460°

Why Players Are Angry With Apex Legends Microtransactions, Explained

Apex Legends is a free-to-play game with microtransactions for cosmetics, but they seem ridiculously priced.

Read Full Story >>
thegamer.com
Action GO FIGURE1930d ago

Are these players the 12 year olds who can't borrow mummy or daddy's credit card?

They're JUST skins.

81BX1930d ago

They are dicks about the skins though. You can unlock the limited skins with in game currency only after you purchase (with real $) the skin required to unlock it. Now there are base skins. Idc I'm not paying for crap

Action GO FIGURE1930d ago

Skins that offer no ingame advantage whatsoever. Complain about the MT pricing sure but don't forget this game was released for free.

SoulClaw1930d ago Show
frostypants1930d ago (Edited 1930d ago )

Then DON'T pay for them. Don't get them. What's the big deal? It's a FREE GAME and this stuff is cosmetic. They have to make their money somehow. People will whine about anything...the entitlement culture in gaming is so freaking laughable.

vallencer1930d ago

I can't stand this argument of "It's free so it's fine". Yeah it's free we all know that but just because it's free doesn't mean it has to be shit. Their microtransactions are garbage. 18 bucks for a cosmetic weapon skin is outrageous. Now I wouldn't care about the price if it wasn't for the fact that you only receive 45 free loot boxes which probably won't get you enough crafting mats to craft a legendary item. Then when you've received all the loot boxes there isn't any way for you to get more crafting mats without actually paying money for the boxes. It's a greedy scheme that forces players to spend money if they want something cool. It is legit a bad system.

81BX1930d ago

Lol why are people upset? I clearly stated I wasn't getting them. The fact still remains they are locked behind other skins. Argue facts not emotions gents!

frostypants1929d ago (Edited 1929d ago )

@vallencer: "18 bucks for a cosmetic weapon skin is outrageous. "

I agree...so DON'T BUY IT. What's so hard about this? Yes, they put a few super-rare skins out there for people who are willing to shell out for them. Those people are nuts, but hey...let them. This doesn't impact gameplay at all. Why is this so difficult to process? Do you feel some subconscious need to own every stupid skin in the game?

@vallencer: "It's a greedy scheme that forces players to spend money if they want something cool."

You just described every financial transaction ever. If you think the item is cool enough, you'll open your wallet. If you don't, you won't. Yeah, they want your money for some silly non-game-changing crap because they gave you 99% of the actual effort they put into the game for free. So freaking what? Again, your post screams "entitlement".

You people are going to ruin this for everyone, and we'll be back to paying $40-60 for games like Black Ops 4/Blackout where the developer begins to abandon it after a few months. All because you couldn't get over the fact that you couldn't have some stupid teal monkey glitter-tastic bedazzled disco camo skin (that nobody except you even really notices) for free.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 1929d ago
GottaBjimmyb1930d ago (Edited 1930d ago )

Free or full-price, any game with PTW microtransactions are just unacceptable to me.

However, on that same note, if the MTs are just for skins or cosmetics, I am 100% on board for either type of game (But especially a free one) as I don't participate in them, unless I really want to, but get all the benefits of the profits. Unlike Mobile games, most console and PC devs actually reinvest into expanding upon their games and making them better experiences.

Hard understand what the argument would be in complaining about any paid cosmetic in a free game, as you can just not buy them...

And I don't like this game at all.

starchild1930d ago

Very sensible perspective. I agree on all points. This childish kneejerk reaction some people have in demonizing all microtransactions makes no sense. Some take it so far that I've even seen some of them act like any kind of DLC is bad.

I, like you, am against pay to win type microtransactions, but beyond that I don't really have any issue with cosmetic microtransactions or DLC that adds further story/gameplay content.

Sirk7x1930d ago

Agreed. Don't like it, don't buy it. If paying money gives you a statistical, or any in-game advantage, then you're in shit country.

Palitera1930d ago (Edited 1930d ago )

Microtransactions wrecks the progression design in any game, whether you buy them or not.

End of discussion.

GottaBjimmyb1929d ago

Palitera, I play overwatch, rocket league and many other games where I unlock items almost every game, and have some of the best items without ever paying. In fact, many, even most of the items can be achieved without any money.

So end of discussion is hardly an argument, sounds more like you just have nothing to support your argument, but are unwilling to change it.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1929d ago
Rude-ro1930d ago

I remember we use to play games for rewards...
Now, the only reward is “you gave it your best” but pay for the rest.

GottaBjimmyb1930d ago

You still can unlock stuff (sometime everything) in almost every game with MTs... so not following your point.

UltraNova1930d ago

@above

Dude back then we didnt have to put in GOD knows how many grind hrs to unlock anything or everything if that was your choice. Today though if you want some unlockables in a game with MTs your screwed, especially if its a F2P game. So in that light, Rude-ro is right.

DerekTweed1930d ago

@UltraNova

Call of Duty 4: Modern Warfare had gold skins for some guns that required a lot of hours to get. For example the gold AK-47 required 150 headshot with every assault rifle, 1050 headshots, that took ages.

UltraNova1930d ago

Derek,

That was an Activision game though. In other words, I'm not surprised.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1930d ago
fr0sty1930d ago

One of the best uses of MT's in a FTP game I've seen so far. I've never felt obligated to spend a dime to get the "full experience".

Jin_Sakai1930d ago (Edited 1930d ago )

What angers me is how they charge for store items. The bare minimum store item cost 1,100 Apex Coins. So you’re required to spend minimum $20 for a gun skin. Then you’ll be 50 Apex coins shy of getting a second skin so you’ll have to spend an additional $10 to get a second skin.

I understand the game is F2P but these prices need adjustments!

Epic weapon skin.............1,100 Apex Coins
Legendary weapon skin...1,800 Apex Coins
Banner frame....................1,100 Apex Coins

Apex Coins cost:
1,000 $10
2,150 $20
4,350 $40
6,700 $60
11,500 $100

https://ibb.co/W2vg6B7

UltraNova1930d ago

Oldest MT tactic in the book. Anyhow, its F2P and progression is not tied to monetization - it depends on us the consumers 100% wether or not we buy those skins etc.

vallencer1930d ago

Yeah they really do need adjustment. I get they need to make money and obviously streamers are just throwing money at them so it probably won't change but it's insane. I wouldn't have as much of a problem if there was some way to receive crafting mats after you get the last free loot box. But the system is designed currently to force you to spend money on loot boxes if you want more items. It's broken and needs fixing.

--Onilink--1930d ago

The game might be free to play and the MTs optional and cosmetic, but if you dont think charging $18 for a weapon skin or $11 for a banner isnt just straight up abussive...then you must live in some kind of delusional world.

And lets not even mention that most prices are set just above what the currency packs are worth, in order to make people pay more.

Abusive practices need to called out, even if you are not directly affected by them, otherwise companies will continue to raise the ceiling on what they do with MTs until it does end up affecting you

Cobra9511930d ago

The game is "free"-to-play. Unlike full-priced games, I have no problems with MTs in F2P products. That's the only way they make money. Don't like them, don't play them. I don't play them at all. I don't support that business model; but clearly, many of you do. So take the bitter with the sweet.

TheSaint1930d ago

It's attitudes like yours that have led us to this point.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 1929d ago
Fluttershy771930d ago

The day I can no longer play a game without MT's (which sadly soon enough will come) will be the day I completely stop trying new releases and become full and exclusively retro

TK-551930d ago

"The day I can no longer play a game without MT's (which sadly soon enough will come)"

No it won't so stop being hyperbolic.

starchild1930d ago

Suit yourself. But there will always be games without microtransactions. And I don't see what the issue is with microtransactions beyond the pay to win variety, which I honestly haven't run across very much. In most games that have cosmetic microtransactions I am barely aware they are even there as an option and then I ignore them and I haven't felt like they hurt my experience in those games. I've never paid for a cosmetic microtransaction item, but I've bought a number of DLC expansions and nearly always felt like I got my money's worth.

PoSTedUP1930d ago

Ill buy dlc if I feel the main game was sold to me complete. I will buy cosmetics too if their are enough guns in the game originally and/or they are cool to me.

PoSTedUP1930d ago

I've been retro for most of this gen. While I loved every second of it, it really is mind blowing jumping back to current gen. I've been gone long enough where rdr2 is like my life now lol. Shit got real while I was gone I guess hah. Its important, imo, to go back and dedicate time to older games you've missed through almost every generation. I feel like a time traveler back to tell you guys I 'done f***ed up the past entirely. My bad.

-volt-1930d ago

Free To Play anything is such a scam.

harmny1930d ago

Do you know what a scam is?

jaycptza1929d ago

Obviously no, he is 8 years old

kneon1930d ago

Free to play is fine, as are microtransactions. The only problem is when you need to spend money to play. If it's just cosmetics then it's fine, not a scam at all.

starchild1930d ago

Agreed. People are playing for free and can choose to buy what they want or not buy anything at all or simply go play something else.

When you said "spend money to play" I think you meant to write "spend money to win" and I would definitely agree with that. It goes against the spirit of fair competition.

Other than that devs can choose how to package their content and how much to charge for it. We are free to choose to buy it or not.

The Wood1930d ago (Edited 1930d ago )

Some people expect everything for free. That's unreasonable on a free to play. Trying to use its zero barrier of entry to leverage pay to compete/win is wrong in my opinion. This does not look like that from my understanding but maybe the apex coin bundle price could be a little fairer so you never feel like you've overspent and always have dormant loose change

Rachel_Alucard1930d ago

Free 2 play suffers from an issue where you end up spending more money on it overall then just buying the game with a single $60 purchase. I'd rather do that but these companies insist on taking advantage of whales so a single purchase isn't enough anymore it seems.

The Wood1930d ago

Rachel_Alucard

'Free 2 play suffers from an issue where you end up spending more money on it overall'

That can happen and I'm sure the powers that be rely on it happening. The thing is there are full price games that adopt the same thinking. With free to play you at least get a choice to spend up to whatever.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 1930d ago
Christopher1930d ago (Edited 1930d ago )

Not very good scammers when they openly show the cost of everything. Perhaps you meant overpriced?

1930d ago Replies(3)
MatriXcian1930d ago

18 dollars for a single weapon skin is ludicrous and has certainly turned me off from any purchases in the future. The game is great mind you I'm currently lvl 54 already but I just can't justify paying the money they want. The sad thing is at lvl 100 you reach the cap so if you want any new skins or characters you're forced to spend cash.

Action GO FIGURE1930d ago

So ingame skins dictate your enjoyment in games? They don't make you pay until you reach 100 but how else do you propose the game to be support later? They depend on these MT boxes because you know... the game was... free?

MatriXcian1930d ago

So you support a single weapon skin costing almost 20 dollars? If so you are the problem with the gaming community as a whole. No one is saying not to charge for skins but an 18 dollar price tag is ludicrous. Trust me with the popularity of this game I'm sure they have already doubled the price it cost to make and with a 10 yr lifespan that they are aiming for they're guaranteed to have an enjoyable profit margin

PoSTedUP1930d ago

Sounds more like a donation. Anyone who needs a skin or two to enjoy this game should go play something else imo. Its either you want to donate or you're really just a sucker (a contributing sucker) for paying 18 bucks for a skin lol.

Eldyraen1930d ago

I’m assuming your level resets when the first season starts and every new season—like fortnite’s system. Level up faster on reset for more rewards again most likely.

sinspirit1930d ago (Edited 1930d ago )

If that were true then it would be a very generous f2p model imo. I think the packs from leveling is an alright amount for free loot in a free game. I'm a fan of the rainbow six pack rolls from every win and every failed roll increasing the chance next time, but it's not f2p and earning the operators takes forever

starchild1930d ago

If the price isn't worth it to you then don't buy it. People don't buy what isn't worth it to them. Things will sort themselves out as they always do in free markets.

If few people are buying them they will lower the prices. If many people are buying them then that means many people are finding value in them in the context of their experience playing the game. The market dictates prices.

Show all comments (93)
70°

Apex Legends Converted Me, A Solos Hater, To Playing Alone

I was sceptical about Apex Legends’ Solos mode. Now I’m engrossed

Read Full Story >>
thegamer.com
70°

Apex Legends Showcases New Upheaval Update

ESTNN writes: "Alter is a dimension-hopping force of chaos who uses her Void tech to usher in an apocalypse in every realm she visits. Seeing an opportunity to start the biggest world-ending event of them all, Alter travelled to our dimension to see her wishes fulfilled."

24d ago
70°

New Updates Coming with Apex Legends: Upheaval

Get insights into game updates coming in Apex Legends: Upheaval including Solos, Alter, and a new dawn of Broken Moon!