Kotaku editor-in-chief Brian Crecente posted a reveal of the newest game in the Call of Duty franchise, Modern Warfare 3. What made this reveal different was Crecente revealed everything. Weapons, game modes, levels, locations, characters, plot twists and the surprise game ending.
Was this a legitimate reveal of an exclusive or was this an abuse of industry privilege?
Captain Price's fate at the end of 2011's Call of Duty Modern Warfare 3 could've been very different, as this new post-credits scene reveals.
The developers have provided a little band-aid while PlayStation players attempt to get back into MW3.
Recently, players of Modern Warfare 3 and Warzone were met with a new bundle featuring the B.E.A.S.T. Glove, inspired by King Kong's armament in the Godzilla x Kong movie. However, the $80 price tag attached to this themed accessory left many Call of Duty fans feeling underwhelmed.
Morons that allow themselves to be milked continuously by this company is the definition of irony.
Spend more $$ and you'll end up In easier lobbies so you win both ways when ya spend that cash
Controversy in the COD community feels like it happens within an alternate timeline. Activision will take the piss with something, there will be a momentary fuss about it, and then they will forget about it and carry on anyway. Repeat this cycle literally every year for the rest of time.
I'm so tired of hearing about what they're doing with this game, its never going to change and it's never going to value the consumer over money, furthermore the people who engage so heavily in the microtransactions I guess allegedly are having a blast and can't wait to do it some more this year when the new version of the game drops.
Probably. But this was the biggest leak in gaming for a long time. Any site would leak it. ANY site. Good score for them.
If people really wanted to play the MW3 campaign properly they could just not read the article, that's what I'm doing
Kotaku is part of the Gawker network. You expect anything more of them? Their philosophy is get hits, don't worry about facts or ethics. The tiger just went tiger.
http://www.youtube.com/watc...
That's why I'm not looking up the ending ;)
.
How could anyone defend this kind of thing??? The intent was for personal gain and I would say to harm Activision and COD. Activision has an army of lawyers and they should sue this clown till he is flat broke. If he did do this, Activision will have a case and EVERYBODY by now knows Kotick is an old school mobster.
It's one thing when fanboys debate and guesstimate how a game will play out. It's different thing entirely when a well known web site with certain privileges tries and assassinates a game as big as COD which will have literally BILLIONS of dollars at stake. I hope this clown thinks it was worth it.