920°

Top 5 Developers who Milk Game franchises to dryness

With the advent of any great Game franchise comes the concept of Money making by extensively milking the franchise to dryness as Developers and Publishers find different ways to exploit the winning formula.

These are Quite possibly the Top 5 Franchises that have been milked to dryness by Publishers.

Read Full Story >>
geniusanime.com
ilovepsvita4645d ago

Activision deserves to be placed at number 1 position on the countdown.
COD is definitely the most Milked franchise in gaming history with a sequel coming out every year.

Misterhbk4645d ago

Why the hell is Nintendo not on the list. Should have been right up there with Activision.

People can say what they want, but Mario is spun off into so many series one might lose track of him.

Mario Golf
Mario Kart
Mario Party
Mario World/Galaxy/Land/Whatever
Paper Mario
Mario and Luigi World/Land/Whatever
Mario Baseball
Mario Sports (just threw all the different sports into one)

I'm sure I'm excluding quite a few but you get the point. I"m not saying the games aren't different or good or fun or any of that, but lets be honest, Mario is a milkfest. they could easily create new characters and IPs for so many of these games, but nope...Just Throw Mario and Co. out there.

geniusgamerdoc4645d ago

I disagree with you my friend.

MARIO might have spun off into hundreds of games but all of them dont fall under a single gaming Genre.
We have seen all kinds of games ranging from Tennis, Golf, Cart racing, Adventure, Rpg, to Baseball and Smash brawlers.
Just because of the inclusion of Mario it doesnt become a Milked franchise.

With every new Mario named title Nintendo has brought something new. Super Mario Galaxy is one of the most Eye Candy-ish games ive ever played.

But whereas COD games look almost the same when you compare each other.

Brownghost4645d ago

they milk the character but the games are all amazing

Pozzle4645d ago (Edited 4645d ago )

I think a lot of people are willing to look past the shitty titles because Nintendo still manage to make some pretty good Mario titles. I could do without the crappy spinoff sport titles, but I personally hope they don't stop making games like Mario Galaxy or Mario Kart.

SilentNegotiator4645d ago

I agree.

Mario Kart peaked at Double Dash, Mario Party didn't really make the best use of the wiimote, and the sports titles haven't made huge improvements.

badz1494645d ago

it's not about the games are great or not, it's just a list for milking and Nintendo MUST BE in the list somewhere! instant FAIL!

ZBlacktt4644d ago

All those games are the franchises characters. Not the same game play type. Where COD is the same thing over and over and over.

milohighclub4644d ago

Tomb raider hasn't been milked. 9 releases over 3 gens?!

rjdofu4644d ago

This should belong to the top 5 milking topics of all times.

Wyvern4644d ago (Edited 4644d ago )

There are more then 220 Games with Mario in it. :D
Need to mention Street Fighter too.

-Alpha4644d ago (Edited 4644d ago )

Throwing Mario and Co. out onto these games is a lot better for Nintendo and Nintendo fans than throwing on a new face nobody knows about.

Mario is a universal character. His popularity is unrivaled and the genres he is in help keep that unique, colourful style fans love about Nintendo games. What is the point of replacing Mario with a new character? Highly counter-productive.

And there is a strong difference between milking the game and milking the name. A ton of the Mario titles are high quality games and adored by legions of fans.

In fact, same goes for a lot of other Milked games. Milked isn't always bad, it's when you do very little to improve and when you ride on the name value alone that it becomes bad.

Getowned4644d ago

NFS: Underground 2 was and still is my favourit raceing game i really wish they would make a new one just like #2 expect bigger with more cars and customizations.I would buy a HD remake of that game imo best racing game ever made **IMO**.

lol i knew cod was going to be on here.

and don't be hating mario! mario owns.

Gurt_McSquirt4644d ago

Half of these are publishers, half are developers... It should read "Top 5 Game Series' That Are Milked To Dryness"

TXIDarkAvenger4644d ago

There's not 1 Mario franchise, there's many in different genres. So no the games aren't milked but I guess you could say Mario is. But at least a majority of Mario games are quality games that are awesome and have lots of replay value.

capcock4644d ago (Edited 4644d ago )

super mario and mario golf/kart/party etc are all different franchises STARRING mario, they are not milked.

CrimsonAng3l4644d ago

I agree with you Misterhbk about everything you said. Sonic is another franchise that's been milked for so fricken long that it should be on the list.

JaredH4644d ago

I think Nintendo characters are milked more than anything else, even Call of Duty. Nintendo hasn't even made an original ip since Pikmin(not counting the mini-games). All they do is take the characters they thought of years ago and put them in new situations. I do think it's great that they somehow make the games fresh but honestly they can't do that forever.

BattleAxe4644d ago

1. Call of Duty
2. Mario
3. Halo
4. Madden
5. Tiger Woods

+ Show (15) more repliesLast reply 4644d ago
ATi_Elite4645d ago

Here's two good ones........

well EA has been pumping out John Madden Football games since 1988 and yearly since 1990.

But seriously I thought Street Fighter 2 got milked down to the butter milk before Capcom released Street Fighter 3.

Biggest4644d ago

Sports titles shouldn't be thought of in the same sense as Call of Duty or Mario. There is a new season every year for sports, and though games like Madden try to change as little as possible, they aren't exactly the same. Mario and Madden might add as little in each new release (a few add-ons or changes to the general gameplay), but Mario does it for the sake of doing it. Madden does it because there is a new season. I guess I'm saying they have a more legit reason for a new game. That being said. . . I haven't purchased a Madden game since 2003. The 2K series was much more rewarding to me. Madden buying rights to the NFL license turned me off immediately. Furthermore, I still love Mario. I play every classic-type Mario game and will be playing Paper Mario. Yes, Mario is milked. Sometimes I love milk.

Tachyon_Nova4645d ago (Edited 4645d ago )

You know that since Rathcet and Clank began in 2002 there was a game in 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2 games in 2007, 2008, 2009 and 2011. That is 10 games in 10 years.

Since Battlefield began in 2002 there was a game in 2002, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2 games in 2008, 2009, 2010, and 2 games in 2011. That is 10 games in 10 years.

Since FIFA branded games began in 1993 there has been a game in 1993, 1994, 1995, 1996, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2 games in 2000, 2 games 2001, 2 games in 2002, 2003, 2004, 2 games in 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, and 2011. That is 23 games in 19 years, and this not counting FIFA Manager or FIFA Street games, which would take that total to 34 games in 19 years.

Since Call of Duty began in 2003, there was a game in 2003, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010 and 2011. That is 8 games in 9 years.

Need for Speed began in 1994, and there has been a game in 1994, 1997, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2 games in 2009, 2 games in 2010 and 2 games in 2011. That is 18 games in 18 years.

Don't even get me started on Mario or Final Fantasy, I would be here all year listing mario games alone.

So is CoD really the most milked gaming franchise ever? Not by a long shot.

StoneyYoshi4645d ago (Edited 4645d ago )

rachet and clank has brought something new to the table each year they had released a game. same goes to battlefield.

call of duty stopped bringing new things to the table once cod 4 came out.

and it definitely has been more than 8 games in 9 years for call of duty

Call of duty: finest hour

Call of duty 2: Big red one

Call of duty: roads to victory

Call of duty: World at war: final fronts (ps2)

Call of duty: modern warfare: mobilized (nintendo DS)

Call of duty : world at war: zombies 1 and 2 (iPhone)

so that actually makes it 14 games in 9 years. not milked?

Hicken4645d ago

Sports games don't count. As the roster of each team changes each year, new games were necessary- before this generation, it wasn't possible to update your rosters via online connection.

As for everything else you mentioned, only one of those games- as far as I know- has DLC you're required to pay for, multiple packs per year, and that people buy up by the millions. Only one of those game(s)eries) will still be full price a month before the next entry's release.

I'll let you guess which series that is.

Tachyon_Nova4645d ago (Edited 4645d ago )

@ Hicken - I tend to agree that sports games don't count myself. However, it has become a popular stance to take that each 'new' CoD should be released as DLC, since all it adds is new weapons, maps and a 5 hour campaign. If all that can only be considered worthy of a DLC release, then how can a new player roster and a few gameplay tweaks warrant a completely new game?

I honestly don't see how CoD's DLC is milking though. Each CoD game provides a heap of maps and game modes, easily more than most other FPS's straight out of the box. If you still want more, then you have the option to buy more.

If they were starving players for content by only having 4-7 maps (as with Medal of Honor and BFBC2) as opposed to 12-15 maps as with CoD, then I would say you had a point.

@dontbhatin - I am only counting main games, not platform specific variants like CoD 4 mobilised or World at War: Zombies for iPhone. I didn't count Battlefield 2: Modern Combat, Bad Company 2 for iPhone or any of the Battlefield expansion packs, so I don't see that it is fair for you to for CoD.

StoneyYoshi4645d ago (Edited 4645d ago )

id rather have 4-7 well created maps, instead of 12-15 maps that they didn't put much work into. still no reason to charge 15 dollars for 4-5 maps when you see the competition tossing everyone new maps like free candy. the only maps that either bad company game charged for is vietnam for bad company 2.

@tachyon

then rachet and clank should only be 7 games then because 3 of those are variants for the main games.

and for battlefield it should only be 8 games then. if you only want to count main games.

J_Cob4645d ago (Edited 4645d ago )

I'm going to have to agree with Hicken and Tachyon_Nova regarding the sports games. I just don't get the why people always jump on the CoD hatewagon. If you break down Battlefield to its fundamentals its big maps and vehicles. They just recently added destruction with the BC series and now it looks prettier. To say a game isn't milked because it has a new paint job is just ignorant. By that logic all IW has to do is get a new engine and add destruction and it's a whole new game. It's still the same thing at its core. People would still complain because of the DLC.

Hicken4645d ago

Doing that WOULD make it a new game. If all they added was moderately destructible environments, it'd cause the way people played to change drastically: no more camping, no more setting up turrets in choke points. For vehicles, they'd need bigger maps, which would again force people to change how they played the game.

As for the DLC, I honestly think Activision is at a point financially where they could give away the DLC for an entire entry. They've made more than enough money off the franchise to do at least that as a thank-you to fans.

But they never will. As long as people are willing to buy it, they'll be willing to charge for it.

J_Cob4645d ago (Edited 4645d ago )

@Hicken I'll agree that destruction would change the game but fundamentally it would be the same. Just based off the design of CoD's play style. Choke points could vanish to a certain degree, but with the map design people would know where people are going after awhile and what they are going to blow up. With CoD's fast arcade movement people with slow reflexes are going to camp regardless. It's the nature of the beast. CoD picks up tons of new people with each iteration every year. Most never having played an FPS before. These people camp even when the grenade symbol is shown on their screen. They will not move for anyone or anything. You also mentioned they would need bigger maps. Then it wouldn't be CoD anymore. That's trying to turn CoD into BF with destruction. You need to think along the lines of CoD with destruction.

morkendo234644d ago

@ Tach nova

out of those 18 NFS only first 7 was EXCELLENT i have ALL 7. "the RUN" will be # 18 until nov. other 10 was horrible (in my opinion)

WANNAGETHIGH4644d ago

@Tachyon_Nova..Save ur comment.N4G is anti COD with bias BF fan boys. Ur list is spot on. But I disagree with spot gamrs,Its normal when a season finishes nd a new one starts a new sport game has to come out. But the rest is spot on.

aman84r4644d ago

You know what the funny thing is people count expansion packs as games only in case of COD.

Biggest4644d ago

Call of Duty would be a brand new game if it added new elements. Call of Duty 4 was new. Before it there were similar games with minor updates. After it there have been similar games with minor updates. If Call of Duty added new elements to gameplay (destruction, vehicles, maps) it would become a new game and change their trend of milking. I hate Call of Duty because it is $60 for nothing new. In comparison you can purchase other games for $60 that re-work/change multiple aspects of the game. Uncharted 2 is a good example of that. They added multiplayer, increased graphic fidelity, and changed the basic presentation into an industry standard. . . For $60.

jdfoster4644d ago

You missed out Fifa World cup which released in 2010 to coincide with world cup

Getowned4644d ago (Edited 4644d ago )

no i think it's actually about 22 call of duty games if you count all systems.

CrimsonEngage4644d ago

Hate to burst your bubble but there have been only 3 Battlefield games - 1942, 2 and BF3. The rest are spin-offs. Hurrrrrrrrr

hadriker4644d ago

@Tachyon_Nova

You have to take into account the game quality as well

Since Modern Warfare 1, Activision has released a CoD game yearly with little changes in game play. Mostly just glorified expansion packs. They did the same thing with Tony Hawk, and guitar hero. They milked the IPs for all they were worth, and when the consumer market finally said "we need something new in our favorite IP" They failed hard and the franchise went the the way of the Dodo.

IPs like Battlefield may have a comparable number of releases as the CoD franchise, but every release has been a logical step forward in terms of gameplay, technlogy and innovation. They aren't just releasing the same game with some new skins and maps, which is basically what Activision is doing with the CoD series, and has done with others.

Thats the difference they are trying to point out.

Tachyon_Nova4644d ago

Alright this is my last comment so I'm going to reply to everyone who has mentioned my post here.

@dontbhatin - No, there have been 10 seperate Rathcet and Clank games. The original, Going Commando, Up You Arsenal, Deadlocked, Size Matters, Tools of Destruction, Quest for Booty, A Crack in Time, All 4 One and Secret Agent Clank. That is 10 games. As for Battlefield, I feel that there is enough content in Heroes and Play4Free that they can be considered seperate 'main' games. although they are obviously spinoffs.

@Hicken - I'm sure they could give the DLC away if they wanted to, but they are a business that exists solely to make money, why would they give a product which costs them a lot to produce for free? If they did it for one game, people would expect it for the next and would be significantly less likely to pay for it. As for camping, I don't see how bigger maps would help reduce this. Have you ever played Bad Company? The bigger maps just give people an incentive to snipe because they don't have to run so far in order to get into a position where they can kill people.

@J_Cob - Exactly, people will camp no matter what sort of measures you put in place to stop them, its how they want to play.

@Morkendo23 - I haven't played thta many of the NFS games, but I can say that the original Hot Pursuit and Hot Pursuit 2 back in the 90's were easily my favourite games from the series.

@WANNAGETHIGH - Like I said above in my second comment, I tend to agree that sports games shouldn't be counted, but I included it only because a lot of people like to say that each new COD should be released as DLC only, when clearly there is more fresh content in each new COD than in each new FIFA.

@aman- It's not surprising, people seem to apply different rules to COD games (i.e. in general graphics don't matter apparently, but in COD's case using the samer engine each game is grounds not to by the game)

@Getowned, why would I count each game for each system seperately, it is still the same game?

@CrimsonEngage - You're joking right?

@hadriker - Fair point, although EA are more guilty of this than anyone in at least one case (Battlefield Play4Free is literaly BF2 except with mild destruction and some new assets).

+ Show (13) more repliesLast reply 4644d ago
WitWolfy4645d ago

I agree Activision at the top, they literary milked GH to DEATH!

Altosax314644d ago

Didn't they milk Tony Hawk as well?

Ser4644d ago

Yup. Literally.

Guitar Hero literally DIED because of the excess milking. The same goes for Tony Hawk. What was the last Tony Hawk game? Ride? With that stupid skateboard peripheral? What a joke.

hadriker4644d ago

Activation is easily the worst

CoD
Tony Hawk
Guitar Hero

Legion4644d ago

The issue is milking it to dryness though. I truly don't think the campaign has been milked to dryness yet, as it is still interesting each time I play the game.

The multiplayer though... I haven't seen enough quality change in it to see it as anything but dry. BUT saying that... people must really like evaporated milk, because they are playing the hell out of that game.

narutogameking4644d ago

Yeah and Mario games are a rarity these days......

Dee_914644d ago (Edited 4644d ago )

what how isnt EA number one

they literally release the same gameS every year for the past decade and a half

iWishTifaWasReal4644d ago

@ilovepsvita

not to mention

fcking DLC (Map packs)

cost $15. if you multiply it by four (4 map packs a game)

15 x 4 = $60 + plus COD (the actual game) 60

= $120

4644d ago Replies(1)
+ Show (6) more repliesLast reply 4644d ago
Godmars2904645d ago

With a possible 5-6 games set in the FFXIII world, Sqaure needs to be at #1.

Jihaad_cpt4644d ago

the stories are all different though and look at how often the games come out, not every year

Godmars2904644d ago

And its another thing that they presented these games early and have taken forever to get them out besides. Will be changing much of the theme and gameplay while still on the same world.

The really bad thing that's going on is that they offered a weak story with a poor resolution with FFXIII, and now they're stretching it out. How is that not an example of poor story telling?

Marceles4644d ago

A poor resolution? I hope you mean story-wise. Personally I didn't find it any different than FF5, weak story but fun as hell to fight. Especially in the post-story missions.

kaveti66164645d ago

It's ironic because you're milking this topic to death.

Brownghost4645d ago

didnt they say they will have yearly releases of halo

Legion4644d ago

Actually original plan was to have Halo and Gears of War release in off years. Might not have came about exactly as planned but that was the idea at the beginning.

Brownghost4644d ago

well i hope not and my comment was not bashing halo i was asking a question

Legion4644d ago

I din't say you were bashing Halo. But you made a statement not a question. You can fix that problem by adding some punctuation when posting.

I was simply giving you the facts that I have read based on your statement in counter to those facts.

No issues...

Brownghost4644d ago

oh no i wasn't talking to you just the general reading this also i cant edit my post and wish they would let you edit your comments

IHateYouFanboys4645d ago (Edited 4645d ago )

wheres ratchet and clank? whatve they had, 10-11 games in 9 years?

Also, it should be PUBLISHERS that milk franchises, not developers. every other NFS game is developed by someone different, same with half the other games on the list.

BiggCMan4645d ago

10 years, 6 main games excluding spin offs. 7 if you count the new co-op one coming out. They are also all substantially different in many ways.

MaxOpower4644d ago

Totally agree, none of these are developers!

narutogameking4644d ago

Every other Call of Duty is also developed by a different studio. Treyarch and Infinity Ward take turns.

Show all comments (223)
80°

Cheat Provider To Pay Call Of Duty Creator Activision Nearly $15M In Damages

Cheat software provider EngineOwning will pay Call of Duty creator Activision nearly $15 million in damages and legal fees.

Read Full Story >>
twistedvoxel.com
Jin_Sakai1d 6h ago

Cheat providers for competitive games should be illegal.

Rynxie1d 3h ago (Edited 1d 3h ago )

This is what developers and manufacturers should do. I know going after cheat devices/makers is a cat and mouse game, and cost money. However, they can get that money back by sueing these manufacturers of cheat devices. Take a page from Nintendo's playbook.

Garethvk1d 10h ago

We can hope. Especially if the rumors of Cillian Murphy and Alaska are true.

RaidenBlack1d 8h ago

That'd be too good if true.
But Henderson also leaked that next Far Cry setting was targeting some asian island.

jznrpg6h ago(Edited 6h ago)

With their shitty practices I really don’t care what Ubisoft announces until they reverse their course

Relientk771d 10h ago

Assassin's Creed Hexe is what I wanna hear about most. Yes I wanna play as a witch with magic during the 16 century witch trials in Germany (as per rumors). Sign me up

Huey_My_D_Long1d 10h ago

Yeah, Hex sounds amazing to me as well, and I've been playing since AC 1. I'm real curious how are they gonna fit the magic into the game, maybe in similar way the dlc introduced gods and god abilities. but I love that I've heard its gonna have a horror vibe.

Garethvk1d 10h ago

Hopefully it is full of good stuff.

Garethvk1d 10h ago

I would love The Division 3.

RaidenBlack1d 8h ago

The studio just completed Avatar and busy with Outlaws and also got their F2P Heartland cancelled ... IMO, Division 3 will surely come but it'll take more time.
I'd be most thrilled if Ubisoft greenlits a sequel or at least a remake of the studio's first game i.e World in Conflict

anast1d 6h ago (Edited 1d 6h ago )

I would get hyped about Hexe. If the rumors are true, UBI might get a gold edition purchase out of me.

Demetrius1d 10h ago

Hopefully gameplay of ac shadows or star wars outlaws, if they finally announce the new far cry I'm definitely getting that, far cry still fun af and gorgeous games, yeah ubisoft has their faults but atleast they're not copying souls like games their titles still have identity

neutralgamer19921d 8h ago

We will definitely see gameplay for star wars and AC. Farcry let's see

OtterX1d 10h ago (Edited 1d 9h ago )

I'm going to be an outlier amongst the rest of these comments.... give us something NEW! I'm pretty burnt out on Ubisoft franchises, unless you're giving us a new Rayman game!

*Edit - imagine what they could do with a Rayman 3D game in this day and age. I say now is the time to revisit the series.

RaidenBlack1d 8h ago

Would love a AAA PoP too or a back to roots Ghost Recon (none of the open world stuff)

MeatyUrologist1d 7h ago

Hell yes! Ghost recon in the style of the originals with real consequences, permanent and all!

jznrpg6h ago

I love Rayman, played it a ton with my kids years ago. But Ubisoft puts dumb crap in their games. MTs , paid tiers , always online requirement for single player games and as they stand now I could see them doing that to Rayman

OtterX6h ago

Yea unfortunately, you're right. :'(

Garethvk1d 10h ago

Beyond Good and Evil 2: It is coming really; we promise.

OtterX1d 10h ago

Their microtransaction monetization scheme on it will lie somewhere between good and evil!

Haha JK.... it'll be completely evil. 🙃

Show all comments (21)
450°

Ubisoft say AC Shadows protagonists will be "romantically attracted to different types of people"

Ubisoft recently shared more details about Assassin's Creed Shadows protagonists, confirming that both of them will romantically attract and be attracted to different types of people.

Hugodastrevas8d ago

That should please everyone I'm sure...

RpgSama8d ago (Edited 8d ago )

Feudal Japan DEI LGBTQ+ Samurai, sounds very accurate for the time period. Surely a decision made only with historical accuracy in mind.

Crows908d ago

Or even modern day accuracy.....

Lexreborn28d ago

You have no idea what you are talking about, bet you didn’t know nobunaga was bi-sexual. Or ran maru his is often depicted as androgynous was a “beautiful boy”.

So yeah, feudal Japan had tons of lgbtq and kawaii enough… A BLACK SAMURAI! All without the need of offending a Caucasian because the world is diverse.

VenomUK8d ago (Edited 8d ago )

This story has cracked me up so much! Bravo Ubisoft, bravo! 🤣. So last week everyone was upset that in the long-awaited first Assassin’s Creed: Japan game the protagonist is black. But NOW he is also LGBTQ+ ! It’s like the Ubisoft creative team sat around a table and said “How can we best impress our Kotaku/IGN/Polygon friends and antagonise gamers? Let’s make it woke x 100!’ And then they all silent clapped!

Just you wait until the Star Wars: Outlaws details come out, there better not be anybody complaining about Kay Vess’ dating preferences and the gay droid armies.

Christopher8d ago

It actually is.

Japanese were very Greek in their sexual experiences.

lodossrage8d ago

Lexreborn2 is right

Go read up on Japan's feudal era homosexuality and bisexuality was a very common thing in that time.

I just have to laugh because the same people complaining about this are the same ones crying about wanting "historical accuracy". When it's clear most of the whiners don't even know history themselves.

Christopher8d ago (Edited 8d ago )

Facts don't care about downvotes, btw. You either claim to understand historical accuracy or you just admit you don't like the stuff people did throughout history.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wi...

thorstein8d ago

Japan had no Christian stupidity about sexuality.

That's where your nonsensical puritanical view comes from: the Abraham's faiths.

It's feudal Japan, they don't believe in your religion's made up nonsense.

I mean, if you're going to embrace a particular viewpoint, you should at least be aware of where it comes from. Most of the world doesn't care about your ideals.

In those days, they certainly didn't care about your religion.

Get over yourself.

RpgSama7d ago

All of you guys missed the point, I even said I'm very sure they did it ONLY because they wanted to be historically accurate. Stop defending this, we all know why they did it and who they want to pander, it's not out newfound respect for history.

lodossrage7d ago

@RpgSama

Nobody is defending anything.

People are just pointing out the fact that after they just cried about the game not being historically accurate, when they SHOW they're accurate, they cry about it because they don't like certain parts of history

Not to mention you contradicted yourself RPGSama. You just pointed out you said they "ONLY because they wanted to be historically accurate". Then turn around and accuse them of pandering and/or having an agenda. Those two things are opposing statements

Cacabunga7d ago

Dumbest decision ever.. always online was a pass for me but now not even for free I’ll try it..

LordoftheCritics7d ago

It's made by Ubisoft Montreal.

Obviously we'll be allowed to bang anything that moves.

RiseNShine7d ago (Edited 7d ago )

Yeha pretty sure.

H97d ago

People actually telling you that Japan had sexual deviancy which is correct however what's hilarious is that they will act as if it holds the same moral value that the LGBT community holds today, oh the things men used to say about themselves when they are attracted to other men, it's not empowering in the least bit

senorfartcushion7d ago

It was more common to be attracted to the same sex before the crusades.

7d ago
Tapani7d ago

You are completely lost on Japanese history. Japan was one of the most liberal places in the world, and in many ways still is. You can slice and dice it from your western hubris and whatever point of view, but the reality is that history tells great stories about freedom of choice and people not being judgemental on this island. Also one of the reasons I want to raise my family here, no need to have those whatever Western woke bullshit here, because everyone just respects each other without using all that nonsense.

+ Show (14) more repliesLast reply 7d ago
CrimsonWing698d ago

Geezus, just make a good game… holy sh*t this is becoming insufferable.

Crows908d ago

Oh yeah!!!! What about being inclusive???

I'm sorry
..please replace the word inclusive with stupid.

Hofstaderman8d ago

You asking UbiSoft to make a good game? This is not 2002.

thorstein8d ago

I thought you crybabies wanted "historical accuracy." Now that your going to get it, you're going to cry more.

PRIMORDUS8d ago

It's past the point of retarded, everyone seems forced to do this bullshit now in games. 😑

Barlos7d ago

Hell no. A good game or film is secondary now to the agenda and the 'message'.

It's not enough to be simply entertained these days, there has to be an overarching real world narrative. I mean look at Dr Who as a recent example. Disney have completely destroyed it all in the name of 'diversity'.

senorfartcushion7d ago

You sound like you don't have a very active sex life ,😅

CrimsonWing697d ago (Edited 7d ago )

Are you projecting? 😝

senorfartcushion7d ago

It's the only thing that explains the incel crap. They can't simply be angry virgins who don't get any, so then a lack of a sex life i.e. a dad of three or something, is also a good additional explanation. They're either lonely and don't get any or too busy to get any. There's a horrible news for sexual control with incels, and they're angry because they simply aren't the right people to achieve that control. They're weaker animals.

notachance7d ago

dude’s too busy commenting on other people’s sex life to actually stay on topic.

That or he’s angry but didn’t have half the brain needed to refute back so he went for the classic ad hominem fallacy.

senorfartcushion7d ago

Notachance

It's a fact that remains true. The only way it can't be true is if humans were not greedy and heavily reliant on procreation.

Your username is fitting.

CrimsonWing697d ago (Edited 7d ago )

dude, let’s be real, you’re on a video game news site going into the comments section and taking time out of your life to go to war with people you think don’t f*ck. You sound as much of a virgin as any incel does.

Let’s be real, bub you’re just as pathetic as the rest of them. Anyone who would look at this who doesn’t waste their time on a video game news site or video games in general probably thinks the only thing you f*ck is your crusty ass pillow.

C’mon, man. Anyone who f*cks doesn’t immediately go into a comment section claiming others have no sex life. It’s just one of those things if you are getting your d*ck wet. It just comes off like you’re projecting in hopes to god nobody figures out you can’t get any, so you try to flex, even though you’re completely full of sh*t.

I mean, that’s the only thing that makes sense to me 😅.

senorfartcushion6d ago

I'm engaged without children - I'm doing just fine.

This is just nerd sites now. Users are just so angry and for basically the same reasons. Most people go through phases with this type of stuff but it's scary seeing the same attitudes being regurgitated over and over again. From what I've seen it's a strange mix of sexual frustration, lack of proper financing and the need to have 100% control over both so that they aren't taken away from the users.

CrimsonWing696d ago

@fartcushion

Look, man, people are allowed to have opinions and show frustration with stuff. It has no bearing on them not getting sex or not making money.

I have no idea how people commenting on being tired of hearing about SJW sh*t being shown in the spotlight like some carnival sideshow where publishers are wanting some pat on the back for means they’re financially unstable and don’t have a sexual relationship.

What, are you on the spectrum? Like how do you come to that conclusion and make multiple responses to the discourse with “virgin alert” or “you need to have sex?” That right there is kind of sus to me.

I don’t know in what world you lived in where this hasn’t been a nerd site, but people are allowed to comment their thoughts on things and still have relationships. You’re just as much of a nerd as everyone in here.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 6d ago
+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 6d ago
8d ago Replies(3)
darthv728d ago

Is that genuinely a selling point for people?

RpgSama8d ago (Edited 8d ago )

They sure as hell want to see if it is, time and time and time again.

VincentVanBro8d ago

You have to understand they’re incapable of writing a good story so this is the best they could come up with

thorstein8d ago

Well, after last weeks crying about historical accuracy. Now Ubi days, " Oh, okay, historical accuracy: here you go."

Now you're saying you don't want the accuracy? Can you guys just make up your minds?

7d ago
notatallsurprisinggg7d ago

It's a genuine click-bait snippet to rile up people like you to push traffic.

7d ago
7d ago
+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 7d ago
Show all comments (119)