Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare Reflex – First 10 Minutes

qface64 - 45 days 9 hours ago

the game doesn't look as bad as i thought it would
when i saw that one screen i thought the game would look worse than anything EVER
but it looks ok actually it could look better but its not the nightmare i thought it would be

Agree(1) | Disagree(0) | Report

MasterChief3624 - 45 days 3 hours ago

That was one of the most frustrating gameplay video watching experiences I think I've ever had. I mean, damn :P

May as well say it's just the first two minutes of the game, considering that's how long it would take the average person to get through that section D:

Agree(1) | Disagree(0) | Report

EvilTwin - 45 days ago

Seriously. That was painful to watch. Not because of the graphics, which actually look very nice (great job, Treyarch). But that looked like someone who had never played FPS before.

Agree(2) | Disagree(0) | Report

HeroOfCows - 45 days 7 hours ago

Silly youngster. It didn't work for me and I'm 2008 years old (0001 AD).

Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report

Dutch Boogie - 45 days 7 hours ago

HEY! that's my psn profile pic there bub.

Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report

electricshadow - 45 days 6 hours ago

Mine too! OMG! We're twins!

Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report

Madusha - 45 days 8 hours ago

Lol yh I was laughing at how long he took to type in JPS (just push start). Great vid and the graphics are awesome. Definite must buy for me.

Agree(1) | Disagree(0) | Report

TheDeadMetalhead - 45 days 7 hours ago

Ba-dum chh

Agree(1) | Disagree(0) | Report

EvilTwin - 45 days ago

Activision was surprised at how well W@W sold on Wii; that's the reason they gave for the COD4 port.

Hopefully if this one sells, they'll port over MW2 next year.

I'm just happy to see it make it to Wii with fully customizable controls. It can't compete graphically with the HD consoles (although Treyarch did an admirable job), but this could end up being the best-controlling console version of the game.

Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report

sidar - 45 days 1 hour ago

More like for the work that has been done to get the port working.
But whatever, they say they will promise MW2 if the this one will sell well...they are c*nts, they know it will sell.

Agree(1) | Disagree(0) | Report

EvilTwin - 45 days ago

They're still charging $50 for the older version:
http://www.gamestop.com/Cat...
http://www.walmart.com/cata...

The GOTY version has what, 4 extra maps?

Considering what the older version is selling for, plus the year Treyarch had to put into porting the game, it makes sense. Plus, this looks to be Wii's best shooter (just like COD4 was arguably the best shooter on the HD consoles before).

Better late than never.

Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report

NaiNaiNai - 44 days 19 hours ago

No thats total BS, you can not port a old game, lower the graphical quality and then charge full price for it.

If you back this your a complete idiot.

Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report

EvilTwin - 44 days 19 hours ago

Sure you can. They're doing it, after all. No need to be insulting about this, either.

After all, you can't make the graphics BETTER for Wii. It's impossible. That's like complaining about putting a game on a console while charging full price, even though there's a graphically superior version available for high-end PCs.

And btw, through today, Activision has actually been charging more for the inferior console versions compared to the PC version.
http://www.gamestop.com/Cat...
http://www.gamestop.com/Cat...

I assume they'll drop the price as soon as MW2 hits shelves, but there you go -- $10 more for lower graphical quality and a control scheme that is quite inferior to a mouse/keyboard set up.

Also consider the price of paying for the human labor of porting this game to Wii, ENHANCING the current Wii graphics engine Acitivion has, streamlining the online for a system that hasn't had great online play, and putting an entirely new control scheme in place. Not cheap. You're focusing on graphics exclusively, but I'd wager that nailing the control scheme took as much time as anything.

I prefer the remote/nunchuck over dual analog for FPS on consoles any day of the week, so I'll most likely buy it, as this will be the best FPS on Wii.
[If I had a decent PC to play COD4, I'd already have that version instead.]

But hey, if you think it's a rip-off, don't buy it. Pretty simple.

Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report

NaiNaiNai - 44 days 19 hours ago

So MW is allowed to get away with it but L4D2 isn't.

Man some of you people are sad.

Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report

sidar - 44 days 19 hours ago

That comparison is pathetic, L4D2 is merely an upgrade to the original. Not much has change.
CoD needed to be PORTED. HUGE DIFFERENCE.

People are actually pissed they are getting a 2 year old port, so what gives?

Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report

EvilTwin - 44 days 19 hours ago

I never mentioned L4D, NaiNaiNai.

But it's pretty simple -- a developer/publisher will charge what they think a game is worth on the market.

Activision put a year's worth of work with about a 30-person team into porting COD4, and they're putting out a game that will most likely be the best of its kind on Wii. They've been charging $50 for a 2-year old version of this game already (while a superior version is available for cheaper if you've got a good PC), one that only had a few added maps, not an overhaul to go to a new system.

Would I like it to be cheaper? Hell yeah. But I can appreciate how much effort had to go into making this game work on Wii.

Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report

SpoonyRedMage - 44 days 19 hours ago

I don't agree with getting a 2 year old port either, especially for full price, but I think that Treyarch put quite a bit of work into it and I definitely won't condemn anyone for wanting to pick up the games. But it's not for me.

Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report

EvilTwin - 44 days 20 hours ago

The control scheme looks dead-on (despite some iffy play -- the sniper rifle for close combat?). That's the most important thing.

Some of the textures look fantastic. Some don't. But until we get some good quality screen caps or are actually playing the game, we won't know for sure just how good it looks. That said, it's not like COD4 was every the absolute prettiest FPS out there.

I don't know if it quite makes the "360 launch title" look (good smoke effects, though), but it doesn't look bad at all. I'm hoping to be pleasantly surprised when I pick it up. The action looks to be all there; combine that with fully customizable IR, and it looks like Wii's best shooter.

Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report

LynyrdSkynyrd - 45 days 3 hours ago

Youre a douche. Go to the normal-people comments (Gamer Zone) and see that you are the only one who thinks that.

Go away

Agree(0) | Disagree(1) | Report