Lens of Truth: Call of Duty - Modern Warfare 2 Analysis

Ju - 43 days 16 hours ago

...dips a lot. Yeah, down to 58fps instead of 59. Wait, on one occasion I think its 59.91 vs 59.11. Yeah, definitively. Don't buy this sh!t. LOL.

Agree(4) | Disagree(1) | Report

cyclindk - 43 days 15 hours ago

I meant 20 dollars and the game goes for around 56 dollars...

Agree(0) | Disagree(1) | Report

GameOn - 43 days 15 hours ago

Did you not notice all the PS3 fans arguing over the same thing?

Agree(3) | Disagree(6) | Report

The Dude - 43 days 7 hours ago

Its got to hurt ps3 fanboys like you that one of the biggest games of 2009 is sub par compared to the xbox 360. And then to hear you all cry about how you aren't going to but it is just icing on the cake. I hope the 360 version outsells the ps3 version 4 to 1. :)

Agree(1) | Disagree(6) | Report

NotSoSilentBob - 43 days 6 hours ago

Subpar? Idk about you but there is BARELY any Difference and any that is should be in the TVS settings. Multiplats these days are equal. 2007 has come and gone and yet 360 owners INSIST that everything is better on the 360. The only way you can tell 90% of the freaking games between systems is the controller now. Jesus you children are PATHETIC.

Agree(3) | Disagree(3) | Report

PJ - 42 days 21 hours ago

They also said the the xbox had better frame rate and load times. Did you even read the article?

Agree(1) | Disagree(0) | Report

GameOn - 43 days 15 hours ago

But why, You're spending double the amount of money you need to.

Agree(2) | Disagree(0) | Report

darkride66 - 43 days 12 hours ago

The problem with sites like LOT is there's usually no way of checking if they're accurate or not. In this case, there was a recent screenshot comparison of this title to compare, so we know that something's up because that site's PS3 shots had nice light bloom that wasn't always on the 360 version and the colors looked better.

Most of the time, the only other site doing these types of comparisons is Eurogamer, and Eurogamer has a proven pro-360, anti-PS3 bias compared to the average game site. On top of that they're actually partnered up with Microsoft to deliver Eurogamer content exclusively to XBL. It's no wonder they have a pro-360 bias, it's in their best interests.

So, where else can you go to verify that what LOT says is actually true.

I'll take Metacritic scores and reviewers I've trusted over the years versus these questionable "comparisons" any day. Half the time they don't even bother comparing the final, retail code but instead use demo's at various build stages against each other. That says a lot right there.

Edit: And how the hell did these guys get an advanced copy of this title? You can't tell me Infinity Ward knowingly advanced them copies of each version of this title so they could pick apart one version over the other. Oh wait. They didn't. A Play and Trade broke the street date, just for LOT. How nice.

Agree(5) | Disagree(9) | Report

Thoreau - 43 days 13 hours ago

you would know you don't have to fix anything, or you have a bootleg television.

Agree(1) | Disagree(2) | Report

junk-3d - 43 days 11 hours ago

I love how everyone posts the http://www.cynamite.de/ link as if they are 100% truthful. It is called adjusting the in game gamma, LoT left all game settings default like they always do and http://www.cynamite.de adjusted each system to match.

So, if you are adjusting which one is correct? The washed out PS3 or the overly contrasted Xbox 360. Last I remember it isn't up to the consumer to choose what is right visually, it is the art directors job. IW failed at matching the visuals with their default out of the box settings.

Agree(1) | Disagree(0) | Report