690°

First Video Footage of Killzone 3 MOVE Gameplay

Sony has shown the first gaming scenes from Killzone 3 with Move support. The video shows the scenes from the sony keynote.

Read Full Story >>
translate.google.com
sinncross5046d ago (Edited 5046d ago )

Too Cool!
Killzone 3 is going to be an absolutely blast

5046d ago Replies(15)
meetajhu5046d ago

Ok i'm getting playstation move just for this one game!

Gamehead365046d ago

I am completely sold on move. That was fucking awesome. This is what happens when you put quality motion controls in quality developers hands. For the slow ones, you get quality experiences. You actually get 2 experiences in games compatible with both sets of controls, and games with as much content as this will get my $60. Trash ass ported garbage can kiss my ass and will only get my money when it is 15 or less, plus ill buy it used. Mwuhahahahaha

Ravage275046d ago

Has the graphics improved again? Whatever it is, KZ3 is looking REALLY good right now, and i can totally see myself tossing grenades using the Move. Controlling the elevation might require some practice though :)

sikbeta5046d ago

@meetajhu

just for this game? Pffft, I was sold since Sony announced Ape Escape + Move and Sorcery :)

Seriously, the line-up of Move compatible games keep growing and gets better, Move will prove to everyone that motion-controls can be applied in hardcore games

Takoulya5046d ago

I just hope GG makes it so that you don't have to point to the edge of the screen to make your character turn. I don't like that. I want GG to make it so that it's classic camera style. It seems cheap with that camera and reminds me far too much of playing Call of Duty: World at War on the Wii. Not good at all.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5046d ago
Hydrolex5046d ago

2K guys are watching and hopefuly learning, they are like Damn we are so noobies but it's okay we will show in Mafia 3

Chuk_Chuk5046d ago

That melee kill made me cringe. Damn that was brutal

KingME5046d ago (Edited 5046d ago )

The thing that made me cringe was the guy was pumping bullets into him prior to the melee kill and it didn't affect him. He should have been dropped like a bad habbit.

Not to mention, the fact that the A.I. troop stared at him for 3 seconds before even taking a shot. He wouldn't have lasted 2 seconds in MW2. It seems that the added move support but forgot to work on the A.I.

Just an observation.

lol although I'm still going to get it :)

nycredude5045d ago

Are you retarded or something it was a demo and most likely in god mode.

DORMIN5046d ago

On KZ3 and Move.

And I just realized this game is still in Alpha build. O_O

D4RkNIKON5046d ago

It is more than just KZ that sold me on Move, LBP2 will be absolutely amazing with move!

Hydrolex5046d ago

" Is it snowing in the game ? Fail, they couldn't put grass in the game so they made it snowing "

hahahaha stupid people make me laugh

Jonoc335046d ago

Ahahaha roozium, if they're bringing Portal 2 to PS3 why wouldn't they bring future games to PS3 too? Are you retarded? And Mass Effect 1 is old. Nobody needs it on PS3 so that's why it's not coming out. Can just play it on PC anyway.

You're right, major damage control.

omi25p5046d ago

mass effect 1 improves mass effect 2 it a big way. How is it old

raztad5046d ago

Looks really good. Accurate and responsive. Immersive. I preordered MOVE yesterday when I learned MAG was getting support.

BTW, is me getting it wrong or you actually can carry more than two weapon in KZ3? I'm surprised nobody has mentioned because, thats is great news!! no more COD "2 weapons only" crap.

gijsbrecht5046d ago (Edited 5046d ago )

That's indeed what the man said; you can at least carry two big guns with you. Besides the pistol and the knife I assume.

heroprotagonist5046d ago

It's cool, I'm not going to hate just because I am more of a PC and 360 fan. It looks like it will be fun. Sony is at least showing hardcore games can be done with their motion controls.

Consoldtobots5045d ago

nevermind MOVE (we know it will be great) those graphics looks like a generational leap above KZ2. That's why I LMAO at dumb fanboys trying to troll the Cell.

+ Show (7) more repliesLast reply 5045d ago
gamerzBEreal175046d ago (Edited 5046d ago )

LOOKS AWSOME! CANT WAIT TO PLAY KILLZONE IN A HOLE NEW WAY!!!

*EDIT*
i hate these google articles so much

Shmai_the_Cat5046d ago

Looks astonishingly good. Never expected Move to work that well. MUST HAVE.

THE MAX SPEED 215046d ago

Very good like socom. It works.

What's so hard to understand there?

CryofSilence5046d ago

I'm reading it as, "Very good. Like Socom, it works." ;)

KingKiff5046d ago

Grammar never hurts.

I don't like re-reading comments to try and get the point of it.

Simple things like commas (,) and full stops (.) and the biggest thing of all, proper use of capital letters, can make it so much easier for the rest if us.

Hydrolex5046d ago (Edited 5046d ago )

lol I didn't understand what he said either ! so it's either my english or his english messed up, I guess it's mine... NOTTTTTTTTTTTT

Consoldtobots5045d ago

who you kidding King, I've seen a white teenager on JEOPARDY use ghetto slang. I cringed at hearing the english language get mangled by someone with at least a middle class upbringing.

jack_burt0n5046d ago (Edited 5046d ago )

oh its better than i could have imagined it looks so effing good. visceral meaty and responsive.

Show all comments (112)
200°

Sony shares big new PS Plus stat, but not the one we want to see

PlayStation Plus has improved the split of PS4 and PS5 players on its priciest tiers, but Sony continues to hide total subscriber numbers.

Read Full Story >>
theloadout.com
mandf11d ago

lol acting like it’s equivalent to ms numbers

Mr Logic11d ago

Uh...They're definitely not equivalent.

"Microsoft’s Xbox Game Pass service now has 34 million subscribers."

"the total number of PS Plus subscribers across all tiers was 47.4 million"

darthv7211d ago (Edited 11d ago )

That PSN number seems like it should be much higher... especially when you consider that PS4 alone has a sell through of over 117m. To not even be at least half that is rather interesting.

To the XB side, having 34m to an install base of roughly 50m (XBO sell through) or even 85m (360 sell through) is a greater percentage of unit to member ratio than PSN.

bloop10d ago

That's not the "gotcha" you think it is Darth.

darthv7210d ago

^^it's not supposed to be bloop.... it's just an interesting observation.

Einhander197210d ago

darthv72

"That PSN number seems like it should be much higher... especially when you consider that PS4 alone has a sell through of over 117m. To not even be at least half that is rather interesting.

To the XB side, having 34m to an install base of roughly 50m (XBO sell through) or even 85m (360 sell through) is a greater percentage of unit to member ratio than PSN."

Have you ever heard of a PC before? I hear they are pretty popular.

fr0sty10d ago

MS started lumping gold subscribers in with those GP numbers... keep in mind.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 10d ago
shinoff218311d ago (Edited 11d ago )

What. Definitely more os plus subscribers but that makes sense due to actual console sales

Darth the difference between the bases are huge your right but you gotta think. Ps players buy more games, where as the Xbox base relies on gamepass for their gaming. So it makes perfect sense

darthv7211d ago (Edited 11d ago )

What makes perfect sense though? You say PS players buy more games... so then logically there should be more PS+ subscribers given the increased number of online multiplayer games in the PS4 generation alone. The PS4 was the first time that + was required for online play much like Gold was for 360 users.

Keep in mind we are talking subscribers, not simply XB/PS users. I assume you meant to say offline single player games, which is most likely true as well. That gen also saw a significant increase in games with an online component comparted to the previous gen.

victorMaje11d ago

I for one will be going back to essential at the next renewal. When I feel a game is good & right up my alley, I’ll check trusted reviews & just buy it.

jznrpg11d ago (Edited 11d ago )

I have the top tier until 2028 as they gave me a massive discount for all the years I had left but I’ll most likely go to essential as well. I buy my games but my kids do use the service occasionally. They do prefer to own their games as well since any game can leave the rental service at some point and they don’t like that idea. They mostly use it to demo games then ask me to buy games if they really like it.

RedDevils10d ago

For me, I will cancel it all together but unfortunately I still have it till 2030 lol

meganick11d ago

I would like to see Sony add a fourth tier of PS Plus for people who just want to be able to play games online without any of the perks like monthly games, store discounts, or anything like that, and it should cost $20 annually, $30 maximum. There’s no way I’m paying $80 just to play games online. Even the original $60 fee was too much, and I would often wait for sales to re-up my subscription.

P_Bomb10d ago (Edited 10d ago )

Essential is too expensive, I agree. We’ve got one Essential and one Premium sub. Dropping the Premium when it expires.

gamerz10d ago

Just let my subscription lapse for the first time since 2010. Will sub again every now and then for a month or so to access my old ps+ games but for me it's the end of an era.

DivineHand12510d ago

Let those numbers continue to drop because it is now too expensive. $80 per year just to play online. I noticed they didn't offer any discounts on the subscription or controllers during this year's days of play for the first time in many years and they will feel it when people choose not to renew.

My subscription will lapse next month and it will stay that way until further notice.

KevtheDuff10d ago

There were savings on subs and controllers here in the UK? I bought a controller yesterday in the sale..
It would be weird if those deals were not in other territories too?

300°

Sony Says The PS5 Is Its “Most Profitable Generation To-Date"

During Sony’s recent business segment meeting and investor presentation regarding its game and network services, the PlayStation company revealed that PlayStation 5 is the company’s “most profitable generation to-date.”

It’s the top slide of the presentation, showing that in its first four years, the PS5 generation has already hit $106 billion in sales, having almost caught up to the PS4’s total $107 billion generated.

Operating income for the PS5 generation has also already surpassed that of the PS4, having now reached $10 billion.

ApocalypseShadow12d ago (Edited 12d ago )

I wouldn't doubt it. They released a high quality system. A lot of high quality games from themselves and their support of 3rd party developers and indies. They released many high quality remakes and remasters. They released a high quality GaaS game going against the naysayers thinking Sony would abandon single player games. And they most likely are profiting a lot more than PS1, PS2 PS4 and the loss leading PS3 that drained all their profits.

Now, I'll wait to see what's cooking tomorrow. But can you use some of those profits to better support your high quality VR headset? Because, by supporting it, you can sell more games and more systems and make more profits?

jznrpg12d ago (Edited 12d ago )

I want RPGs for PSVR2! Good ones of course

shinoff218312d ago

If it had some rpgs I would buy right fking now. It looks dope and alot of fun, but it's biggest game resident evil 4(maybe) I've got no interest in. I'm not a fan of racing games, even with that metro game coming i was never much into that series. Rpgs would be fantastic.

MrNinosan12d ago

Lemme know if ya wanna play some Zenith 🙌
Bought it at release, but haven't played it more than 1-2 hours but for sure on my "todo list".

Cacabunga12d ago

Normal when they released mostly cross gen games so far. That’s a lot of money saved..
We haven’t seen what PS5 can do yet. 4years in and PS4 games still look great to me. The gen leap isn’t quite there yet.

--Onilink--12d ago

The interesting metric for me is the $106billion in operating income/profit (not sales as mentioned in the article) reaching the same as the PS4 did with only half the consoles sold.

In particular because they all are supposed to be making the most per hardware sold after a few years when manufacturing costs are down.

So even putting inflation aside(and the higher console price), it is interesting that they could reach PS4 $ with just half the consoles sold.

Maybe there is more to the metric thats whats seen at face value, but they have clearly been making a lot more money than before on the software side (with also less games released I suppose, given its only been half the generation so far)

VersusDMC12d ago

The bulk of the money has to be coming from the 30% cut on all games and microtransactions. Especially on all the free to play juggernauts like genshin, apex, fortnight, etc.

--Onilink--12d ago (Edited 12d ago )

@Versus

They are definitely making a lot on that for sure (which the $70 price increase factors into as well), but its not like many of those games werent around for the PS4 too.

They might be counting the gen as a whole and not just PS5 itself (so extra profit from PC sales, whatever that may be)

PS+ price increase and different tiers probably amount to part of that too.

But in general, its still quite a surprising metric. Half the time, half the consoles sold, less first party games released so far and still already making more of a profit than last gen is quite something, and as mentioned, there is probably more to it that we dont know, after all, since we are talking about operating income, all the expenses they have also factor into it, so it is also possible that they have found ways to significantly reduce that + all the means of increased revenue that appear to be factoring into the equation

All in all, just an interesting situation from a business perspective

porkChop12d ago

It's for the whole generation, so it would likely be including PC. They also make much more profit on digital sales vs retail, and digital is far more prominent these days. The generation also started at the height of COVID when everyone was home, spending far more money on gaming/hobbies. It makes a lot of sense for this gen to be more profitable.

Abnor_Mal12d ago

This will surely shut up all the new trolling accounts trying to spread lies and non facts in other articles comment sections before this article is posted.

Hofstaderman12d ago (Edited 12d ago )

Obscurely, those trolls or troll will not show in these articles as the truth is contradictory to his or their orchard-sized daily dose of copium and hopium.

Tacoboto12d ago

Or... They're intentionally trolling you guys specifically. Because they know it upsets you so easily.

Name-dropping Orchard, after this many months? How long has it been and he's still in your thoughts?

Elda12d ago (Edited 12d ago )

I'm quite sure the individual is reading these positive comments downvoting & seething at the same time. Edit: It just downvoted my comment...lol!!

Hofstaderman12d ago

No I'm entertained by this individual. I love unhinged people, they are so interesting lol.

repsahj12d ago

Wow! I am super impressed that in just 4 years, ps5 already caught up to the PS4's. Congratulations.

JackBNimble11d ago

That happens when half of your games are cross platform. I'm still waiting to see what the ps5 is capable of, because they sure haven't pushed any limits.

And where are all these ps5 exclusive games?

sagapo12d ago

Not really surprised as Sony barely has any competition at the moment.

Show all comments (47)
150°

Sony CEO says although AI "has been used for creation," it's "not a substitute for human creativity"

"AI is not a substitute for human creativity. We position it as a technology that supports creativity. Creativity resides in people. We will continue to contribute to people's creativity through technology," the CEO said.

Read Full Story >>
gamesradar.com
1nsomniac19d ago (Edited 19d ago )

...not yet but 100% within the next 10 years!

..Then Sony will use it like the drop of a hat. They're no different to the others.

isarai19d ago (Edited 19d ago )

They used to be 😞 sure it was always a business, and money's always the priority, but they used to have a very strong stance on supporting artists and creativity. "Dont f#@k with the artist" was a phrase they touted a few times back in the ps1-ps3 era, a philosophy carried over from their music branch PlayStation was created from. It's not COMPLETELY gone, but it's barely there compared to what it was back then, i just want them to return to that.

Eonjay18d ago (Edited 18d ago )

I am highly encouraged by their statement about human creativity. "Dont f#@k with the artist" is exactly what they are saying. But at the same time, I don't think people understand that Sony is a corporation. If they don't realize growth, they don't get to exist. When you say 'Sony', you are talking about a bunch of investors. To speak about them any other way is a illogical and incorrect. They haven't changed. They have been a group of investors since they became a public business.

isarai18d ago

Ugh, i really wish people would stop gambling people's livelihoods by turning a project/game into their political soapbox. Im all for statements and having your own opinion, but there's more people working on this than just druckman, ham fisting your political beliefs onto just seems inconsiderate for everyone elses job security when it can result in a failure due to people avoiding it for that reason.

I play games for escape, im so tired of nearly every AAA game blatantly dragging real world issues to shove in my face when I'm trying to take a break from it all. They don't even bother to be subtle about it, quite the opposite, it's blasted and force fed to you and it's just getting exhausting

Einhander197218d ago

People are taking a whole interview and cutting it down to clips that make him look bad and take what he actually was saying out of context. For example he also said things like this AI has "ethical issues we need to address"

-Foxtrot18d ago

@Einhander

Why defend him at this point?

It’s not taking things out of context, he said what he said.

Old ND would never talk about soulless AI taking over so many creative things they are well known for. The whole “ethical issues” is just a good PR spin people who push this crap fall back on to make their statements not seem as bad. So many AI lovers do this.

AI has no place is so many creative based things.

Einhander197218d ago

Well yeah, because everyone else is using it so they need to stay competitive. It's the same as paid online, they didn't want to go that route but their competition was making so much money they needed to add paid online just to keep up.

RaiderNation18d ago (Edited 18d ago )

AI will never replace humans in game development in terms of conceptualizing new games. Humans still need to come up with the ideas and what they want to implement. However much of the day to day menial coding could be AI driven to reduce production time and team size. I could also see AI being used for bug testing/optimization that could lead to better quality games at launch. I'm actually very optimistic about how AI can positively impact game development.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 18d ago
XiNatsuDragnel19d ago

Good statement but hopefully this holds up

NotoriousWhiz18d ago

People that aren't software developers just don't understand the benefits of AI. People who's only exposure to A.I is the Terminator movie and other related sci fi films won't understand the benefits it provides.

It's not about replacing human labor. It's about making human labor easier.

Many years ago, I had laser eye surgery done. It was performed by a robot. The doctor took my measurements and calibrated the machine to make sure it would do what needed be done. And then the robot corrected my vision in 10 seconds.

15 years later and I still have 20/20 vision.

Eonjay18d ago

AI in and of itself is not a 'bad'. Money is bad. Money is evil, and corporations will do whatever they can to get more of it. They will find ways to implement AI to replace as may jobs as possible. This isn't even up for debate. It is the charge of the corporation to maximize returns for the investors. They have no choice. I'm a developer and I know that my job will absolutely be replaced. Therefore, I have decided to become an AI dev. AI has a lot of potential to help us solve problem on a scale most can't even imagine. The issue, as ever is that our monetary system only ever allows us to focus on greed and fiscal growth.

But I am a pragmatist. Perhaps an AI model can be built to help protect us from our most dangerous instincts and habits. And perhaps Congress can pass laws to protect us from people who would use AI to manipulate and control us (spoiler: they wont).

RaiderNation17d ago (Edited 17d ago )

Progress is inevitable. Nobody driving cars today is complaining that the horse and buggy is no longer around. Yes, some jobs will be lost but guess what? With innovation comes new job opportunities. It's how the cycle of the job market works.