1040°

Left 4 Dead fans angry at Valve over L4D2

New Game Network explains how many L4D fans are unhappy with the announcement of Left 4 Dead 2 from Valve at e3, just seven months aver the release of the original game. Steam forums have many threads expressing anger and disappointment. A Steam Group called "L4D2 Boycott" has been created with over 2000 members already.

Read Full Story >>
newgamenetwork.com
The Meerkat5463d ago

Do people complain that Fifa 2010 gets announced 4 months after 2009?

STFU

The more games the better.

GWAVE5463d ago

Valve is beginning to get all "EA"-ed. A year ago...heck, even 8 months ago, "old Valve" would have released this content as a free add-on for Steam customers. And it would have been as a big "we're sorry!" for shafting people on the included content for the original L4D game, which had so little content.

Yet, here they go releasing a "new" L4D game about a year later, and I can guarantee you that:

- the graphics will barely be improved
- there won't be very many campaigns/maps (they've already pretty much confirmed this)
- very few new enemies and weapons will be added

And people will still worship it because it has "Valve" slapped onto it. Skip you, Valve. Quit giving your fans the middle finger.

Blaze9295463d ago

When I heard L4D2 was announces the FIRST thing I thought was, "wtf. Isn't that a bit too soon?" Like L4D1 lacks so much content and got old fast even after the survival mode DLC. I don't see why they couldnt add more campaign levels but no, instead went to L4D2 in such a short time and will slap another $60 price tag on it. If it's anything like the first game, they are truly foolish to think people will buy it knowing what they'll get.

sonarus5463d ago

You are an idiot to compare annual sports titles to full release games. If you want to be accurate compare the COD annual releases. And yes people are complaining about that too

MegaMohsi5463d ago

At least those are made by 2 different developers and in my case I always skip the treyarch ones.

lsujester5463d ago

I'm angry at Valve, but not about Left 4 Dead. I'm angry because they can get around to producing two zombie games in two years, but can't get around to making Episode 3 in the same time.

yippie1234y5463d ago

what i would like to know is why there has only been 1 sequel to counter-strikes in the past i dunno 10 years?!?

i mean it was possibly the biggest online shooter ever. they should take another shot at a console version but this time make it good.

Megaton5463d ago

Sonarus is right, a comparison to the annual CoD releases is more appropriate, but still kinda flawed considering it switches between developers. A comparison to annual sports 'roster updates', as some people call them, isn't the same thing.

Gotta say I was surprised to see it announced so early as well. Doesn't seem like a Valve move. I hate to think EA is rubbing off on them this much.

yippie1234y5463d ago

i couldn't agree with you more

truewittness5463d ago (Edited 5463d ago )

where are the same people that should be complaining about and boycotting madden, nba live, actually all sports franchises and the call of duty franchise? they are announced 7 months after their release as well. and what about FF13 and FF14. announcing 14 before 13 is even out.

Rainstorm815463d ago

madden next gen has been a serious disappointment to say the least (backbreakers animation is light years ahaed and it the first gamee, not to mention they openly said they would like to work on madden. stupid EA), NBA live is non existent when you have NBA 2K SERIES. and COD:MW2 wont be as successful as the first (on PS3), the shooter market has boomed and codMW2 " dosent seem to do anything new" CoD:MW 1.5.

A true sequel is Uncharted 2 : Among theives especially when compared to the first. (get the MP beta its great) it just seems valve has fallen to EA's strategy quantity then worry about quality down the road. EA has failed this Gen in my eyes thats why they were over taken by activision for number 1

TheIneffableBob5463d ago

Let's not get ahead of ourselves. Just because Valve is releasing ONE sequel a year later does not mean they're getting "EA-ed".

TenSteps5463d ago (Edited 5463d ago )

there are people who are complaining on sports games as simple roster updates with adding a few gimmicks here and there,

the Call of Duty franchise are developed by two different developers some even mention skipping the Treyarch ones I see that as some sort of complaint.

FFXIII and FFXIV are different one is a single player game designed by a certain team the other is an MMO designed by mostly the FFXI team so you see they are different games by different people by the same company (SE Production Team 1 is handling FFXIII while SE Production Team 3 is developing FFXIV)

Tony P5463d ago

Fans know this and feel shafted because they haven't yet seen any substantial content for L4D to either the SP or the MP. Really Valve, wtf?

Did they not see how poorly this would go over with fans? Unless this is magically revealed to be a content update or DLC, expect very annoyed customers.

Ftr, I could give a crap about the aesthetic arguments.

kevnb5463d ago

and to think, I was thinking about it.

5463d ago
Tito Jackson5463d ago

I dont understand why there is any reason to be mad, upset, etc.

Maybe Danny McBride can help illustrate a reason to be mad....lol.

ThanatosDMC5463d ago (Edited 5463d ago )

See this is what i was hating about L4D2. Those people hating on me from what of my comments just didnt understand.

We will probably get charged $49.99 or $59.99 depending where you buy it.

There's not enough maps on the first one. Not enough mods either.

Beast_Master5463d ago

Isn't this game like 4 hours long with like 4 maps? Sounds like you guys got 1/2 a game to start with now your complaining because you are going to get charged for the second half? (See Starcraft 2) LOL.

poopface15463d ago

thats because I never bought L4D, even when it was only 10$ or something on steam. Ill stick with half-life and counter strike for my valve games.

maybe they will make a much longer game now that people are complaining.

I still think that L4D will be supported more than a lot of other games, since its valve. Look at cod4, sold 10 mill and we get only 4 overpriced maps.

Nikuma5463d ago

This bullsh1t rehash of a game isn't getting my money. The only way I'd play it if they made it a free or 5$ update for the PC. It's the same exact Fing game with a new Fing skin. This is very unexpected by valve and I sense some sort of higher power pulling the strings on this one.

I just lost a lot of respect for valve with this BS move.

bullswar5463d ago

I personally dont give a rats ass ... it was an awesome game and Ill buy its sequel.

Sitdown5463d ago

I'm confused....why is he considered an idiot because he compares it to annual sports titles?....especially when sometimes from year to year all they need is a roster update. Ohhh, and not nearly as many people complain about COD as you would like us to believe...cause most of us know the development cycle. Most people should know by now that you pay for being an early adopter...sometimes its a good thing and sometimes its not.

BISHOP-BRASIL5462d ago

Fifa gets announced but it has content for you to play for a year, just like most sports games.

L4D is short. The online extendfs its life, but the truth is most people are done with the online already.

It causes a duality. The franchise is already in a need of a new game, which is a good reason for the announcement, but is also a shame that L4D was so short lived.

V ii T aL5462d ago

I loved the first one. But now I have moved on. I will be picking this up in November along with Modern Warfare 2 which also looks amazing.

y0haN5462d ago

I am another big Valve fan really peeved at this. We've received virtually no support for the game since release, and now this. A cöck slap to whoever bought the first game. Thanks for beta testing, and the money, sucker!

soljah5462d ago

wtf

zombies 09 vs zombies 10 what the differences?

basically valve charging double for the same game.

where is should be 1 game plus some dlc for a few bucks more

commodore645462d ago

I really have to laugh!

I have seen no-one complain about the fourteenth (!) iteration of the final fantasy series.
Yet, people are complaining that L4D2 is too much too soon?

Get a life, people.

KKanjiAnkh5462d ago

I can't agree w/the FF logic at all, at least the core story changes & never is the same in every FF. Square switches up the fighting engine to prevent stagnation, and they definitely don't make 3 hour games.

justpassinggas5462d ago

Err...FF games are all different. They might as well be called different names because they're not sequels or even related to each other except for minor cameo appearances of chocobos and moogles and that's about it. Have you even played a single FF game?

Not to mention the fact that each FF game on average lasts over 40 hours. L4D does not last for a tenth of that in single player (and FF is pure single player except for XI).

evrfighter5462d ago

What fans are angry over is NOT the time it took to release the game. But...

That pc gamers paid $45 or $50 for a game they ALL thought was going to be supported like TF2. If you look at all the content they've released in TF2 after it was launched, they could have made an expansion or a new title out of it.

Check out the steamcommunity forums, They are ablazin. I myself was fooled into thinking l4d would pay for itself via new content.

TheRealSpy025462d ago

this is an expansion that they are passing off as a sequel, plain n simple.

If you own L4D, L4D2 should be half off if you download it.

divideby05462d ago

YES....it goes for ALL games..
but I am open minded and own all the consoles on launch day, so I dont suck up to anyone

+ Show (31) more repliesLast reply 5462d ago
Lou-Cipher5463d ago (Edited 5463d ago )

Since when is DLC more important than a new game?

A new game will always be better than getting DLC. (you know that content that should of already been in the game when you purchased it)

I would much rather get to play Grand Theft Auto 5 instead of Gay Tony DLC.

GamerPS3605463d ago

you are absolutely right but If there is no significant improvement then it's rip off.

I love L4D. I play at least once a week but I am not spending on L4D2 if the game is same as L4D. But, I don't underestimate Valve. They have good track record.

kevnb5463d ago

its typically more a pc thing, until this gen.

BlackPrince 425463d ago

Normally I would agree with you about sequels, but in this case no. L4D is really light on content compared to other games, being episodic and movie like in nature, and Valve promised to offset this by releasing new maps and story modes for free, at least for PC.

Instead of doing what they had promised though, they're taking the maps they have developed, shoe-horning in some new characters, abilities, and weapons, and then releasing a new game at full price.

Nikuma5463d ago

Have you seen the gameplay footage? It's the same game with a new skin. No thank you.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5463d ago
timmyrulz5463d ago

I dont see many complaints that FF14 will be released the same month as ff13.

qface645463d ago

that's different though since they are 2 different games just with the same name
i don't blame these guys for being annoyed
i mean if you stop and look at LEFT 4 DEAD 2 for a sec you will realize that the whole game is just basically a bunch of DLC in a disc

left 4 dead never had a story so that's out the window
also left 4 dead was very very short even when you play online there's just so many times you can play the same level over and over

the only thing that will be different is new weapons maybe new enemies and new maps if your lucky maybe some new modes
all of that is DLC right there
its DLC everyone was expecting especially considering its a valve game

The Master Chief5463d ago (Edited 5463d ago )

FF14 Online isn't a real Final Fantasy RPG. It's a pay every month MMO like FF XI on 360. Which is horrible.

read disc error5463d ago (Edited 5463d ago )

They should be mad...FF MMOs have been pretty weak compared to WOW. FF XI online is already on the 360 and sucks pretty bad. However, the Sony Defense Force will latch onto anything because in their hearts they know they paid more money for a console with less cool exclusive games.

5463d ago
SRT4Chris4015463d ago

because ff14 is an MMO, they did same when FF10 came out, and a year later ff11 came out. They put the releases closer this time. Plus FF14 is more like a sequel to FF11 not 13. L4D2 is blatantly, and obviously nothing more than DLC content promised to us, and they just decided it was more profitable to sell it as a new game rather free for pc, and like $5 for 360 content. Valve has been going down hill and on the greedy side since they released steam. Valve is getting as lame and tired as the Source engine...

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 5463d ago
Mr_Bun5463d ago

They should be mad about paying full price for L4D 1

user8586215463d ago

am pissed a just bought l4d last month for ma pc!!! wtf!!

Montreafart5463d ago (Edited 5463d ago )

Graphically and technically, it doesnt stand apart from the original. Hell, its even worse. Cartoony lmao. So why would it be part 2. Lmao, I knew immediately Valve was trying to rip off them sucker xbots haha.

But the bots are stupid, so Valve is right to rip off stupid people.

zagibu5463d ago

I still think they will offer it for free or a bargain for existing l4d 1 customers...
It's too early to get angry.

+ Show (1) more replyLast reply 5463d ago
Show all comments (216)
130°

Looking Back At 2008, An Unbelievably Incredible Year Of Video Game Releases

Huzaifa from eXputer: "2008 was home to the likes of Call of Duty: World at War, Dead Space, GTA 4, Far Cry 2, Left 4 Dead, and many other hits, which is outright remarkable."

ChasterMies22d ago

Some of these low paid video game “news” writers weren’t born before 2007.

just_looken22d ago

Here here

Those that were around before 2000's i am sure are like me that think we entered a world of non readers or those that follow without question.

I can not wait to see fallout 3 a goty game even though it was about water with non content until you add the dlc/updates then you got the performance/crashing

CrimsonWing6923d ago

I don’t think anything can compare to 2023

lucasnooker23d ago

1998 - the best year in gaming! Metal gear solid, crash bandicoot 3, medievil, half life, ocarina of time, thief, tenchu, resident evil 2, Spyro, tomb raider 3, oddworld abes exodus, banjo kazooie.

It was a different breed of a gaming era. You’ll never understand what it was like back then. The aura of gaming, it was different!

KyRo23d ago (Edited 23d ago )

I second this. Gaming was a lot more varied and fun than it is today. I'm 35 so getting on compared to some here but I got to see all the changes from NES up to now but I've never felt so disappointed in any generation than I have this current gen. I was expecting more from this generation rather than prettier versions of games that came before it. Game mechanics have become so refined that alot of games feel the same and has done for a while now.

Maybe it's time to have a break for a while. I love gaming but I don't feel I get much fun in the traditional sense out of it anymore.

CrimsonWing6923d ago (Edited 23d ago )

Metal Gear Solid, Resident Evil 2, Abe’s Exodus, and Ocarina of Time are the only things from that list that I liked.

Here’s the 2023 game releases that I personally liked… and big releases that I didn’t care for:

- Dead Space Remake
- Wo Long Dynatsy
- Resident Evil 4 Remake
- Diablo 4
- Fire Emblem Engage
- Hogwarts Legcay
- Street Fighter 6
- Hi-Fi Rush
- Like a Dragon: Ishin
- Octopath Traveler 2
- Final Fantasy Pixel Remasters
- Final Fanatsy XVI (actually ended up not liking this, but it was still a big deal release)
- Baldur’s Gate 3
- Armored Core VI: Fires of Rubicon
- Lies of P
- Mortal Kombat 1
- Marvel’s Spider-Man 2
- Starfield (Ended up hating this one, but big release)
- Super Mario Bros. Wonder
- Zelda: Tears of the Kingdom (I’m an old-school Zelda fan, but didn’t really enjoy this game)
- Alan Wake 2

I mean, honestly I’ve never seen a year of major IP releases like that, ever.

Profchaos23d ago (Edited 23d ago )

Isn't it just a generational thing realistically.

I've been gaming since way back and I some of my favourite games go as far back as the late 80s for me each generation has a year or two of game changing releases one after another before an inevitable dry spell.

I kind of agree gaming had a different feel games hit different because we didn't have the internet nothing got spoiled and you really had to put in the effort to beat a puzzle which could set entire groups of people looking for a solution. But most importantly games were experimental and not as cookie cutter as today even basics like controls were not universal today r2 is shoot l2 is ads garunteed you can't deviate from that in a shooter back then it could of been square, R1 or R1 and circle nothing was standard.

But as time moves on a new generation picks up their controller they are going to be interested in different things that PS1 demo disc with the t Rex blew our primitive 16 bit brains back on launch but to kids today it's laughable.
The new gen of kids coming into to hobby seem to value different things to us there seems to be a huge focus on online play, streamers, gaming personalities, and social experiences, convience of digital downloads. To me I value none of that but that's ok like my parents not liking the band's I would listen to its just the natural cycle.

Gameseeker_Frampt22d ago

Just about every year in the 7th generation was great and something we most likely won't experience again.

2009 for example had Assassin's Creed 2, Batman: Arkham Asylum, Dragon Age: Origins, Uncharted 2, Halo 3: ODST, Killzone 2, Borderlands, Bayonetta, and Demon's Souls to name a few.

just_looken22d ago

It still amazes me we got over 7 rockstar games ps2/ps3 but 3 for the ps3/ps4/ps5

Dragon age 1-3 and mass effect 1-3 in 7ish years what a generation.

320°

Most Offensive Video Games That Would Never Cut It Today

Times are changing, and these games would have never been made in today's climate.

Read Full Story >>
wealthofgeeks.com
thorstein60d ago (Edited 60d ago )

Every single time someone uses this phrase whether it's music, movies, books, comics, video games, etc it's always the same claim.

The ubiquitous "they" won't allow it to be made. And every decade these claims are made the claimant completely ignores all the "offensive" material that is published when the claim is made.

In ten years, you can write a new article about how you can't make games like Helldivers 2, Resident Evil VIII, Mortal Kombat I, Dragon's Dogma 2, Alan Wake 2 etc etc etc any more.

MrBaskerville60d ago

Yeah, people wouldn't be constantly outraged if there weren't games that people found enraging. The whole SBI discourse shit wouldn't be a thing if all games were inoffensive. A game like Starfield can make a guy froth at his mouth, so there will always be room for a list like this.

0hMyGandhi59d ago

Normally, I'd be inclined to agree with you, but there are massive caveats.
TV shows like Venture Bros, Ren and Stimpy, and Aqua Team wouldn't/couldn't be made today. Hell, Ren and Stimpy was a *children's* show, same thing with Rocko's Modern Life.

It's not for some arbitrary reason, either. It's branding and IP alignment. Companies are far more risk-averse than they were when I was kid in the 90's. Of course, you have companies coming out of the woodwork to hell spur on similar content, but remember: Cartoon Network and Nickelodeon and some incredibly provocative material.

And for movies? it's pretty obvious. American Pie/Wedding Crashers/Eurotrip among many other "raunch coms" have fallen out of style, and are absolutely outside what the modern day film industry is willing to stand by.
Ace Ventura 1 and 2, Dumb and Dumber, Freddy Got Fingered, Rat Race, Harold and Kumar, and Van Wilder follow suit.

Remember: I am not explicitly talking about films put onto streamers. I am talking wide-releases in actual theaters. Same thing goes for games: Carmageddon, Duke Nukem, Manhunt, Six Days In Fallujah (with their original concept), Hatred, and so on and so forth. Of course, I'd be inclined to mention most tactical shooters like Rainbow Six and Joint Ops as well, due to cultural sensitivity regarding *who* you are shooting and why.

And not all of it is bad (obviously). Tastes change, and perspectives change to fit the demographic.
I should add that I'm a lefty, living in L.A. Working in film.

thorstein59d ago

The Boys, Invincible, Jojo Rabbit, Deadpool, Gen V, Last of Us, Banshee... There are plenty of media being made today that people will claim "can't be made today".

Profchaos59d ago

Yeah but if you consider manhunt which was basically a snuff film could you seriously make that game with high than PS2 era graphics.

thorstein59d ago

The Outlast Trials just came out.

But the storyline of Manhunt was that you were executed. But then lived. And if you didn't do as you were told, you'd die. And the people you killed were not innocents.

It was all filmed by a psychopath.

As we speak GTA VI is being finished up for a release. You get to play a Bonnie and Clyde type of protagonist who run up against the law.

Bodycam looks so real.

People are making those games. Articles like this will always exist no matter how incorrect they are, no matter how many times they blame "them" for whatever it is "they" do to prevent "those" games from being made.

Number1TailzFan59d ago

The UK is the biggest junk country pandering to that nonsense as well, with laws against free speech and expression to match. It got so bad even Rowan Atkinson made a video on free speech about it.

Now the UK raises the age rating on harmless films like Mary Poppins, it's just a load of pansy weak ass nonsense.

MrDead59d ago (Edited 59d ago )

The right wing Tories have been in power in the UK for the 14 years you know the ones that are "anti-woke", blame them for your perceptions.

Killer2020UK59d ago (Edited 59d ago )

Are these snowflakes in the room with us now?

This is more faux outrage designed to get hits. The consequences are unfortunately creating hysteria amongst those willing to buy into it and blame "them" or "the left" or "liberals" meanwhile the left are kicking off about genocide, actual real world abhorrent acts. Nobody is campaigning to censor this shit.

Huey_My_D_Long59d ago

Not too mention the fact that some of these game are controversial for you know, underage porn and encouraging rape.

So either the guy just came in to comment snowflakes without reading anything, or he is calling people snowflakes for having a problem with said titles. Crazy how much brain rot someone can have.

banger8860d ago

Dead Island: "The early PC version of the zombie game swapped the playable character Purna’s Gender Wars skill with a prototype name, which shouldn’t be mentioned directly. The skill name made fun of both Purna as a character and feminists."

"Feminist Whore" lmao

gold_drake60d ago

ill add one more to the list.
drakengard 1.

its ridiculous tho, especially since they'd still be able to find their place in alot of places in the world. except america of course ha. and maybe Australia.

ppl are so sensitive these days. ha. but it is what it is.

Barlos60d ago (Edited 60d ago )

They're not offensive.

And we need another Fat Princess. Fantastic little game!

Some people just have no sense of humour if this sort of thing offends them. They need to lighten up and stop taking themselves so seriously.

Deeeeznuuuts60d ago

Would love a new fat princess game 🤟

CantThinkOfAUsername60d ago

Games literally about sexual assault, mass genocide, bombing civilians, and school shooting. None of which is satirical.

isarai59d ago

Actually it's about fat princesses

Huey_My_D_Long59d ago (Edited 59d ago )

Its crazy that people are fixated on Fat princess when clearly the list is going over controversies, and not all of them are equal. Like way worse examples but pretend the entire list is like that.

Show all comments (37)
190°

15 Xbox Games That Should Make the Multiplatform Jump

While there’s likely already a list behind closed doors, one can still speculate and offer logical suggestions for titles new and old that should find their way into the PlayStation and Switch libraries.

Read Full Story >>
technabob.com
GamerRN63d ago

Single A games and live service games. Those make sense

S2Killinit63d ago

None of it makes sense. But its happening.

Ps5conehead62d ago

That’s up to Microsoft they want return on there investment. From buying up those publishers. That’s what there in business for. And they made a mistake putting day one exclusive on game pass. So now Microsoft wants to profit any way they can.its called buisness . Just like Sony putting games on pc a year are two after ps5 launch.
So if they can make money off PlayStation and Nintendo. They will do that. And I bet soon real soon they will release some aaa exclusives .and I bet one day it will be same day release

TheEroica62d ago

Sony gamers begging for Xbox games.... Who would've thunk it?

BISHOP-BRASIL62d ago

Yeah, because random site off the internet represents all Sony gamers, they have the letter of attorney and all...

S2Killinit62d ago

Lol what a spin. You dizzy?

AsunaYuukiTheFlash62d ago (Edited 62d ago )

We don’t care about shovelwares. Get that junk out of PS5

StormSnooper62d ago

More like MS begging to put their games on PlayStation.

TheEroica60d ago

Keep begging Sony gamers!

+ Show (2) more repliesLast reply 60d ago
Friendlygamer63d ago

Some of these seem to be exclusive for lack of enthusiasm of the publisher rather than because of deals. A lot of cool indies skip ps for some reason like katana zero, el paso, elsewhere and gunbrela

S2Killinit63d ago

Even more indies skip xbox. We know that right?

Friendlygamer62d ago

Quality over quantity, Microsoft got some really interesting and curated niche games on their machines, maybe in part because of gamepass

S2Killinit62d ago

Quality and MS are not things you bring up in same sentence.

shinoff218362d ago (Edited 62d ago )

Alot of indies skip xbox to. It goes round and round. Personally I think your off base on that but no need to have the argument.

Friendlygamer62d ago

Between katana zero, valheim, Battletech, el passo... I don't feel off base. maybe ps got a million of light novel games that will never release on Xbox but like I've said, I'm talking about niche games highlights, the 10%.

  Heck, it's probably thanks to Microsoft that the s.t.a.l.k.e.r games came to console ps included, meanwhile Sony backwards compatibility continues to be extremely anemic.

And I'm sure most ps5 users are happy to ignore these games and just play wathever new 3rd person action game is trending but it's cool that Microsoft gives some love to smaller audiences and software preservation

shinoff218362d ago

Again your off base just to be snide. All it's showing though is your ignorance.

One light novels wtf is that even. Ps has plenty of pretty damn good indies.

Speaking of indies and ms being responsible. You know F.I.S.T. of course you do alot of you guys just support gamepass. Well here's a history of Sony being responsible for helping indies. Look up the China project from Sony.

Lastly lol your ignorance showing again. Sony has plenty of games. Personally third person is better then first anyway but that's besides the point. Sony gets so many games that xbox doesn't get because yall don't support the games. Jrpgs being a great example. I personally am not into every Sony first party game. Alot of us aren't. On the other side you don't get to eat often so you gobble up everything. Me personally God of War not my cup, etc. For me I'm into jrpgs and ms just can't touch Sony on those. Again because the Xbox base doesn't support it. Devs dont wanna waste their time or money. Hit me up when falcom develops a game over there.

Speaking of third person narrative games. Aren't yall drooling over hellblade 2. The first one was Sony exclusive at one point. Another not my cup game. Showing we don't have to fall in line and agree we love everything Sony puts out. The facts are they sell though unlike elsewhere(not nintendo)

StormSnooper62d ago

You are same person as GamerRN, yes?

Abnor_Mal62d ago

They really think PlayStation fans would want to play Redfall? Pfft.

Personally nothing on that list would be any game I’d want to play.

TwoPicklesGood62d ago

I’d absolutely love Hellblade 2, Palworld, and Quantum Break on ps5 as I’m sure tons of others would too. There’s nothing wrong with wanting games from another console and its sad that people try to act like they aren’t interested in them.

shinoff218362d ago

While indont agree with the games. I agree with the point. Your not wrong.

DarXyde62d ago

Sunset Overdrive makes very good sense. Palworld might.

Don't know about the others. Hellblade II does make sense given the original launched on PS4 first. Quantum Break was a massive letdown for me. I absolutely hated the whole TV show thing and I don't think anyone should have to relive that on modern hardware.

Show all comments (31)