The Latest Bad Company 2 Trailers & Screenshots

StanLee - 49 days 9 hours ago

Man, this game looks to be a vast improvement over the first. More traditional multiplayer game modes such a Deathmatch and Team Deathmatch would be welcomed.

Agree(7) | Disagree(1) | Report

ABizzel1 - 49 days 9 hours ago

Their trying to 1up IW not be IW. Battlefield looks like a huge improvement over the first game in all areas, and that's from someone who couldn't stand the first one. I guess COD 6 or COD MW3 are going to have to step it up, because EA is trying to take their spot.

Agree(7) | Disagree(1) | Report

TechWiz - 49 days 9 hours ago

"is it me or they are trying to be IW and make this game a new COD:MW"

1st The Battlefield Series(2002) started before COD (2003)
2nd BF2 (2005) was released before COD:MW (2007)
3rd COD:MW doesn't have destructible enviroment
4th BF has Tanks/Planes/Helicopters and COD:MW does not.

If anything IW wants to be like DICE

Agree(12) | Disagree(3) | Report

Ju - 49 days 9 hours ago

It sure targets its competition, which is MW. But its the better game, none the less. (and now I'm counting the disagrees LOL)

Agree(9) | Disagree(1) | Report

Montrealien - 49 days 9 hours ago

I have been playing MW2, don`t get me wrong, it`s a great game. It`s just not a crazy improvment over the original MW though, at least not from what I have seen up until now.

What I have been seeing of Bad Company 2 however seems to be, I can`t wait to get this game, but I will be quite honest, Bad Company 1 will take more of my online shooter time then MW2 will in until BC 2 comes out, that is for sure.

you know what`s ironic TechWiz? When Call of Duty first came out, the main tag line beeing thrown around was. (From the People who brought you Medal of Honor) which as you know, came out before BF2 but the key IW guys were still working for EA at time.

Agree(1) | Disagree(1) | Report

TechWiz - 49 days 9 hours ago

True but Dreamworks made Medal of Honor which is owned by EA. DICE is also owned by EA.

Note:
I'm not trying to diss IW, they are great developers, I was just pointing out that DICE is not trying to be like IW.

Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report

2good4u2 - 49 days 9 hours ago

i think it's a very different game... in pretty much everything.

Agree(1) | Disagree(1) | Report

Montrealien - 49 days 8 hours ago

I should of been more clear, I was refering to the Allied Assault Medal of Honor on the PC, which was made by 2015 which became IW. If I am not mistaken, Dreamworks only did the first 2 PS1 versions, EA then took hold of the franchise fully.

Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report

ABizzel1 - 49 days 8 hours ago

You know what's funny. I wrote a blog about Uncharted 3, and what I think it needs to surpass what Uncharted 2 has done basically saying stealth needs to be enhanced, climbing needs to be enhanced, multiplayer needs to be fixed, and stages should be more open like in MGS4.

And here we have a perfect example of developers overhauling a game to make it the best they can, and its receiving all the praise it rightfully deserves.

So for those of you who disagreed and said Uncharted needs to stay the same then take a look at this game. Evolution makes games better not playing the same BS over and over again.

Agree(6) | Disagree(1) | Report

dgroundwater - 49 days 9 hours ago

While I agree COD is light on thrills while Battlefield pours on the awesome explosions etc. The gunplay in Battlefield games is not as tight or responsive as MW's.

Just look at how they are touting the M1911 in that article. $100 says it will be the same cap gun we saw in BF 1943. Nine times out of ten, you will be left saying "What the hell!" after unloading 3-4 rounds into a guy just to have him take you down.

Agree(2) | Disagree(0) | Report

perseus - 49 days ago

I'll agree with that.

COD has more satisfying bullets. :-)

Agree(2) | Disagree(0) | Report

Anti-Fanboyer - 49 days 8 hours ago

conquest mode replaces those two and combines them into one. And yet it has manage to be successful even as a former pc exclusive.

Agree(1) | Disagree(0) | Report

jcaashby - 49 days 7 hours ago

I for one HOPE they DONT add Team Deatmatch or Deatmatch.

Its what made me like BBC1 so much. The 2 modes were about winning the match by attacking or defending or taking control of spots on the map. You won as a team!!

MW is all about just accumulating kills. Ill go for BBC2 over MW2!

Agree(3) | Disagree(1) | Report

cyberwaffles - 49 days 5 hours ago

jc is right. battlefield is all about teamwork and strategy, even when you play lone wolf style. cod is where you join a sabotage game mode just to get a lot of kills instead of finishing the objective.

Agree(0) | Disagree(1) | Report

jcaashby - 49 days 7 hours ago

Yeah I read about that NUKE thing for 25 kill streaks..total wackness!

Agree(1) | Disagree(1) | Report

iceman06 - 48 days 13 hours ago

Understood...but just as juvenile and "trash talking" as the original post. Have you played EITHER or BOTH games to know which is better? Unless you are a Q & A tester...I'll answer NO!!! They both look GREAT!!! Let's just wait and see!
No disrespect intended...just making a point!!!

Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report

iceman06 - 48 days 12 hours ago

Is somewhat like an unsung hero to those that migrated from the PC to consoles...or just want another OPTION to COD. Therefore, YES, they will champion what THEY think is the best choice of military styled FPS. It's called an OPINION...and in my humble one I actually had more FUN with the Battlefield series. Did I say that COD sux? NO! Did I say that BC2 was gonna pwn MW2...NO! Yet, from you I get that a fan of one game has NO LIFE because he/she wants to state an opinion. It would seem that the same can be said for you showing up in a BC2 article to state YOUR opinion...or am I misled?
Once AGAIN...no disrespect intended...just stating a point.

Agree(0) | Disagree(0) | Report