240°

Natal dev: Natal will spawn new genres of videogames

360 magazine recently interviewed Johnny Chung Lee, the motion control celebrity who is now working on Project Natal. We asked what kind of games he thought Natal would enable, and if the technology will spawn entirely new genres that we hadn't seen before. To give you a little teaser of the interview, here's what he had to say...

Read Full Story >>
360magazine.co.uk
Stevie Ray Vaughan5398d ago

Cant wait to see this. Bring it on Natal

KingKionic 5398d ago

Even Johnny chung Lee approves.

:)

N4PS3G5398d ago

yeah ..this guy creates some pretty awesome things

Syronicus5398d ago

I am not one for getting physical when I am gaming but my kids love it. Can't wait to see where they take this new peripheral.

callahan095398d ago

Yeah, well he is employed by Microsoft now.

5398d ago
KingKionic 5398d ago

Causal...oh noes!!!

But seriously...It`s going be fun ether way you think about it.

militant075398d ago

dude, johnny chung lee works at microsoft now

William Wallace5398d ago

I am afraid of the loads of casual games that this will bring. We already have one shovelware platform, we don't need another.

Thugbot1875398d ago

E3 most overlooked story. Guy has some amazing ideas.

Blaze9295398d ago

You obviously didnt read the article:

"Natal won’t necessarily be more geared toward casual gamers"

also this is an important note:

"and that the technology will be very entirely compatible with the regular 360 controller. "

So there goes any stupid "no buttons/controller in hand = fail" discussion.

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 5398d ago
Halo3 MLG Pro5398d ago

I said this many times before.... Natal is going to revolutionize a new way of gaming. Much bigger and broader than motion controllers. Play beyond indeed. ;)

5398d ago
Natsu X FairyTail5398d ago (Edited 5398d ago )

you're the same guido from WSHH??????

edit:

2 disagree for asking if he's the same guy frm another site?

either its the work of multi-acounts or you guys are just really really retarted.

Syronicus5398d ago

That I would not go as far as to say that Natal will revolutionize motion controls but it sure will make it interesting. The thing I like about it is that my kids will not have something in their hands while playing games. That way I can keep from busting out a TV when the remote goes flying. Natal looks good but I have to say that revolutionizing motion controls... Maybe that's stretching it bit too far.

Kushan5398d ago

Natal and the Wiimote are as different from each other as the Wiimote and the DualShock 3 are. You can't compare them, they work in completely different ways and have completely different applications.

Mike134nl5398d ago

If it becommes a hit and only if it becomes a hit, it might revolutionize motion controll.

The biggest revolution I see for now is that you will never need to look for your remote controller, the dream of many laisy people.

But if they succesfully manage to get rid of buttons and controllers that could be accounted as a revolution. That said the motion controll revolution was started by Nintendo, lets see if Microsft can take it a step further.

Syronicus5398d ago

They are so different? They both react to motion. Sure they might have some differing nuances but in the end, they are both motion controls. One just captures you the user and the other captures the control motions... Seems pretty similar to me.

edhe5398d ago

Yes, revolutionise. If you think that the Wii was revolutionary then you've got to accept that natal is too.

To move from a static controller to a motion one, then to complete removal of the controller to provide an entire interface without holding anything is even more of a revolution than unergonomic controller with some accelerometers [or is that the sixaxis?].

Mc Fadge5398d ago

I'm yet to see somethign revolutionary about the Natal system, everything I've seen so far has been done before, but with the addition of the extra axis of motion, Z axis. They're still the same games, just that little bit better.

Syronicus5398d ago

Wasn't the project name for the Wii, the Revolution? If I recall correctly it was and that is what the Wii was. It brought motion controls into the mainstream and showed what it could do for the casual market. It was a revolution. Anything after is more of a copy but as with Natal, it could quite possibly be a vast improvement.

cliffbo5398d ago

Natal is not revolutionary it is simply the same as the Eye-toy from Sony no better, the eye-toy does everything the natal does and has done for sometime now.

yes MS do it again steal an idea and try to claim it as there own will they ever come up with an original idea of there own i guess not

Rainstorm815398d ago

There was already one revolution and sorry it was by sony. Nintendo made motion control mainstream. The eyetoy actually started the motion control FAD. Poor support and marketing held it back from success. The Wii has built in motion control tech, unless Sony and MS follow the nintendo blueprint NATAL/PS motion wont ever be as successfull as the wii unfortunately. Just give me a controller and some core games.

For anyone that thinks NATAL/PS Motion wont create a new level of shovelware you are in denial. Motion Control has the ability to kill the Hardcore Gaming Industry, once the core audience is comprised of mainly casual gamers every system will be like the Wii as far as game library.

This could be a revolution, a Casual Gamer Revolution. scary huh?

+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 5398d ago
N4PS3G5398d ago

You know..just to give all this Natal is only for casual games a rest ;)

" Lee also said that Natal won’t necessarily be more geared toward casual gamers and that the technology will be very entirely compatible with the regular 360 controller."

Mc Fadge5398d ago (Edited 5398d ago )

But I'll believe it when I see it, though I'm sure there will be some "hardcore" games that utilise Natal. Lee is very good with technology, but I don't believe he's tried his hand at game design yet. His applications of technology are impressive, but so far they've really only been interfaces.

EDIT: 2 disagrees in less than 5 minutes. I'm happy to have a discussion, but it's hard when you don't talk.

Tony P5398d ago

I don't really disagree at all. For all the hype, MS and Sony's motion efforts will either blow away or fall as hard as Wii (perceptually speaking).

I'm all for positivity and possibility, but I think I may have earned the right to my scepticism after decades of underused and ill-thought peripherals all claiming to 'expand the way we play'. But scepticism is not indifference and certainly not bashing. I hope more than 1st party devs will take advantage of the tech and find genuine 'hardcore' uses for it.

So the question is, will there be actual effort put in to make Natal games that last or will we get the equivalent of Sony's best camera efforts last gen: Eyetoy Play 1-3, Eyetoy Groove, and Spytoy?

Mr. Lee speaks with hope, but unfortunately history disagrees.

Show all comments (74)
50°

LG Gaming Week deals kick off with $500 off this 45-inch UltraGear OLED curved gaming monitor

Save a bucket load on this massive curved gaming monitor- with the potential of even more savings in LG's Gaming Week

80°

Review: GameScent - Now you can smell your games | KnowTechie

KnowTechie writes: "The GameScent is a unique way to add immersion to your games. Thanks to its HDMI and 3.5mm jack, the device is versatile, so you can use it across your consoles and PC. However, it would be great to see a new range of scents since there are only six, and many smell similar to each other."

Read Full Story >>
knowtechie.com
TheLigX15h ago

Ah yes… whenever I play a game I always think that it would be so much better if my home could smell more like gasoline and burnt gunpowder.

staticall15h ago

Boogerman, Binding Of Isaac, Fallout, Postal and Scorn, here i come, smell away!

Skate-AK14h ago

Can't forget Octodad and Harlod Halibut.

160°

Here's why PC gamers aren't upgrading GPUs as often as they used to

At a time where GPUs are more available than ever, it appears as though PC gamers aren't upgrading as often as they used to.

Vits2d ago

For me, the primary concern with new software is how it's often exclusive to a new series. This not only frustrates me but also raises questions about the lifespan of the hardware. With GPUs no longer offering significant performance boosts, they rely heavily on software enhancements.

However, this reliance is contingent on developer support. When the new 5000 series hits shelves, it's likely that the 4000 series won't be compatible with Nvidia's new software. This would negate any advantage it had over the 3000 series, leaving one to wonder why they upgraded in the first place. And the same will keep happening as we move through the generations.

AMD is a bit better in that regard as they often use open standards, which offer wider compatibility. However, they have even less developer support, and their software solutions tend to lag behind Nvidia by at least one whole generation. So if you have a 3000 series from Nvidia right now, it doesn't really make that much sense to upgrade to the 7000 series from AMD because feature-wise they are pretty similar level.

just_looken8h ago

The huge thing you are missing is display.

If you have a 1440p/1080p monitor there is 0 reason to leave the 3,000/amd 6,000 series those cards are cheap with many years of driver support left and can push those resolutions for you 0 issues well unless you go below the 60 series range or amd's 6400

Right now computer games are having issues because of garbage drm and or just a garbage port that even is trash on consoles like dragon dogmas 30fps BS all versions.

There is 0 reason to get a 5k/amd 7k series card unless you are doing serious rendering and or 4k gaming or you want more vram as yes games are taking up more thanks to higher native textures.

It would be a huge help if these "gaming" consoles used real hardware not some apu/igpu garbage even a 3 year old gaming laptop has better guts. A real cpu/gpu/ram/mb/psu/storage on a console would help so much on game porting/optimization for the devs.

Vits7h ago

I don't think that is a huge thing. Hell, I would even argue that is completely not important.
Pc Gamers in general do not care about resolution that much and therefore I don't see 4K gaming becoming a thing on Pc any time soon. It's just not worth it. Even more when right now there are many better ways to improve the visual quality of your experience before going for the resolution.

From QLED, OLED, miniLED-based solutions, Fast IPS, IPS Black, better VA panels, all of them play a much larger role than resolution in improving game visual quality. Not to mention you don't need to sacrifice refresh rate if you stay in the Full/Quad HD bracket. And refresh rate is a thing that PC gamers care about.

And let's be honest, developers are not focusing on native solutions anymore. So why bother going for higher resolution if the game is going to fake it either way? It's a waste of resources that clearly most PC gamers aren't willing to do.

Furesis1d 21h ago

oh my god, these "Here's why" articles are always about the most obvious shit ever, like do people actually read these?

Neonridr1d 16h ago

because they last for generations. You don't need to upgrade every 1, 2 or even 3 years. I went from a 1080ti which served me so well to a 3080 with years in between. I won't even consider upgrading until the 5000 series at the earliest, but will most likely wait for the 6000 series.

hard joe1d 2h ago

not every gamer have money to upgrade every year

just_looken8h ago

But you do not need too on a pc if you're non 4k gamer 3 year old hardware will work for you.

Show all comments (17)