1120°

IGN: Left 4 Dead Review

There's absolutely no doubt that Left 4 Dead is one of the most social and exciting multiplayer games that we've ever played. It's almost pitch perfect in how it captures the tension and the action of a Hollywood zombie movie. This is an incredible and highly replayable multiplayer experience that's definitely worth checking out, especially if you're looking to prepare yourself for the inevitable zombie apocalypse. Just make sure you bring your friends.
9 / 10
M337ING - contributor
Published: 415 days 6 hours ago | Review | Xbox 360 | PC
 
 

1234Next »
Showing: 1 - 50 of 159 Comments
Shut this user up Let user speak
Spike47 - 415 days 6 hours ago
1 - Not A sleeper HIT AT ALL, this game actually has enough hype to cast a shadow some flaws but it is still a great game, just not as good as some think
The review is just about right I guess when looking at it closer.
Some people are calling L4D a sleeper hit with all the priase it has been geting lately.That's called hype, and from playing the demo the only thing that stands out is TEH 4 PLAYA CO-OP!

EDIT: I'm not being a fanboy, after I save up money to get R2 I am looking forward to buying L4d on my PC if my friend gets it.
Shut this user up Let user speak
N4PS3G - 415 days 6 hours ago
1.1 -
Not a sleeper hit says... you? its nots as good as people think says... you?

Why do you stay these as facts ? when they are just meerly opinions
Shut this user up Let user speak
Jenzo - 415 days 5 hours ago
1.2 -
Maybe Ted Price and co should take lessons from Gabe Newell and Valve on how to design good multiplayer? Quality > quantity.
1.3 thenickel | 415 days 5 hours ago - User only got 1 bubble - Show
Shut this user up Let user speak
Bodhi - 415 days 5 hours ago
1.4 -
Though that comment was a little fanboyish Jenzo, I do agree I love Left 4 Dead's multiplayer aspect a lot more then Resistance 2's.

Something about zombies swarming and destroying my friends is a lot more fun then me and my friends running around the map, being so detached from one another.

I played the demo probably over 30 times now with friends and it's never old. Two of the smallest levels known to FPS has kept my friends and I's attention. Great stuff.

I've said this before but people refuse to listen to me but...

Left 4 Dead Multiplayer GotY 2008.
Shut this user up Let user speak
barom - 415 days 5 hours ago
1.5 -
I tried the demo on X360. Personally I have to agree somewhat. If played as a single-player, you can find better experiences (it's still good but not great). Haven't tried co-op though but I can see that that part might be a lot of fun. But I'm wondering if the Horde mode for Gears 2 might be just as satisfying.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Kigmal - 415 days 5 hours ago
1.6 -
Awesome score. I think I might buy this game now.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Jason 360 - 415 days 5 hours ago
1.7 -
I like playing games on my PC to, and L4D will be great on PC, after I boot up my PC running "$200 Microsoft Windows". You know that "Windows" operating system you can't play without? well that, or a "Microsoft" Xbox 360.
Shut this user up Let user speak
pansenbaer - 415 days 4 hours ago
1.8 -
You like paying 200 bucks to 'use' a computer? Wow, must have a lot of money to waste...I'm assuming you like spending 300+ dollars for an office suite? You really like giving Microsoft your money that much!? Whats so great about Windows? I can do everything that Windows can do for free, except play 'Games for Windows'. So if I have to spend 200 bucks, just so I can spend another 50 on a game, you can count me out.
Shut this user up Let user speak
callahan09 - 415 days 4 hours ago
1.9 -
Hey, Jenzo, not only if you had been playing Resistance 2 would you realize how Ted Price and co. KNOW HOW to make compelling multiplayer experiences... but if you had been reading the reviews, you'd know it, too, because that is the feature of R2 that 95% of reviewers agree is where it is a high quality title. Most of the qualms with R2 seem to be with the campaign, not the co-op and the competitive multiplayer.

Edit:
@ Bodhi, who said: "Something about zombies swarming and destroying my friends is a lot more fun then me and my friends running around the map, being so detached from one another."

Are you kidding me? You haven't played much Resistance 2 co-op either, have you? I have played like 10 hours worth of R2 co-op and let me tell you, everybody sticks together, forms up, and helps out. People select classes based on what our party needs. If we start out with 8 soldiers, you know for a fact someone will quickly switch to Spec Ops, and somebody else will switch to Medic, and before you know it, you've got enough ammo guys, health guys, and shootin' guys in the right proportions to go take on the baddies, and everyone sticks together. The game ABSOLUTELY encourages (nay, REQUIRES) everyone to stick together, because all of the classes require each other for full effectiveness. The player who strays from the pack not only gets killed, but also increases the chances of the other 7 players getting killed because they don't have his assistance. If you were truly a Resistance 2 Co-Op player, you would know that teamwork is essential and everyone does indeed work together.

I hate having to defend games, but dammit I'll do it anyway, because so many people spew false information because they haven't spent proper time with the games they're criticizing. If you haven't played enough of a game to really know what you're talking about, then you shouldn't be talking about it at all. Dammit, why was Insomniac, Ted Price, and Resistance 2 ever brought up in here to begin with? This is about Left 4 Dead, and yet somehow I find a great game that has nothing to do with Left 4 Dead being criticized by people who clearly don't know what they're talking about and I'm compelled to come in here and defend the fine work of talented developers who get unnecessarily shat upon by hyper-critical nimrods that don't even really play the games they claim to know all the faults with.
Shut this user up Let user speak
iHEARTboobs - 415 days 4 hours ago
1.10 -
@jenzo

I can't speak about L4D's multiplayer but R2's is fun. IGN loved it and so did most of the reviewers. Quality and quantity. But i know you love getting people riled up, i just wish you'd do it in the open zone.
Shut this user up Let user speak
meluvulongtime - 415 days 3 hours ago
1.11 - 1 1/2-2 hours of gameplay?! ouch!
I was looking at getting this, but not so sure if there is only 4 scenarios. I would imagine the co-op is fun, but for how long? Curious as to how things change to make it not seem repetitive. Think I'll wait a bit.
Shut this user up Let user speak
StephanieBBB - 415 days 2 hours ago
1.12 -
positive +
- There is not one single game like this out there and that is someting very uniqe.
- Gameplay looks very fun.
- Very different enviroments in each map.
- High replayability online.

Negative -
- The graphics looks very outdated at some places.
- Can be completed in less than 2 hours.
- Replaybility is not as high offline.
- Feels like a mod.

I would say that Valve as a developer seemes kinda lazy. They seem to only settle for just good enough, both with how much content the game has and how good it looks. I don't know if they ran out of space on the dvd-9 or if they just ran out of resources, but Imo, it's far too short. But Left for dead is no less than very refreshing and fun for that it seemes. I don't know If I would buy it based on how small it is, but I might be able to trick my brother in to buying it so I can play it as his place.
Shut this user up Let user speak
callahan09 - 415 days 1 hour ago
1.13 -
To all those who disagree with my above statement, I implore you: please, explain yourself. Am I wrong?
Shut this user up Let user speak
ThanatosDMC - 415 days 1 hour ago
1.14 -
I cant wait for someone to copy the codes and put it in Zombie Master's Banshee zombies.

Also, did you notice that the brute acts and attacks like Dog from Half Life 2?

I think, they're still selling the game at a discounted price on steam. Better to buy it on the PC for mods as always especially if it's a valve game. They really love modders!
Shut this user up Let user speak
freddukes - 414 days 19 hours ago
1.15 - For all of those judging single player length
@meluvulongtime and others who judge the length of single player

Okay... I agree - it's short... But have you ever heard of Team Fortress 2? Day of Defeat Source? Half-Life 2 Deathmatch? Counter-Strike: Source? They're all EXCELENT games by Valve, yet none of them have a single player option. I only think Valve put in a single player on this game to add a little story in to it, they basically wanted yet another multiplayer game in their collection like so many others. In fact, half-life is the only single player game Valve have which I can think of at this time....
Shut this user up Let user speak
YogiBear - 414 days 13 hours ago
1.16 - @Jason 360
It's ok I can play all of your WINDOWS ONLY games on my Mac. :)
Shut this user up Let user speak
BananaSlug - 414 days 11 hours ago
1.17 - @ Jenzo
maybe Valve should take tips from Ted Price on how to program A game for the PS3.
Shut this user up Let user speak
AAACE5 - 414 days 8 hours ago
1.18 - Honestly...
I would have to consider L4D a sleeper hit, cause before the demo came out, I had almost no interest in this game. But once I finally convinced myself to try it... It blew me away, with the way it just grabbed me and made me want to go for the ride!

Even when I got a few friends to join, it got even more entertaining! One thing I really liked about it was when You have friends playing with you, you keep constant communication because it gives you a reason to talk to one another, and laugh at eachother. A.K.A. it feels like being in the arcade with your buddies right next to you on a four player game... except you don't have to keep dumping quarters in a machine to keep the fun going!
Shut this user up Let user speak
Fishy Fingers - 415 days 6 hours ago
2 -
You should never doubt Valve. As a PC fan, I hold them in the highest esteem. Even though I'm not keen on their chubby captain and lack of tech progression.
Shut this user up Let user speak
solar - 415 days 5 hours ago
2.1 -
agreed Fishy. i feel that Half Life 3 we will see a new Engine. hopefully that isnt 10 years in the future ;) plus im praying for some Ep.3 info now that L4D is out. anything HL would over shadow L4D and Valve doesnt want to do that.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Dread - 415 days 4 hours ago
2.2 -
THANK U BODHI SOMEONE FINALLY EXPLAINED THE OBVIOUS COHERENTLY SO THAT SONY SACKBOYS HATERS DISGUISED AS PC PLAYERS CAN STOP THIS STUPID ARGUMENT ONCE AND FOR ALL.

O SNAP WRONG POST... THIS IS INRESPONSE TO 6.2
2.3 inane | 415 days 4 hours ago - comment has been reported as SPAM -
Shut this user up Let user speak
RememberThe357 - 415 days 4 hours ago
2.4 - If this game is even half as good as Half-Life 2
It going to be freakin awesome!
Shut this user up Let user speak
chaosatom - 415 days ago
2.5 -
bubbles for you inane
Shut this user up Let user speak
Nicolator - 414 days 21 hours ago
2.6 - ya
i really enjoyed the demo.. its sooooooo much better playing with friends shyt.. played it on the hardest difficulty and wen the hordes come at u everyone one just shouts f*ck! "guys!! they are coming!!! everyone shoot shoot!! shoot!!.. loool.. makes ur heart race up and down.. and u feel u are really trying to survive i would so pick this up..

the graphics are quiet desent didnt notice any pop ins at all

great score
Shut this user up Let user speak
YogiBear - 414 days 13 hours ago
2.7 - The first Half-Life is...
one of my favorite games ever but Valve as a company sucks ass. They have always had a superior complex about themselves and their lack of innovation is a major hurdle. I hope Left4Dead is good.
Shut this user up Let user speak
BananaSlug - 414 days 11 hours ago
2.8 - @ inane
SUP INANE!

CAN U HEAR ME? YOU ARE 2.3 AND I AM 2.8 SO I HAVE TO YELL!
Shut this user up Let user speak
Spike47 - 415 days 6 hours ago
3 - They are really good
good enough to surpass the boring aspect of zombie shooters and add some flavor to it with multiplayer. They were very smart with this game.
Shut this user up Let user speak
KingDizzi - 415 days 5 hours ago
4 -
Very good score but this should come as no surprise, Valve are fantastic developers. Tubby is very unprofessional though and they need to upgrade the Engine they use but besides that I love 'em.
Shut this user up Let user speak
DeathroW22 - 415 days 5 hours ago
5 -
It really is a shame it isn't coming out on PS3, i loved the demo on the 360 but not many friends own/play on their 360 much anymore and i only know of one person planning to get this game.
Shut this user up Let user speak
anubis12 - 415 days 5 hours ago
6 -
Another AAA 360 (or get it on pc what ever) exclusive NICE
Shut this user up Let user speak
season007 - 415 days 5 hours ago
6.1 - or get it on PC
and you call it exclusive?
alright..
Shut this user up Let user speak
Bodhi - 415 days 5 hours ago
6.2 -
Exclusive = Games exclusive to a certain console or platform (PC, 360, PS3, Wii)

Multiplatform = Games for all or most or more than one consoles (PC, 360, PS3, Wii)

Platform = Any platform on which you can play a game (PC, 360, PS3, Wii)

Console = A gaming system specifically made for gaming on a TV on a console (360, PS3, Wii)

Platform Exclusive = Games exclusive to only one platform (PC, 360, PS3, Wii)

Console Exclusive = Games exclusive to a certain console (360, PS3, Wii)

Left 4 Dead = Console exclusive (360), Multiplatform (PC, 360)

It's not really that hard of a concept, I'm sure most of you are considering the PC as a console when it is not.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Jason 360 - 415 days 5 hours ago
6.3 -
Bubbles 4 Bodhi
Shut this user up Let user speak
pansenbaer - 415 days 4 hours ago
6.4 -
@ Bodhi

You do realize that when Valve was asked weather or not the game would be coming to PS3, the said, word for word, "Left 4 Dead is 100% Xbox 360 exclusive". Regardless of your logic (which obviously is correct) Valve is wrong because it is coming out on the PC. I think that's where most of this talk is stemming from.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Traveler - 415 days 2 hours ago
6.5 -
@pansenbaer

No, because in context it was obvious that they meant that it was console exclusive to the 360. (They were being asked if there would be a PS3 version.)

Anyway, consoles are much more popular nowadays than PC gaming and so a game being a console exclusive is still a pretty nice feather in the 360's hat.
Shut this user up Let user speak
killedinaction9 - 414 days 21 hours ago
6.6 -
I really don't give a crap if it's on the PC.
What are the PS3 owners thinking? "YES!i can get it for the PC!there's no way i'm gonna buy a POS 360 for this game, exclusive my arse"
if this is the case then please buy the PC version.More money in M$'s pocket meeeeaaaans....yes,you guessed it.

More money to buy your exclusives.
Shut this user up Let user speak
season007 - 414 days 21 hours ago
6.7 - lol yea my PC is running windows
but playing the game or not, i still use windows, it doesn't make sense when you say i buy game on PC and it means more money for microsoft...

and it is not like all money i spend on game has to go to microsoft's pocket either..
Shut this user up Let user speak
karlostomy - 414 days 19 hours ago
6.8 - well... to summarise then.
It's good luck for 360 and PC owners

and

rotten luck again for ps3 owners.
Shut this user up Let user speak
BWS1982 - 414 days 18 hours ago
6.9 - Karl, why are you so hate filled?
It really is irrational, but I am not sure you'll understand why.
Shut this user up Let user speak
likedamaster - 414 days 9 hours ago
6.10 -
@ BWS

Well, you have to admit, it is "bragging rights" to 360/PC owners. I personally have a 360 and a super-souped up pc. I will most likely get both being I have different friends on both and just love playing on the awesome 360 for achievements & co-op and pc for the m/kb & high FPS.
Shut this user up Let user speak
BWS1982 - 414 days 6 hours ago
6.11 - Well I guess I'd have to just state
that I see a difference from bragging rights and pissing on somebody else's opinions. I have a great Crysis-able laptop, and will be getting a 360 down the line to add to my PS3, but just because I have just a PS3 right now, you won't see me being a fanboy saying "Left4 Dead sucks, lol, PS3 is better because....".....it's just stupid.
Shut this user up Let user speak
mintaro - 415 days 5 hours ago
7 -
Will be picking this up.
Shut this user up Let user speak
solar - 415 days 5 hours ago
8 -
like ive stated many times before...another AAA title on the way from Valve. my pre load is done...ready to kill more zombies tomorrow. <3 Valve.
8.1 thenickel | 415 days 3 hours ago - User only got 1 bubble - Show
Shut this user up Let user speak
Ceekay - 414 days 21 hours ago
8.2 -
There are no zombies in this game, zombies don't run.
Shut this user up Let user speak
GWAVE - 415 days 5 hours ago
9 -
Great score. I still think the 9/10 for graphics is too high. The game (especially the 360 version is plagued with pop-in. Sometimes an object won't appear on screen until you're 6 feet or closer. It's hard to justify a 9/10 when much prettier games have been getting 8/10 and 8.5/10 for their graphics.

But can this pull me away from R2 and Gears 2 co-op? Hmmm. That remains to be seen.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Bodhi - 415 days 5 hours ago
9.1 -
Well the graphics held up well to be honest, there's no pop in from any of the levels I've ever played. Have you played the full game or something?

I've never seen pop in on Left 4 Dead. I have however run into pop in on Resistance 2 and Gears of War 2.

The film grain and the textures on the 360 are still pretty great looking. I'd say Resistance 2 and Left 4 Dead are about each other's equivalent in terms of graphics, and Resistance 2's graphics were pretty great. Gears of War 2's graphics blows both of them out of the water when the textures load in after a couple seconds.
Shut this user up Let user speak
GWAVE - 415 days 5 hours ago
9.2 -
You haven't noticed any pop-in? Really? I notice it all the time. It's especially easy to notice in L4D because there aren't a lot of movable objects (like random boxes) in the levels. So, the few objects that you do see really stand out, especially when they...you know...POP IN. The zombies don't pop-in, which is nice. The environments don't have a lot of draw distance, so I don't know why you'd compare R2 (which has a lot of size and draw distance in the levels) to L4D.

Both are great games, but I would sincerely disagree that L4D's graphics are equal to R2's co-op graphics. Not only do they show larger environments in R2, but there are more things going on (more object, water physics, bullets flying through the air), and an equal amount of enemies. L4D does a great job of working with what it has because the inside environments make everything really claustrophobic and tense (which is a good thing). Still, it can't hold a candle to R2's graphics.
Add Comment (Gamer Zone)
Gamer Zone Posting Guidelines
The Gamer Zone is for members who want a more friendly and civilized discussion. This section is heavily moderated by the N4G staff, so leave your fanboyism at the door please. Members who are unable to behave in a mature and respectful manner will be temporarily or permanently restricted from posting in the Gamer Zone. Using words such as Xbots and Sony droids, or other words from the console war vocabulary, is strictly prohibited in this Zone.
Read More...
 
 
You must log in to post comments.
Username:  
Password:  
 
 
About N4G
N4G is a social game news site that covers the game industry 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
More Info... | Submit News