400°

The 2019 Bethesda E3 Showcase - LIVE on June 9th @ 5:30pm PT

Yes, Twitch Drops are back for those that tune in and watch the showcase on Twitch.tv/Bethesda. This year we have amazing items for three titles: The Elder Scrolls Online, The Elder Scrolls: Legends and RAGE 2!

The Elder Scrolls Online

Watch the BE3 Showcase and earn five Ouroboros Crown Crates and a Clouded-Senche Leopard mount for ESO! Your five Ouroboros Crown Crates and Clouded-Senche Leopard will be delivered in game by June 19. There are two ways to qualify:
PC/Mac players – On elderscrollsonline.com, link your ESO account on with your Twitch account, then log into Twitch on June 9 and watch the BE3 Showcase on the Bethesda Twitch channel.
Xbox One & PlayStation 4 players – Log into ESO on June 9 between 3pm EDT and 11pm EDT and kill any one monster in the game.

E3 Primer ESODrop

RAGE 2 – Get the exclusive Twitch Assault Rifle skin just for tuning into the Showcase on June 9. You’ll receive your skin during the week of E3.

The Elder Scrolls: Legends – Crush your opponents in style with the all-new, exclusive Ancestor Moth card back! Watch the Showcase on June 9 and you’ll receive your new card back during the week of E3.

E3 Primer LegendsRAGE

In addition to Drops, we will once again also be doing Trivia/Polls/Announcements through our Bethesda Twitch Extension. The fun and games will start happening on the channel 90 minutes before the show starts.

Platformgamer1814d ago

i want the evil within 3, nothing else

Christopher1814d ago

Please stand by for 3 hours of Skyrim, coming February 2020.

LOGICWINS1814d ago

Evil Within 1/2 and Dishonored 1/2 Switch ports would make me happy, but my wallet sad.

-Foxtrot1814d ago (Edited 1814d ago )

Same

I feel like the intro is giving us a "I'm Sorry" vibe even Pete is giving us the "you are everything to us" bullshit speech. Just say "WE'RE SORRY FOR FALLOUT 76"

The planted crowd by them, mostly the developers, is really sickening cheering Todd on as he makes jokes about it

NarutoFox1814d ago (Edited 1814d ago )

I guess you're going to be disappointed. Ghostwire is their next game.

Platformgamer1814d ago

i am... i'm so infuriated right now.
and the fake audience is getting me really nervous i want to punch them in the face.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1814d ago
jznrpg1814d ago (Edited 1814d ago )

I didn’t think it was possible but Bethesda could win E3 . MS was horrible besides the multiplats of Cyberpunk and Tales and Elden Ring but you can’t count Multiplats towards MS’s show . I want Elder Scrolls 6 but it isn’t suppose to be there so Evil Within 3 is all I can think of .

phoenixwing1814d ago

They could win E3 but that would mean that Square Enix drops the ball when their conference comes. Which is possible.

Christopher1814d ago

I'm surprised people are calling MS horrible. They didn't break any records, but they showed a lot of games coming that they now own, announced they own even more, and shared enough about the future to keep people enticed. Why are we negging on them showing us third-party games that we want to play? Not like Sony was there to show those games, so someone had to.

phoenixwing1814d ago (Edited 1814d ago )

@christopher

the games were going to release regardless and as for the exposure they would have released a trailer sometime anyway as well. Only the indies really need E3 tbh people don't appreciate indies as much as AAA games though.

Edit: I will give credit where it's due though, and say that the Double Fine buyout was probably the highlight of the show for them. That's a good stream of new interesting games or at least possible new interesting games.

Christopher1814d ago

***the games were going to release regardless and as for the exposure they would have released a trailer sometime anyway as well.***

But it's not like they didn't show alongside a ton of exclusives. Why criticise those at all when it wasn't all they had? It's just like every other conference and something we praise Sony for in the past.

rainslacker1814d ago (Edited 1814d ago )

Bethesda usually has some good shows, so it's not that surprising. They always talk themselves down based on the trends of the year of where they screwed up. As soon as I write that, Tood Howard made a joke about the negative press they've gotten, and is talking about FO76. The showings themselves are usually pretty good though.

It's usually after the conferences they screw things up....typically also headed by Tood Howard.

I'm putting my money on Square Enix though. They have a lot of potential things they could show which would be big, and FF7 release date would be big if it's as soon as next year, coupled with a solid game play showing.

Edit: Not two minutes after I submit this, they go into a mobile game. So, maybe I spoke too soon.

SegaGamer1814d ago

I wonder how much BS Todd Howard will come out with this year.

phoenixwing1814d ago

Yeah that's the sad thing. Gonna have to make sure i'm impressed with actual gameplay because Todd Howard's descriptions are pure bull crap. He tried to make out fallout 76 to be a grand adventure with his descriptions.

Relientk771814d ago

I'm going in with very low expectations

If they show Dishonored 3 though, I am gonna lose my sh**

001814d ago

can't wait for these sweet sweet lies

Show all comments (75)
150°

Resident Evil Zero and Code Veronica Remakes are reportedly in the works, not Resident Evil 1

Industry insider Dusk Golem reveals that there is no Resident Evil 1 Remake in the works. Instead, Capcom are reportedly in active development of Resident Evil Zero and Code Veronica.

-Foxtrot1d 4h ago

RE Zero would be better to do first over RE1 because they can tie the story into RE1 more.

The original RE Remake was weird because Rebecca never mentioned anything about what happened in Zero and it felt so disjointed because Zero was developed during the Remake and they clearly didn't share any notes with one another.

Cacabunga2h ago

Wise decision. 2 of my favorites!

Knightofelemia1d 1h ago

Give me Dino Crisis dammit Capcom

TGG_overlord7h ago

And all it took was +24 years + a phone call from me lol.

Show all comments (12)
70°

Limited Run Games reveal physical console editions of Clock Tower: Rewind

Love survival horror? Love physical editions of games? Limited Run Games have got your back as they reveal a physical collection for Clock Tower: Rewind on Xbox, Switch, PlayStation and PC.

Read Full Story >>
thexboxhub.com
Hugodastrevas4d ago

Still waiting for the physical release of Tomba!

150°

10 Biggest Xbox Mistakes of All Time (So Far)

The Xbox brand has done a lot of good over the years, but their various blunders are pretty wild to look back on in their magnitude.

Read Full Story >>
culturedvultures.com
piroh4d ago (Edited 4d ago )

Ironically number 9 can save them at this point (releasing games on multiple platforms)

ChasterMies2d ago

By “save them” you mean make more profit for Microsoft. Xbox will still be a dying hardware platform.

OtterX3d ago

You could add the naming scheme for the consoles, it just confuses customers. I know they wanted to avoid traditional numbering bc it would always be lower than their competitor, but this whole 360 then One then Series thing is confusing af. Imagine a Soccer Mom trying to figure this stuff out. I still mistakenly call the Series X the One from time to time on accident.

RNTody3d ago

Don't forget about the Xbox One, Xbox One X and Xbox Series X! Good luck to Soccer moms around the world.

S2Killinit2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

They did that on purpose to confuse and direct attention away from the generational numbering.

MS doesn’t like reminding people that they joined the industry after others had already been involved in gaming.

For instance, they called the xbox “360” to combat PlayStation “3” because they wanted to seem like “more” than “3”, so instead of xbox 2, they opted for xbox 360. Also this had the additional benefit of selling consoles to uninformed parents who might purchase a “360” instead of a “3” by mistake, or because they thought 360 was more than 3. Kind of a disingenuous move.

They have been continuing with their confusing naming patterns for pretty much the same reasons. Frankly, it fits with who and what they are as a brand.

FinalFantasyFanatic2d ago

I can understand their reasoning, but whoever came up with that naming scheme should be fired, bad naming schemes have killed consoles (I'm pretty sure it was the major reason for the downfall of the WiiU). They should have had unqiue names like Nintendo and Sega have had for their consoles, far less confusing for the consumer.

Cacabunga3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

Phil Spencer is the worst that has happened to Xbox.
They built a respectable brand up to Xbox one. Then this guy took over and things became a joke

Reaper22_3d ago

He still has his job. Something you can't say about Jim Ryan.

Cacabunga3d ago

Both bad execs. One is on job and one thankfully retired.

FinalFantasyFanatic2d ago (Edited 2d ago )

I didn't like either person, both people damaged their respective brands and produced worse outcomes, but Phil did save the Xbox brand from being retired by Microsoft. Although in hindsight, he should have just let it die, rather than languish in limbo like it is now.

Rainbowcookie1d 16h ago

Yeah but the one that was "bad" didn't even affect sales.

bunt-custardly3d ago

Phil Spencer was also on the team back when 360 was around, alongside Shane Kim, Peter Moore etc. I think the damage that did the most harm was the Don Mattrick "Always Online" console (ahead of its time basically). They handed Sony and Nintendo a free-pass when that was revealed. It went downhill from there. Then the corporate machine went into full swing to try and recover. They have to a degree as a games company for the masses, and less so for the core gamer. Outside USA, the Xbox brand does not sell as well as Japanese based consoles (citation needed).

Cacabunga3d ago

Want a decision maker. The always online and TV plans was a disaster yes, but they caught up by announcing 1st party games that gamers actually kept the hype going.. until this moron took over and introduced the PC day one release.. e all know where that ended..

S2Killinit2d ago

I dont think they were ever a respectable brand, not since the beginning, when their goal was never to be involved and share in the gaming space. I think the OG xbox was an exception because MS as a brand was still getting its foot in and so the people behind that were people of the gaming industry.

FinalFantasyFanatic2d ago

The 360 was the brand in its prime though, everything went downhill towards the end of that generation. Its staple games like Halo, Forza and Gears are what kept the console relevant and afloat for so long.

MaximusPrime_3d ago

Really good video.

I remember the days with RRoD was big news on here, N4G.

Microsoft had it turbulence number of years.

Looking at the success of Sea of Thieves despite being 6 years old, time to release Halo, Forza horizon 4 & 5 on PS5. It'll help their revenue

shinoff21833d ago (Edited 3d ago )

2 of the 4 games they did already sold really well. So it's definitely going down. Idk about halo or forza but I feel those studios they've bought in the last 5 years, their coming

ChasterMies3d ago

I found this video painful to watch. Can someone list them out?

Top 10 for me from are:
1. 2013 reveal presentation
2. Bundling Kinect 2 with Xbox One
3. RRoD or why rushing to market with hardware is always a bad idea.
4. Buying studios only to close them.
5. Ads on the Home Screen
6. Letting Halo die.
7. Letting Geard of War die.
8. Every console name
9. Charging for Xbox Live on Xbox 360 when Sony let PS3 players play online for free.
10. Cancelling release of OG Xbox games after the Xbox 360 launched.

Show all comments (30)