610°

Hudson: PS3 development too expensive

Gamertm writes: Hudson has ruled out developing and publishing full PS3 games, due to the development costs on Sony's format being too high.
Alternative Sources:
TheWickedOne - contributor
Published: 551 days 16 hours ago | News | PlayStation 3
 
 

12Next »
Showing: 1 - 50 of 97 Comments
Shut this user up Let user speak
Expy - 551 days 17 hours ago
1 -
Hudson who?
Shut this user up Let user speak
Genesis5 - 551 days 16 hours ago
1.1 -
Is that Rock Hudson? I thought he was dead.

Edit:
Well who ever you are just get your cheap butts over to the Wii cause we have never heard of you.
Shut this user up Let user speak
ErcsYou - 551 days 15 hours ago
1.2 -
Is the PS3 really too expensive or is Hudson Soft just broke??

Either way it doesnt matter until they make me a sequel to Milo's Secret Castle or another Bloody Roar game..
Shut this user up Let user speak
Expy - 551 days 15 hours ago
1.3 -
It's funny, because the only real difference is the development kit hardware... Apart from that, programmers are paid on a wage, regardless what language they program in. So how exactly is it more expensive...
Shut this user up Let user speak
player911 - 551 days 15 hours ago
1.4 -
Hudson makes tons of sweet games. If you haven't picked up from the graphic, they make Bomberman and the Mario Party series, which are pretty big sellers.

They've been around since the 70's.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Fanboi - 551 days 14 hours ago
1.5 - I failed.
To care.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Expy - 551 days 14 hours ago
1.6 - @player911
Maybe so, however Mario Party is exclusively Nintendo, and Bomberman isn't really enough to make anyone care whether or not they develop for PS3 or not.
Shut this user up Let user speak
jaja1434 - 551 days 14 hours ago
1.7 -
"It's funny, because the only real difference is the development kit hardware... Apart from that, programmers are paid on a wage" is actually not true. Since the talent pool of programmer who can actually program for the PS3 is smaller, the demand is higher for them and thus their pay is higher. Simply supply and demand really.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Bad_Karma - 551 days 10 hours ago
1.8 - Lifts finger and points >>>>>>>>>>>>
THE CARE FARM IS THAT WAY
Shut this user up Let user speak
peksi - 551 days 9 hours ago
1.9 - Forgot 2 words at the end of the topic
"for us"
Shut this user up Let user speak
Gothdom - 551 days 7 hours ago
1.10 - What?
Bomberman can easily be made for PSN instead of a full fledge PS3 blu-ray game.

The rest of Hudson, I don't even care about... moreso if it's a new Adventure Island, I hated that game so much.
Shut this user up Let user speak
ReBurn - 550 days 23 hours ago
1.11 - @Expy
Some programmers are more expensive than others. For instance, Visual Basic programmers are less expensive than Java programmers right now. By at least $15 per hour.

Because the PS3 is custom hardware it is going to cost more to hire people that have experience with it. Not all programming is the same.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Spike47 - 551 days 17 hours ago
2 - Yeah who
is Hudson?
Shut this user up Let user speak
SlyGuy - 551 days 12 hours ago
2.1 - are they the guys
who made Adventure Island on the Nintendo?
Shut this user up Let user speak
gambare - 551 days 12 hours ago
2.2 - whodson?
I think they made a bomberman for the 360 but after that.... they haven't done anything great the problem is, if they think is expensive to develop in the PS3 then they should not try the next gen systems beyond 2010, the systems aren't going to simplify with time and the costs of the production will rise even more.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Voiceofreason - 551 days 6 hours ago
2.3 -
Gambar.. What ever gave you that idea? Production costs will go DOWN not up. As more companies program for PS3, it will be easier for them to do as they go along.. The same is true for every other console gen we've had. PS2 started really expensive to program for in the beginning but by the end just about any dev company could make a PS2 game.
Shut this user up Let user speak
JBaby343 - 551 days 4 hours ago
2.4 - @ Voice
I think he means as a whole games will become more expensive to make. Yes in a generation costs will decrease as programming improves but the fact is games cost more today than they did 10, 15, and 20 years ago. Atari and Nintendo games weren't $60. Next generation of consoles will games costing more on the average.

But as to the article... Never heard of hudson.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Mr Arthur Ritis - 551 days 3 hours ago
2.5 - Mortal Kombat II
was $90 on genesis when it came out. I'm old. Damn.
3 Angelitos | 551 days 17 hours ago - User only got 1 bubble - Show
Shut this user up Let user speak
OOG - 551 days 16 hours ago
3.1 -
that comment is true but stupid all at the same time.....

People can make good games but when it costs too much to make the game people dont want to take the chance especially investors etc. It's not that easy to go ok lets throw 10s of millions dollars down to make this game that we do not have a gaurantee on selling. This is a big issue for ps3 especially for companies outside the "Sony Umbrella of developers" to make a game because it can quite possibly break your company over 1 game.

Same reason your gonna see a lot more sequels then anything on the PS3...because as we have seen not all good new games...or at least decent games are making a profit.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Seraphim - 551 days 15 hours ago
3.2 -
that's the thing though. If you don't want it to cost a fortune it doesn't have to. You can still produce low budget titles on the PS3 and even 360 for that matter. You don't have to go all high tech w/ coding, physics, graphics, and the whole nine. And the kind of games Hudson makes I wouldn't expect that from anyway. They make very simplistic games for the most part and if they really wanted to they could easily go about creating them on PS360 for little to no additional cost. But the kind of games they do make would be more suited for a PSN title anyway; $20 tops. I'd include XBM but with the limit cap I don't think Hudson would be able to offer the kind of games they'd like on the XBM. At least not in the way they expressed they like the PS Store and the kind of games they probably have in mind. Anyway, aside from Bomberman their games are really bombs anyway. There's very few decent games I can think of that Hudson has come up stemming all the way back from the NES.
Shut this user up Let user speak
fusionboxer - 551 days 6 hours ago
3.3 - On point
Yea seraphim is pretty on point here. Other then the Bomberman franchise , Hudson despite what some may want to believe haven't made anything especially appealing to the mass market.

It's ok that they don't want to make full fledged titles on the ps3, but don't shut ps3 owners out of bomberman online. That's just classic fun. Then again they could go the route of Nippon Ichi and work on amazing gameplay with less then stellar visuals like with the case of Disgaea 3.

If anything, come out with a line of PSN titles so that they don't waste millions on a game no one will buy. I mean most of the users here don't even know who they are.

As a joke I say they release a game next week that's total bullshit and add trophy support. Everyone will rush to buy it (including myself ) and Hudson will make a hefty profit.
Shut this user up Let user speak
darkvenom - 551 days 16 hours ago
4 - Hudson?!...
This is what i think of Hudson...


Shut this user up Let user speak
fusionboxer - 551 days 6 hours ago
4.1 - I'm sorry man...
But that's kinda whack. No offense though. I just wouldn't want you to use it again in less then stellar circumstances.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Sangria - 551 days 16 hours ago
5 -
I only know two series from Hudson: Bloody Roar and Bomberman. Everything else are mobile phone games. So of course, if you develop mainly mobile games you'll find out PS3 development too expensive, just like an unemployed person would find a Ferrari too expensive.
Shut this user up Let user speak
KarateExplosion - 551 days 7 hours ago
5.1 - THANK YOU
For bringing up bloody roar. Its amazing people are on this website (news 4 gamers) who's comments are... Hudson who? They make good games. Dont get butt hurt because they said they wont develop for the ps3. By the look of the article they arent gonna be doing to much with 360 either. Pay some respect where respect is due.
6 mboojigga | 551 days 16 hours ago - User only got 1 bubble - Show
Shut this user up Let user speak
Millah - 551 days 16 hours ago
6.1 -
Lol most these kids have never even heard of Hudson. Bomberman anyone? Gee maybe thats why theres a picture of Bomberman sittin right there?
Shut this user up Let user speak
Wildarmsjecht - 551 days 16 hours ago
7 -
It is too expensive. Thats why I don't develop for it.

See what I did there?
Shut this user up Let user speak
Hagaf22 - 551 days 15 hours ago
7.1 -
is it to expensive? or are they just too cheap and lazy.... ummmmm.... i dont hear insomnic complaining, nor naughty dog, nor really any one else, can't say not having bomber man on ps3 is gunna hurt my feelings much, im back off to resistance now....
Shut this user up Let user speak
Voiceofreason - 551 days 7 hours ago
7.2 -
Well if you havent heard anyone else obviously you are new to gaming. Hudson isnt the first company to say this. Of course you can name off plenty of companies in Sony's pocket but not everyone gets that benefit.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Kigmal - 551 days 16 hours ago
8 -
Add Hudson to list of companies PS3 fans hate.
Shut this user up Let user speak
cmrbe - 551 days 16 hours ago
8.1 - Well
i bet you hate companies that don't develop for the x360.

Edit Snuka : Sucker Punch and Insomniac offcourse just to name a few :).
Shut this user up Let user speak
Snukadaman - 551 days 15 hours ago
8.2 - crmbe
besides ncsoft what other companies dont develop for xbox?
Shut this user up Let user speak
Sevir04 - 551 days 15 hours ago
8.3 - lol!!! cmrbe
That was funny way to flip the script
Shut this user up Let user speak
Kigmal - 551 days 14 hours ago
8.4 -
No I don't hate those companies at all. I don't hate any company at all, not even EA. And actually I like Insomniac because I was a fan of the Spyro series back when it was in its prime. But yes, I don't hate companies in the gaming industry. Maybe Hudson doesn't have that much money to make a full PS3 game. They never said they don't like PS3.
Shut this user up Let user speak
cmrbe - 551 days 14 hours ago
8.5 - Well
Kimal that is cool and i believe you. I don't hate any devs that work exclusively for the x360 either. I only responded because you were generalising. Not all PS fans you know.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Kigmal - 551 days 12 hours ago
8.6 -
I feel you bro, but if you take a look at all the comments before me, you would see why I said it.
Shut this user up Let user speak
kazuma - 551 days 6 hours ago
8.7 -
when was spyro in its prime? lol
Shut this user up Let user speak
pwnsause - 551 days 16 hours ago
9 -
im pretty sure makeing at least a PSN game wouldnt hurt
Shut this user up Let user speak
jwatt - 551 days 16 hours ago
9.1 -
Yea they could make Bomberman on the psn they got one on live.
Shut this user up Let user speak
darkpower - 551 days 16 hours ago
9.2 - You may be interested in this part of the article:
"That said, it’s not beyond the realms of possibility that the company’s coding efforts may yet be seen on Sony’s console.

Despite ruling out releasing standard boxed titles on the PS3, Ishizuka (according to the translation, anyway) does appear to praise Sony’s PSN download service, describing it as “attractive” in the business sense."

They don't usually create too many disc-based games anymore anyway, do they? I haven't seen too many Hudson 360 games, either (after Bomberman Zero, I can't blame them).
Shut this user up Let user speak
ape007 - 551 days 16 hours ago
10 - hudson
go make another crappy mario party game

don't worry it will sell millions and it's cheap, not expensive
Shut this user up Let user speak
Kigmal - 551 days 14 hours ago
10.1 -
oh the irony ....
Shut this user up Let user speak
Skerj - 551 days 16 hours ago
11 -
Awww I was hoping that Rengoku for PS3 would see the light of day.
Shut this user up Let user speak
NegativeCreep427 - 551 days 16 hours ago
12 -
Who here wants to wager that it has less to do with their budget and more to do with just being F'n lazy?
Shut this user up Let user speak
darkpower - 551 days 16 hours ago
12.1 - Yeah
They got their lessons from Valve and Gabe Newell.
Shut this user up Let user speak
The Lazy One - 550 days 20 hours ago
12.2 - cmon...
Could we drop the lazy argument already? It's like anytime a developer says developing for the PS3 is in any way negative there's a default sony fanboy response of the developer being lazy.

Would you just give it a rest?
Shut this user up Let user speak
Millah - 551 days 16 hours ago
13 -
Not like thats really a big loss anyway, Hudson hasn't made anything good in ages.
Shut this user up Let user speak
DrPirate - 551 days 16 hours ago
14 -
Go tell that to Johnathan Mak who coded everyday shooter by himself and did all the sound effects and music on his own on a PS3 dev kit.

Go shove it up your ass you cheapskates.

Edit: I'd prefer they say they don't "want" to develop for PS3, than say it's too hard or too expensive.
Add Comment (Gamer Zone)
Gamer Zone Posting Guidelines
The Gamer Zone is for members who want a more friendly and civilized discussion. This section is heavily moderated by the N4G staff, so leave your fanboyism at the door please. Members who are unable to behave in a mature and respectful manner will be temporarily or permanently restricted from posting in the Gamer Zone. Using words such as Xbots and Sony droids, or other words from the console war vocabulary, is strictly prohibited in this Zone.
Read More...
 
 
You must log in to post comments.
Username:  
Password:  
 
 
About N4G
N4G is a social game news site that covers the game industry 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
More Info... | Submit News