880°

Far Cry 3 gunning to look 'incredible' on PS3, 'fantastic' on 360

CVG: Ubisoft Montreal says it can "definitely" replicate the stunning Far Cry 3 experience shown running on PC at E3 on Xbox 360 and PlayStation 3.

Speaking to CVG in LA last week, producer Dan Hay said his development team is aiming to have the shooter looking "incredible" on PS3 and "fantastic" on Xbox 360 - but PC players will be able to "dial it to 11".

Read Full Story >>
computerandvideogames.com
Kon4733d ago

What is better, incredible or fantastic?

N4GAddict4733d ago

Neither; CVG asked the developer so they can create the story for hits.

SephirothX214733d ago

We all know that real life looks the best. Unless you're news4geeks looking in the mirror.

Lifendz4733d ago

Reminds me of a bit some comic did about the confusion in selecting an over the counter drug. "Do I want fast acting, or long lasting?" "Do I need extra-strength, or do I want maximum strength...which one has more strength?"

Demo for Far Cry 3 was really intriguing...lots of good games coming out this year.

flankhim4733d ago

I hope this one has more driving. So they can call it really far drive 3!

WhittO4732d ago

incredible is better than fantastic.

DaTruth4732d ago (Edited 4732d ago )

Farcry 2 was "Uncredible" on PS3 and "Craptastic" on 360!

Never played the 360 version, but if they are in any way the same game it couldn't suddenly get better. No amount of good graphics could have fixed Farcry 2!

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 4732d ago
fluffydelusions4733d ago

In the end they will both look about the same anyway. I've learnt you can only count on Sony 1st parties to go above and beyond.

news4geeks4733d ago (Edited 4733d ago )

Yeah all two of them, uncharted2 and killzone2. After that the best looking games are third party. This idea that the ps3 is significantly superior to the 360 in graphics is nonsense. Sony just blew a hole in their pocket developing an overpriced cpu.

Pintheshadows4733d ago

So news4geeks, I take it that you have never played R and C or God of War 3 or inFamous 2. For that matter Xbox exclusives such as Gears tend to look far better than multiplats.

You have no clue about anything to do with games.

paintsville4733d ago

@newsgeeks
Right ON!!!
Now as for Far Cry...It'll look great on PS3. It'll require a 5 gig install, and won't perform nearly as well as the 360 rendition. As long as you don't play this side by side with the 360 version you'll think it looks and performs great on PS3.

TheJackasaurus4733d ago

@news4geeks you missed god of war 3, mgs4, heavy rain, gt5, lbp2 resistance 2?

TheFreak4733d ago (Edited 4733d ago )

Everybody that has a ps3 and a 360 knows that the ps3 has better looking games than the 360. End of discussion?

Aquanox4733d ago

And both versions will pale compard to the PC. =)

evrfighter14733d ago

Agree with news4geeks...

Except kz2 is a blurry low res textured mess and I skipped uncharted 2.

Sevir044733d ago

ofcorse you did evil, of course you did, but that still doesnt change the fact that those 2 games you listed can not be topped by any 360 exclusives to date!. trolls will be trolls disagreeing with the facts only make you ignorant!

evrfighter14733d ago Show
+ Show (8) more repliesLast reply 4733d ago
You Noob4733d ago

we have the 1 milion dollars question!!

RedDead4733d ago

In the end they will both look about the same anyway. I've learnt you can only count on Pc exclusives to go above and beyond.

fluffydelusions4733d ago (Edited 4733d ago )

I know you are having a go at my comment but the article specifically mentions PS3/360 which is why I said that. Yes, everyone know PC has the best graphics. The elitists here tend to remind us of that on a daily basis and even I game on PC(steam id is same as my username if you'd like to check)

stu8884733d ago

couldnt agree more mate. BUT above and beyond, you can't be talking about games surely...

Uncharted 2, Gears of War series, Red Dead Redemption, MGS 4, Forza and GT... I could go on with great games PC gamers are missing out. So no, PC does not go above and beyond, console does...

All decent games on PC are released on console. The best console games, on average rated higher than PC exclusives (metacritic). You are wrong!

Just suck 'em. in fact fuck off and shag your USB drive or something like what you PC gamers do.

Otheros004733d ago

High end pcs, yes. Low ends pcs, no.

Objective4733d ago (Edited 4733d ago )

Ever played yesteryears' Marvel Comics paper and pen RPG? Incredible was above Excellent and Remarkable, but below Amazing and Uncanny... There was no Fantastic though...

showtimefolks4733d ago

i play red dead on ps3 and few people were telling me to play it on xbox360 so after playing both versions i couldn't see the difference

these sites want hits fanboys from each side want to believe they are getting the better looking games while both will play the same

now few games push the console boundaries 3rd party wise. The next game that will do and surpass it will be RAGE 3rd party wise and gears3 and uncharted 3 1st party wise respectively

so enjoy the games and forget about the minor difference

_LarZen_4733d ago

If you cant see the diffrence on Red Dead on PS3 VS X360 you should never....ever ever...comment on mathers like this again.

NEVER.

showtimefolks4733d ago

really was there that big of a difference i could see some minor graphics details here and there but really that much.

i finished the game on xbox360 after i finished it on ps3 and maybe something is wrong with my eyes but i didn't see something where i said to myself one is better version than the other

i am not that kind of gamer where small things make big difference to me game ran smooth on both systems looked about the same. Gameplay wise it was about the same

but anyway that's just one gamers testing i guess

ABizzel14733d ago

There's nothing wrong with your eyes, you only find the differences if you truly search for them. The only thing that's truly noticeable when playing a game is the framerate, because it affects how the game is being played. Then screen tearing. Minor graphical problems aren't noticeable unless you have both games running side by side, or the different is completely apparent from the start, but seeing how this is 2011 and not 2006 that problems gone.

_LarZen_4733d ago

I have the X360 edition and borowed the PS3 from my father and the difference is realy noticable on this game.

The AA and the textures are so bad on the PS3 version :(

Just look at this..remember to click Watch picture in original size.
http://n4g.com/news/526409/...

BlackTar1874733d ago

even there larzen its not some mess that you make it out to be even in your own link.

They have differences and to some look like it just a different color pallet that's it.

nothing game breaking/game ruining in any of those pics.

I don;t think i even played RDR on ps3 i think it was a 360 only game for because of MP friends

mastiffchild4733d ago

It'as a myth prpetuated by sits like LoT that EXIST purely to show diffeences between multiplat tiles so is it any wonder they find the differences when even the devs are saying the most important thing for them is parity? In other words devs are saying they know it would be stupid to take advantage of a strength one console has but the other doesn't-why? Because that would alienate HALF their audience/market and ?games are expensive and need their margins and for a multiplatform game to cut off half it's customers is suicidal.

99.9% of the time if I'd not been "informed"of the tiny details differing between console versions of 360 and PS3 games I'f NEVER have known about them even having played both versions close together. I prfer my PS3 because of to things these days-I don't want to pay a Gold sub any longer and I like a DS3 better than a 360 pzd but for multiplats and performance I couldn't care less either way. You'd be just as well off with 360 playing the inferior FF13 on however many discs as you would be playing Bayonetta's supposedly broken PS3 port.

They're the two more crecent examples where I think I can see the difference without being prompted and even there i wouldn;'t say to ANYONE "hey, ou GOT to play it on the other platform, you're missing out!". Only with The Orange Box do I truly feel a PS3 version of a multi has been THAT poor it's obvious to everyone and a shoddy mes that's best avoided if you have the choice but even so, if you only have a PS3 those meta scores speak for themselves-it's still amazing and if it wasn't amazing on the system reviewers would have said so. And that's the WORST sodding port I can think of!

LoT/DF and comparison sites of every size have to find winners and losers and actively seek them out in ways we couldn't possibly do. they use programs to detect FPS and screen tear issues and so on. Speed up and slow down to check detail and even use different settings than you should if they'r struggling and they do it because they exists to do so and without a winner or loser every other release why would anyone ever go to them?

Seriously, they know there's ads to be sold in the fanboy hits they collect-by and large-and I feel for anyone who truly goes to them expecting to find out things pertinent to their own experience as they count a lot of stuff you could NEVER see even with games running side by side FFS. It's annoying to me that we don't see multiplatform titles pushing the 360 and PS3 as well or as hard as the very best exclusives do on each platform but fact is EA/Ubi whoever ants the games as close as possible as long as they reach an acceptable and saleable standard close to each other. Annoying but unavoidable with close console sales figures.

Rant over. Sorry but nothing annoys me like the crud sold as things the average gamer should care about or even be able to see with their own eyes by these sites. I just don't get why we visit them. If a difference is bad enough to be obvious to a gamer don't we imagine it would be picked up by the average reviewer who is way more likely to even SEE both versions than we are? A bad port is picked up on ANYWAY so sod these sites telling us who won because their C told them so when their eyes can't.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 4733d ago
malamdra4733d ago

good, some honesty from a developer

I guess MS didn't made them sign the contract that most devs have to sign that forces them to scale down the PS3 version so both will look very similar

mendicant4732d ago

Can you provide proof of said contract or are you talking out of your ass?

Arkham4733d ago (Edited 4733d ago )

When we as gamers have to argue which is better -- "incredible" or "fantastic" -- it is a good day indeed.

kikizoo4733d ago

Incredible >>>> fantastic..

except if they said "incredible" because they don't are usualy good with ps3.

50Terabytespersec4733d ago (Edited 4733d ago )

we've heard all this malarkee before with so many games,that are multi console PC ports.
Al i have to say is the PS3 has Uncharted 3 and after seeing all thoose fluid physics and graphics as well as KZ3's stage with water effects etc. it doesn't get any better!!!
The SPU's are being used correctly and so is the Blu-ray capacity.
Now stop saying this game is gonna be anything but a PC port.
Obviously PC has an advantage but so does PS3,
PS3 inspires hard work and creativity with its unique design , but PC's inspire a easy quick fix game engines with not too much paradigm or out of the box changes in thinking.

Im tired of FPS PC ports slap onto xbox360 and PS3 then saying all this crap about how they look so great??
BS !!
Give me something exclusive and specific!1
I paid 500 for my PS3 and it has SSD drive i want some real serious native games!!!

thesummerofgeorge4733d ago

Well I heard that the PS3 version is gonna look fantabulous, whereas the 360 version will merely be stupendous. Neither will match the PC version, which is purported to look scrumtrulescent. As you can well imagine, this came as troubling news...

Gamingisfornerds4732d ago (Edited 4732d ago )

"So we want to make sure that if you're playing it on PS3 it looks incredible, and if you're playing on the 360 it's unbelievable.

Unbelievable > incredible...haha

Misleading and pointless header.

Armyntt4732d ago

These stories that use such grand superlatives piss me off.

palaeomerus4732d ago

Incredible means "should not be believed" and fantastic means "resembling an insubstantial dream or hallucination".

RIPSKATEDESTROY4732d ago

incredible: so extraordinary as to seem impossible
fantastic: conceived or appearing as if conceived by an unrestrained imagination

good would be better

subtenko4732d ago

Incredible sounds better. Fantastic sounds like a 'pat on the head' kinda compliment.

+ Show (15) more repliesLast reply 4732d ago
N4GAddict4733d ago

You would have thought CVG would ask a question like that but NOPE, they want the hits they don't even need.

soundslike4733d ago

most importantly though...are there hidden diamonds all over the map?

gemc6664733d ago

no, more important is.....are the enemies going to spam over and over again¿?¿?¿? 1;?

BeastlyRig4733d ago (Edited 4733d ago )

Pc should look uber orgasmic settings!

before the fanboy war this is what they said

"So we want to make sure that if you're playing it on PS3 it looks incredible, and if you're playing on the 360 it's unbelievable, sounds amazing and looks fantastic," he said."

seems to be no advantage in ps3 vs 360..

I hope there will be graphics mods for this game!
so much love for pc from devs in 2011 vs being shunned in 2010..

clarkdef4733d ago

Hate the way you mention fanboy, YOU ARE ONE LOL. You would have 5 bubbles if you weren't.

However you're still right about the orgasmic settings.

YodaCracker4733d ago

It seems almost impossible to have 5 bubbles on this site unless you are a PS3 fan. If you are a 360 fan, you will naturally have less bubbles.

Paralex4732d ago

They're going to look equal on both systems. Both systems can handle the same, no major differences. PS3 often lacks in actual performance, but the graphics can stand up to par. They need to add more RAM to the PS3.

Nes_Daze4733d ago

Both versions will look about the same, it's usually what happens with multiplatforms now, only fanboys will call another version superior to another based on small minor imperfections.

KRATOS-PS34733d ago

sadly there are often a lot of differences

Nes_Daze4733d ago

If you dig for them and make them up in your head, yes...there will be -_-

bigjclassic4733d ago

this is what is wrong with gaming. Last gen devs were proud to pump out strong stuff on XB1 and GCN, but this time around everyone wants to be the "same".

mobijoker4733d ago

And look like console ports on pc like crysis 2.

Show all comments (106)
Garethvk1d 10h ago

We can hope. Especially if the rumors of Cillian Murphy and Alaska are true.

RaidenBlack1d 8h ago

That'd be too good if true.
But Henderson also leaked that next Far Cry setting was targeting some asian island.

jznrpg7h ago(Edited 7h ago)

With their shitty practices I really don’t care what Ubisoft announces until they reverse their course

Relientk771d 11h ago

Assassin's Creed Hexe is what I wanna hear about most. Yes I wanna play as a witch with magic during the 16 century witch trials in Germany (as per rumors). Sign me up

Huey_My_D_Long1d 11h ago

Yeah, Hex sounds amazing to me as well, and I've been playing since AC 1. I'm real curious how are they gonna fit the magic into the game, maybe in similar way the dlc introduced gods and god abilities. but I love that I've heard its gonna have a horror vibe.

Garethvk1d 10h ago

Hopefully it is full of good stuff.

Garethvk1d 10h ago

I would love The Division 3.

RaidenBlack1d 8h ago

The studio just completed Avatar and busy with Outlaws and also got their F2P Heartland cancelled ... IMO, Division 3 will surely come but it'll take more time.
I'd be most thrilled if Ubisoft greenlits a sequel or at least a remake of the studio's first game i.e World in Conflict

anast1d 6h ago (Edited 1d 6h ago )

I would get hyped about Hexe. If the rumors are true, UBI might get a gold edition purchase out of me.

Demetrius1d 10h ago

Hopefully gameplay of ac shadows or star wars outlaws, if they finally announce the new far cry I'm definitely getting that, far cry still fun af and gorgeous games, yeah ubisoft has their faults but atleast they're not copying souls like games their titles still have identity

neutralgamer19921d 8h ago

We will definitely see gameplay for star wars and AC. Farcry let's see

OtterX1d 10h ago (Edited 1d 10h ago )

I'm going to be an outlier amongst the rest of these comments.... give us something NEW! I'm pretty burnt out on Ubisoft franchises, unless you're giving us a new Rayman game!

*Edit - imagine what they could do with a Rayman 3D game in this day and age. I say now is the time to revisit the series.

RaidenBlack1d 8h ago

Would love a AAA PoP too or a back to roots Ghost Recon (none of the open world stuff)

MeatyUrologist1d 8h ago

Hell yes! Ghost recon in the style of the originals with real consequences, permanent and all!

jznrpg7h ago

I love Rayman, played it a ton with my kids years ago. But Ubisoft puts dumb crap in their games. MTs , paid tiers , always online requirement for single player games and as they stand now I could see them doing that to Rayman

OtterX6h ago

Yea unfortunately, you're right. :'(

Garethvk1d 10h ago

Beyond Good and Evil 2: It is coming really; we promise.

OtterX1d 10h ago

Their microtransaction monetization scheme on it will lie somewhere between good and evil!

Haha JK.... it'll be completely evil. 🙃

Show all comments (21)
450°

Ubisoft say AC Shadows protagonists will be "romantically attracted to different types of people"

Ubisoft recently shared more details about Assassin's Creed Shadows protagonists, confirming that both of them will romantically attract and be attracted to different types of people.

Hugodastrevas8d ago

That should please everyone I'm sure...

RpgSama8d ago (Edited 8d ago )

Feudal Japan DEI LGBTQ+ Samurai, sounds very accurate for the time period. Surely a decision made only with historical accuracy in mind.

Crows908d ago

Or even modern day accuracy.....

Lexreborn28d ago

You have no idea what you are talking about, bet you didn’t know nobunaga was bi-sexual. Or ran maru his is often depicted as androgynous was a “beautiful boy”.

So yeah, feudal Japan had tons of lgbtq and kawaii enough… A BLACK SAMURAI! All without the need of offending a Caucasian because the world is diverse.

VenomUK8d ago (Edited 8d ago )

This story has cracked me up so much! Bravo Ubisoft, bravo! 🤣. So last week everyone was upset that in the long-awaited first Assassin’s Creed: Japan game the protagonist is black. But NOW he is also LGBTQ+ ! It’s like the Ubisoft creative team sat around a table and said “How can we best impress our Kotaku/IGN/Polygon friends and antagonise gamers? Let’s make it woke x 100!’ And then they all silent clapped!

Just you wait until the Star Wars: Outlaws details come out, there better not be anybody complaining about Kay Vess’ dating preferences and the gay droid armies.

Christopher8d ago

It actually is.

Japanese were very Greek in their sexual experiences.

lodossrage8d ago

Lexreborn2 is right

Go read up on Japan's feudal era homosexuality and bisexuality was a very common thing in that time.

I just have to laugh because the same people complaining about this are the same ones crying about wanting "historical accuracy". When it's clear most of the whiners don't even know history themselves.

Christopher8d ago (Edited 8d ago )

Facts don't care about downvotes, btw. You either claim to understand historical accuracy or you just admit you don't like the stuff people did throughout history.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wi...

thorstein8d ago

Japan had no Christian stupidity about sexuality.

That's where your nonsensical puritanical view comes from: the Abraham's faiths.

It's feudal Japan, they don't believe in your religion's made up nonsense.

I mean, if you're going to embrace a particular viewpoint, you should at least be aware of where it comes from. Most of the world doesn't care about your ideals.

In those days, they certainly didn't care about your religion.

Get over yourself.

RpgSama8d ago

All of you guys missed the point, I even said I'm very sure they did it ONLY because they wanted to be historically accurate. Stop defending this, we all know why they did it and who they want to pander, it's not out newfound respect for history.

lodossrage7d ago

@RpgSama

Nobody is defending anything.

People are just pointing out the fact that after they just cried about the game not being historically accurate, when they SHOW they're accurate, they cry about it because they don't like certain parts of history

Not to mention you contradicted yourself RPGSama. You just pointed out you said they "ONLY because they wanted to be historically accurate". Then turn around and accuse them of pandering and/or having an agenda. Those two things are opposing statements

Cacabunga7d ago

Dumbest decision ever.. always online was a pass for me but now not even for free I’ll try it..

LordoftheCritics7d ago

It's made by Ubisoft Montreal.

Obviously we'll be allowed to bang anything that moves.

RiseNShine7d ago (Edited 7d ago )

Yeha pretty sure.

H97d ago

People actually telling you that Japan had sexual deviancy which is correct however what's hilarious is that they will act as if it holds the same moral value that the LGBT community holds today, oh the things men used to say about themselves when they are attracted to other men, it's not empowering in the least bit

senorfartcushion7d ago

It was more common to be attracted to the same sex before the crusades.

7d ago
Tapani7d ago

You are completely lost on Japanese history. Japan was one of the most liberal places in the world, and in many ways still is. You can slice and dice it from your western hubris and whatever point of view, but the reality is that history tells great stories about freedom of choice and people not being judgemental on this island. Also one of the reasons I want to raise my family here, no need to have those whatever Western woke bullshit here, because everyone just respects each other without using all that nonsense.

+ Show (14) more repliesLast reply 7d ago
CrimsonWing698d ago

Geezus, just make a good game… holy sh*t this is becoming insufferable.

Crows908d ago

Oh yeah!!!! What about being inclusive???

I'm sorry
..please replace the word inclusive with stupid.

Hofstaderman8d ago

You asking UbiSoft to make a good game? This is not 2002.

thorstein8d ago

I thought you crybabies wanted "historical accuracy." Now that your going to get it, you're going to cry more.

PRIMORDUS8d ago

It's past the point of retarded, everyone seems forced to do this bullshit now in games. 😑

Barlos7d ago

Hell no. A good game or film is secondary now to the agenda and the 'message'.

It's not enough to be simply entertained these days, there has to be an overarching real world narrative. I mean look at Dr Who as a recent example. Disney have completely destroyed it all in the name of 'diversity'.

senorfartcushion7d ago

You sound like you don't have a very active sex life ,😅

CrimsonWing697d ago (Edited 7d ago )

Are you projecting? 😝

senorfartcushion7d ago

It's the only thing that explains the incel crap. They can't simply be angry virgins who don't get any, so then a lack of a sex life i.e. a dad of three or something, is also a good additional explanation. They're either lonely and don't get any or too busy to get any. There's a horrible news for sexual control with incels, and they're angry because they simply aren't the right people to achieve that control. They're weaker animals.

notachance7d ago

dude’s too busy commenting on other people’s sex life to actually stay on topic.

That or he’s angry but didn’t have half the brain needed to refute back so he went for the classic ad hominem fallacy.

senorfartcushion7d ago

Notachance

It's a fact that remains true. The only way it can't be true is if humans were not greedy and heavily reliant on procreation.

Your username is fitting.

CrimsonWing697d ago (Edited 7d ago )

dude, let’s be real, you’re on a video game news site going into the comments section and taking time out of your life to go to war with people you think don’t f*ck. You sound as much of a virgin as any incel does.

Let’s be real, bub you’re just as pathetic as the rest of them. Anyone who would look at this who doesn’t waste their time on a video game news site or video games in general probably thinks the only thing you f*ck is your crusty ass pillow.

C’mon, man. Anyone who f*cks doesn’t immediately go into a comment section claiming others have no sex life. It’s just one of those things if you are getting your d*ck wet. It just comes off like you’re projecting in hopes to god nobody figures out you can’t get any, so you try to flex, even though you’re completely full of sh*t.

I mean, that’s the only thing that makes sense to me 😅.

senorfartcushion6d ago

I'm engaged without children - I'm doing just fine.

This is just nerd sites now. Users are just so angry and for basically the same reasons. Most people go through phases with this type of stuff but it's scary seeing the same attitudes being regurgitated over and over again. From what I've seen it's a strange mix of sexual frustration, lack of proper financing and the need to have 100% control over both so that they aren't taken away from the users.

CrimsonWing696d ago

@fartcushion

Look, man, people are allowed to have opinions and show frustration with stuff. It has no bearing on them not getting sex or not making money.

I have no idea how people commenting on being tired of hearing about SJW sh*t being shown in the spotlight like some carnival sideshow where publishers are wanting some pat on the back for means they’re financially unstable and don’t have a sexual relationship.

What, are you on the spectrum? Like how do you come to that conclusion and make multiple responses to the discourse with “virgin alert” or “you need to have sex?” That right there is kind of sus to me.

I don’t know in what world you lived in where this hasn’t been a nerd site, but people are allowed to comment their thoughts on things and still have relationships. You’re just as much of a nerd as everyone in here.

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 6d ago
+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 6d ago
8d ago Replies(3)
darthv728d ago

Is that genuinely a selling point for people?

RpgSama8d ago (Edited 8d ago )

They sure as hell want to see if it is, time and time and time again.

VincentVanBro8d ago

You have to understand they’re incapable of writing a good story so this is the best they could come up with

thorstein8d ago

Well, after last weeks crying about historical accuracy. Now Ubi days, " Oh, okay, historical accuracy: here you go."

Now you're saying you don't want the accuracy? Can you guys just make up your minds?

7d ago
notatallsurprisinggg7d ago

It's a genuine click-bait snippet to rile up people like you to push traffic.

7d ago
7d ago
+ Show (5) more repliesLast reply 7d ago
Show all comments (119)
210°

Ubisoft to Focus on "Return to Leadership" in Open World Genre, Expand Live Service Experiences

Ubisoft says they are focusing on two "core verticals," and that's to return as a leader in the open world genre, and live service games.

enkiduxiv16d ago

Calling Ubisoft a leader in open world gaming at any point in time would be like calling Dollar General a leader in retail.

excaliburps15d ago

Well, to be fair, they did pump out good open world games before. It was used as a template so much that people now know what it means when you say it's like an Ubi open world collectahon.

shinoff218315d ago

What though? I can't think of one game they had where I liked anything about it. Atleast since the ps3/360 Gen

Kornholic15d ago

If they have never been the leader in open world gaming, then explain me this: why does almost every open world game follow the same tired old Ubisoft open world formula?

Follow the Leader.

Aphrodia15d ago

YO dont' talk bad about the General. There'll be problems...

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 15d ago
isarai16d ago

You were never the leader bro 🤣

shinoff218316d ago (Edited 16d ago )

I don't think they were ever the leader tbh. I've never really cared for any of their open world games. I do wanna try watch dogs 2 because it looks like it's set in San Fran. Looked interesting

Show all comments (36)