With the turmoil in the games industry Xbox, but also PlayStation and Nintendo, are looking beyond the bastion of hardware exclusives to grow their brand.
Come celebrate the 1-year anniversary of Diablo IV and the 2-year anniversary of Diablo Immortal! There are heaps of rewards to mark these celebrations with a bounty of devilish goods across both games.
1 more month then I can celebrate 1 year since i stopped playing and uninstalled the game.
Tales of the Shire has many hurdles to jump to live up to the J.R.R. Tolkien masterpiece, and magical elements might be its most pertinent one.
"NACON and Big Ant Studios are today very proud and pleased to announce that "TIEBREAK: Official game of the ATP and WTA" will be released on 22 August 2024 for PlayStation®5, PlayStation®4, Xbox Series X|S, Xbox One and PC (Steam). The Nintendo Switch™ version will be launched at a later date." - NACON and Big Ant Studios.
***...and it’s becoming clear that there’s seemingly a consensus between both Playstation and Xbox that the entire industry is going through a recalibration. Starting with console “exclusives.”***
What is the consensus? One does day and date release on console and PC and is porting their games to competing platforms. The other does 2-year later PC ports of games to just Steam and has one past-exclusive on Xbox because of licensing demands.
I ask again, what is the consensus?
***The recalibration has been accelerated thanks to a massive wave of layoffs that has roiled the video game industry.***
What nonsense is this? The "recalibration" has been happening since the start of this generation, but now it's because of last year's layoffs?
***PlayStation, Xbox, and EA have drastically reduced their staff making headlines at every major gaming publication.***
Why is PlayStation always first in this statement of layoffs even though it has laid off fewer than the other two? And, again, how has something that has existed since the beginning of this generation being based on layoffs over the last year?
***PlayStation seems to agree as they’ve slashed console sales predictions for 2024, from 25 million to 21 million, and highlighted plans to be more aggressive with PlayStation game releases on PC.***
Which they've already been doing. This isn't new. He's just repeating what Jim Ryan said before him. And he didn't say be more aggressive, he said they would be proactive. That doesn't mean more aggressive.
***Gamers want more access in more places, and both Xbox and Playstation are ready to appease that request to meet their ballooning budgets, albeit in different ways. For Xbox, it’s releasing former console exclusives on rival hardware, while PlayStation is ramping up its PC porting business. That could mean fewer console exclusives as hardware sales forecasts are reduced, but more ways to play the games we love.***
Oh, so it's not a consensus. Thanks IGN.
___
What a poorly written article. It interjects comments on being risk-adverse with investments because of inflation, budgets, covid, etc. to talking about improving market reach potentials due to hardware not selling as much (but, still obviously selling enough for 2 out of 3 of them). It muddies the whole argument by throwing things together in a disorganized manner just to get kitchen sink quotes from people we've never heard of. Then it tries to sell this as a 'consensus' as if the goals of Xbox and PlayStation are the same. They're not. PlayStation still wants to focus on their hardware and reach further after 2 years on PC. Xbox wants everyone to stop having exclusives and put games everywhere because hardware is their weakest area of the business and they want to get in and stay on top of subscription model gaming.
This is not a consensus.
I thought the new consensus was it did not matter that PlayStation is not bringing their games to Xbox because if the Steam storefront ends up on Xbox they will get to play all PlayStation games anyway. Especially with MS going PC handheld, they will be able to play every game under the sun directly or through emulation when it comes to Nintendo. That’s the mindset I see everyone been saying for the past few weeks
Just because Xbox has failed they always have to say oh the others are also doing it, no they are not. Great games sell and that hasnt changed, if GP was a huge success XB would not need PS or Nintendo gamers to increase sales.
Subs do not work and when your backed with billions like xb and still cant make good games something is very wrong.
After the gaslighting and lies from IGN over stella blade i would like to see them and kotaku fade away
I highly doubt Nintendo will ever even consider bringing over Mario, Zelda, Metroid, etc. to PC. Maybe if they stopped focusing on piracy this or that we would have had some of their games on PC at this point. I have a OLED Switch but Nintendo really should consider the PC to. Sony and MS are doing their part and not worrying about that piracy bullshit. I believe this is what caused Nintendo to loose badly against Sony back in the N64/GC days. While you could have copied PS1 games later on with your PC Sony did not really care. If the N64 was CD based and the GC used real DVDs and played movies, things would have been a lot different. Nintendo could have been much closer to PlayStation or even tie it during those days. But Nintendo again lost that opportunity.
There are two ways to "win" in this world: by outperforming or by undermining. One is respectable; the other is pathetic.