300°

PlayStation Vita’s Operating System May Compete with Apple’s iOS - Nick's Gaming View Episode #64

"Call of Duty to be a "game changer" for the PlayStation Vita, PlayStation Vita's operating system to compete with Apple's iOS, Gears of War 3 delivers epic DLC offering, and more. Nick's Gaming View Episode #64 is fully loaded with this week's latest gaming news during the midst of PlayStation Vita's launch."

-TheGamerAccess.com

Read Full Story >>
thegameraccess.com
Knight_Cid4482d ago

cod isnt a game changer, not when its on 5 systens

MaxXAttaxX4482d ago (Edited 4482d ago )

You can take that literally and be an ass (like on every Vita article).
Or you could provably imagine that COD on the PS Vita will be a more unique game (using Vita functions).
Or maybe it's just a regular COD game.

Vita has comparable graphics and gameplay, controls and multiplayer not found on previous handheld COD titles.

And whether it's a unique game or multiplatform... does it matter?
IT'S GOOD PUBLICITY FOR THE VITA EITHER WAY.

Knight_Cid4481d ago

am I an ass? Or am I tellign the truth. It hurts huh.

"Vita has comparable graphics and gameplay, controls and multiplayer not found on previous handheld COD titles. "

irrelevant, irrelevant, irrelevant, irrelevant. The uncharted om vita had all of that and it isnt breaking any preorder records or anything

BubloZX4481d ago

@Knight_Cid Uncharted isn't COD in terms of sales bro. People buy consoles just because of COD. COD is a game changer for the ps vita in west compared to other handhelds like the iphone or the 3ds.

MaxXAttaxX4481d ago (Edited 4481d ago )

"The truth" is apparently whatever you interpret it to be.
You're the only one in these articles saying the same sh**.

Also, Uncharted isn't COD. ALL COD games are ports / multiplatform and that hasn't affected its sales or appeal.
If you want to dismiss the points I made above and be stubborn, then fine.

It's like you literally don't want something that's good for the Vita to happen.

mbsaeger4481d ago

I totally disagree. Although COD itself may not be a game changer -- FIRSTY think of COD mobile on this extremely powerful device, imagine console-like COD in your hands. Secondly it can also be a game changer because COD has not been multiplayer on a mobile device before. I can totally see COD on the vita as a game changer because now we can all have the PS3 experience of COD with us at all times and online.

Knight_Cid4481d ago

You really need to understand the history of mobile games.

The power of the device is irrelevant, a port of a console game is irrelevant when its been on handhelds before, multiplayer is irrelevant.

Was uncharted vita a game changer? Hell it had the lowest preorders of any uncharted game.

Think logically. Nobody wants to buy a vita for ps3 ports. Sony has said this. Thats counter to there strategy.

A port of a ps3 experience of COD at all times and online will not sell well if its on the ps3

BubloZX4481d ago

@mbsaeger

I agree completely with you.

@Knight_Cid

You need to understand the history of game francises. COD since it's debut has managed to help spark console sales dramatically. While uncharted is an amazing franchise it pales in comparison to COD in terms of sales. All the vita needs to have mass appeal is release a GT game and Monster hunter and it is pretty much a done deal. With monster hunter and GT the vita stands a chance at outselling the 3DS in japan on a weekly bases. With GT, COD, and Fifa the vita will begin to over take it's competitors in Europe. COD and sports games like madden and 2k games will help it perform well in America. Just because you may not like the vita or can afford one doesn't mean it won't sell to it's targeted audience which Sony stated is adult males with a ps3. I'm 21 and I have 3 ps3's and the vita has appealed greatly to me and that's why I bought it. And it's better than the 3DS by far in my opinion, all I play on it is freakin pokemon and Zelda lol.

Shackdaddy8364481d ago (Edited 4481d ago )

I agree w/ you knight. I mean, I don't think CoD will fail on PSVita, but it definitely won't be a console mover. It's just like CoD for the wii (maybe not as extreme though).

If they make a whole separate CoD game specifically for the Vita then ya, I could see that being big (I HIGHLY doubt that will ever happen though). But, a straight Cod port to the Vita that's exactly like the console version won't be the game changer that people think it is...

Denethor_II4481d ago

I found a new cure for trolling. It seems that when you fail to acknowledge the troll, the troll simply disappears.

The reason ipod/pads work for most people is there simplicity, so in that way I suppose it can compete. But I personally will own an ipod and a Vita, I don't think they're really sharing the same market.

tmanmushroom4482d ago

I feel like the Vita has a lot of potential, and games like CoD and MGS will help tap into it

nevin14481d ago

i don't like touch screen.

one2thr4481d ago (Edited 4481d ago )

You do know that it has buttons and two analog sticks... And a "Touch-pad"... Right?...

nevin14481d ago

But you can't you use them for menu navigating.

MySwordIsHeavenly4481d ago

I'm with you, nevin1. Why just touch the app you want to go to...instead of navigating through the menu with buttons, making sure your app is highlighted, and hitting "x"?

They just make it too easy...

one2thr4481d ago

If people complain enough, Sony will eventually make an update for that...

360GamerFG4481d ago

Still doesn't change that he doesn't like the touch screen now does it?

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 4481d ago
one2thr4481d ago (Edited 4481d ago )

No, no it doesnt... But i guess if you give people the right to complain, it also gives them the right to complain about something meaningless... If he doesnt like "touch-screen" then he doesnt have to touch, but instead use it for its intended purpose, and that is to interact with all and any porposed operations that occur... Or if not he'll be suck staring at the time and date on the screen. I guess that counts as fun too right?

LX-General-Kaos4481d ago

Am i hearing about COD in a positive light again from posters? Something must be in the water today.

360GamerFG4481d ago

Yes, the fact that it is on a SONY platform and will help said platform sell units.

LX-General-Kaos4481d ago

Reasons like this is why i continue to come to this site. If you are having down time theres always hypocritical entertainment to be found on this site.

PopRocks3594481d ago

Not to be a stiff, but why is this appearing in the Wii U section...?

Show all comments (27)
60°

Call Of Duty On Game Pass Is A Big Risk Big Reward Gamble

Discover the impact of Microsoft's decision to include Call Of Duty in Game Pass. Explore the pros and cons and speculate about future changes.

Read Full Story >>
gamersocialclub.ca
Elda8d ago

Most folks that have a Gamepass subscription will not spend the $70, they will use Gamepass instead to play COD. MS will most likely make their money from some solely PC players & some solely PS5 owners. Even some PC players may opt to use Gamepass instead of spending $70. I would think MS would want to make every dime they could from retail sales. As long as they put new releases of COD day one on Gamepass, MS will lose out on some sales of COD.

porkChop8d ago

COD makes truck loads of money on microtransactions. That's likely the play. Get more people in the door through Game Pass and sell more microtransactions. Have a steady stream of events to keep people interested so they keep their sub, and then just the sub alone would double the revenue from that player each year.

Elda8d ago (Edited 8d ago )

Buying the game at $70 a pop including the deluxe versions is much better than people subs for a dollar to $15 a month. Die hard fans that usually buy the game also buy into the transactions. Again putting any new COD day one on Gamepass is definitely a sure loss of making some retail money for every copy of COD. With the last iteration of COD being bad most likely people are going to sub to Gamepass to play COD basically saving themselves $70, that is a loss of retail sales.

Kakashi Hatake8d ago (Edited 8d ago )

Most that don't have Gamepass will just buy the game and he done with it. People that do will just result in a retail sale being lost. Some will buy the subscription for the month then be done. This is lose lose. Casuals aren't going to pay almost 300 dollars a year for COD.

ApocalypseShadow8d ago

The reality is that Microsoft already knows the answer as stated by them in their documents. PlayStation gamers have built up an ecosystem of games and they aren't migrating over and dropping what they have to buy an Xbox to play one game in a service you have to pay monthly for. Cheaper to just buy the game. And, I'd bet many casual COD players don't know or care about the acquisition.

Which is why Jim Ryan pushed to make sure that that one game continues to be sold as usual on Sony's platform to keep the status quo. Every other IP owned by Activision are worthless. And Activision has shown they don't care about other IP like Tony Hawk by cancelling them.

Sales WILL be lost on Xbox. That's for certain. Microsoft can only hope that Xbox gamers continue to buy up those micro transactions to make up for those lost sales. Only positive for Microsoft is that they get to dip into PlayStation game sales that we all know from history and NPD, that Sony's console sells more games. But increase subs from Sony fans for game pass? Not happening in any way that matters.

Sony, on the other hand, can have their cake and eat it too. They get COD and they can continue dropping more content for their fastest selling GaaS game which is Hell Divers 2. As the game passes 12 million sales and doesn't beat you over the head with micro transactions, Sony has a win win situation and can support the game getting more content to keep players engaged.

As a side note, COD is probably going to turn into some version of Sea of Fortnite Duty. Games as a service sitting in game pass being milked dry with micro transactions and constant updates making you feel you're playing an unfinished game that keeps going and going with no soul.

Tedakin8d ago

I'm not sure why everyone is acting like COD is a surprise. That was always the plan. They said in court during the FTC case they were doing this. They have said repeatedly and recently all first party games are going to Gamepass.

badboyz098d ago

gamepass like PS Plus are rental services. Games like COD you buy not rent. So in my case unless I plan on keeping gamepass for 2yrs minimum than the benefit of adding cod is pointless.

80°

5 Reasons Why Call Of Duty On Xbox Game Pass Is A Big Deal

We've put together 5 reasons why we believe the arrival of the Call of Duty franchise on Xbox Game Pass will be a big deal for Microsoft.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
peppeaccardo8d ago

Throwing bananas at the monkeys' cage.

920°

Microsoft To Add New Tiers & Pricing To Xbox Game Pass Subscription With Addition Of Call Of Duty

Microsoft will reportedly add new tiers and pricing to its Xbox Game Pass subscription with the addition of Call of Duty to its game catalog.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
Jin_Sakai11d ago

And so it begins. Game Pass days are over.

ThinkThink11d ago

How come? Because there's a rumor of adding an additional tier?

Jin_Sakai11d ago (Edited 11d ago )

CoD is just a way of raising the prices and pushing people into paying more for Game Pass. It’s losing its value and the day 1 first party games aren’t really worth it anymore.

purple10111d ago

yes, because people were sold on the promise of one price, activision games included, now they want another whole tier to include cod,

not what people initially brought into, (well gamepass had many subs even before Activision, but you get my point)

So, One more lie, to add to the stack of lies, perpetrated by these scumbags,

jin_sakai probably think this ones the nail in the coffin, id tend to agree

Cacabunga10d ago

Sony better take notes and rethink their future plans.

this really couldn’t get worse..

peppeaccardo9d ago

If you pay attention to the target audience of this so called gaming service it all starts making sense and MS is doing exactly what they r supposed to do to get their money back ... if you really understand the reasoning of the lower side of the spectrum of the cod players MS has found its gold vein ... we r in business territory as entertainment is long deceased on the MS vocabulary.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 9d ago
Hofstaderman10d ago

Best deal in gaming??? We think not.

10d ago
GamerRN9d ago

So you probably don't like all three tiers of PSN either.

notachance10d ago (Edited 10d ago )

If they’re as stupid as to make it more than $5/month increase from the highest tier I’d laugh my ass off.

crazyCoconuts10d ago

That would be a way of getting to say they kept the promise of all games on GamePass without cannibalizing their sales

10d ago
GamerRN9d ago

Isn't there an 8 dollar difference between bottom and top tier PSN?

Bathyj10d ago (Edited 10d ago )

Making gamepass worse value by making it more expensive, as well as CoD losing Xbox sales and PlayStation gamers will want it less if Xbox gamers are getting it for "free".

Takes real talent to damage 2 things with one move.

Chocoburger10d ago

Call of Duty needs to be taken down a notch, its too popular for its own damn good. So yeah, it seems like MS is going to help make that happen. So good job, I guess?

crazyCoconuts10d ago

If they price it so high that people won't want it, they won't sign up so MS won't lose out on sales. Not all of those bad things will happen, just some of them

PhillyDonJawn10d ago

Really? You think CoD on PS would sell less cause Xbox gamers get access thru gamepass? I doubt that. COD fanbase is huge they're gonna play where they want to play and not care how the next person got it

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 10d ago
Notellin10d ago (Edited 10d ago )

I ended my subscription right around when they announced the purchase of Activision/Blizzard.

No offense but I'm not paying a subscription fee to get the worst 3rd party publishers games for free. It's like paying a monthly fee to only eat at Chili's or Applebee's while everyone else is having all the amazing food.

My hope was Gamepass would bring more games like Grounded or Hi-Fi Rush. We have all seen how that's going.

I'll never spend another dollar on an Xbox service ever again after the recent studio closures. I've defended them on here and elsewhere but they don't deserve any trust from any consumer at this point.

PhillyDonJawn10d ago

I understand your feelings but your analogy made no sense lol

VariantAEC8d ago

Never eaten at Chilis or Applebees... are they really that bad?

Notellin8d ago

@PhillyDonJawn

It makes perfect sense and I can't figure out how you are unable to comprehend the words.

PhillyDonJawn5d ago

It made no sense cause Gamepass has a huge variety of games including hit games. You're implying Gamepass games quality is that of Chiles and Apple Bees lol. We all know that's not accurate so your analogy made no sense. MLB the show was steak 48 when it was PS exclusive now it's on gamepass it's suddenly a blooming onion from Applebee's 😂.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5d ago
S2Killinit10d ago

And soon you will have the option to opt for the Sports package, but if you want sports you also need to pay for the weather package.

As Ive said since this thing was introduced. Prepare to get nickel and dimed.

PhillyDonJawn10d ago (Edited 10d ago )

They do that that'll be the end of them. They're not that crazy. Only way that would work is if you could build a game pass package $5 sports, $5 shooter, $5 rpg, etc. But even then it's bad business for MS cause ppl that only play sports and shooters would get it cheaper compared to an all game bundle and they'd lose money.

InUrFoxHole10d ago

@Jin Sakai
But you're totally fine with paying for psn with no day 1, 1st party...

crazyCoconuts10d ago (Edited 10d ago )

The PSN essential value you get with base online access is unparalleled, puts Xbox core to shame. The PSN extra package however seems to be diminishing in value as it probably should. With any luck we'll have people buying their frickin games again as these sub services lose popularity

PhillyDonJawn10d ago

@Coconut not gonna lie I wanna start buying games again lol. (I do but not day 1 releases) I still feel bad for not buying Ori 2. Had it not release day 1 on GP I would've bought. So if they move day 1 titles to a new tier (which I'm not subbing to) I'd buy the games I really want day 1. While the ones I want to play but not badly I'd wait til it's available on the lower tier to play.

lodossrage10d ago

@InUrFoxHole

oh come on, There was a time Xbox fans were ok with just paying for the right to play online without getting anything for it.

ironmonkey10d ago

He's fine with paying for better games. Xbox ain't got it. Redfall day one enjoy....

InUrFoxHole9d ago

@lodossrage
And here both xbox and and sony fans pay still pay for online

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 9d ago
1Victor10d ago

@Jin by Microsoft standards another $10 should do the trick🤦🏿

PhillyDonJawn10d ago (Edited 10d ago )

Nah I disagree, the value of GP has been crazy they were screwing themselves for quick subscriber gain. I always felt the day 1 releases would eventually stop and they only did it to get ppl to sub faster. That's why it quickly surpassed PS sub. Now that they hit a ceiling and picked up Activision they can only A. Take away the day 1 releases and hope the sub count remain or B. Increase the cost and hope they keep the sub count. Seem they went with
C. Add a new tier which is likely a mix of A and B.
If the new tier is only Activision games and they leave ultimate alone I'll be happy. I don't play COD so

10d ago
SPEAKxTHExTRUTH10d ago

Did you say that when Sony raised the price of PS+ and didn’t offer anything to justify the increase? I doubt it…

Chevalier9d ago

Yeah and Xbox tried to DOUBLE the price of Gold remember?

badkolo10d ago

if they add more top tier games , more value and charge more for this tier, cool thats just normal business and an option for its users. how does that affect you or us in any way. there is still a cheap option and so on. and yea over time we did expect it to eventually go up a few bucks. every other company has but now its a problem when ms does it?

jeromeface9d ago

anyone who thought microsoft was a good idea for leading the industry into a period of better games doesn't know Microsoft...

+ Show (10) more repliesLast reply 5d ago
gold_drake10d ago

gotta make back that money somehow. but its definitely a scummy move before cod comes to gamepass haha.

Tacoboto10d ago

Similar kind of thing happened back when Starfield came out.

The dollar new accounts for a month, trials, various promotions kinda dried up as they finally had a big game coming, following a price hike in July. But reception was eh.

And they haven't delivered on letting us cloud stream our owned library yet either.

crazyCoconuts10d ago

I think you're hitting on the core issue with Starfield. All of this breaks down of they can't make good games. Whether you're leasing or selling to one platform or multiple, the games gotta be good. That's the thing that's absolutely bonkers about this whole thing: making good games has been Microsoft's Achilles heel for many years now

mrcatastropheAF10d ago

Where did they promise allowing you to cloud stream your owned library? Lol anything downloaded to your console you can play remotely anywhere. Don't recall them making that promise.

New tier for gamepass solely due yo call of duty is a garbage move though. They keep shooting themselves in the foot

Tacoboto10d ago

@catastrophe

They said it June 2022

https://news.xbox.com/en-us...

"We’re excited to share that later this year, it’s our intent to roll out the ability for Xbox Game Pass Ultimate members to play, from the cloud, select games they already own or have purchased outside the Xbox Game Pass library."

LG_Fox_Brazil10d ago

It doesn't surprise me, it's very clear that MS is trying as hard as possible to recover all the money spent on Activision and Bethesda, they will do whatever they can, doesn't matter if people will like ir or not, as long as the higher ups see money arriving, it's all fair game

Profchaos10d ago

Pretty much Xbox wrote a cheque that Microsoft can't cash.
Inflated metrics egos and a belief that they could get the casual gamer playing hardcore titles via cloud on mobiles really lead them to belive they were in a better position than the reality.

I don't believe gamepass was ever that strong with many gamers likely signing up multiple fake emails for the dollar trials over and over boosting that count along with Xbox live gold hacks and other methods of getting gamepass for next to no money a month have been well known and exploited for years.

Microsoft have a belief that everyone's grandma wants to play halo on a mobile if they could just reach them because they played Wii bowling once so they must want to play halo

XiNatsuDragnel10d ago

Oof this is Microsofts grand plan?

Fishy Fingers10d ago (Edited 10d ago )

While a rumour cant say Id be surprised if true.

Certain other subscription services I sub to have increased in price while adding nothing and we expect theyre potentially offering up the biggest game of every year and its back catalog for "free"?

But I'd happily skip it if there are options (or upgrade for a month for the campaign)

Outside_ofthe_Box10d ago

People expect the price of games to stay the same forever so why wouldn't they expect the same for subscription services?

Crows9010d ago

Price increases are fine. As long as they make sense. Games at 60 was a good price point. Things don't have to go up in price just because.

I used to buy some games at 60...how many do I buy at 70? None. It's a loss for the industry. The higher the price the likelihood sales won't be as high. For $10 more they lost $60.

Same thing with subscriptions. As long as it's affordable people will set it and forget it. If it stops being affordable people will be more picky...so a price increase of $5 could net them a loss of millions.

Outside_ofthe_Box10d ago

Let's be honest, nobody wants prices to increase. I personally have always thought that $40 was the perfect price and never liked it when they increased it to $50 for the PS2 generation and then $60 for the PS3. The $60 price did hold on for a good while though.

Same with sub services. The whole appeal is 'the best deal in gaming' mantra people love to chant, but we all know that they will increase the price eventually especially if they are putting CoD that will actually sell a ton even at that $70 price point.

Show all comments (126)