150°

PS3's Image Biases: Good or Bad?

I've noticed this trend for quite a while and have been trying to come up with a good way to discuss it. After letting the idea mull around in the back of my mind for a while, I think I've seen it played out enough to easily cut to the chase. The image and reception of the Playstation 3 is very much affected by whether the person looking at it already owns an Xbox 360 or not. Let's take a closer look at how the PS3 is viewed differently by 360 owners and non-owners.
smokeymicpot - contributor
Published: 601 days 17 hours ago | Article | PlayStation 3
 
 

Showing: 1 - 35 of 35 Comments
Shut this user up Let user speak
chaosatom333 - 601 days 18 hours ago
1 -
The picture is so true.

It's all about the perception.

btw, xbox looks the same to ps3 owners as ps3 looks to xbox owners.
Shut this user up Let user speak
sonarus - 601 days 14 hours ago
1.1 -
Looking at the comments, it certainly sounds like a lot of PS3's will be sold with the launch of MGS4
Shut this user up Let user speak
mikeslemonade - 601 days 11 hours ago
1.2 -
Right now there is no need to own both a PS3 and 360 unless you are a hardcore gamer. And it has never been the case because multi-console owners make up less than 10% in previous generation. Right now it's only 3% but the generation is still early.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Dannagar - 601 days 17 hours ago
2 - Exclusives.
About a year ago, I could tell you that there's a major difference between Playstation 3 and Xbox 360. Now days, they aren't so different. They are priced similarly, and they share a good number of the same games. It really comes down to first party exclusives. Who's exclusives do you want? It's all a matter of preference.
Shut this user up Let user speak
kevoncox - 601 days 14 hours ago
2.1 -
On this site the Ps3 is king. However, i the eye of public perception the ps3 still hasn't gotten warmed up. The ps3 still won't be up and running for sometime. I feel like sony's console has a software drought. I mean normally a Sony console will have about 3 FF games. 2 years into the life cycle and Sony will only have 0 FF on the table.

Don't ge me wrong the 360 is suffering from the same drought. I jus thtink the cost of development s realling limiting software #s.
Shut this user up Let user speak
seraph741 - 601 days 13 hours ago
2.2 - i'm impressed
i just want to say, i am impressed with the comments on this article (for the most part) so far, i was expecting the worst, but overall its actually a pretty good discussion about the article instead of just plain flaming. It's ok that people have their opinions, as long as they realize thats all it is. Maybe N4G has hit a turning point ( i hope, its been out of control lately)?

(i'm getting the feeling i might have spoke to soon though with only about 18 comments, lol)
Shut this user up Let user speak
PoSTedUP - 601 days 17 hours ago
3 -
i want GT5 and socom
Shut this user up Let user speak
GCO Gamer - 601 days 14 hours ago
4 -
that picture is the bomb.....get it?
Shut this user up Let user speak
Condoleezza Rice - 601 days 14 hours ago
5 - "A lot of folks see it as an inevitability for the PS3 to surpass the 360 in total sales. . ."
With Blu Rays victory in January,HD penetration increasing,and Exclusives releasing,it's kinda plain to see that the Ps3 is positioning itself as the HD box to own in your house,and succeeding at that.

A lot of people slammed Sony for the inclusion of Blu Ray in their Ps3,now with future movies having only a Blu Ray release,Sony are looking wiser and wiser.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Rapture333 - 601 days 14 hours ago
6 -
On the top of my heard here are the games im looking forward to... EXCLUSIVE "Only coming to the PS3 and not the PC or 360.... Or PC."
Resistance 2, Killzone 2, Little big planet, Socom :Confrontation, MGS4, GT5, FF XIIV, The agency, Haze, Motorstorm 2....
Those are most of the exclusives. And we get the same multi-platoform games as the 360 does!
Shut this user up Let user speak
AclayPS3 - 601 days 14 hours ago
7 -
The majority of Xbox 360 owners were Original Xbox owners most likely, so it's obvious how they may feel toward the PS3.

However, the Original Xbox only sold around 25 million console units worldwide, while the PS2 sold over 120 million, and there are more people around the world that are Sony console users and that means that there are more people around the world that are potential PS3 owners.

The Xbox 360 owners view of the PS3 isn't even any different that the person that has just a PS3 and there view towards the 360.

I think that the introduction of a Gamerscore and all that other stuff on the Xbox 360 is almost dumb because it's like so many Xbox gamers are just Achievement Whores and they only play video games just to increase there Gamerscore and they don't play video games for the Love of video games.

The Playstation 3 hasn't even hit it's stride yet because not even one highly anticipated game has been released. All I've got to say is that once MGS4 is released, PS3 sales will soar. And then there's just a list of other MUST HAVE PS3 exclusives that will be system sellers this year.

And just one more thing. PS3 exclusive games actually stay exclusive to the console. Xbox 360 games almost always get ported to the PC.

But, Sony has a much bigger lineup of Exclusives than Microsoft does and that's the flat out truth. Sony has more game studios than Microsoft does, and each year there are only a small handful of games that are actually published by Microsoft Game Studios.

The PS3's future exclusives like Metal Gear Solid 4, Final Fantasy XIII, Gran Turismo 5, Socom Confrontation, The Getaway 3, Killzone 2, Resistance 2 and more will be the selling point for the PS3. Microsoft's Game Studios just can't keep up with Sony's and Exclusive games is what makes a console, not Xbox Live, Achievements, and GamerScores.
Shut this user up Let user speak
ceee227 - 601 days 13 hours ago
7.1 - You know...
a lot of what you said smells of fanboy. Just so we can be clear, a PC is not a console. Some people do use Macs as their PC, you know. You made your decision = PS3, I made my decision = PS3 (and a Windows PC), but it does not make Xbox 360 a bad decision.
Shut this user up Let user speak
kewlkat007 - 601 days 13 hours ago
7.2 - haha "Exclusive games is what makes a console, not Xbox Live, Achievements, and GamerScores."
UmmmRiiiight - Go tell that to Nintendo.

You know not a bad comment but you state your opinions as if FACT. As if you know exactly what makes a Console, well a Console.

1. Nintendo is successful looking at what they do financially speaking yet they do not share half of what the ps3 and 360 has.

2. You state Ps3 games, as if it's that exact reason why MS won't be around or will be selling. Did you also know Sony PS sold well when it got down to a certain price and MS has that upper hand this gen? So who really knows.

3. I'm sure this is all what you think will happen and many will disagree, now if you have already made up ur mind about the so-called console war, then you'll always be very much bias till the next consoles roll around.

4. You state the PC as it is an alternative to the 360 because some of the games that come out on the 360 sometimes make it to there, but that is still not a reason to not buy an xbox360,a s well as gamers who want to enjoy games in front of a 46 inch brava or something.

In your mind Sony already won.
Shut this user up Let user speak
GIJeff - 601 days 9 hours ago
7.3 - k
whats wrong with plugging your PC into the TV via HDMI? Honestly, unless you are one of those people who cant live without xbox live, there is almost no reason to own the 360. 360 exclusives = better on PC. PS3 exclusives = impossible on any other platform. at the end of the day, it comes down to preference though...
Shut this user up Let user speak
DJ - 601 days 14 hours ago
8 - Wow, great article.
And yeah, I still don't understand the appeal of Gamerscore and Achievements since it's really just code that's looping on the system. They're arbitrary numbers that don't mean anything, or contribute to gameplay as far as I'm concerned. But that's because those things didn't exist on the original Xbox and I never upgraded to a 360. I'm pretty sure I would get addicted though, despite all the logic i just spewed out.

Great article that shows the majority of people who are still on previous-gen consoles will probably see the PS3 as a really great option.
Shut this user up Let user speak
scottie2521 - 601 days 12 hours ago
8.1 -
yeah achievements mean nothing to me. i don't have all day and night to play video games so it's very important to me to use my gaming time wisely. my goal is to flip the game, maybe twice if it was really good but thats it.

never would i waste my time to get a high (worthless) gamer score. got too much on my plate.
Shut this user up Let user speak
GIJeff - 601 days 9 hours ago
8.2 - i partially agree
i could care less about achievements. But leader boards / trophies / whatever you want to call them are great for bragging!
Shut this user up Let user speak
PimpHandHappy - 601 days 13 hours ago
9 - i look at achivements
as something i could never strive for.

and i mean in gaming OK

but i can see how they can maybe bring a smile when you get em. Like if you do something funny like walk on zombies.

Its when you play a crap game just for the gamerscore do i call you a fool.

i do like gaming history! Thats kinda cool

it helps weed out the noobs
Shut this user up Let user speak
kwicksandz - 601 days 6 hours ago
9.1 - Acheivements can be good
When devs actually think about things that are hard to acheive. beating a level shouldn't be an achievement. Beating a level without dying and getting all head shots on hard should

Stuff that you actually have to achieve rather than just earn through normal play.

The garden gnome through the whole game of Hl2 is a good achievement. performing a high kick in avatar not so much.
Shut this user up Let user speak
badz149 - 601 days 13 hours ago
10 - my opinion
I think that there's a lot of people out there waiting for price cut to buy PS3! people seldom buy based on value, but always buy based on price! the only anchor left which prevent the PS3 from flying is the price! Don't get me wrong, I know that at the moment, the PS3 is 'cruising' but still can't be considered as 'flying', if you get what I mean. simply said, 'flying' means Wii-like 'flying'!

most of gamers nowadays owns a PS or PS2 (I know I'm right at that) and when they heard of PS3 launch, they are thinking of getting it just to be slammed by the high price tag and the issues like delayed games and no big hitters in its 1st year compared to the competitions from 360 big hitters last year (eventhough the 360 was in its 2nd year) and multiplatformers more than always performed better on 360 due to the complexity to program for it which hurted its capability and potential badly! that was where the 360 took full advantage and made gamers buying it despite having a serious issue of the infamous RRoD which forced MS to offer extended warranty and cost them more than 1 billion dollars in expense!

it's a good thing that the PS3 survived the 360 counter attack by the announcement of a hefty price cut and the launch of the cheaper 40GB SKU! It's now clearly dominant in EU region and catching up in NA! game qualities had also gone up and big hitters are already waiting in the release pipeline! anybody saying that the PS3 lineup for this year is trash is just in a very deep denial! PS3 have proven itself as more than capable to outdo the 360 in every aspect and yes, it includes the PSN! online gaming had always been free until the introduction of XBL! people are saying the XBL is better - yeah, because it should be!! people paid for it!!

wait for the big hitters coming and the doubters which are mostly the 360 fanboys will truly see the power of PS brands!! We've seen what GT5P is doing in EU and MGS4 will take the baton next!
Shut this user up Let user speak
ceee227 - 601 days 13 hours ago
11 - Man, am I going to get sh!t for this post. Here goes.
I always wanted a 360, but I was never one to spend my money on more than one console per generation. The main reason I bought a PS3 was for backward compatibility (my PS2 was a piece of crap, it scratched most of my blue bottom discs, it was worse than the PS1 that I had to flip over for it to work). I figured I'll get it now and use it as a PS2 until the good PS3 games start coming out. I think it has worked out for me. The only exclusive that I want to play on the 360 are Halo 3, Mass Effect, Fable 2, and Alan Wake. I am a patient person (hell I own a PS3), I can wait for them to come out on PC. Hate me if you want. I think I pissed off both groups of fanboys. Anyway have fun gaming.
Shut this user up Let user speak
Mwaan - 601 days 13 hours ago
11.1 - Not at all
We appreciate the honesty. Bubbles up.
Shut this user up Let user speak
cmrbe - 601 days 12 hours ago
11.2 - What you
just posted is perfectly logical. You shouldn't get any hate for it.
Shut this user up Let user speak
GIJeff - 601 days 9 hours ago
11.3 - i get hated on
constantly for my honestly. But i dont apologize...
Shut this user up Let user speak
The Wood - 601 days 9 hours ago
11.4 - disclamers always help, lol
bubble up. honesty is the best policy *sometimes*;)
Shut this user up Let user speak
scissor_runner - 601 days 8 hours ago
11.5 - Thats a good post there.
For me messing with PCs and knowing that the HD stuff runs off of the same stuff almost sort of took the hype out of my sails for both of them even though they do look really really good. Then on top of that seeing what people can make on a engine maxed out for a high end PC... the main difference being ram when in comparison to consoles. But like every generation those chips in the consoles some how find away to do stuff n no one has done on PC yet. As a tech junkie though I was a little unimpressed at first but now we have games! Deep down I wanted the consoles to show the PC tech guys how it's done but they are one and the same now.
Shut this user up Let user speak
themyk - 601 days 12 hours ago
12 -
3 people in the last 2 weeks i work with were 360 owners, now they are ps3 owners. and 2 of those 3, traded in their 360 and all their games for their new ps3's and gta4's. i'm pretty sure that is going to be a popular sinario. you can't tell me theres not going to be a bunch of 360 owners who buy a ps3 for the exclusives. i see a lot more doing that than ps3 owners buying a 360. IMO.
Shut this user up Let user speak
cmrbe - 601 days 12 hours ago
13 - Its really is just a difference of perception
Most x360 owners i can tell value live, achievements, gamescores etc very highly. I strongly believe this is mostly due to my belief that the core xbox owners are mostly from a PC background. It is explain why a fair chunk prefer FPS and are hardcore. PS fans however are mostly from a console background mostly from SNES and Genesis era as well as new gamers. Its the reason why they tend to prefer traditional console games like action adventure thrid person games, platformers etc which have been traditionally popular on consoles.

Because of this. A fair chunk of PS fans which is very big propotion of gamers don't value online gaming as highly as xbox fans. This is were the problem is.To make things worse the PS fansbase as most know is distributed evenly between the east and the west unlike the xbox which is mostly are in the west. There is no question that online gaming is very big in western countries but not as much as in the east and the rest of the world that don't have the ISP to do so like where i live.
This is why i believe most PS gamer like myself really don't care about xbox live etc and as such don't value the x360 that much.Its nothing personal at all.

However for me personally i do see now that the x360 is now worth a buy for games like NG2,Too Human and especaily Alan Wake. The price was never an issue. I bought a PS3 for 600 USD not including any game or accessories so buying a x360 is a piece of cake. My only concern is the hardware issue and i think by the end of this year it would be resolved when i by one. There are too many good exclusives on both console that any serious gamer shouldn't miss out on them.
Shut this user up Let user speak
adalwolfe - 601 days 10 hours ago
13.1 -
You make very good points crmbe.

I am a 360 owner, and have absolutely no interest in picking up the ps3. For the reason you stated, i am of a pc gaming background.. multiplayer games (shooters, mmorpgs, rts's) I never picked up a console last generation simply because I was tired of single player games.. to me what is the point of playing a single player game when you cannot show off your gear/skill or the work you put in with your friends. I couldn't even play through all of oblivion since it felt like such a waste of time even though it was a great game, no social aspect gives it no value to me.

Microsoft understands this, and that is my appeal to the console. The ps3 i find are still making the same games that were popular on consoles last generation.. (short single player casual games with limited if any replayability) Which may have been good enough for console gamers last generation, this generation I would think people would expect more.. people still fans of their games are living in the past, and should really make more of an effort to play online with friends..

MGS4 for example its player versus player videos make movement/control look so awkward and unappealing to me even though graphically it looks great.. I can not see myself wanting to even try it let alone buy it..

I highly doubt I would get a ps3 at this point.. would be better off waiting till next generation consoles come out now, they are most likely only a couple years away. If none come out I would go back to pc.
Shut this user up Let user speak
avacadosnorkel - 601 days 3 hours ago
13.2 - @ 13.1
If multiplayer games are the the most important, you need to get a PS3 because some of this generations best multiplayer games are exclusive to PS3.
Shut this user up Let user speak
cmrbe - 600 days 19 hours ago
13.3 - Great post Adalwolf
Yes thats exactly what i mean. Its just a difference of perception. I understand completely where you are comming from. Yes PS has been keeping to the old console games formula with a great emphisis on single player and yes it may have little replayability value but this is what most old console owners like myself are use to and are comfortable with. For me personally i would rather have an EPIC single player than a great mutliplayer. Sony has realise that they must move with time and thats the reason why they are striving with games like Resistance and LBP.

You must realise though that not everyone has broadband connection to play on line. Some that have broadband in areas where they live also cannot afford it. In my case we don't have broadband where i live. Even if i do i am not use to playing on-line and its just not my thing. Perhaps to people like yourself its fun to share and play online but for me a game single player is like a movie experience that i enjoy a couple of days then replay it once in a while like a great movie. I am sure alot of people are like me in this regaurd.
14 sumfood4u | 601 days 11 hours ago - User only got 1 bubble - Show
Shut this user up Let user speak
The Wood - 601 days 9 hours ago
14.1 - I'm a cheap bastard but Wise beyound my years!
bubble
Shut this user up Let user speak
andron666 - 601 days 6 hours ago
15 - Not quite right...
Since the 360 have been out long before PS3, plenty, if not most gamers have been exposed to it's ups and downs already.

Hardcore 360 owners have invested a lot of time and money into their machine. So they conveniently forget that not everybody share their view.

PS3 is as good a choice as the 360, and many even see it as the better option. So effectively 360 owners are the ones with a skewered view of image.
Shut this user up Let user speak
dale1 - 601 days 3 hours ago
16 -
bought my ps3 60gb day one for £469 with resistance,i knew it would take time for the games to come but as i have 200+ ps2 titles it wasn,t a case of worrying about having nothink to play at launch.
i looked at getting the 360 due to the delays of the ps3 then rrod started to appear and a few people that i knew who had got them were getting some serious issues with scratching discs and bad after sales treatmant from m/s so that was me out.
when i checked out what the ps3 had under the hood in terms of its hardware ie wifi,bluray,harddrive,memory slots etc,i could see the value in the system,at the time the cheapest blu ray player was £499 and considering hi def games need space bluray was the perfect answer for the years ahead.
as for online the 360 as the edge at the moment if your interested in points etc but psn is starting to get some nice downloadable content with the likes of warhawk,socom,wipeout,flow,sup er stardust hd etc etc,not just old retro games from the past,and with psp connectivity and tv recordable tuner to add it offers me more than the 360 is capable of doing and its free,
best of all it looks like it belongs to my bravia lcd they should drop the white 360 i mean who wants that under your £1000 lcd no one i know, better if they made it silver or black like the elite.
anyone know if the 150mb cap rate for downloads still applies for xbox live?
Add Comment (Gamer Zone)
Gamer Zone Posting Guidelines
The Gamer Zone is for members who want a more friendly and civilized discussion. This section is heavily moderated by the N4G staff, so leave your fanboyism at the door please. Members who are unable to behave in a mature and respectful manner will be temporarily or permanently restricted from posting in the Gamer Zone. Using words such as Xbots and Sony droids, or other words from the console war vocabulary, is strictly prohibited in this Zone.
Read More...
 
 
You must log in to post comments.
Username:  
Password:  
 
 
About N4G
N4G is a social game news site that covers the game industry 24 hours a day, 7 days a week.
More Info... | Submit News