1030°

Casual Kinect 'surprises' Sony

Sony has revealed its "surprise" over Microsoft's casual launch line-up for Kinect.

Read Full Story >>
computerandvideogames.com
SupaGamer5061d ago

I think it surprised everyone.

Danja5061d ago

did it ? I think i would have been more surprised if Microsoft came out with a bunch of hardcore games for kinect we all knew this was there attempt to capture a piece of the causal market ?

IRetrouk5061d ago

no micro said it was for harcore gamers too, did you see any support for the hardcore?

sikbeta5061d ago

Yeah, the Same WTF! kind of Surprise we all get, no-1 would ever thought MS was going to that root...

AKS5061d ago

@jjohan35

No doubt. That dude really knows how to get down. LOL.

Dragun6195061d ago (Edited 5061d ago )

What surprised me was that MS didn't show or announce at least one Hardcore Kinect title in their E3 Keynote.

The only kinect title that I thought would go great with the hardcore audience was Children of Eden. Even MS agreed that they should have shown this game during their Keynote. The game looks awesome though, I just wonder how it'll work with the PS Move.

nix5061d ago

well.. most of the Sony games for PSEye were casual. so Sony knows there's only so much one can do with camera. so hey!

it's great that we can play hard core games with Move. good 'move' sony. i'll be buying a couple.

R2D25061d ago Show
gaffyh5061d ago

@marius - What about Skittles?

Bigpappy5061d ago

M$ said well before E3 that Natal would focus on casual gaming first. I was not surprised by this.

insomnium5061d ago

That video reminds me of those claptraps in Borderlands.

ChozenWoan5061d ago

I like the way Tiger Woods is right behind him with that... "I hope I don't have to demo my game with that thing" look on his face.

thehitman5061d ago

that MS actually took the Kinect route and not went more the Wii route like Sony, what Kinect had to offer was like a given from day 1 as I own a eyetoy already and know what the technology can do and its limits. Only casual party games can come from camera-type motion controls.

DaTruth5061d ago

"ROFLMAO xD"

That is exactly what I did!

+ Show (14) more repliesLast reply 5061d ago
BeaArthur5061d ago

It didn't surprise me. It was pretty obvious that they wanted a piece of the Wii pie.

KingME5061d ago

One guys makes this comment and the title says "Sony" as if the guy speaks for the entire company.

MicroSony4Life5061d ago

he is speaking for the entire MS company.

Double Standard much.

KingME5061d ago (Edited 5061d ago )

I have never said "when Greenberg says something he is speaking for the entire MS company." So I would appreciate it if you didn't imply that BS.

To be honest with you, people on this site take almost anything they read (Especially negative stuff about MS) as truth.

So to answer your question of "Double Standard much" I say..."Head up your ass much?"

DaTruth5061d ago

Never understood why someone takes something that some fanboy said at one time and applies it to a stranger he doesn't know!

You always think that they must have stalked his comment history; but no, it is always just a comment tagged to a person who likely never said that!

badz1495061d ago

"Sony worldwide studios boss Shuhei Yoshida" - If he's not the voice of Sony, then I don't know who else IS!

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 5061d ago
nikkisixx25061d ago

The Move surprised me more than Kinect because the PS Move will be supported by mutliplatform games (Dead Space 2, RUSE, NBA 2K11, etc.).

krisprolls5061d ago

That's the thing : Move is supported in REAL games like Socom, Killzone, RE5 or NBA 2K11...

Kinect is mostly a toy for casual shovelware and party games until now...

rdgneoz35061d ago

@R2D2
I think they did read it, as they're saying the casual /family-friendly games are not real games. And many agree seeing as MS only showed casual games during E3 and not anything hardcore / real games like shooters, sports games, action, or adventure games.
Move on the other hand will have a hand in casual and hardcore games, and that was shown.

vhero5061d ago

It was surprising that MS never showed a single game coming out at launch that "wowed" anybody and made them think I really wan Kinect for that game.

Sevir045061d ago

because the KINECT is outselling the MOVE, and the reason for that is it's Second coming of Jesus level marketing which has already started hot off the heels of E32010. I agree. their was nothing at the kinect event that made me want to rush out and buy it and having tested it my self it still needs work, but It just proves that Sony isn't pouring in the ammount of money to market what many would call a better solution to MCgaming.

MS has it's hands on this industry. and the casuals are all hyped about it. Just walk into gamestop and observe how the marketing is working. the guys at the counter talk about it and the people interested light up like a lamp hearing it.

Bigpappy5061d ago

It has more to do with appeal. Kinect is selling its self because the casuals see it as simple, different and fun. The move does not have the same effect because it gives the first impression of being like the wii. That gives Sony the challenge of trying to convince casuals that Move is not just a copy of wii (Good luck with that). For the hardcore, all they need to do is show hardcore gameplay. For casuals, they need better casual game than the wii. M$ is sitting pretty right now, unless Sony can use the PS-eye to make some Kinect centric games that show the casuals that they can do what kinect can and more. That is the only way I see Sony offsetting Kinect.

beardpapa5061d ago

@Sevir

Justin Bieber. That is all.

badz1495061d ago

they didn't just showed up at E3 with just the red balls game! although most of the things being showed for Kinect at E3 were pre-recorded or acted (fake light saber duel & skittles being the most obvious of all) but things to come are yet to be seen. I respect M$ as a worthy rival for Sony and Ninty and expect them to come out with something to our surprise later. not hoping much but I think M$ can do better with Kinect than what already shown. afterall, competition is good for the industry and it's sad to see if any of the company available now crumbles just like that.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5061d ago
JokesOnYou5061d ago (Edited 5061d ago )

I like the tech, but like I said long before E3 I'm not buying into Kinect until it offers some games I'm interested in....I really do want it for dashboard navigation but again I'll wait for a hardcore game. For now it seems micro has the launch lineup aimed directly at casuals. Thats fine, theres plenty of stuff coming for the usual 360 fanbase, Crackdown will hold me over until Reach and Gears3 looks like it will raise the bar yet again. Micro is smart they know casuals will love stuff like Kinectimals, Dance games, and exercise stuff, look at the wii and they want to first go after that market. I do think at some point there will be plenty of hardcore titles with Kinect support. It will be interesting to see what they do with Star Wars.

JOY

Hallmark Moment5061d ago (Edited 5061d ago )

Lol at this fud in response to Kinect's popullarity/interest/demand-36 0S- Kinect

+ Show (4) more repliesLast reply 5061d ago
5061d ago Replies(2)
TrevorPhillips5061d ago

LOL at your DP ^^

And to me both Kinect and Move will suprise me.

DA_SHREDDER5061d ago (Edited 5061d ago )

Yah, i figured they had at least one game use Natal in a way that we never thought of before? I always knew it would make for a great dancing game or fitness game. But never did I think that it would be a platform for microsoft to make shoddy casual games? I figured Fable 3 would really do something cool with it, but I guess I was right the first time? Natal is just a gimmick, and just proves that 99% of the media are a bunch of fagot fanboys who love to hype games with no logic behind what they believe or want.

I remember watching the E3 when Natal was first announced, I was like, wtf is everyone freakin out for? They didn't even show any games besides that ridiculous paint game (wanna make an elephant with real pillows anyone?) and a bunch of prerended and scripted vids with people playing supposed Natal games, that Im pretty sure was just of games that don't even exist or worked in the first place.

But then I seen the PSmove and what it could do, the tech behind it, how precise it was, and they were actually demoing it there right in front of everyone. Noone in the gaming media was even hyped for it, even though the guy took the sword and was scratching the skeletons chin with his sword, or the laser whipe, ball n chain, everything it had to offer. I was like , ZoMG!.

Which is why since then I gave up on the media. There are a few gaming sites that I listen to their podcast cause their some good people, but everyone has different views and taste in gaming, but one thing I learned for sure through all this is dont go by what anyone says about a game till you see or played it for yourself. And unless u see actual gameplay, dont believe that natal can do what MS says it can do. I heard that you cant even sit down and use it like they been showing in the vids. MS is hoaxing everyone, but im not gonna be a statistic. Yall go ahead and knock your own socks off.

GodGinrai5061d ago (Edited 5061d ago )

while i couldnt care less about kinect at this point in time it baffles me that you think move is going to something nintendo aint already done...it even looks like a bloody wiimote!..matter of fact..get of that fizzy fanboy flavoured cool aid.

Edit:on topic. MS suprised me with kinect by underwhelming me. i was expecting MS to really show and prove...they gave me nothing..i mean c`mon man..kinectimals!?

MysticStrummer5061d ago

Yeah you did miss something... all the articles that rave about the precision of Move compared to the Wii. That precision means more hardcore titles are possible. No Kool-Aid needed.

krisprolls5061d ago

PS Move >>> wii because :

1) Move has core games like Socom, Killzone, RE5 or Heavy Rain, Wii doesn't have those core games

2) It's more precise

3) You can do augmented reality and 1:1 due to the camera, not with the Wii

4) games are in HD on PS3 with Move, not on Wii

It's superior to the Wii in every way.

moparful995061d ago

You really did miss alot. I will forgive you for assuming that move is just a wii knock off. Move is uber precise with a 1:1 ratio allowing precision just not possible on the wii.. Move utilizes the playstation eye which allows for depth of field and tells the game exactly where you are in 3d space instead of just detecting basic movement. Inside of the move wand are accelerometers and gyroscopes that also detect rotation and orientation of your hand and wrist, all of this combined lends to some exciting possiblities with move.. Moreso move can be used while sitting and isn't restricted to 2 players. All in all move strikes a perfect balance between the wii and kinect allowing gamers of all types to take advantage of move.. Another example of sony innovation at its best...

GodGinrai5061d ago

I hear what you guys are saying but motion controls still havent convinced yet. I was atleast quietley optimistic for them before E3..but the cats out the bag.And i dont like what i see from either. id still rather play KZ(or any FPS for that matter) with a controller.Has any body played KZ/socom with move to co-sign its usefulness in these kinds of games? Granted, sony have shown more that would apeal to core gamers but...im just not convinced.Im more impressed with all the 3d shenanigans sony has been getting up to.

xX TriiCKy Xx5061d ago

Just a side-note: Its actually Kool-Aid...

moparful995060d ago

I understand where your reservation comes from given the unfulfilled promises of the wii. But I watched a video in which an editor at ign played socom 4 with move, before playing he expressed how uninterested he was in move, but after raved at how precise and natural it feels.. Thats why I am excited for move, I think we all yearn for "mouse-like" precision on our consoles and I believe that move is the answer. Fingers crossed that it's as precise and functional as its advertised to be... Besides sorcery just looks cool.. lol

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 5060d ago
nycredude5061d ago

I'm with you man. Sold my 360 and bought a gaming laptop. Pc and ps3 is all I need. I don't fall for BS. I am buying the move though for Sorcery, Socom 4 and Killzone 3 and Heavy Rain.

krisprolls5061d ago (Edited 5061d ago )

yeah I agree, PC/PS3 combo for the win.

MS = bullshit PR, lies, paying for online, 12 year old retards screaming racist insults on Live, stupid generic FPS, no exclusive, Kinect Eyetoy ripoff casual shovelware...

Sony delivers.

36T5061d ago (Edited 5061d ago )

"I don't fall for BS. I am buying the move though for Sorcery, Socom 4 and Killzone 3 and Heavy Rain"

Seems to me like you're about to fall for BS. lol! You and krisprolls should go on a date. Both brain dead Sony lovers! The perfect match! AWWWWWWW! May i suggest you both bring the glowing precision dildo stick to the party?

DevastationEve5061d ago

Move probably won't do too well with hardcore gamers either, unless the games have a special "move" oriented control set. But many hardcore games already map out onto every friggin button on either 360 or PS3's controller, so you're going to be missing some functions.

Kinect could be awesome, since it recognizes gestures. Like holstering to switch weapons or any other function that normally gets its own button.

Kinect PLUS Move would be VERY AWESOME, one tracks your movement and the other tracks your aim!

Red-Dead-Roar5061d ago

move tracks both movement and your aim! your point being?

pew-pew!

xX TriiCKy Xx5061d ago

Sorcery and Socom 4 are gonna be fuckin BEASTLY! I can't say the same for KZ3 and Heavy Rain as I haven't played/nor seen footage of them using Move.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 5061d ago
DaTruth5061d ago (Edited 5061d ago )

"Yah, i figured they had at least one game use Natal in a way that we never thought of before? I always knew it would make for a great dancing game or fitness game. But never did I think that it would be a platform for microsoft to make shoddy casual games? I figured Fable 3 would really do something cool with it, but I guess I was right the first time? Natal is just a gimmick, and just proves that 99% of the media are a bunch of fagot fanboys who love to hype games with no logic behind what they believe or want.

I remember watching the E3 when Natal was first announced, I was like, wtf is everyone freakin out for? They didn't even show any games besides that ridiculous paint game (wanna make an elephant with real pillows anyone?) and a bunch of prerended and scripted vids with people playing supposed Natal games, that Im pretty sure was just of games that don't even exist or worked in the first place.

But then I seen the PSmove and what it could do, the tech behind it, how precise it was, and they were actually demoing it there right in front of everyone. Noone in the gaming media was even hyped for it, even though the guy took the sword and was scratching the skeletons chin with his sword, or the laser whipe, ball n chain, everything it had to offer. I was like , ZoMG!.

Which is why since then I gave up on the media. There are a few gaming sites that I listen to their podcast cause their some good people, but everyone has different views and taste in gaming, but one thing I learned for sure through all this is dont go by what anyone says about a game till you see or played it for yourself. And unless u see actual gameplay, dont believe that natal can do what MS says it can do. I heard that you cant even sit down and use it like they been showing in the vids. MS is hoaxing everyone, but im not gonna be a statistic. Yall go ahead and knock your own socks off."

Quoted for truth!!!!

Bigpappy5061d ago

From now on, I will only read article and visit site that are PS3 and Move centric. All the other sites are a bunch of M$ loving MF's. Yep, I have now seen the light and will cacel my pre-order of Kinect, as I was duped by M$ and the media, who brain washed me into thinking I would enjoy playing with Kinect. M$ just wants to sell these things to make some quick bucks, so they lie to us, then leave us with $150 webcam that that could not do half of what they said it would.

Why do I even bother listening to M$ and the bias media. Shame one me. Now I know the truth. The "Truth" has spoken, and my mind is finally free!!! Thank you mighty one. Thank You!

Rainstorm815060d ago

I agree E3 09 left me scratching my head as to why no one saw the potential of move's accuracy and percision, yet everyone was on the Natal PR videp footage as if it was an actual representation of what you can do with the camera.

1 year later , all the hardcore types of titles from that vid are gone and the name change equal a change of MS audience focus. While move's potential is starting to be realized for the Core gamer.

Im not a heavy motion supporter but of all the options available Sony's offering looks like it would fit my gaming tastes the most.

IRetrouk5061d ago

i honestly thought it may have been more than a high def eyetoy but from what iv seen that is exactly what it is, oh well, at least my kids will have fun.

Show all comments (126)
330°

Microsoft's quest for short-term $$$ is doing long-term damage to Windows, Surface, Xbox, and beyond

Microsoft is pushing for no "red line" for what games could come to PlayStation, and it all revolves around Satya Nadella and CFO Amy Hood's plans to increase every department's margins.

Read Full Story >>
windowscentral.com
Brazz11h ago

"The plan to move Xbox games to other platforms is codenamed "Latitude" internally, and I know there's debate and unease at Microsoft about whether or not this is a good idea. More upcoming Microsoft-owned games slated for PlayStation are already being developed. At least for now, they're potentially obvious games you'd most likely expect. And yes, while it's true Microsoft is a prolific publisher on PlayStation already, it has typically revolved around specific franchises like Minecraft. From what I've heard, Microsoft is pushing for no "red line" for what games could come to PlayStation, and it all revolves around Satya Nadella and CFO Amy Hood's mandate to increase every department's margins. "

Yeah, they are going to kill Xbox hardware.

Xeofate9h ago

"Yeah, they are going to kill Xbox hardware."

It's for the best.

Quit stringing along xbox fans and screwing over PlayStation owners.

crazyCoconuts4h ago

Take good care of those Xboxes if you have 'em ...

outsider16244h ago

An Xbox game on a Playstation. Never in my years of gaming did i ever thought this was gonna happen.

jznrpg24m ago

It is dying anyway so doesn’t make much of a difference

VersusDMC9m ago

No way can they get rid of the hardware as probably 90% of game pass subscribers are hardware users.

Highly doubtful those users will move to PC or Cloud to subscribe there and the competition (Sony and Nin) will never have gamepass on their system.

If they want to keep the current subscribers, they need to keep releasing new hardware.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 9m ago
gold_drake11h ago

i think it will kill off the xbox brand. windows will be fine.

but there is and would be a chance that xbox might be killed off in the future. if they fail to make the money they put in. imo.

S2Killinit8h ago

They wont kill it, but they will go fully PC while keeping xbox as a brand, and go multiplatform for the most part. They will also work tirelessly to diminish console gaming’s importance.

PRIMORDUS5h ago

It would be best if Xbox goes the way of Sega, just make and publish games. I know I myself will not support them at all with buying games from them, you all can. 🙃

ChasterMies3h ago

The Xbox brand will live for the games. I don’t expect Microsoft to entirely drop out of gaming hardware. They make Surface tablets and laptops. They’ll make Xbox branded hardware for those that want it.

shadowT10h ago

"Microsoft is pushing for no "red line" for what games could come to PlayStation"

Forza and Starfield next?

Skuletor9h ago

Starfield would be no surprise and there's the rumor that it will come to Playstation after the Shattered Space DLC, Forza (along with Halo and Gears of War) I find less likely but I wouldn't be surprised if they eventually end up on PlayStation too, especially if Xbox give up on hardware and go the Sega route.

shinoff21839h ago

Not to worried about forza. I'd rather see others like what inxile and obsidian are working on. Starfield sounds like it needs more time in the oven so let it cook first imo. If starfield and it's a small if does release on ps it'll be in the fall around the time for dlc or right at the dlc and come packaged with it.

-Foxtrot9h ago

In the words of Phil Spencer when he was talking about Nintendo last year

“It's just taking a long time for Microsoft to see that their future exists off of their own hardware"

S2Killinit8h ago

Yup. MS are a cancer to console gaming.

Aloymetal8h ago

100%!!
I wonder what happened to that dude that was always here posting those court articles with cartoons about MS spending all those billions in studios. He suddenly disappeared, I guess he doesn't like bad news when the green brand is in trouble. No new articles from him as of late...

PRIMORDUS5h ago

Yup, and it's only going to keep spreading.

Outside_ofthe_Box5h ago

Phil Spencer's words always comes back to bite him lol

9h agoReplies(7)
Show all comments (54)
130°

Microsoft's Absurd Antics Have Me Scared For Dishonored And Arkane Lyon's Future

With Arkane Austin no more and Lyon living for who knows how long, the superb Dishonored is in serious danger; Microsoft cannot be trusted.

Relientk772d ago

I love the Dishonored series so much and really want Dishonored 3. Microsoft better not screw this up.

JEECE1d 22h ago

I mean, I think the fans will probably kill Arkane Lyon by cooking up reasons to hate whatever they do next without playing it. I've never seen a game so artificially disliked as Deathloop.

thesoftware7301d 22h ago

Lol, why don't we just say, we are worried about all studios owned by MS now. They will keep closing studios until they have none left ...🙄

Skuletor1d 19h ago

Just merge them all into a single studio, have it churn out a single Call of Duty every year and call it a day, lol.

Barlos1d 19h ago

Don't be scared, you'll be fine.

Skuletor1d 19h ago

It's exputer, fine is one word I would not associate with them.

Profchaos1d 18h ago

I think it's becoming clear based on matt bootys comments there's no future for any IP that can't sell above 10 million within the launch window. But is also a small game that gives them prestige

/S it's beyond a joke right now

Show all comments (10)
290°

More Job Losses At Xbox, “There’s More To Come”: Paul Thurrott

Paul Thurrott in a recent episode commented on the on-going Microsoft fiasco hinting at more job losses and that "there's more to come".

Read Full Story >>
spieltimes.com
Sonic18814d ago (Edited 4d ago )

There won't be no more acquiring game publishers from Microsoft in the future . Xbox has to pay Microsoft back. It might take two decades to do that.

sagapo3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

I don’t understand what you’re saying. Xbox IS microsoft so there’s no “paying back “.
And MS gross profit in 2023 was over 140 billion dollars so forget your 2 decades.

Unless you mean the money MS invested in Xbox (acquisitions included) and the time it will take for xbox as a brand to gain that money back on it’s own, then yeah, that could take a while.

romulus233d ago

The better term to use might be return on investment, xbox is simply a division of Microsoft one that MS can easily do away with if profit margins are not met. So in that regard he's right, if xbox isn't showing the expected return on investment the higher ups are expecting than it's unlikely Microsoft will acquire any other studios any time soon, especially if they are spending billions buying developers just to shut them down in the end.

MrBaskerville3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

Xbox is a division that they discussed shutting down but doubled down on after Gamepass was pitched.

It needs to make money at some point. Big money.

rokos3d ago

According to Statista the net income of Microsoft is about $72.4 billion dollars which is a bit lower than last year profit. That is almost as much as Activision's acquisition but I assume that would be a one off since it costs so much plus I see how their focus has been shifted to AI, thus any major future investments will probably be in that area.

Markusb333d ago

i think you are really missing the point

VariantAEC2d ago

@romulus23
That is not why MS buys studios. They might continue to buy because it's about taking that sweet sweet IP out of the corporate husks of their acquisitions.

+ Show (3) more repliesLast reply 2d ago
SonyStyled3d ago

“There won't be no more acquiring game publishers from Microsoft in the future”

No bro, there do be is for Microsoft not acquiring for what is now if not what it be is 😂

3d ago Replies(2)
ChasterMies3d ago

Xbox isn’t a separate company from Microsoft. It’s all Microsoft.

Abear213d ago (Edited 3d ago )

Let’s be real, this is the media spinning all the acquisitions and liquidations of said developers and spinning it to make M$ the villain.

This was bound to happen, a bigger slice of pie and cut costs, when the games come they stand to make more and that’s their agenda—it was the writing on the wall when the sales went through and legally all those who approved the sale and mergers knew this would happen.

Snowflakes need to realize business is ugly and you can cry all you want but this is how capitalism works. And it works.

That said, M$ needs to steer the narrative and grab hold of all this, make their plans known, hype the hell out of all those dead IP’s they plan to revive, and be honest about the timeline. This is likely to involve mobile and IP on other consoles, and most people realize that.

The problem is this company is incapable of being transparent and seems to often want to dissuade and confuse is customer base. The lack of E3 has hurt Microsoft and I don’t think they know how to properly or effectively market their brand anymore.

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 2d ago
jwillj2k44d ago

There really needs to be a class action lawsuit here. You buy these companies just to put people out of jobs. And it’s not like something happened to derail their plans this WAS the plan. Microsoft has no business in this space at all.

franwex4d ago (Edited 4d ago )

Microsoft has been doing this for years. They simply want the IPs. Look at Nokia. Look at Skype. This time it simply expanded to games. Gaming is not as important to Microsoft’s executives as it was to the founders too. Bill Gates was willing to sell the og Xbox at a loss. Steve Balmer approved the red ring of death fiasco. This CEO isn’t really a gamer.

-Foxtrot4d ago

Maybe it's time though to put a stop to it and use a big giant like Microsoft as a huge example to the rest of these big companies.

There has to be a line drawn somewhere.

People like the FTC and the like went against Microsoft yet their Actvision deal was still allowed to go through yet look what's happened...it's not even Acitivisions studios aswell, it's Bethesdas.

VariantAEC2d ago

Years?

Try several decades, and in the gaming space 2.3 decades.

Jon615863d ago

You do realize this happens in ALL industries? Or are you just saying this because it is Microsoft? In any case I feel for those that are being let go but the trch industry is suffering right now.

jwillj2k43d ago (Edited 3d ago )

This absolutely does NOT happen all the time. Let me know the last time 1 company with a terrible product track record spent 100 billion onto acquire MULTIPLE successful companies in under a year only to shut them down and stop making their products regardless of how successful they were. Not merge them, completely shut them down.

And you can’t use Microsoft in your example.

Notellin3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

Class action lawsuit? The law is on their side and protects them at all costs. There are no rules to protect the people at the bottom.

jwillj2k43d ago

Not true when it comes to mass layoff do your research.

RNTody4d ago

Ninja Theory, Perfect Dark, Crash Bandicoot, Spyro, Wolfenstein 3, Dishonored, Prey, Doom, Quake... something tells me that bad things are going to happen to these entities under Microsoft.

MrDead3d ago

ID software, the makers of Doom and Wolfenstein that have been with us since 1991 could be gone and MS will keep the IPs.

I hope some of these studios can buy their freedom from MS otherwise this is going to be even more devastating for the industry and gamers.

Yui_Suzumiya3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

That's exactly what I'm worried about. I've been a fan of id since Wolfenstein 3D and I'm honestly afraid.

lodossrage3d ago

Toys for Bob saw the writing on the wall and bought themselves out.

Wouldn't be the first time a company did that under MS either. Bungie and Twisted Pixel did the same. Considering what just happened, I can see some other devs trying to buy themselves out too.

anast4d ago

Good thing the bosses of all those small studios made their money.

glenn19794d ago

they cant do it right now they will get burned

XiNatsuDragnel3d ago

Phil and his team need to be gone

lodossrage3d ago (Edited 3d ago )

Won't make a difference.

The whole structure needs to be overhauled. Anyone that replaces Phil will be no different than him, Mattrick, or anyone else.

Until the company changes how they go about business, nothing will change

glenn19793d ago

I just don't have any idea what they would do , they have done sooo much damage on their xbox brand, they have a show at July or June I think, but will it even matter even they show amazing games, idkn

lodossrage3d ago

True,

But they may as well get it over with. Whether it happens now or later, the burning is going to hit the same.

Reality is the ONE move that can alleviate a lot of this is the one move they can't make. Remove day 1 from gamepass.

Show all comments (68)