520°

PS5 is About to Go on a 3-Month Stretch of Exclusive New Game Releases

While Sony may not have major first-party games on the way any time soon, there are still big PS5 exclusives set to launch in the near future.

Read Full Story >>
gamerant.com
Flawlessmic109d ago

And that's the difference between Sony and MS.

When MS had that god awful year and 7 month stretch this generation where they knew they had nothing coming, they were unwilling to compensate that by securing 3rd party deal to ensure they looked after us gamers and instead gave me no reason to turn on my xsx

Sony on the other hand, sees the stretch ahead of time and made sure even if weren't playing 1st party exclusives that they made sure to secure big 3rd exclusives to ensure Sony gamers had something more than the competition to enjoy that could only be played on the platform.

MS won't have that issue again with all ots studios now but still just shows how much smarter Sony is.

Obscure_Observer109d ago ShowReplies(13)
LastAvenger109d ago

The problem is Microsoft secure third party timed exclusivity via GamePass while if it does release on PS it’s to a cost. But this doesn’t bode well when all Day One releases get lost in the Fray within the Netflix of Gaming.

Lightning77109d ago

The last time MS tried having 3rd party games everyone complained. There not true exclusives, they're not 1st party and rebelled against TR exclusivity.

Christopher109d ago

And you argued that it was fine. Hypocrisy is on both sides here.

Einhander1972109d ago

People complained that Microsoft was paying to keep a series that started on PlayStation off PlayStation, and they weren't even publishing it. It's a false equivalency argument your making.

Helldivers PlayStation owns the IP
Rise of the Ronin PlayStation is publishing
Stellar Blade PlayStation is publishing
Final Fantasy 7 was originally a PlayStation game and literally only 2 of the 16 main Final Fantasy games have launched on xbox same with the vast majority of spin off games. (but of course all xbox has ever done is try to steal off PlayStation and Nintendo)

2'nd party publishing partnerships have been a staple of not only PlayStation and other platform holders but of major publishers for as long as gaming has existed.

Second party publishing isn't what's changed it's xbox fanboys trying to act like it's bad or that those games aren't exclusive, that's what has changed.

108d ago
MrBaskerville108d ago (Edited 108d ago )

It's not like MS has been securing third party deals near monthly in years by now.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 108d ago
Lightning77109d ago

@Chris I did? Are you making things up? Show me where I said it was fine.

Christopher108d ago

I dunno, am I "everyone" from your comment?

109d ago Replies(1)
Lightning77108d ago

@Chris every including the media and fanboys complained hard about it. Only for Sony to turn around and do the exact same thing.

Idc personally games, are games but I'm just pointing out the hypocrisy.

@Ein "People complained that Microsoft was paying to keep a series that started on PlayStation off PlayStation"

Huh? Games like Street Fighter didn't start on PS neither did FF. FF started on Nintendo wtf. Stellar Blade was multiplat originally announced for Xbox until Sony took over and canceled the Xbox version.

108d ago
Flawlessmic108d ago

You mean like xbox fans cry about Sony's timed or other wise exclusives ?
At the end of the day who cares what the cry baby's from either side are crying about.

From Ms and Sony's perspective they need to look after there own consumer base, simple as that, let the other side cry.

My point was Sony's looks after its consumers consistently by hook or by crook Sony gamers and left hanging very very rarely.

Ms on the other hand so worried about perceived perception rather than looking after there gamers.

Moot point anyway, Ms have a rediculous amount of studios now so it's a none issue.

Was just pointing out the difference.

Christopher108d ago

***Idc personally games, are games but I'm just pointing out the hypocrisy. ***

I was also pointing out the hypocrisy. Just not the one you were focused on, the hypocrisy of the other side. I'm not saying what you're saying is wrong, only you tend to only focus on one side of the fence, not both.

Lightning77108d ago (Edited 108d ago )

"That's great you should always point out hypocrisy, problem is you only ever point out the hypocrisy of one side yet use terms like fanboy as if what you're doing doesn't apply to that moniker."

Well If you're talking about this site I see more hypocritical statements from one side more than any other fanbase Don't get mad at me that's the nature of things here. Twitter's more 50 50.

"You also ask people to prove and show you were they get their information from a lot but you yourself never offer the same. "

Depends on the information but I always post links and facts. If y'all choose to ignore them, then that's on you. Outta mind, outta site mentality. The fact that y'all think FF started on PS is beyond laughable and I shouldn't even have to provide a link. Sure let's pretend Sony invented gaming and everything. They invented Halo and Mario while we're at it. These are the ppl I have to deal with....

"Doubling down on your "everyone" comment with "every including the media and fanboys" doesn't provide any legitimacy to your claim."

https://medium.com/@ahacsed...

https://kotaku.com/people-a...
https://leaderpost.com/ente...

Theres more but this should give you an idea. Do I need to link N4G's reaction I definitely can lol. You know what lets do it.
https://n4g.com/news/156648...

Pepole here tried justifying by saying "oh it's online trolls in general" When the PS fanbase were the most up and arms about this easily because the game started on PS. Zero accountability for their actions just excuses.

Anyway You were saying about not having facts. You probably won't remember, just ignore them and tell me how I don't provide facts in some other post the next day.

@Flawless I feel ya. The visceral attacks from back then aren't around these days whenever Xbox does timed stuff. Hey the issue was MS never invested in their studios back then, just trying to buy out exclusive games. Which is weird because MS did it back during the 360 and there was no issues.

Lightning77108d ago (Edited 108d ago )

@Chris what hypocrisy? Did you provide? Ok give me examples of Xbox fanboys being hypocritical? There's lots out there from the Sony base to take from. I point them out because they're abundant in there hypocritical stances then switch up on dime to keep their narrative.

I'm Thinking myself what they've been hypocritical about.

I got one, Xbox fanboys downplayed the importance of exclusives for well over 10 years, they have some, now suddenly exclusives are the most important thing in the world. There's 2 sides this though, who hyped exclusives to be the end all be all in the first place? Which fanbase bragged to death and back about having exckusives? You can't talk about one with out the other. Only difference is PS fans are way more vocal about those things and sets these standards themselves. They need to be 1st party, they need to be built from the ground up, it needs to be new IP every once in awhile, it needs to be high meta, sell X, Y, Z amount. I've heard all this from PS fans in the past 10+ years. I dont know what to tell you, I dunno why deny it? But sure that's still stands in some regards tho, Xbox fans still downplayed exclusives as none factor or importance they're still guilty, and hyping AA exclusives games then turn around and say the AA Sony has are not important. The biggest hypocrisy there from Xbox fans that I can think of.

Outside_ofthe_Box108d ago (Edited 108d ago )

***"There's 2 sides this though, who hyped exclusives to be the end all be all in the first place? Which fanbase bragged to death and back about having exckusives? You can't talk about one with out the other. Only difference is PS fans are way more vocal about those things and sets these standards themselves. They need to be 1st party, they need to be built from the ground up, it needs to be new IP every once in awhile, it needs to be high meta, sell X, Y, Z amount. I've heard all this from PS fans in the past 10+ years. I dont know what to tell you, I dunno why deny it?"***

You have to go back further than 10 years buddy. Everything that's is toxic today was started by Xbox fans during the 360 era.

The PS3 had very few notable exclusives it's first two years out. Guess what the Xbox fans said about the PS3? "The PS3 has no games" When PS fans throw it back at their face during Xbox One era, what is the response? "Multiplats are games too" "Exclusives aren't the end all be all" etc.

Multiplats ran better on the 360 for most of that generation. Guess what Xbox fans proudly boasted about? You guested it, "having superior multiplats". Now here comes resolution gate for Xbox One era. Guess the responses? "Play games not resolution" "It's the same game on both consoles" etc

The 360 had an early lead on global sales due to coming out a year early and dominated the US in sales. All of sudden NDP and VGchartz was the most anticipated articles every month. Well do I need to tell how things are in regards to the following generation?

Looking at how very different people were during PS360 and fast forward to now during PS5-Series, you learn that both sides flip-flop because of blind loyalty and trying to call out one side is pointless and isn't going change anything. If PlayStation came out tomorrow and said we're realsing all of our games on other platforms within a 1-2 year window after they release on PS first, you see all the blind loyalist come up with ways of why it's a great idea. If Phil came out tomorrow and said they making all their games including those from recent acquisitions exclusive all of a sudden high dev costs and expanding their reach and smart business sense wouldn't matter anymore.

You better off focusing on those who pretend to be above fanboy nonsense but still flipflop on their stances despite being "neutral" and owning all consoles...

gold_drake108d ago (Edited 108d ago )

thats exactly what i thought too, like they made sure exclusives are still coming out like

Petebloodyonion108d ago (Edited 108d ago )

I love to see how ppl have 0 knowledge of how business works.
"they were unwilling to compensate that by securing 3rd party deal to ensure they looked after us gamers and instead gave me no reason to turn on my xsx"

Do you expect that Capcom, SE, GTA, 2K, etc are willing to sacrifice 60% of their consumer base and sour their relationship with Sony for a paycheck in regards to AAA IP?

Just like MS can easily buy a publisher with money and Sony Can't
Sony can easily secure deals due to the huge market share they control by pushing for a lower cut or paying for sales loss on other platforms.

Just to show my point about how strong is Sony's dominance.
They are charging companies for crossplay in regard to potential losses (similar to what Apple wants to do)
Something that Nintendo and MS will not do.

Flawlessmic107d ago

I expect Microsoft to use the trillions of dollars it has available to them to secure exclusives if there is nothing coming from first party

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 107d ago
XiNatsuDragnel109d ago

Sony is smarter with there studios unlike Microsoft rn.

jimbo676109d ago

You can damage control all you want. Not gonna help their stock price which is crashing.

F0XH0UND922108d ago

Found the dude that has no idea how the stock market works lmao

RedDevils108d ago

Funny thing he better go educate himself for some finance, it might help get a bit richer than he is now.

109d ago Replies(3)
108d ago Replies(6)
Eonjay109d ago

Yeah, I'm sure Sony wants to get out more 1st party games, but I'm kinda stacked right now with their Second and Third party games. This month for me has been Gran Blue Fantasy, Helldivers 2 and I will be getting FF7: Rebirth. I will be trying Rise of Ronin in March and Stellar Blade in April. Just will those game alone, I should be pretty busy until June easily.

darthv72109d ago

Stellar blade for me as well.

MrNinosan108d ago

For me it's Granblue, Helldivers 2, Pacific Drive and Rebirth in February (and maybe Ultros), then Rise of the Ronin and (Dragons Dogma 2) in March, Stellar Blade in April and probably something else I've forgot.

tay8701108d ago

Playstation 1st party studios are some of the best in the and utterly destroy xboxs. That being said I have bought alot of 2nd/3rd part games already for playstation. So far this yr i have bought linfinite wealth, FF7 rebirth, rise of the ronin, pacific drive and stellar blade. all except infinite wealth are exclusives. Sony stepped up big time to full the gaps. Still mulling over picking up gran blue fantasy as well

jimb0j0nes109d ago

Crazy strong first half of the year, bit worried about the second half though...

raWfodog109d ago

No backlogs to catch up on? I’ll never run out of games to play as my backlog is easily a dozen games, at least.

franwex108d ago

There’s always third party games too. I know the argument here is regarding exclusive content, but you get first party and third party stuff. So even if there’s no good first party, you can still enjoy third party. Most Xbox owners have, lol.

tay8701108d ago

Don't be, still have many exclusives coming in the latter part of the yr. Concord, silent hill 2, a.i. limit, forever skies to name a few. Also could see convallaria, lost souls aside, phantom blade zero. Rumor is that a new astrobot game might release late this yr too. Plenty of great multiplat games releasing later this yr as well. We won't be starving for games by any means. :-)

109d ago
Show all comments (74)
210°

Final Fantasy VII Rebirth Combat Director Wants Final Part To Offer Players "Even More Freedom"

The Final Fantasy VII Rebirth combat director has expressed that he wants the final part in the trilogy to offer players "even more freedom".

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
gold_drake6d ago

i wonder if where gonna be able to jump

EternalTitan5d ago

Well its not an action game.
Even Elden Ring added jumping as an evolution of the combat system since Dark Souls did not feature jumping.
I want jumping as much as the next action game fan but this isnt that type of game.

gold_drake5d ago

i didnt say i wanted it.

i said "i wonder".

and part 3 could literally be anything they want it to be.

Cacabunga5d ago

I will certainly buy it. I really like the complex world and story of FF7.

TheEroica5d ago

I was wondering if the game will make a profit?

-Foxtrot6d ago

I love the game so far but please don’t make the final part a mini game fest

Everytime I get to a new part in Rebirth it’s “mini game time”

Inverno5d ago

Hope ya don't mind me asking since it seems like you've played it, did it feel like a decent step up from the last game or was it more like the best from the last but more polished?

CS75d ago

It makes Remake feel like a demo.

9.5/10 imo. And I think the “mini games” did a great job of adding variety to the gameplay. Purely optional as well.

-Foxtrot5d ago

Here's my thoughts

I think it's a big step up from the first instalment, I'm enjoying it way more.

I thought keeping it just in Midgar was silly, it felt dragged out and it didn't have much variation in terms of the scenery.

However with Rebirth, as soon as you get out of Kalm you have a big world to explore and it's great to just wander round and explore.

Now that I'm half way in though, despite still liking what I'm playing, the gameplay loop is now starting to slow down on me. I've got to a new region and I'm like "Yaaay...need to go and find those towers again, oh look another special beast marker, is that a bird I see in the distance? Better follow it to another Mako Crystal"

It's like....you know how Peter Jackson was only supposed to have two Hobbit films then Warner Bros wanted a third film so he stretched the second film out as much as he could so he could keep stuff for the third film making a trilogy? Yeah it feels like that, so these mini games are a part of that overall gameplay loop to keep us going and stretch the game out overall so they have something for the third and final game.

I personally think you could have had the first instalment get you out of Midgar and through to Grasslands / Junon and the second game finishes things off.

shinoff21833d ago

If your referring to ff16, rebirth was 1000 times better. It also felt like an rpg. It wasn't as dumbed down as 16 either.

Becuzisaid5d ago (Edited 5d ago )

I had a weird cycle of love/hate for all the mini games as I played through. At first I really hated the seeming need to check all these boxes while exploring the grasslands. I didn't enjoy the Gilgamesh quest initially, and thought Queen's blood was fine but didn't want to commit to it. The side quests didn't really grab me either.

Then for some reason everything in Junon region changed my mind and I did pretty much everything. I liked most of the side quests, I actually liked playing fort condor (didn't care for it in the intergrade dlc). And my interest for completing these quests stayed pretty much through to Cosmo Canyon.

Then they added that horrible Lifestream memory/battle mini game and I started getting so burnt out of it all. I just wanted to do the story. I didn't do any side quests in neibleheim and beyond except for the summon. I abandoned Gilgamesh.

So what I'm saying is I would like the third part to go back to the focused progression from remake. Keep the mini games to the gold saucer. Start the game snowboarding if you want, but from there keep the story rolling.

-Foxtrot5d ago

That's funny you say that because I did everything in the Grasslands but once in Junon I started to slow down a little until Corel where by the end I was burnt out. I'm still currently going but I'm just doing what I can while things keep getting thrown at me.

I would have preferred half of these mini game side fillers / collectibles for some really beefy side quests that really adds onto the world of FFVII.

Inverno5d ago

Sounds like they hadn't really figured out what they wanted to do with Remake and this one is more of what they thought of doing which is probably why they're dragging it out to make a trilogy. Disappointed to hear it has towers cause man do i hate towers lol. It's been a while since I've played the first and it'll be a while longer to play the sequel, but it sounds like I'll enjoy it. 7 really impressed me especially after being disappointed with 15, felt like Square finally realized that FF was THEIR big franchise again.

Tacoboto5d ago

How many hours are you into it at this point?

My friend got like 20-30 in and pretty much quit because of its mini game era. He loved and basically binged through Gran Blue compared to Rebirth

-Foxtrot5d ago

I'm half way through at the moment roughly. Still have a bit to go.

It's hard because if I see thing on the map to complete I feel compelled to do them despite being burned out from it all.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 3d ago
MetroidFREAK215d ago

As long as it comes out on PS5 to have the entire series on one platform, do whatever you want

franwex5d ago

The combat is my favorite thing about Rebirth. Would be really cool if they can improve it even more.

Knightofelemia5d ago

I hope after FF7 Square will either give a new FF game the remake treatment. Or give some of their older titles a remake treatment like Chrono Trigger, Chrono Cross, even Xenogears.

FinalFantasyFanatic5d ago

I'd rather just a remaster/port to modern systems, if any game deserved the remake treatment, it would be Xenogears, but I don't trust SE to do it, especially if Takahashi isn't on board to flesh out that second disc.

Miraak82 5d ago

I'm sure SE can pull it off without him , SE has pretty good writers and have been putting out bangers for a while now plus they probably have inside material and perfect works to reference from to expand the story .
Would just need someone to champion the project .

Saw this the other day pop up on my suggested https://www.youtube.com/wat... . It's a nice form of reference to how I'd like a remake to look like ,

jznrpg5d ago (Edited 5d ago )

Vagrant Story !!! Or XenoGears second choice

Show all comments (27)
160°

Stellar Blade Dev Teases More Suits & Content Updates, Discusses Sequel Plans

Stellar Blade developer Shift Up has teased more suits and future content updates, and has also discussed plans for a sequel.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
thesoftware7307d ago

This game reminds me of when my daughter used to play the Bratz dress-up game on the Gamecube.

VersusDMC7d ago

Pretty sure in the bratzs game you also finish off a boss by cutting off it's arms and impaling it to a wall. Both games are well know for their violence. 🙃🤣

thesoftware7307d ago

People seem more excited about the cute dress-up outfits rather than the actual game.

CrimsonWing697d ago

@thesoftware730

So, games with alternate costumes like fighting games, games like Resident Evil, Devil May Cry, hell let’s say the Souls-like games when you’re choosing cool looking sh*t for builds and crap ton of other games that do this are like the Bratz game?

Like, why in the f*ck do people get all douchey when a game is about titillation. You play Halo or anything? Do you like “dressing up” Chief? I guarantee you this wouldn’t be a response for Street Fighter 6 season pass costumes. I enjoyed running through RE4 Remake with different costumes, not once did I think it’s “dress-up.”

I know you thought you were being clever with the snarky comment, but instead you just sh*t the bed with it. Devil May Cry must also be like Bratz with the alternate outfits… Geezus, sometimes I just can’t with the comment diarrhea some people spray on this site.

thesoftware7307d ago

They both have a lot of cute outfits with which to dress up your avatar.

DarXyde7d ago

I'm guessing because it's another game that you wanna play, but your pride won't let you...?

thesoftware7307d ago

So?...err, I mean No!

Nah, my backlog is too big at the moment, and the demo was just ok for me.

I won't get it anytime soon unless my daughter wants to play a dress-up video game again. It would be kind of strange as she is 28 years old, lol.

Hypertension1407d ago (Edited 7d ago )

@thesoftware730
You backlog doesn't seem to be an issue when Xbox release a game.

Tust me, this game is amazing. It's better than anything Xbox has put out this generation.

The demo is barely scratching the surface.

thesoftware7307d ago

@Versus,

No, but I think that sounds awesome because the Bratzs sucked, so dismembering them in a game may have been fun.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 7d ago
100°

Stellar Blade Tops Circana April Charts

The latest US sales data is out, and while hardware may be down for the big 3, software is ruling the day, including Stellar Blade topping the charts

Read Full Story >>
gamersocialclub.ca
helicoptergirl8d ago

Must be weird for Xbox fans to see Sea Of Thieves at number 4 on the NPD charts

ravens528d ago

The "best selling" game!?!? Lol. The narratives, I swear.

PhillyDonJawn7d ago

No it's more funny than weird. Cause ps fans swore SoT was bad and didn't interest them at all 😂

helicoptergirl7d ago

Everyone knows a game can change in 6 years. The beta testers on xbox one are apparently laughing so you tell me. Well the definitive edition players look to be enjoying themselves. Thanks for your service

PhillyDonJawn6d ago

"A game can change in 6 years" 😂 no game ever.

CrimsonWing698d ago

Well, would you look at that Sony! Guess there’s an audience after all for this stuff.

JEECE8d ago

I wonder where the change from "NPD" to "Circana" ranks on the chart of lamest rebrands? And yes I know it changed awhile ago it just annoys me every time I see it.

anast7d ago

People like this game, despite the big puritan push against it.

Hugodastrevas7d ago

Stellar Blade deserves it, it's just a gorgeous well-optomized working right out of the box game. Would plat all over again.

Show all comments (10)