750°

Nvidia GF100: Video-Leak shows real-time ray tracing, tessellation and Far Cry 2

Three Nvidia GF100 vids leaked out: The videos shows real-time ray tracing, tessellation-water-features and a performance test with the ego-shooter Far Cry 2.

Nihilism5249d ago (Edited 5249d ago )

Looking good, I benched my GTX280 to compare, 55 frame average at those settings, they got 84.1 frame average, aka 66% performance increase and that's only the gtx360...

Thank god for a tax refund coming my way soon.

I heard that the Fermi NDAs end at "9pm", don't know if that's GMT or what, but either way, we should have some kind of solid performance figures by tomorrow, or maybe just a lot more speculation :S

I'm sick of the speculation, so lets hope for the best.

jmd7495249d ago

not bad for a mid-range card. the ray-tracing framerate increase made me lol, from 0.23fps to 0.62fps. :P

i'm gonna hold on to my GTX295 for as long as i can.

Kurylo3d5249d ago

Im waiting for it to come out so i can get a new computer. My current machine has 2 gtx 260s.

For my work though the prospect of a C GPU is awesome. Plus direct x 11 i want lol.

JsonHenry5249d ago

I was thinking the same thing. Time to (possibly) upgrade! I have a new HD 5870 that I am totally willing to sell if Fermi is a better part.

Now my real conundrum is if I am going AMD Phenom II or a cheap i7 in my next build. I know the i7 is faster, but for the money I have no noticed that much of a difference. (everything is more expensive for the i7, triple channel RAM, the intel MBs are crazy expensive too)

Nihilism5249d ago (Edited 5249d ago )

Don't believe the hype, the CGPU stuff is only for programs that are made to use it, you won't see automatic hardware acceleration in any programs, so essentially 99% of people will never even see that function in use.

But I agree about DX11, a lot of good games using it coming out, that's the real question though isn't it, how well it runs games in DX11, although the farcry 2 benchmark is of interest to me because I love that game and plan to get a 120hz monitor so I can play it with a fermi card at 120 frames with vsync, and even it it cant quite make that, it will at least be better than 60 frames

gaffyh5249d ago

Wow, quite a noticeable difference. Will have to think about upgrading soon, but I probably will upgrade my whole computer when I need to. My 9600GT is good enough for most games at the moment.

TheIneffableBob5249d ago

Since the time was revealed by a person in California, that 9 PM is likely PST, so 12 AM EST.

Kakkoii5249d ago

@jmd749:

Well you have to look at the ray-tracing speed increase in terms of % increase. It's performing the ray-tracing 260% faster. As the number becomes larger, the amount of FPS increase from the % increase becomes exponentially more.

@dchalfont:
Well the thing is, Nvidia worked really hard to implement Fermi support in the upcoming version of Visual C++. So developers will VERY easily be able to open their source code and port it to run on your 300 series and up GPU's. It takes a very minimal amount of modification to do. So you will see at least a few companies releasing versions of their app's that support Fermi GPU acceleration in 2010. And years on from there it should hopefully pick up speed. "Hopefully".

ChrisW5248d ago (Edited 5248d ago )

Which is extremely NICE!!!

But, I opted for the gtx275 over the gtx285 because I found not enough difference between the two to warrant an extra $100 on Tom's Hardware benchmarks:
http://www.tomshardware.com...

As for the gtx295, $500+ is a bit steep for me.

I'll probably upgrade in about two years when the next-next gen graphics card hits "just-below" $300.

+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 5248d ago
ChickeyCantor5249d ago

A video of a video of a video, LOL?

Nihilism5249d ago

OMFG *blue shift takes place*

phosphor1125249d ago

They don't exist anymore apparently.

Pandamobile5249d ago

The videos were removed from Vimeo.

Letros5249d ago

Nice job Nvidia, won't be long before they ship now.

hoops5248d ago

March or April they will be coming. Can't ait to see independaent bench marks from various sits

zaz125249d ago

nice,but i'm gonna hold on to my GTX260 till the end of the year. I may end up building a complete new rig with "gtx 380".

BX815249d ago

So, this will work with my commodore 64 correct? I'm not too late am I guys?

mrv3215249d ago

I believe the commodore64 has one built in it just needs a new firmware to use it.

commodore645248d ago

The Commodore64 cannot be improved.
It's already perfect.

Show all comments (50)
90°

Which Far Cry Should I Start With? - A Beginner's Guide 2023

If you’re new to this long-running franchise, we’ve got you covered.

Read Full Story >>
gameluster.com
masterfox445d ago

Farcry 3 and literally thats it! lol

GamingSinceForever444d ago (Edited 444d ago )

I recently tried 3 for the first time but the frame rate was a turnoff.

I liked 5 and 6 though.

banger88443d ago

If you have a Series X or S, the Xbox 360 version runs at 60 fps with fps boost. It's a shame the remaster doesn't.

isarai445d ago

2 and 3, pretty much the only ones i really enjoyed. 1 was amazing for the time but aged quite poorly. 4 has the elephant gun, all i can praise from any entry after 3 lol

cooperdnizzle444d ago

Ummmm 3 than stop.

Okay maybe two as well. But yeah probably 3 and then move on.

JEECE444d ago (Edited 444d ago )

Far Cry 2. People constantly rant about games now being too easy, holding your hand, having too many unnecessary RPG-lite leveling features, etc. People specifically complain about open world games being too focused on tons of collectibles and "checkmarks" that just waste time.

Far Cry 2 is an answer to all of those complaints. It was made by Ubisoft before they fell into all the traps discussed above (and before they started inserting towers into their games to defog the map). It has respawning enemies, weapons that degrade, and the collectible diamonds are very useful in the game (which you find in a similar way to the way you find shrines in BOTW with a radar system). The map you have is an in game item you pull out while playing, not a pause menu that is unnecessarily detailed. Also the enemy AI and physics are much better than later entries in the series.

It has a mixed reputation because people at the time said it was too hard, the weapon degradation was annoying, and then respawning enemies were annoying. FC2 came out in 2008, so this was before games like Dark Souls and BOTW had come out and made it cool to like these types of features.

XbladeTeddy443d ago

Far Cry 2, the one with the AI that find you through walls and trees, can one shot you from a mile away and have 100% accuracy? That was frustrating not fun because cheap AI.

JEECE443d ago (Edited 443d ago )

Uhh, I mean, it isn't one of these games where once the enemies have detected you they will magically forget you exist because you walked behind a wall or went into a bush. And yeah the AI isn't stormtrooper level accuracy. Again, these are positives, not negatives to me.

To be fair, I'm really directing this at the people most critical of "Modern Ubisoft" or "Modern Open World" design elements. Like the type of people who fawned all over Elden Ring because it had a clean UI because they are so burnt out by the "checkbox" type of open world design.

If you like those types of games, then a later FC game like 3 and especially 4-5 would be more your style.

Show all comments (11)
220°

10 Old Games With Outstanding Graphics

GF365: "There are some games with extraordinary visuals that impress us to this day. Here are old games with outstanding graphics."

Read Full Story >>
gamefreaks365.com
ShwaaMan491d ago

Bioshock still looks fantastic, one of my all time favorites.

Yui_Suzumiya491d ago

Beyond: Two Souls on PS3 can compete with modern day graphics.

SonyStyled491d ago (Edited 491d ago )

Same as Killzone 2 and 3, uncharted 2 and 3, Infamous 2, Heavy Rain, Resistance 3

jasonismoney491d ago

I wish this was entirely true, but you might want to load up Killzone 2 and Resistance 3 again.

SonyStyled490d ago

@jason I watched some gameplay videos of KZ2 and R3 on my full screen. They are on par or succeed graphically to the first person shooters mentioned in the article that also launched on the seventh generation of consoles. Try the same and see what you think

cthulhucultist490d ago

Killzone 3 was super impressive! I could not believe the graphics back then as I was regularly pausing the game to stand in awe looking at the surroundings! Resistance however did not impress me that much. Heavy rain is also another amazing graphically speaking game. It almost felt next gen

Fist4achin491d ago

I always thought the first 3 Gears of War games looked great and still hold up for today.

SonyStyled491d ago

They did for their day. I recently played gears judgement with on the 360 and the draw distance was so blurry. The characters up close look great though

JEECE490d ago

Far Cry 2 was awesome. In addition to having demonstrably better physics and AI than later games in the series, it had a lot of design decisions that, criticized at the time, have since been praised in games like BOTW and Dark Souls.

iNcRiMiNaTi490d ago

It might not be super amazing by today's standard but I thought Mgs3 looked really good

JEECE490d ago

In terms of art style it still holds up.

Show all comments (13)
430°

Far Cry’s best game gets brutally realistic as mod remakes Ubisoft FPS

The Far Cry series’ best game – not Far Cry 6 – just got more brutal and realistic thanks a mod than revamps and remakes the classic Ubisoft open-world FPS

Read Full Story >>
pcgamesn.com
lonewolf10613d ago

Far Cry 2 where your guns never ever jammed until you got into a gunfight is their best? I disagree.

MIDGETonSTILTS17613d ago

I liked 3 more.

The malaria angle was more annoying than immersive.

And, the enemy AI had too good of eyesight to allow any stealth. They’d spot you a literal half mile away, I hated it.

lonewolf10613d ago

Yeah, some weird mechanics for sure, some did really enjoy it, I certainly didn't.

bloop612d ago (Edited 612d ago )

The map was designed badly and an absolute pain to navigate from what I can remember too. You ended up having to go to the same few places all the time and there was a huge inaccessible area between them that you had to go around.

It definitely had the best physics system of the entire franchise, but a lot of the mechanics took the enjoyment out of it.

LordoftheCritics613d ago

It was fun for its time but a bunch of those systems today won't survive a launch weekend.

Profchaos612d ago

I'd say it was their most ambitious and had the best setting to date next to the original island.

But gameplay wise it was clunky and maybe it was released to early if the teams had modern systems to build it on the game would have been much better less corridors more open and less gaurd outposts that auto regen

Knushwood Butt612d ago

How do you use guns when not in a gunfight? Shooting trees?

lonewolf10612d ago

Yes and you could do that for hours in FC2 with a gun and it wouldn't jam, not hard to grasp is it.

Knushwood Butt612d ago

I see.

I haven't spent hours shooting trees.

I must try it.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 612d ago
MajorLazer613d ago

Love Far Cry 2 on Infamous difficulty.

Hikoran613d ago

This should be an opinion piece. Not news.

Gwiz613d ago

Blood Dragon is much better.

Pedrof613d ago

Far Cry 2 may certainly not be the most "fun" game in the series but from a narrative standpoint it definitely is the most interesting of the bunch. FC2 couldn't be further away from the pointless fragfests that the following episodes turned out to be.

Show all comments (29)