Comment (Gamer Zone)
Gamer Zone Posting Guidelines
The Gamer Zone is for members who want a more friendly and civilized discussion. This section is heavily moderated by the N4G staff, so leave your fanboyism at the door please. Members who are unable to behave in a mature and respectful manner will be temporarily or permanently restricted from posting in the Gamer Zone. Using words such as Xbots and Sony droids, or other words from the console war vocabulary, is strictly prohibited in this Zone.
Read More...
 
 
You must log in to post comments.
Username:  
Password:  
 
 
About N4G
N4G is a social game news site that covers the game industry 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
More Info... | Submit News